footballman_696969
Footballguy
Thoughts?
First snaps were solid. Seems to have a nice connection with Damerien McCants.I don't have the opportunity to see it. I wanna know how Troy Smith looks when he gets in. Please let me know?Thanks!
No news other than they have knee injuries. Aiken lloked like he could have an issue. Pollard just hurt his shoulder...wouldn't be surprised if it's more than a nick as it had a little hang to it when he was going off the field.Thanks for the Updates Boston...can't get the game here (Saints are on). Been following online. Any news on the Aiken and Williams injuries?WR Sam Aiken, a free-agent signee brought in to primarily help the special teams units, suffered a knee injury and did not return to the game. S/LB Tank Williams remained on the field after playing on the kickoff coverage team in the second quarter. Trainers tended to him on the field, but he walked off under his own power.
He was 1-3 on his series. One real nice pass for a long completion, one bad pass for an incompletion and another pass for an incompletion that was a nicely thrown ball. He really didn't play long enough to get a handle on him.I don't have the opportunity to see it. I wanna know how Troy Smith looks when he gets in. Please let me know?Thanks!
Thanks!Keep me posted if it's not too much trouble.First snaps were solid. Seems to have a nice connection with Damerien McCants.I don't have the opportunity to see it. I wanna know how Troy Smith looks when he gets in. Please let me know?Thanks!
I'm not a Boller fan but he looked real good going against the Pats first unit (or what's playing of that unit tonight). He looked comfortable and made some real nice veteran throws.Thanks!Keep me posted if it's not too much trouble.First snaps were solid. Seems to have a nice connection with Damerien McCants.I don't have the opportunity to see it. I wanna know how Troy Smith looks when he gets in. Please let me know?Thanks!I really feel he's going to be the guy come week 1.
He knows he's under the gun.I'm not a Boller fan but he looked real good going against the Pats first unit (or what's playing of that unit tonight). He looked comfortable and made some real nice veteran throws.Thanks!Keep me posted if it's not too much trouble.First snaps were solid. Seems to have a nice connection with Damerien McCants.I don't have the opportunity to see it. I wanna know how Troy Smith looks when he gets in. Please let me know?Thanks!I really feel he's going to be the guy come week 1.
Lamont Jordan 14 rushes and averaged over 4 yards per carry for the Pats, not bad at all for the first preseason game of the year.Thoughts?
Jordan ran well. Ran hard "down hill" ... he looked good. I was also impressed with O'Connell's athleticism.Lamont Jordan 14 rushes and averaged over 4 yards per carry for the Pats, not bad at all for the first preseason game of the year.Thoughts?
They seem to be giving him alot of work to see what he's got.Lamont Jordan 14 rushes and averaged over 4 yards per carry for the Pats, not bad at all for the first preseason game of the year.Thoughts?
I like what I've seen (especially the fact he looks healthy) but let's remember he's going against backups and guys who are going to get cut.I know it's pre-season, but I would be totally fine with Lamont starting opening Sunday instead of Flaurence.
It's inevitable as far as I'm concerned. Maroney just doesn't have the make-up of a workhorse. Atleast I've never seen it since we drafted him. I loved the Lamont pick up and think it could turn out to be a brilliant pick up.I like what I've seen (especially the fact he looks healthy) but let's remember he's going against backups and guys who are going to get cut.I know it's pre-season, but I would be totally fine with Lamont starting opening Sunday instead of Flaurence.
I underestimated Lamont Jordan last season when it started. He didn't sustain, but he certainly started off very well. With that said, I thought Laurence Maroney finished the season strong. He was finishing his runs and looked to be running hard.I know it's pre-season, but I would be totally fine with Lamont starting opening Sunday instead of Flaurence.
