What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ran a 10k - Official Thread (10 Viewers)

Moral of the story is what you eat, drink and how much you sleep is critical to your success.
This is no lie. Ever since I figured out a good food routine each week my running has been a million percent better with way less bonking on my long runs. As a matter of fact, I can't remember the last time that happened. In the past on anything over say 10-12 miles, if I hadn't eaten right I would be wiped at the end of those runs.

Now after those long runs I've been able to have a normal day. It's been awesome. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I can't do this now, but after I do my final race this year in December, I'm going to give this a shot.

Maximum HR training

Nothing but slow running.  I think @bushdocda tried this for an extensive period and I think he said it served him well.

@OrganizedChaos (worth a read).  And good job on your last 2 runs and slowing down.  Probably felt good to not work so hard  :)

 
Don't you use Weather Underground?  I'm showing Milwaukee below 60 dew point from Tuesday morning until Saturday.  https://www.wunderground.com/forecast/us/wi/milwaukee/43.01%2C-88.01?cm_ven=localwx_10day

(And dew point is the same for me here down south.)
:goodposting:

Doing so could mess up my schedule next week, but I'm considering booting my 90 min weekend run to Sunday afternoon - that 58 dew point looks heavenly.  Then 69/55 Wed, 71/52 Thu, 74/55 Fri, and 67/58 Sat.

 
Well, I can't do this now, but after I do my final race this year in December, I'm going to give this a shot.

Maximum HR training

Nothing but slow running.  I think @bushdocda tried this for an extensive period and I think he said it served him well.

@OrganizedChaos (worth a read).  And good job on your last 2 runs and slowing down.  Probably felt good to not work so hard  :)
If you do, I don't think you should follow that maximum HR chart.  You seem to have a naturally high heart rate (NTTAWWT) and I'm concerned you'd be running too slowly.  

 
So, when you do this, if your HR hits that max, do you have to stop?  Or do you keep slowing down even more?
I have a range based on the percentages I read about in the Advanced Marathoning book. When I get to the top of the range I try and slow down. So sometimes I may have to come back down to myself shuffling down the sidewalk. Especially on these humid days.

It's been harder lately to hold it for a couple reasons. The heat, and I'm just ready to run fast.

For me, I'm just trying to keep everything under 150 if possible. It's been hard. But for me, at 155 I am still in the zone of where I should be.

 
If you do, I don't think you should follow that maximum HR chart.  You seem to have a naturally high heart rate (NTTAWWT) and I'm concerned you'd be running too slowly.  
Interesting. 

Per the formula, I'd be at 138.  I could consider bumping it to 143 even though I'm technically at the 2 years of consistent training but will be close and that might be good enough.

I do think this heat/humidity right now is raising it a decent amount.  When I did the base training earlier this Spring and worked on it for a bit, I could keep my HR in the upper 130's for slow runs.  So 140ish should be pretty doable (but will likely require me to run around 10:30ish pace to start).  That's still in the range of most calculators for my current paces so I'd think it'd be ok to try for a month or so.

 
Interesting. 

Per the formula, I'd be at 138.  I could consider bumping it to 143 even though I'm technically at the 2 years of consistent training but will be close and that might be good enough.

I do think this heat/humidity right now is raising it a decent amount.  When I did the base training earlier this Spring and worked on it for a bit, I could keep my HR in the upper 130's for slow runs.  So 140ish should be pretty doable (but will likely require me to run around 10:30ish pace to start).  That's still in the range of most calculators for my current paces so I'd think it'd be ok to try for a month or so.
In particular, I don't like this part:

For all you workouts, you should be exercising in a zone that’s between your MHR and 10 beats less. And we’re not talking about your average heart rate over the course of a workout. Your heart rate should be in this zone at all times, according to Dr. Gangemi.
 I think it's silly that if your heart rate occasionally gets a little higher because you're trying to make a traffic light or running up a hill that it makes any long term difference.  Besides, how slow would you have to go to have a heart rate of 128? (Or even 133?)

Frankly I think you should basically just keep doing what you've been doing with the exception of adding more volume when you're ready.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I apologize to those of you that are tired of me ranting about this.  I have to get it out of my system about once a year.
I can see both sides. What would be nice/interesting is to try it and see if building that base helps in the long-term. I don't think it's meant to be the way to train all the time. Eventually after a couple months, you can run the same paces you do now but just at a lower HR (like where you are now, for example). 

During the winter, when I won't run as much and won't be training for any particular race, it would be ideal to get out and just try it for a month or two and see. I like being the resident guinea pig anyway.

