Radiohead isn't THAT bad. Give them a chance. Fake Plastic Trees is pretty good.I am ashamed to be a part of a message board that puts STP in the same universe as Radiohead.
...and this comes from a guy from San DiegoI am ashamed to be a part of a message board that puts STP in the same universe as Radiohead.
I agree STP is light years better than radioheadI am ashamed to be a part of a message board that puts STP in the same universe as Radiohead.
Same. I wish I liked them... they get so much love but I just don't "get" them, I guess.STP
But then again I hate Radiohead
Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
how so?Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)how so?Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
What? Radiohead has been around for 30 years.People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)how so?Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
There artistic peak is late 90s, early 00s. That's a lot more recent then Rush, Floyd. STP was basically done as a legit band by the time Radiohead was just coming into their own.What? Radiohead has been around for 30 years.People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)how so?Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
It's ok, some people prefer fast food to a gourmet meal. Don't knock 'em or you'll be called a snob or elitist.I am ashamed to be a part of a message board that puts STP in the same universe as Radiohead.
This has to be trolling. They are the epitome of contemporaries. They both formed in 85 and then hit it big in 93. RH has lasted longer thanks to Scott's blow habit, but if you think STP is closer to Rush and Floyd (neither of which I can stand) then you are crazy.There artistic peak is late 90s, early 00s. That's a lot more recent then Rush, Floyd. STP was basically done as a legit band by the time Radiohead was just coming into their own.What? Radiohead has been around for 30 years.People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)how so?Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
Older? STP and RH both formed in 85 and had albums come out in 92 & 93.People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)how so?Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
There artistic peak is late 90s, early 00s. That's a lot more recent then Rush, Floyd. STP was basically done as a legit band by the time Radiohead was just coming into their own.What? Radiohead has been around for 30 years.People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)how so?Entirely due to the average age around here.Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
its a smack habit not blow, get it rightCorporation said:This has to be trolling. They are the epitome of contemporaries. They both formed in 85 and then hit it big in 93. RH has lasted longer thanks to Scott's blow habit, but if you think STP is closer to Rush and Floyd (neither of which I can stand) then you are crazy.Ilov80s said:There artistic peak is late 90s, early 00s. That's a lot more recent then Rush, Floyd. STP was basically done as a legit band by the time Radiohead was just coming into their own.HughHoney said:What? Radiohead has been around for 30 years.Ilov80s said:People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)peaces said:how so?Ilov80s said:Entirely due to the average age around here.tdoss said:Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
I'd argue that was the commercial peak. Their artistic peak is still being discovered...Ilov80s said:There artistic peak is late 90s, early 00s. That's a lot more recent then Rush, Floyd. STP was basically done as a legit band by the time Radiohead was just coming into their own.HughHoney said:What? Radiohead has been around for 30 years.Ilov80s said:People here trend older and so RH is a newer band losing to older bands (Rush, STP, etc)peaces said:how so?Ilov80s said:Entirely due to the average age around here.tdoss said:Damn...Radiohead is getting abuses in these matchups
Bud Light still sells a lot of beer too.I am ashamed to be a part of a message board that puts STP in the same universe as Radiohead.
And Monster cables keep sellingBud Light still sells a lot of beer too.I am ashamed to be a part of a message board that puts STP in the same universe as Radiohead.![]()
I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
Radiohead has to win one of these at some point right?
That might be the brawl to end it all. Someone needs to set us up the poll.I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
thats ridiculous, and I hate Radiohead.I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
The beatles? No. But nickleback would take down radiohead easilystarting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
I really don't understand how people think it takes so much talent and artistry for Thom Yorke to whine at 50bpm. They make terrible music but are somehow still popular. They're the McDonalds and Bud Light of music.thats ridiculous, and I hate Radiohead.I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
I really don't understand how people think it takes so much talent and artistry for Thom Yorke to whine at 50bpm. They make terrible music but are somehow still popular. They're the McDonalds and Bud Light of music.thats ridiculous, and I hate Radiohead.I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
I really don't understand how people think it takes so much talent and artistry for Thom Yorke to whine at 50bpm. They make terrible music but are somehow still popular. They're the McDonalds and Bud Light of music.thats ridiculous, and I hate Radiohead.I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
AJ's point proven.I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.
Wat? Wow, I need to pull the hook out of my mouth on that one...I really don't understand how people think it takes so much talent and artistry for Thom Yorke to whine at 50bpm. They make terrible music but are somehow still popular. They're the McDonalds and Bud Light of music.thats ridiculous, and I hate Radiohead.I'd vote for nickleback over radiohead in a heartbeat.starting to wonder if the nickleback might not take down the beatles in a fbg poll.