I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
Bingo!I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
I'm still hearing that they are going out of their way to get Chad to win the starting job. I agree Jackson didn't seem in sync with the offense or the QBs, but a couple of the throws seemed behind him or the timing was just off. I'd be more concerned if Brady was the one guiding the team on those drives, and on that line of reasoning with so many other guys in on plays that normally wouldn't be, it's hard to conclude much either way. By that I mean that even if he looked great it was not the base offense with all the regulars, so drawing any conclusions would be a bit misleading either direction.I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
While I agree with this in theory what I don't like is how he looked tronight is how he has looked since he has been with the Pats (in the limited time we have seen him) even when Brady's at QB. It just seems like something is missing. I really hope I'm wrong because it only helps the Pats if he pans out but I just don't have much faith in Jackson not traveling down the Bethel Johnson path of unfufilled potential.I'm still hearing that they are going out of their way to get Chad to win the starting job. I agree Jackson didn't seem in sync with the offense or the QBs, but a couple of the throws seemed behind him or the timing was just off. I'd be more concerned if Brady was the one guiding the team on those drives, and on that line of reasoning with so many other guys in on plays that normally wouldn't be, it's hard to conclude much either way. By that I mean that even if he looked great it was not the base offense with all the regulars, so drawing any conclusions would be a bit misleading either direction.I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
You must be high. Chad Jackson will be lucky to make it out of camp. Dude is a bust.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
I agree, Cjax looked like a guy just signed to the team Monday. He's definitely thinking out there too much. Michael Irvin -- of all people -- made a fairly insightful comment on the radio this morning about the development of WRs: he said that if you are breaking from the huddle thinking about what the route is you are supposed to run, you are already done. You should be going to the line thinking "How am I going to beat my man?" That's what good WRs do.Cjax has the look of a guy who is thinking "Ok, now where exactly am I supposed to make my break to the outside?".I really hope he looks better with Brady at QB, but this was not at all encouraging. To put it another way, Ray Ventrone looked like a more natural WR ...While I agree with this in theory what I don't like is how he looked tronight is how he has looked since he has been with the Pats (in the limited time we have seen him) even when Brady's at QB. It just seems like something is missing. I really hope I'm wrong because it only helps the Pats if he pans out but I just don't have much faith in Jackson not traveling down the Bethel Johnson path of unfufilled potential.I'm still hearing that they are going out of their way to get Chad to win the starting job. I agree Jackson didn't seem in sync with the offense or the QBs, but a couple of the throws seemed behind him or the timing was just off. I'd be more concerned if Brady was the one guiding the team on those drives, and on that line of reasoning with so many other guys in on plays that normally wouldn't be, it's hard to conclude much either way. By that I mean that even if he looked great it was not the base offense with all the regulars, so drawing any conclusions would be a bit misleading either direction.I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
hijack:I love this quote....Q: What is your best talent outside of football?Kenny Irons: “Drawing. I like to draw, if you consider that a talent. I like to disguise myself as other people, too. I call that a talent. I like telling people that I am somebody else. I tell people that I play water polo and if they ask me what position I play I tell them right water. I don’t even know if that is a position but I tell them that I play right water.”I agree, Cjax looked like a guy just signed to the team Monday. He's definitely thinking out there too much. Michael Irvin -- of all people -- made a fairly insightful comment on the radio this morning about the development of WRs: he said that if you are breaking from the huddle thinking about what the route is you are supposed to run, you are already done. You should be going to the line thinking "How am I going to beat my man?" That's what good WRs do.Cjax has the look of a guy who is thinking "Ok, now where exactly am I supposed to make my break to the outside?".I really hope he looks better with Brady at QB, but this was not at all encouraging. To put it another way, Ray Ventrone looked like a more natural WR ...While I agree with this in theory what I don't like is how he looked tronight is how he has looked since he has been with the Pats (in the limited time we have seen him) even when Brady's at QB. It just seems like something is missing. I really hope I'm wrong because it only helps the Pats if he pans out but I just don't have much faith in Jackson not traveling down the Bethel Johnson path of unfufilled potential.I'm still hearing that they are going out of their way to get Chad to win the starting job. I agree Jackson didn't seem in sync with the offense or the QBs, but a couple of the throws seemed behind him or the timing was just off. I'd be more concerned if Brady was the one guiding the team on those drives, and on that line of reasoning with so many other guys in on plays that normally wouldn't be, it's hard to conclude much either way. By that I mean that even if he looked great it was not the base offense with all the regulars, so drawing any conclusions would be a bit misleading either direction.I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
Vinny Testaverde is only a phone call away.I just don't understand why the Pats don't have an experienced QB in a backup role. There would be no downside to that.
He started.Did Antwaan Barnes play on the 2nd or 3rd unit??Anyone?
Any update on Aiken today?WR Sam Aiken, a free-agent signee brought in to primarily help the special teams units, suffered a knee injury and did not return to the game.
its week 1 of preseason, featuring a largely watered down Ravens offense with a depleted O-line, considered by many to be one of the worst lines in the NFL..lets see how Mayo looks against Mangold, D'Brick Ferguson and Faneca, or against some of the better lines - in a regular season game...also, the older,slower NE defenders know how to win a big game in the NFL, lets see Mayo do something special in a big spot before we anoint him as the next Ray Lewis. jeez.Ravens are blitzing like crazy for a preseason game which is stunting NE offense so tough to takeaway much from that side of ball for NE.
I will say don't sleep on the Pats D. The popular consensus is old and slow. But these rookies look good. I like Pats as top 3 fantasy D, if not the #1.
No word yet on him or Tank Williams.Any update on Aiken today?WR Sam Aiken, a free-agent signee brought in to primarily help the special teams units, suffered a knee injury and did not return to the game.
