Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I’m fine with the death clause.
28 Touchdowns for Rosen. That's a little under 2 per game but he can do it. I watched Mitch Trubisky throw for 6 touchdowns in one game. It's the modern NFL, everyone's a superstar.
Ok that makes more sense, but the flow of what you were writing made it seem like you were talkng about Ballege scoring 28 TDs.
This is only a valid strategy in small leagues (10-12 teams) that start 1 QB and have short rosters.
That's odd. Prescott had an extra 659 passing yards, 136 yards from scrimmage, and 4 total TDs than Tannehill+Osweiler. Which would typically be something like 65 fpts. In Anarchy leagues (which use TMQB) QB Dolphins was QB25 for the regular season.
Sounds like a guy who’s slow to pick things up. I’m not so sure all those questions are a good thing.
Interesting article. I'm sympathetic because I have also clashed with people in my career because I always need to know the "why"
this is a pretty good intro to the QB situation there. Rosen sounds like he's getting up to speed and looks good in these OTAs. I'd be concerned if he was slow in adjusting but, 3 weeks in, he's making his case. Fitz is Fitz ultimately. he's going to be awesome for bursts but will flame out in time. i hope Rosen can reset after a shaky rookie year with AZ and take advantage of the opportunity.
Been managing employees for 30 years, “why” guys don’t last long unless they bring much more to the table. Which is usually not the case.
Luckily I have. Jury is still out on Josh. Has a strong arm, but does he have the mentality
Why would trading for Rosen make it more obvious you would want to draft Murray? And in a 1QB league it seems both moves (trading the pick and drafting Murray that high) aren’t all that great value anyway.
If you don’t have “why guys” your business/company never evolves. You need to have people to question things or things never change.
I suppose that depends on the nature of the employee base, but I've found just the opposite in tech. "why" guys are big picture people - they need to know how the aspect they are being exposed to affects the overall plan so they can contribute to it or mitigate failures. They may need to learn to balance the education with production, but I wouldn't want employees that are just satisfied with pushing their buttons and clocking out on time. Give me those hungry to learn and understand any day because once they do they prove invaluable.
I agree to a certain extent. But I also find that usually the people who “brag” about being “why” guys are also the ones who are just slow to pick things up that’s their crutch.
I’m guessing he’s not going to be on very many rosters at all next year. People will start giving up around week 8 or 9 this year.