 
What's your 10 beat range according to his calculator?
It would be way low. I don't subscribe to the 180 rule that Maffetone suggests. I'd be walking for all my workouts. 

If I was using his 180 calculator my aerobic zone would be 126-136. This is why I use the percentages from that book.

Using Maffetones theory with my actual known HR, I would be right where I am currently aerboically training. 197 - 49 + 5 = 153.

So in theory his method is about right. But the 180 number is just wrong, IMO.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I rolled most of my MAF miles at 142-152 HR and if my HR crept out I wasn’t too strict and tried to hold it and I got better as learned to warm to my range better.  Too strict would make me obsess on it and defeat the purpose to me.

My easy runs now are more 130-140 and run based on Hanson plan/pace calculator from 5k a bit ago.

 
So if I did 192-42, that would put me at 150. 

I already do keep most easy runs under that (except when going up a hill). I think it's a matter of not doing any speed work for a month or two and sticking with all slow runs. Even still, I think I noticed a similar drop a few months ago during base training even with twice weekly speed stuff. 

Just something for me to think about after early December.

 
I rolled most of my MAF miles at 142-152 HR and if my HR crept out I wasn’t too strict and tried to hold it and I got better as learned to warm to my range better.  Too strict would make me obsess on it and defeat the purpose to me.

My easy runs now are more 130-140 and run based on Hanson plan/pace calculator from 5k a bit ago.
Did you do any speed work at all when you did this?  How long did you do it for?  Have the benefits lasted for you?

 
So if I did 192-42, that would put me at 150. 

I already do keep most easy runs under that (except when going up a hill). I think it's a matter of not doing any speed work for a month or two and sticking with all slow runs. Even still, I think I noticed a similar drop a few months ago during base training even with twice weekly speed stuff. 

Just something for me to think about after early December.
Yeah, so your range would be between 140 and 150. 

So pretty much almost exactly where I am give or take a few beats. 

 
Did you do any speed work at all when you did this?  How long did you do it for?  Have the benefits lasted for you?
No specific speed work but I did some tempo/race pace stuff during marathon plan.  

I think it was most of 2017, my strava stuff should show ‘MAF’ runs in the description. 

Have benefits lasted? Yeah.  It gave me enough structure to progress to where I feel like I now have enough of a base to work with. 

 
I can see both sides. What would be nice/interesting is to try it and see if building that base helps in the long-term. I don't think it's meant to be the way to train all the time. Eventually after a couple months, you can run the same paces you do now but just at a lower HR (like where you are now, for example). 

During the winter, when I won't run as much and won't be training for any particular race, it would be ideal to get out and just try it for a month or two and see. I like being the resident guinea pig anyway.
Winter crock pot season is certainly a good time to do it, but shockingly I side with juxt in that I would not follow it to the beat.  Use the time to find your comfortable pace then just never get out of it - whatever HR it is.

 
I apologize to those of you that are tired of me ranting about this.  I have to get it out of my system about once a year.
Rant away.   :)   

I subscribe to the benefits of slow running, but I still struggle with the logic of all slow runs and such extremely low HR runs. As to the former, I'm not comfortable with the short striding that's necessary for MAF and carrying that on, without exception, for months on end.  It seems detrimental at some point for all the leg muscles and such to grow out of touch (lack of muscle memory) with a long, full, hard stride.  As to the latter, keeping my HR below 120-125 or so is just wickedly slow ..more of a shuffle than a run.  

I accept the fact that moderate-paced runs (or really, race-paced runs) are tweener runs that offer little benefit - not fast enough to build race-pace skill, but not slow enough to allow aerobic benefits to occur. 

 
Rant away.   :)   

I subscribe to the benefits of slow running, but I still struggle with the logic of all slow runs and such extremely low HR runs. As to the former, I'm not comfortable with the short striding that's necessary for MAF and carrying that on, without exception, for months on end.  It seems detrimental at some point for all the leg muscles and such to grow out of touch (lack of muscle memory) with a long, full, hard stride.  As to the latter, keeping my HR below 120-125 or so is just wickedly slow ..more of a shuffle than a run.  

I accept the fact that moderate-paced runs (or really, race-paced runs) are tweener runs that offer little benefit - not fast enough to build race-pace skill, but not slow enough to allow aerobic benefits to occur. 
Yeah, I know you've said this a few times and I tend to agree.  The speed work that I started doing really made a difference in my overall stride.  When I do my slow runs now, I don't feel like I'm shuffling like I used to.  And I find that benefit almost more important than the actual speed work itself.  It feels good to lengthen the stride and feel "natural" while running (like a kid again). 

I might try it for a month (when I'm only likely going to run 3, maybe 4 times per week anyway, if that) and go from there. 