I cant help but feel the same. I have no faith whatsoever from the reports out of camp of his inconsistency that he'll be anything other than a role player/backup. I just dont think he has the mental make-up of a smart, reliable receiver. To simplify, the idiotic BLONDE dreadlocks he's attached himself to are a dead giveaway. I dont think the kid's real bright.While I agree with this in theory what I don't like is how he looked tronight is how he has looked since he has been with the Pats (in the limited time we have seen him) even when Brady's at QB. It just seems like something is missing. I really hope I'm wrong because it only helps the Pats if he pans out but I just don't have much faith in Jackson not traveling down the Bethel Johnson path of unfufilled potential.I'm still hearing that they are going out of their way to get Chad to win the starting job. I agree Jackson didn't seem in sync with the offense or the QBs, but a couple of the throws seemed behind him or the timing was just off. I'd be more concerned if Brady was the one guiding the team on those drives, and on that line of reasoning with so many other guys in on plays that normally wouldn't be, it's hard to conclude much either way. By that I mean that even if he looked great it was not the base offense with all the regulars, so drawing any conclusions would be a bit misleading either direction.I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
Ummm, sorry, didn't think using the phrase "rookies look good" qualified as over-the-top hyperbole. But your quote about a 50-year old safety sums up the common perception of the D. As a Pats fan, I was just informing the board (kind of the point of the message board I thought) that so far in camp the rookies and lots of defensive FAs looked better than advertised. In limited preseason play that held up. Worth keeping an eye on, as I think playing with a lead, this defense could be a very good fantasy unit.Tanner9919 said:its week 1 of preseason, featuring a largely watered down Ravens offense with a depleted O-line, considered by many to be one of the worst lines in the NFL..lets see how Mayo looks against Mangold, D'Brick Ferguson and Faneca, or against some of the better lines - in a regular season game...also, the older,slower NE defenders know how to win a big game in the NFL, lets see Mayo do something special in a big spot before we anoint him as the next Ray Lewis. jeez.Ravens are blitzing like crazy for a preseason game which is stunting NE offense so tough to takeaway much from that side of ball for NE.
I will say don't sleep on the Pats D. The popular consensus is old and slow. But these rookies look good. I like Pats as top 3 fantasy D, if not the #1.tough to call the Pats defense the #1 overall unit, when they weren't even the #1 unit LAST SEASON with Samuel, Wilson et al.
now they have also-ran DB's and a 50-something safety ( Harrison) trying to fill that void..I can only laugh about the NE secondary![]()
Seymour looks great huh? won't be long before he hurts himself like every other season..
Funny you mention the blond dreads. As silly as it sounds I've had a bad feeling about this kid since his first year. Early in his rookie year there were a lot of reports about his immaturity and inability to grasp the Patriot offense as he was off to a slow start (injuries were a factor as well). He caught a TD pass (I believe it was against Buffalo but I could be wrong). The camera shows him on the sideline and as he takes off his helmet he's got this foolish 'do with blue beads that a 13 year would wear. For a guy on a veteran-laden team where rookies typically fall in line it really stood out as the 'do just screamed "hey, look at me." Especially since he was already off to a slow start and there were questions about his maturity.I hope I'm wrong here as it's very obvious he has some legit physical tools. Yet, I really don't have a lot of confidence he's going to be a guy that Brady is going to trust...and if he doesn't trust you you may as well call it a day because you're not going to see the ball too often...especially on a team with weapons like Moss, Welker, Gaffney, Watson, Thomas and Faulk.twitch said:I cant help but feel the same. I have no faith whatsoever from the reports out of camp of his inconsistency that he'll be anything other than a role player/backup. I just dont think he has the mental make-up of a smart, reliable receiver. To simplify, the idiotic BLONDE dreadlocks he's attached himself to are a dead giveaway. I dont think the kid's real bright.Boston said:While I agree with this in theory what I don't like is how he looked tronight is how he has looked since he has been with the Pats (in the limited time we have seen him) even when Brady's at QB. It just seems like something is missing. I really hope I'm wrong because it only helps the Pats if he pans out but I just don't have much faith in Jackson not traveling down the Bethel Johnson path of unfufilled potential.David Yudkin said:I'm still hearing that they are going out of their way to get Chad to win the starting job. I agree Jackson didn't seem in sync with the offense or the QBs, but a couple of the throws seemed behind him or the timing was just off. I'd be more concerned if Brady was the one guiding the team on those drives, and on that line of reasoning with so many other guys in on plays that normally wouldn't be, it's hard to conclude much either way. By that I mean that even if he looked great it was not the base offense with all the regulars, so drawing any conclusions would be a bit misleading either direction.Boston said:I like the enthusiasm but I've yet to see anything from Jax that shows he can be a decent NFL Wr let alone a #1. The word is he has looked good in camp but there was nothing to be excited about tonight. I'd be very surprised if he puts up better numbers than Gaffney this year.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.
Put down the crack pipe.Getting in a groove won't be a problem for Chad Jackson with Brady at QB. I'm as high on Jackson as I've ever been on an unestablished non-rookie. No way Moss will produce like TO as he ages. Moss doesn't have the innate drive TO does, IMO. Plus, TO is a freak of nature (blessed with incredible "fountain of youth" genes). Bottom line...I see Jackson being their #1 as early as '09 & certainly by '10. He might be the best buy-low (or buy-reasonable) dynasty player in all of FF.