. If $12 million were Fitz's base salary in 2016, that would be the 13th-highest figure for any quarterback in the NFL. It's higher than that of Aaron Rodgers,Andy Dalton, Tony Romo, and Carson Palmer
. If $12 million were Fitz's base salary in 2016, that would be the 13th-highest figure for any quarterback in the NFL. It's higher than that of Aaron Rodgers,Andy Dalton, Tony Romo, and Carson Palmer
![]()
I was on fitz's side for a while here, he played well enough last year to warrant a decent contract. But it seems he's playing hardball without good reason. He's a smart guy but this seems weak.
Terrible examples. First many of those 12 are old deals, so he SHOULD get better money than many that's how newer contracts work. All three examples cited got significant bonuses (up front, even more valuable) when they signed their deals adding 4-8M per year in value. Rodgers got $57M the last three years, $33M on day one. Dalton got $30M in new money over two years, and that was with a crappy final year of the rookie deal bringing it down. Palmer got $50M in new money over three years. $12M would not net Fitzpatrick near what those guys are clearing.. If $12 million were Fitz's base salary in 2016, that would be the 13th-highest figure for any quarterback in the NFL. It's higher than that of Aaron Rodgers,Andy Dalton, Tony Romo, and Carson Palmer
![]()
I was on fitz's side for a while here, he played well enough last year to warrant a decent contract. But it seems he's playing hardball without good reason. He's a smart guy but this seems weak.
. If $12 million were Fitz's base salary in 2016, that would be the 13th-highest figure for any quarterback in the NFL. It's higher than that of Aaron Rodgers,Andy Dalton, Tony Romo, and Carson Palmer
![]()
I was on fitz's side for a while here, he played well enough last year to warrant a decent contract. But it seems he's playing hardball without good reason. He's a smart guy but this seems weak.
The writer chose those examples on purpose, but you're right that they don't prove anything.Terrible examples. First many of those 12 are old deals, so he SHOULD get better money than many that's how newer contracts work. All three examples cited got significant bonuses (up front, even more valuable) when they signed their deals adding 4-8M per year in value. Rodgers got $57M the last three years, $33M on day one. Dalton got $30M in new money over two years, and that was with a crappy final year of the rookie deal bringing it down. Palmer got $50M in new money over three years. $12M would not net Fitzpatrick near what those guys are clearing.
Also, no mention that the final two years are for $12M between them. Even if the $12M is fair (it probably is for him), those next two years are a terrible deal for him to be locked into. If they only think he's a 1 year starter offer him a 1 year deal at $12M. But that offer is garbage and I don't blame him at all.
Then the Jets should just walk away and play with the QB's they have.Still, the guy isn't a desired commodity.
I don't think they really wasted that much money on Forte, but they are poised to waste the last productive years of both Forte and Marshall..... and it can easily take several drafts to find players playing at the level they were playing last year. The eventual drop off is coming for both.They have no options. Forte is old. If they go with a rookie, they wasted money on Forte. They aren't great but they will stink without Fitz.
Not really, he's still better than what that have. If it were my call I'd contact the Bucs about Glennon. But we're almost certainly too late for that.Then the Jets should just walk away and play with the QB's they have.
Then isn't he a desired commodity?Not really, he's still better than what that have.
Because, he's yet to do that in his career? Fitz' last 4 years:I can't believe there's no market for this guy. Why haven't the Broncos signed him? Seems like they'd be the Super Bowl favorite with him onboard. Just no cap room over there?
Everyone is acting like Fitz is some old one year stop-gap. He's 33, not 39. He's younger than Ben Roethlisberger and Philip Rivers, one year older than Aaron Rodgers.
Shouldn't 4000 yards and 30 TDs with a ~90 QB Rating for the next 4 years be worth quite a bit to most teams? Sure there's no guarantee he can keep that up (although his 2014 was actually quite good as well, just with fewer attempts) but it seems like he has a much better shot at it than a handful of other QBs that have signed big deals recently.
Just a note that Fitzpatrick has been rock solid in the Chan Gailey offense. Gailey had him in Buffalo from 2010-2012 where he averaged close to 3600 yards & 24 TDs a season. Fitz then floundered around until reunited with Gailey last year, where he again looked very good with 3900 yards & 31 TDs. Fitz has been a journey man at every stop except when he is paired with Gaileys offense, which he has mastered. No reason to doubt that he would not be successful in it for the next 3-4 years also.Because, he's yet to do that in his career? Fitz' last 4 years:
2015 = 31 TDs, 3905 yards, team = Jets
2014 = 17 TDs, 2483 yards, team = Texans
2013 = 14 TDs, 2454 yards, team = Titans
2012 = 24 TDs, 3400 yards. team = Bills
7 other years of mediocrity. 11 years in the league. You can't compare him to 3 franchise QBs with Hall of Fame consideration.
Pretty much the definition of a journeyman, non-franchise, can't put it all together for 2 straight years, type of guy.
