What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Carlos Hyde, JAC (1 Viewer)

Agree completely. Of course I own Hyde so maybe I'm biased but of all the things SF needs to be focusing on seems like a RB has gotta be pretty low on the list.
Agreed (I'm also an owner).

If only a contending team needed a power back. :whistle:  (Carlos would like Boston)

 
squistion said:
:sadbanana:

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/9381/carlos-hyde

According to Draft Analyst's Tony Pauline, the 49ers are "ready to give up" on Carlos Hyde due to his struggles with injuries.
 
Hyde has missed 14 games through three seasons, including 12-of-32 the past two years. He is now entering a contract year under a new front-office regime. It's possible the 49ers don't see Hyde's power-back skill set as a fit for new coach Kyle Shanahan's zone scheme. Hyde is also one of the NFL's least effective pass-catching backs. If Pauline's report is accurate, the 49ers could consider shopping Hyde for a middle-round pick on draft weekend.
 
Apr 12 - 10:29 AM

Source: Draft Analyst
If I were running a team, this is how I would create a smokescreen.  Dangle the 'we're drafting Fournette at 2' bit followed up by the above.  Nice work SF, but I ain't buying it.

 
Sooooo, piss off one of the few decent players on your team to create a smokescreen for some impossible scenario where someone trades up to draft a RB #2?

 
Sooooo, piss off one of the few decent players on your team to create a smokescreen for some impossible scenario where someone trades up to draft a RB #2?
No, I would imagine someone communicates to Hyde what their intentions are with the upcoming leak that he'll hear about.  The 2nd part, yes, that's one possibility.  Another is to deter someone else trading with CLE if they really want, say QB.  It can go a few different ways but that's the type of confusion I'd be creating.  Just seems like an obvious play here.

 
If I were running a team, this is how I would create a smokescreen.  Dangle the 'we're drafting Fournette at 2' bit followed up by the above.  Nice work SF, but I ain't buying it.
I completely agree. 

You have a Coach/GM with shiny new six year contracts and a mess of a roster that needs to be overhauled at almost every position and the FIRST big move is draft a RB that will be long gone(or beat up and useless) by the time you get the rest of this train wreck turned around? Makes absolutely no sense to me.

FWIW, I also hardly think the prospect of being granted parole out of the Niners organization would "piss-off" Hyde. Right now moving on to CLE would look like a ray of hope if I were Hyde. Think about that.

 
Sooooo, piss off one of the few decent players on your team to create a smokescreen for some impossible scenario where someone trades up to draft a RB #2?
Wasn't telesco dumb enough to trade up ONE SPOT to draft a RB in the first round that still hasn't had a 4yards/carry season or finished a season on the field? If I were SF I'd be doing everything in my power to get as many picks as possible. They need every last one..... and more. This draft will have good players in the mid-rounds. I wouldn't be surprised if a day-3 pick ends up starting at CB or WR for the 'Niners at some point this season.

 
This could be more of a reference to their round 2 pick. If Cook/Mixon are still there, 49ers want other teams to think they have to come and get them.

 
efactor said:
Not buying this.  Seems like smoke in case someone really wants Fornette and thinks SF will (might) take him with the 2nd pick.  SF obviously wants to trade down and this seems like a ploy to spark interest.

This is why the NFL draft is so much fun.  Ton of misinformation being floated around.  One big hustle...................
For a team with so many needs a RB upgrade seems like a really bad move.

 
Lol at the press ever reporting a Shanahan is interested in a 1st round RB. It's been what 15-20 years of history we can point to including Kubiak in Houston and Denver. They believe in there scheme and have never heavily invested in an RB. If they send Hyde out of town it will because they believe he doesn't fit their scheme. I'm more apt to believe he does and if the injury bug sails he's more likely to match Zeke's numbers from last year with fewer 20+ runs and a decent amount more carries.

 
 

The Santa Rosa Press Democrat says Carlos Hyde has looked like "the slowest and most indecisive running back on the team" at 49ers OTAs.
Hyde is learning new coach Kyle Shanahan's outside-zone system after excelling in Chip Kelly's shotgun-based zone-read scheme last year. Beat writer Grant Cohn says Hyde "doesn't seem to have the vision to succeed" in Shanahan's offense, a fit GM John Lynch openly questioned before the draft. Cohn believes the 49ers should trade Hyde "to a team that runs the zone read." We still expect Hyde to open the season as the Niners' clear-cut starter.

 
 
Source: Santa Rosa Press Democrat

 
I was not buying all this anti Hyde news and last week tried to move my 1.1 (LF) for 1.4 Cmac/Mixon) & Hyde. Now I'm kinda glad he did not want to do the trade.

