What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Quarters (.25) bracket # 4:sporthenry hates money (1 Viewer)

Albany (14)

Belmont (15)

Cincinnati (8)

Coastal Carolina (16)

Georgia (10)

Georgia State (14)

Hampton (16)

Harvard (13)

Indiana (10)

Lafayette (16)

New Mexico State (15)

North Dakota State (15)

North Florida / Robert Morris (16)

Northeastern (14)

Oregon (8)

Purdue (9)

St. John's (9)

Texas Southern (15)

UAB (14)

UC Irvine (13)

VCU (7)

Wofford (12)

Wyoming (12)

That is who I see is left.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Albany (14)

Belmont (15)

Cincinnati (8)

Coastal Carolina (16)

Georgia (10)

Georgia State (14)

Hampton (16)

Harvard (13)

Indiana (10)

Lafayette (16)

New Mexico State (15)

North Dakota State (15)

North Florida / Robert Morris (16)

Northeastern (14)

Oregon (8)

Purdue (9)

St. John's (9)

Texas Southern (15)

UAB (14)

UC Irvine (13)

VCU (7)

Wofford (12)

Wyoming (12)
6.03 -- Wyoming (12)

 
Can't wait to tell my grandkids 20 years from now that I had Hampton in a capture pool the year they pulled the greatest upset in history.

 
Good luck all! Please remember this game is for money and honor all debts at the end of the tournament. I will post updates on W/L $ as often as possible and final payouts when it is done.

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's impossible to say. It takes both skill and luck to come out ahead. Mercer, for example, was a late pick last year who upset Duke. Most people who drafted them probably did so because of luck not skill. UConn and Kentucky made for some expensive payouts because of their 7th and 8th seeds making the finals. If all #1/2 seeds win most of their games and there are few upsets, even the worst draft won't lose much (and the best draft won't win much). Don't worry too much about it and enjoy the games.

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's impossible to say. It takes both skill and luck to come out ahead. Mercer, for example, was a late pick last year who upset Duke. Most people who drafted them probably did so because of luck not skill. UConn and Kentucky made for some expensive payouts because of their 7th and 8th seeds making the finals. If all #1/2 seeds win most of their games and there are few upsets, even the worst draft won't lose much (and the best draft won't win much). Don't worry too much about it and enjoy the games.
Or when FGC went on that crazy run.

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's impossible to say. It takes both skill and luck to come out ahead. Mercer, for example, was a late pick last year who upset Duke. Most people who drafted them probably did so because of luck not skill. UConn and Kentucky made for some expensive payouts because of their 7th and 8th seeds making the finals. If all #1/2 seeds win most of their games and there are few upsets, even the worst draft won't lose much (and the best draft won't win much). Don't worry too much about it and enjoy the games.
Or when FGC went on that crazy run.
They bailed me out in a .50 & .25 last year

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's impossible to say. It takes both skill and luck to come out ahead. Mercer, for example, was a late pick last year who upset Duke. Most people who drafted them probably did so because of luck not skill. UConn and Kentucky made for some expensive payouts because of their 7th and 8th seeds making the finals. If all #1/2 seeds win most of their games and there are few upsets, even the worst draft won't lose much (and the best draft won't win much). Don't worry too much about it and enjoy the games.
I totally get that it's impossible to say who made the "right" picks. I'm just wondering from the standpoint of gameplay strategy.

For example of my approaches was to avoid 8/9 seeds completely since those games seem like crapshoots and then you draw a #1 in the 2nd, just seems like a low upside. I shied away from those 10-13 seeds too, since they historically have a low win probability even if the payout is nice. #4 seeds seemed like a sweet spot to me -- a S16 run = a F4 run for a #1.

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's impossible to say. It takes both skill and luck to come out ahead. Mercer, for example, was a late pick last year who upset Duke. Most people who drafted them probably did so because of luck not skill. UConn and Kentucky made for some expensive payouts because of their 7th and 8th seeds making the finals. If all #1/2 seeds win most of their games and there are few upsets, even the worst draft won't lose much (and the best draft won't win much). Don't worry too much about it and enjoy the games.
Or when FGC went on that crazy run.
They bailed me out in a .50 & .25 last year
Hard to believe, but it's been two years.

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's impossible to say. It takes both skill and luck to come out ahead. Mercer, for example, was a late pick last year who upset Duke. Most people who drafted them probably did so because of luck not skill. UConn and Kentucky made for some expensive payouts because of their 7th and 8th seeds making the finals. If all #1/2 seeds win most of their games and there are few upsets, even the worst draft won't lose much (and the best draft won't win much). Don't worry too much about it and enjoy the games.
Or when FGC went on that crazy run.
They bailed me out in a .50 & .25 last year
Hard to believe, but it's been two years.
This is my 3rd year doing this. Cashed out first year because I had La Salle as a 13 make the Sweet 16. Last year everyone got hammered except for those who had UConn & Kentucky, because a 7 & an 8 played for the title. My strategy is to try and land the 3-7 seeds that can make a run, grab a 1 or a 2 that can keep making you money and hope you have a double-digit seed that can win a couple of games.

 
Ok, someone with nollege critique my approach on my selections. I'm curious to get some feedback from those who have done this before. Thanks in advance.
Honestly, it's impossible to say. It takes both skill and luck to come out ahead. Mercer, for example, was a late pick last year who upset Duke. Most people who drafted them probably did so because of luck not skill. UConn and Kentucky made for some expensive payouts because of their 7th and 8th seeds making the finals. If all #1/2 seeds win most of their games and there are few upsets, even the worst draft won't lose much (and the best draft won't win much). Don't worry too much about it and enjoy the games.
I totally get that it's impossible to say who made the "right" picks. I'm just wondering from the standpoint of gameplay strategy.

For example of my approaches was to avoid 8/9 seeds completely since those games seem like crapshoots and then you draw a #1 in the 2nd, just seems like a low upside. I shied away from those 10-13 seeds too, since they historically have a low win probability even if the payout is nice. #4 seeds seemed like a sweet spot to me -- a S16 run = a F4 run for a #1.
Your strategy was perfectly fine. It makes the game fun because everyone picks differently. I basically used calculated expected values to determine my picks. While Kentucky doesn't have a very high upside, probability wise, they are so strong to actually cash. They are a historical anomaly in that I wouldn't consider taking a #1 in the first round for the reasons you stated. But I (along with most people) see them in a class of their own.

Yeah, if you get a #4 seed to make a run, that is definitely some good value. Even a team like Texas Southern that people (including Vegas) don't give a very good chance has a good resume and a win or two from them would be a big score.

When I said you could lose up to $200 earlier, that was probably high as last year was tough. I would guess normal years the biggest losers pay out closer to a max of $100.

 
Looks like last year

UCONN $257.25

Kentucky $210.00

Dayton $115.50

were the big winners. Dayton made the elite 8 as a 11 seed and that first game Ohio St took the lead 59-58 with :17 left, Dayton hit the jumper, and I think Aaron Craft barely missed a buzzer beater. So, that's why it is impossible. If Ohio St hangs on, who knows what they could have done, but one bucket helped make Dayton very profitable.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top