Looks like a one-year wonder to me.
Which is prob why other teams haven't signed him.Just a note that Fitzpatrick has been rock solid in the Chan Gailey offense. Gailey had him in Buffalo from 2010-2012 where he averaged close to 3600 yards & 24 TDs a season. Fitz then floundered around until reunited with Gailey last year, where he again looked very good with 3900 yards & 31 TDs. Fitz has been a journey man at every stop except when he is paired with Gaileys offense, which he has mastered. No reason to doubt that he would not be successful in it for the next 3-4 years also.
Do you remember Pearl Jam's song better man? That's kind of what might happen here. The jets don't really want fitz but they can't find a better qb so they might go back to him.Then isn't he a desired commodity?
I completely agree with you in terms of Glennon, btw. When NY drafted Hackenberg I assumed they were waving the white flag to give Fitz what he wanted because they put themselves in a situation where they are desperate for his services if they are hoping to make the playoffs this year. The way they have handled this situation is pretty weird unless they think they are dealing with a guy that HAS TO play football. I just don't think Fitz is one of those guys. This isn't exactly a guy from the Cromartie school of finance.
I still don't understand why they can't make it an incentive based deal where Fitz gets paid like he deserves to get paid if he performs like he did last season. Seems like an obvious solution to me and if he plays great and the Jets make the playoffs they should be happy to pay him a Bradford/Osweiler level contract. Based on the way those three guys played last year I don't know why anyone would expect him to play for any less, let alone significantly less.
He was so good the Texans traded him for a conditional 7th round pick so they could start Ryan Mallett and Brian Hoyer.He was actually quite good in 2014 in Houston too. Top 10 in the league in QB rating and top 5 in YPA. He just missed some games to injury and didn't have many attempts.
Yeah well my whole point is that NFL teams seem to be undervaluing him.He was so good the Texans traded him for a conditional 7th round pick so they could start Ryan Mallett and Brian Hoyer.
NY has no hope of finding anyone at this point to perform at the level Fitz did last year, and Fitz can only perform that well in that offense with those great weapons..... and that seems obvious to everyone except Fitz and the Jets.Yeah well my whole point is that NFL teams seem to be undervaluing him.
Huh.NY has no hope of finding anyone at this point to perform at the level Fitz did last year, and Fitz can only perform that well in that offense with those great weapons..... and that seems obvious to everyone except Fitz and the Jets.
It's like watching a couple headed for divorce when in the back of your mind you don't think anyone will ever date either of these turds when they are single and they will both end up dying alone...... at least for this season. The Jets really need to pony up to pay for a second television to save the marriage, they don't have to buy a second house but they have to do more than they seem willing to do right now. Fitz is living in the house with custody of the kids and will never have to work another day in his life while the Jets need to decide just how much they want to lose in legal fees to the lawyers to cut off their nose to spite their face. They may be "right" and are offering more than what Fitz is worth to any other NFL team but being right and ending up happy are two entirely different things.
The funny thing is most of us are only worried about the welfare of the kids anyway, don't ruin the entire season of Marshall/Decker/Forte/Powell with your petty(pun intended) bickering!@#! I am a Gailey believer but any of the current QB's on the Jets would probably start a dumpster fire in that offense at worst, or simply ####### the progress of a promising playoff contender at best.
Or maybe you're overvaluing him. The NFL teams know more than you do.Yeah well my whole point is that NFL teams seem to be undervaluing him.
It's a QB driven league and he's had two pretty nice years in a row now, has plenty of career left, and is available in a league where multiple teams seem content to #### away their season with truly dreadful starting QBs. Seems like NFL teams treat QBs the same way that dynasty fantasy owners treat WRs/RBs. If they don't have 10 years left in their career, then they're not interested.
$12M is dirt cheap for a non rookie contract starting QB in the NFL. And the team is being careful not to release the full details of the 3 year offer. It could be the equivalent of a front loaded make-good contract, which would be a serious slap in the face to him.Tool said:Or maybe you're overvaluing him. The NFL teams know more than you do.
Is it? Do you really feel like Fitz value to the Jets is 2/3rds of what Bradfords value is to the Eagles? How about 2/3rds of Osweilers value to HOU?rockaction said:12 million is an awful lot, if the reports are true. Sounds like Fitz is being a bit obdurate here.
Matt Millen certainly did. I feel sorry for the fool that ever questioned one of his decisions.Tool said:Or maybe you're overvaluing him. The NFL teams know more than you do.
Those are fair points. But markets take into account not only the supply of labor, but the demand for labor by the entities that determine the payment of labor.Is it? Do you really feel like Fitz value to the Jets is 2/3rds of what Bradfords value is to the Eagles? How about 2/3rds of Osweilers value to HOU?
To me the obvious solution is escalator incentives that pay him at least as much as those guys if he thoroughly outplays both of them. Again.
Now you could argue that's not fair because neither of those guys have ever played as well as Fitz played last year. I think Fitz and his agent would counter-argue, "No ****, that's what we've been telling you for months now in these negotiations."