 
So, in the first week with a new scheme, he's not amazing at it?  Not sure why people are freaking out.  Yes, the 49ers brought in a RB in the middle rounds of the draft, and they probably won't resign Hyde. He's still the best back on the team.  If he plays for the 49ers this season and stays healthy, he's a top 12 back.

Joe Williams is a mid-level talent who has proven nothing in the NFL. 

 
2017 Outlook

There are a lot of rumblings as of late, talking about how Hyde isn’t a fit in Kyle Shanahan’s scheme, and that rookie Joe Williams

 is “their guy” that they hand-picked. This is where you need to fade the noise from the off-season and listen to what the head coach said about the situation back in March:

“Right now, I see Carlos being our back. We’ve studied a lot of the guys on tape. He’s the guy that’s got the most. Carlos is a guy who I was a fan of coming out of college. He had a real good career there. I looked at him hard when, I think I was in Cleveland at the time and had a good feeling he was going to be a great back then. I don’t think he’s a finished product. I think there’s a lot more to his game and I look forward to us helping him bring that out.”

He then went on to say, “I think Devonta in our scheme in Atlanta is how Devonta, to me, would have been in any scheme. If you’re a real good running back, you’re going to be a real good running back. I think people overrate that a lot personally. Carlos was a great running back in college and he has put some real good things on tape so far in the NFL and that’s why I look forward to having him and getting to work with him. I think it goes the same across the board. People I think overrate a little bit too much the scheme. If you’re a good running back in this league, you’re going to be good in your scheme, whatever that is.”

 
Neither.  

But trade is far more likely. 
Agreed.  The most likely scenario is that he plays out this season, then leaves in FA.  Second most likely is trade. There's 0% chance he'll be cut unless he has a catastrophic injury. He's still on his rookie deal, and costs almost nothing. Any team without a stud RB would be willing to part with at least some kind of pick for him.

 
Agreed.  The most likely scenario is that he plays out this season, then leaves in FA.  Second most likely is trade. There's 0% chance he'll be cut unless he has a catastrophic injury. He's still on his rookie deal, and costs almost nothing. Any team without a stud RB would be willing to part with at least some kind of pick for him.
Ok, how many times will he not be on the active 46-man roster on game days? 

 
Prior to the NFL draft, your post was perfectly cromulent.  But now, there has been a sea change, and Shanny is on record as making statements about guys other than Hyde.
If you say so.

I thought the point about the coach saying that scheme doesn't matter was the relevant part that I quoted. The chronological order of events wouldn't change that.

 
If you say so.

I thought the point about the coach saying that scheme doesn't matter was the relevant part that I quoted. The chronological order of events wouldn't change that.
Sure, scheme doesn't matter.  But competition at his position certainly does.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, how many times will he not be on the active 46-man roster on game days? 
Fewer than Joe Williams?

Joe Williams is an ok RB who they got in the 4th round. Hyde is a proven Vet who Shanahan has previously talked glowingly about.  Could Hyde not work out in Shanny's system and could Joe flourish? Sure, it's possible. But I adhere to the when in doubt buy the more talented player philosophy. 

Also, I think that Hoyer is an upgrade over Kaep and Gabbert and will improve the blocking reads for Hyde.

 
If Hyde is viewed unfavorably by the organization hell likely leave for FA after the year. In 2017 I think it's more likely they run Hyde into the ground than bench him.

 
Sure, scheme doesn't matter.  But competition at his position certainly does.
I agree.

I spent some time watching Joe Williams and Matt Brieda and discussed that here  and here you also have Kapri Bibbs who they traded for during the draft before drafting Joe Williams.

I think Carlos Hyde was a much better RB prospect than any of the competition and that he should be the lead RB in 2017 while healthy. Other RB will get some opportunity as a COP and possible heir to the starting job in 2018 if they do not retain Hyde who will be a free agent.

Fwiw I rated Hyde as a tier one RB prospect in the pre draft process, dropped him to a tier two RB post draft (mostly because he wasn't a 1st round pick and was at that time blocked by Frank Gore). Joe Williams and Matt Breida were not players on my radar prior to the NFL draft.

Williams game against UCLA is excellent. I think he shows more promise than Breida or Bibbs. I have not seen him play at a high level like this consistently enough to think he is close to the level of talent as Carlos Hyde.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fwiw I rated Hyde as a tier one RB prospect in the pre draft process, dropped him to a tier two RB post draft (mostly because he wasn't a 1st round pick and was at that time blocked by Frank Gore). Joe Williams and Matt Breida were not players on my radar prior to the NFL draft.
At what point does pre-draft rating lose it's relevance?  Is it 3 years into the league?  5?

