ookook said:
If one wants to have more equity ACROSS positions, PPR is a VERY poor way to go about it, as it disrupts rank order WITHIN position unnecessarily.
The best solution is to make yards for WRs worth .125 and TDs 7.5. TEs can be .15 and 9. QBs get .075 per yard passing, 6 per TD, and -2 per INT.
Also, should deal with supply and demand by starting 4 WRs and 2 TEs.
Works quite well. Very competitive, interesting draft decisions, etc. Also no need for silly flex.
1. How is this any better than ppr? Are you saying that a back like Rice who catches out of the backfield isnt valuable? A player that catches 8 balls for 100 yards isnt more valuable than a player that catches 2 passes for 100 yards?
YES, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT I AM SAYING. IN FACT THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE AS THE 2/100 TEAM HAS 6 MORE OPPORTUNITY PLAYS.
2. Antonio Gates should go #1 overall in this league.
PERHAPS IN HINDSIGHT, BUT NOT REALLY. QBs ARE VERY VALUEABLE WITH THAT SCORING, AS ARE WRs. START 4 WRs MAKES FOR SERIOUS DROP-OFFS FROM BASELINE.
3. 2 tight ends? There arent enough tight ends in the league for every team to have ONE starting quality player, much less two. What is wrong with a flex spot?
WHAT IS ONE MAN'S SCRUB IS ANOTHER'S QUALITY. I LOST FINLEY AND HAVE BEEN STARTING MOEAKI AND FASONO. VALUE IS RELATIVE. YOU WOULD BE UNDOUBTEDLY BOTHERED BY THE WORST STARTING WRs TOO, BUT WE ARE NOT.