Raiders 2011 WRs (1 Viewer)

[duaneok66]

I am trying to figure out the starters for the Raiders at WR . . .

CBS (comically) listed Jacoby Ford as a starter, but Schillens started instead with Heyward-Bey . . . Murphy has rotated in, and I havent spotted Ford yet . . .

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

I don't get why Ford isn't out there all the time. I guess he could be a terrible blocker, but he's by far their best weapon in the passing game.

 

[duaneok66]

I don't get why Ford isn't out there all the time. I guess he could be a terrible blocker, but he's by far their best weapon in the passing game.

I have only seen him in on one play so far - I may have missed a few . . .

 

[TheWheel]

This team is really stacked at WR. Ford has produced but that really doesn't mean much. I assume Schilens and Bey are playing because the Chefs have short CBs.

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

Is this about the game today or 2011 potential?

 

[Carter_Can_Fly]

This team is really stacked at WR. Ford has produced but that really doesn't mean much. I assume Schilens and Bey are playing because the Chefs have short CBs.

 

[Tau837]

This team is really stacked at WR. Ford has produced but that really doesn't mean much. I assume Schilens and Bey are playing because the Chefs have short CBs.

Stacked?

 

[CalBear]

TD Schilens.

I think you'll see Schilens and Ford starting next year.

 

[duaneok66]

Heyward-Bey was the odd man out on that last series . . .

 

[duaneok66]

This team is really stacked at WR. Ford has produced but that really doesn't mean much. I assume Schilens and Bey are playing because the Chefs have short CBs.

Stacked?

stacked with mediocrity . . .

 

[TheWheel]

Give them a real QB. Ford and Murphy have both produced with crap. Bey was never going to produce right off the bat. Schilens is a freak. You really can't put the onus on the WRs with Russell, Gradkowski, Campbell, and Boller tossing the ball.