Matt Millen certainly did. I feel sorry for the fool that ever questioned one of his decisions.
I guess I would say the market has established what a starting QB(not even an especially good QB) is worth under the current salary cap.Those are fair points. But markets take into account not only the supply of labor, but the demand for labor by the entities that determine the payment of labor.
In other words, if there are no teams, and the other teams valued these guys enough to sign them over Fitz, what does that say about both the availability of the suppliers of labor and Fitz's relative worth?
That was way too heady of a market analysis.
- other teams need quarterbacks, sign or draft the best available at the market price
- Fitz is left without employment
- What does that say about his market demand and his desirability?
Why, if he is so good, is nobody signing him?
Bolded: Me too.I guess I would say the market has established what a starting QB(not even an especially good QB) is worth under the current salary cap.
The Jets have decided they don't need to pay for a starting QB. That decision is fine with me. They should just start Petty, or Hackenberg, or Geno if they are right and they don't need to pay for a starting QB. I have heard Petty is making great strides...... in understanding how to play Madden football. Few more years he may be on the path to playing franchise mode.
If they didn't want to pay a QB I thought they simply should have paid the draft pick for Glennon, or used a draft pick on a QB that is closer to being game-ready like Connor Cook imo. I am completely baffled that they came out of that draft having spent a high pick on a project QB and put themselves in this position.
True. The way he handled the CJ Anderson contract certainly proves NFL folks know a great deal more than we do about market conditions.![]()
John Elway didn't sign fitz either. Pretty sure he knows the business.
Last I checked Matt Millen isn't currently working for any NFL teams.Matt Millen certainly did. I feel sorry for the fool that ever questioned one of his decisions.
He may be going into the season with Sanchez as his starter, so that's debatable.![]()
John Elway didn't sign fitz either. Pretty sure he knows the business.
Because he got a promotion for knowing so much?Last I checked Matt Millen isn't currently working for any NFL teams.
I beg to to differ, if your plan is to have one of 3 or 4 rookies step into the starting spot sooner rather then later ... a Sanchez type is a near perfect choice.He may be going into the season with Sanchez as his starter, so that's debatable.
...and strangely enough Fitzpatrick was readily available to those teams and they chose other options.I guess I would say the market has established what a starting QB(not even an especially good QB) is worth under the current salary cap.
He'd show them. I hope he does now.
He doesn't strike me as a guy who would mail it in. Seems like a stand up guy - the type of guy who would still give it his all for his teammates.I'm OK with Fitz moving on. If last year was as good as it gets with Fitz playing his heart out for that last contract (including three INTs in three 4th quarter drives with the playoffs on the line), then I'd rather save the cap space and see a year of Geno. Let Petty and Hackenberg learn for a year - just like Denver is doing with Sanchez/Lynch. A fat and happy, unmotivated Fitz will only bring mediocrity.
What a terrible post. What makes you think it's his last contract? He's 33 years old - younger than Eli, Rivers, Roethlisberger. What makes you think he'll end up fat and happy? Asking for Geno might be the worst call I have seen all year. Sorry to be rude, but this was just awful.I'm OK with Fitz moving on. If last year was as good as it gets with Fitz playing his heart out for that last contract (including three INTs in three 4th quarter drives with the playoffs on the line), then I'd rather save the cap space and see a year of Geno. Let Petty and Hackenberg learn for a year - just like Denver is doing with Sanchez/Lynch. A fat and happy, unmotivated Fitz will only bring mediocrity.
If you have to apologize, why be so rude and insulting? There's no need to be a richard.Hankmoody said:What a terrible post. What makes you think it's his last contract? He's 33 years old - younger than Eli, Rivers, Roethlisberger. What makes you think he'll end up fat and happy? Asking for Geno might be the worst call I have seen all year. Sorry to be rude, but this was just awful.
I agree with you that asking for Geno is a bit crazy and that Fitz won't get fat and happy, but only the most elite players are playing close to 40 (how many have their been? 2-3? I'm not counting steady backup types who don't actually play). In reality, if Fitz gets a 3 year deal, it'll probably be his last contract. He might not be good enough for people to want to pay him several million a year to sit behind a starter. I'd think they would rather use that roster spot to develop someone with upside. Additionally, he's too error prone. When you sign a backup like Hasselbeck, if he gets in the game, you want him to just be a game manager. Fitz turns it over too much to play that role.You didn't answer the questions. What makes you think this is Fitzpatrick's last contract? I didn't cite Eli/Rivers/Ben to compare skill sets, I cited them because most people believe they all have plenty of years left in them and yet Fitzpatrick is younger than all of them. Plenty of QB's are playing until their 40's.
What leads you to believe Fitzpatrick would get fat and happy with a new contract? He's never done so in the past, not even when he got a then monster deal from Buffalo. He's signed a multitude of backup deals and been ready and able each time when called on. There's zero history of him getting lazy.