And I love these discussions, especially getting viewpoints from both sides.  It's been neat following @ChiefD's HR over the last couple months as I've noticed the steady decrease so I think there's some utility to it, but overall, how much does it help if I'm not otherwise overtraining, which is really the bigger issue overall.

 
I think the rain chance is actually 20% tonight so gonna try to get my ### back out there.  It's been raining here for what seems like the entire summer.

 
Oh, when have you ever gotten a pre-race alert about bears?

Mountain lions, yes.  I remember when you got a warning about mountain lions on the course.
I know two people that have had to stop at WS100 to wait for a bear on the trail, including Jim Walmsley this year.  Most of the time they're found after the section you paced with me, so didn't figure I'd bring that up to you  ;)

As for mountain lions, yes.  At my first 100K a few years ago we had to sign three separate waivers related to cougars as multiple cats had been seen on the course in the prior week.  

 
I accept the fact that moderate-paced runs (or really, race-paced runs) are tweener runs that offer little benefit - not fast enough to build race-pace skill, but not slow enough to allow aerobic benefits to occur. 
Greg McMillan wrote that even those runs provide benefits in those ways.  It's more of a bang for your buck thing.  Since we're on this topic, let me post my favorite running chart in the whole world again:  https://www.mcmillanrunning.com//wp-content/uploads/2016/04/McMillanTrainingZoneGraph2.gif 

This no-man's land where you're not getting the bang for your buck is the white area between 2:30:00 and 3:30:00 race pace.  That's a reasonably narrow range (for me maybe 6:40 to 7:10 or something).  He allows the endurance zone to be much faster than someone like MAF would have you running at.

I love this chart so much because it syncs with my personal experience quite well.

 
I found this run of mine in Mid-May.  I looked and the high that day was 72 degrees.  I was near the end of my base training, had been running a lot, and probably in the best running shape I've been in (2 weeks before my big relay race). 

I had to run an almost 11:00 min pace (10:48 total) and my average HR was still 138.  Now, it would climb to about 150 when I hit some hills and it would drop as low as upper 120's on downhills, but that's otherwise about as ideal as it can get for me. 

The fact that I'm not in as good overall running shape/fitness right at this moment and running in much worse conditions and still managed an avg HR yesterday of 151 with a sub 10 pace easy run makes me think that I'm not as bad off as I thought. 

 
I was once a bigger believer of the MAF/HADD type training than I am today.  I found it to be helpful when first building up mileage and it may have help me avoid injury. 

Where I am at now in my running career I don’t want to go through long periods without quality workouts as I tend to lose fitness quickly.  I think I made mistakes in the past when I would only run quality 24-30 weeks in a given year.  

 
Went to the Yankee game last night (even though I'm a Red Sox fan).  It was in a luxury suite (LOOK AT ME!  I HAVE CONNECTIONS!) so I enjoyed several beverages and bad food. (I also hung out with Chris Chambliss, Mickey Rivers and a very drunk Chuck Knoblauch.)

Got home around 1 a.m.  Tried to sleep in some, didn't really work.  Then got up and tried to do a 8 mile run with 6 miles at 7 min/mile pace.  I got done with one mile and knew it wasn't happening so I shut it down.  Finished with an easy 6 miles and hope to attempt the hard workout again tomorrow. 

Moral of the story is what you eat, drink and how much you sleep is critical to your success.
Got good sleep last night but woke up this morning to my GI system being a mess.  So scrapped the hard workout this week.

I’ll take today to rest.  Maybe body just needs a little reset from running.

 
I blame Chambliss 
Baseball didn’t help.  

Taking kids to local minor league game tonight and then back to suite at the Yankees game tomorrow for a work event.  #LotsOfHotDogs

I have to make sure my body doesn’t revolt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:goodposting:

I have a draft Saturday Labor Day weekend and a golf outing Sunday.  That weekend's long run will be done on Saturday.  I'll try for some quantity Labor Day miles, but given what I expect to do to my body the two days prior I already know it isn't happening.
I'm jealous.  Other than the occasional (OK, daily) ice cream, I'm really trying to watch my diet and limit the extracurriculars ahead of my PR attempt in November.  Sometimes I wonder if it's worth it.  I definitely was doing plenty of partying and drinking in the months preceding my only other sub-3 marathon back in 2011, but I was also 7 years younger...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm jealous.  Other than the occasional (OK, daily) ice cream, I'm really trying to watch my diet and limit the extracurriculars ahead of my PR attempt in November.  Sometimes I wonder if it's worth it.  I definitely was doing plenty of partying and drinking in the months preceding my only other sub-3 marathon back in 2011, but I was also 7 years younger...
To help make it "worth it", have you considered adding a 5K, 10K and/or half marathon to your schedule this fall?  PRs in all of those should be achievable for you.