Sure, the college tape and draft pedigree are there.  But what's he done in the pros (other than get hurt immediately after showing a brief flash)?

I think you could reasonably argue that there isn't a single back on the 49ers roster who can be trusted.  You like Hyde based on a lot of things that are (probably) no longer relevant, and that's your prerogative. 

Personally, I'm placing my bets on the cheap guy (Breida), because the others are too risky for their current prices.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The pre NFL draft is where I rate players based on my perceived observations of their talent at the college level. In the case of Williams and Breida that is all you have to go off of and therefore the only fair way to compare them would be by looking at all of the players from similar context.  The time frame that I use the pre NFL evaluation is 3 years, by which time it should be known how the player performs at the NFL level.

Hyde has performed pretty well under the circumstances although he has missed a lot of games. Kapri Bibbs has some NFL production but the other players do not besides Hyde, so such a comparison would be apples to oranges aside from their college performance. So working with what there is to make a fair comparison.

In 2016 Hyde was RB 14 overall in standard scoring leagues and RB 18 overall in PPR leagues. A RB 2. He missed 3 games. On a PPG basis Carlos Hyde was RB 11 in 2016 a RB 1.

In 2015 Hyde only played in 7 games. He had 13.5 PPG over those seven which is similar to RB 2 level (would have been RB 18 in 2016)

As far as if Hyde is a worthy investment at his current ADP is another conversation entirely, but based on my observations Hyde should clearly be the best RB to have on the 49ers in 2017 and he has performed at a starting caliber level for fantasy in the games that he has played thus far.

As far as my pre NFL draft evaluation being relevant or not, I predicted he would be a RB two in fantasy, and that is what he has been. So you can dismiss this as irrelevant if you want, but the prediction has been accurate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hyde has been one the best runners in the NFL each of the last 2 seasons. Yes, it sucks that he has gotten hurt, but he's a been a probowl caliber runner when healthy, and is the best player on the 49ers offense by a wide margin. Its crazy how people just see a new shiny toy, and just assume they'll be a threat. I wouldn't be shocked if Brieda didn't even make the team, and Williams is no lock to beat out Hightower, let alone threaten Hyde. This feels like a great time to buy low on Hyde. 

 
At what point does pre-draft rating lose it's relevance?  Is it 3 years into the league?  5?

Sure, the college tape and draft pedigree are there.  But what's he done in the pros (other than get hurt immediately after showing a brief flash)?

I think you could reasonably argue that there isn't a single back on the 49ers roster who can be trusted.  You like Hyde based on a lot of things that are (probably) no longer relevant, and that's your prerogative. 

Personally, I'm placing my bets on the cheap guy (Breida), because the others are too risky for their current prices.
Other than be a top 10 rusher per game while on a dumpster fire of a team? 

Average more per carry than DeMarco Murray, Melvin gordon, David Johnson, Lagarette Blount, etc (#11 last year)?

Been pretty much the only 49er on offense to be above average?  

Nothing I guess.  

 
tangfoot said:
Personally, I'm placing my bets on the cheap guy (Breida), because the others are too risky for their current prices.


I wouldn't be surprised at all if Breida never holds a regular job in the NFL.  I hope for his sake that I'm wrong, but I don't see NFL caliber talent there.

 
Obviously, a couple of you are invested in Joe Williams.  Full disclosure, I have some stock in Hyde.

Hyde has certainly had his share of injuries, but when healthy, he has done well.

Now, maybe Joe Williams will get a shot at the job, maybe he won't.  Maybe Hyde will end up leaving in free agency after the season, maybe he won't.

...buuuutttt, I really don't think a 24 year-old rookie 4th round pick is going to be the long-term answer even if Hyde ends up gone.

 
Carlos Hyde has handled first-team reps throughout OTAs and minicamp.

Beat writers have been noncommittal on the security of Hyde's starting job, but it's unrealistic to think he would be immediately unseated by fourth-round pick Joe Williams, journeyman Tim Hightower, or hyped UDFA Matt Breida. The Sacramento Bee's Matt Barrows does caution Hyde "will have to fend off" his competitors, but Hyde remains the heavy favorite to start in Week 1. If Hyde indeed keeps the starting position, he'll offer low-end RB1 upside in the final year of his rookie contract.

Source: Sacramento Bee

Jun 14 - 8:37 PM

 
Faust said:
Carlos Hyde has handled first-team reps throughout OTAs and minicamp.