 
To help make it "worth it", have you considered adding a 5K, 10K and/or half marathon to your schedule this fall?  PRs in all of those should be achievable for you.
I've got zero interest in running a 5K or 10K.  Hate both of those distances.  I may run a half if I can find one that fits into my training schedule.  Once we get into fall and we get that nice, crisp air, I think I'll feel better about my chances of getting that PR.  With 11+ weeks to go, I'm already more fit than I was in March when I ran 3:06, and I'm definitely more fit/healthier than I was back in 2011.  This hot, humid weather just messes with my head...

 
I see some of you had a morning swim and some of you had a morning run.  At this point, is there much of a difference between the 2?

 
I've got zero interest in running a 5K or 10K.  Hate both of those distances.  I may run a half if I can find one that fits into my training schedule.  Once we get into fall and we get that nice, crisp air, I think I'll feel better about my chances of getting that PR.  With 11+ weeks to go, I'm already more fit than I was in March when I ran 3:06, and I'm definitely more fit/healthier than I was back in 2011.  This hot, humid weather just messes with my head...
Oh just take up tri already. ;)

I see some of you had a morning swim and some of you had a morning run.  At this point, is there much of a difference between the 2?
:lol:

The ride was like swimming but faster. 

 
Q "so what did you do for your birthday?

Me: "took the day off work, got up at 430, swam 42 minutes, dropped the car off for an oil change and tire rotation / alignment, ran home 4.2 miles, rode 42 miles. Then ate, drank a beer, and now I'm taking a nap" 

 
Q "so what did you do for your birthday?

Me: "took the day off work, got up at 430, swam 42 minutes, dropped the car off for an oil change and tire rotation / alignment, ran home 4.2 miles, rode 42 miles. Then ate, drank a beer, and now I'm taking a nap" 
Why didn't you wake up at 4:20? 

Happy 43rd birthday.

 
I'm jealous.  Other than the occasional (OK, daily) ice cream, I'm really trying to watch my diet and limit the extracurriculars ahead of my PR attempt in November.  Sometimes I wonder if it's worth it.  I definitely was doing plenty of partying and drinking in the months preceding my only other sub-3 marathon back in 2011, but I was also 7 years younger...
Like the average person, I lack will power off-and-on between late Spring until the holidays.  Knowing this contributed to my 2nd BQ attempt being in April.  I'm often on relative good behavior from January-April, so add a goal to reduce temptation even further.  Winter training brings about its own hurdles, but I think this works for me.  Deal with the elements to the best of your ability, eat well, and drink minimally.  Because I know me from April-December.  And I'm no different than the average person when it comes to diet.  I'll splurge.  Too often.  I'll still exercise, but it isn't going to be as effective at times.  This sort of structure works around it though.  St Paddy's is usually our only scheduled event day between New Year's and whenever Spring Break falls that year, so I only have to work around surprises - usually in the form of upper cuts and jabs from mother nature.

 
Q "so what did you do for your birthday?

Me: "took the day off work, got up at 430, swam 42 minutes, dropped the car off for an oil change and tire rotation / alignment, ran home 4.2 miles, rode 42 miles. Then ate, drank a beer, and now I'm taking a nap" 
Scrolling through strava last hour thinking PC musta had his wheaties this morning - some impressive work.

 
-OZ- said:
Q "so what did you do for your birthday?

Me: "took the day off work, got up at 430, swam 42 minutes, dropped the car off for an oil change and tire rotation / alignment, ran home 4.2 miles, rode 42 miles. Then ate, drank a beer, and now I'm taking a nap" 
Happy birthday!

 
Silly workout/plan question related to what to do or not do.

Plan was supposed to be easy 3 on Wednesday, 45 min tempo Thursday, rest Friday, 3 miles at race pace Saturday, 90 minutes Sunday.

Thursday was crazy with back to school stuff and run never happened. I was able to do the tempo run yesterday during rest day. Would you go ahead and do the pace run today and long run tomorrow and put 3 workouts in a row or just scrap the pace run and run easy today?

I feel fine, but especially with the recent articles posted as a reminder, I don't think I'd benefit from doing it.

 
Would you go ahead and do the pace run today and long run tomorrow and put 3 workouts in a row or just scrap the pace run and run easy today?
I’d run easy today, and if I felt good tomorrow I’d run the last 3 miles of the long run fast. I wouldn’t want to run 3 workouts in a row.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top