Beat writers have been noncommittal on the security of Hyde's starting job, but it's unrealistic to think he would be immediately unseated by fourth-round pick Joe Williams, journeyman Tim Hightower, or hyped UDFA Matt Breida. The Sacramento Bee's Matt Barrows does caution Hyde "will have to fend off" his competitors, but Hyde remains the heavy favorite to start in Week 1. If Hyde indeed keeps the starting position, he'll offer low-end RB1 upside in the final year of his rookie contract.
So Hyde is still the RB1, and he'll have to "fend off" his competitors.  Oh, you mean like every RB in the league? Gee, thanks.

The Joe Williams hype is just that, hype. It's fluff that gives people something to say in the offseason.  Could he be the starter in 2018 when Hyde probably leaves? Of course, but the odds of him unseating Hyde this year, without an injury, are slim.

 
It's not as black and white as some of you make it. I think Hyde will represent great value in redraft. I'm not viewing Williams as a replacement but what I do view him as is someone who has the athletic prowess to walk into that system, if something were to happen to Hyde one way or the other, and be a top 12 back. If my cost for that is a 2nd/3rd round dynasty pick, it's well worth it. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's not as black and white as some of you make it. I think Hyde will represent great value in redraft. I'm not viewing Williams as a replacement but what I do view him as is someone who has the athletic prowess to walk into that system, if something were to happen to Hyde one way or the other, and be a top 12 back. If my cost for that is a 2nd/3rd round dynasty pick, it's well worth it. 
But he's moving into the early 2nd, like picks 13-16 in some rookie drafts. That's probably a round too high for him. A 3rd is perfectly reasonable.

 
"According to the Sacramento Bee, undrafted rookie RB Matt Breida "had more highlights" than fourth-round pick Joe Williams at spring practices.

Williams' 4.41 long speed has been evident in practices, but Breida's speed is also "apparent," and Breida "was especially adept at catching short passes and turning up field quickly." Pass catching was not a part of Williams' game at Utah. Breida is a name to keep in mind this preseason. Among all running backs eligible for the 2017 draft -- drafted or not -- Breida posted the highest SPARQ score with 4.39 wheels and an otherworldly 42-inch vertical at 5-foot-9, 195."

Seems like there may be some solid talent in that backfield, which could hurt all of their values.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"According to the Sacramento Bee, undrafted rookie RB Matt Breida "had more highlights" than fourth-round pick Joe Williams at spring practices.

Williams' 4.41 long speed has been evident in practices, but Breida's speed is also "apparent," and Breida "was especially adept at catching short passes and turning up field quickly." Pass catching was not a part of Williams' game at Utah. Breida is a name to keep in mind this preseason. Among all running backs eligible for the 2017 draft -- drafted or not -- Breida posted the highest SPARQ score with 4.39 wheels and an otherworldly 42-inch vertical at 5-foot-9, 195."

Seems like there may be some solid talent in that backfield, which could hurt all of their values.
Go back and read the thread on camp reports from last year.  There may be no single piece of more useless information in all of sports than who "looks good" or "made highlights" in camp.  Literally the entire list of guys that looked awesome is just a big long list of guys that had absolutely 0 fantasy impact in actual games.  Most never even got to play.

ETA: Actually I'll do the legwork.  Here's the list of guys in order until I got too tired to pull out the rest

Kenny Lawler
Trevone Boykin
Jared Goff
Blaine Gabbert
Keenan Reynolds
Michael Thomas (sorry, the Rams one)
Josh Docston
Cody Kessler
Mack Brown
Connor Cook
Wendell Smallwood
Leonard Hankerson
Greg Salas
Ka'Deem Carey ("the ONE running back standing out for the Bears this offseason".....whoops)
Jalin Marshall
Terrell Watson
Tajae Sharpe
Stephen Anderson

I don't feel like listing all the rest.  We did eventually get some good (not great) notes about Tyreek Hill and Willie Snead, both of which worked out pretty good, but we're talking 2 guys out of 50 here with the other 48 being completely and utterly useless.

ETA2: Even the notes on Snead were that he was going to take a huge step forward, which he really didn't (basically repeated his rookie season, if anything regressed mildly).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll be waiting for him to drop in my lap again this year and lead me to a big year like last year... he will be very undervalued this year imho

 
I'll be waiting for him to drop in my lap again this year and lead me to a big year like last year... he will be very undervalued this year imho
reminiscent of Gore, towards the end of his run in San Francisco.

discounted guy who produced when healthy.  

 
Rotoworld) CSN Bay Area believes Carlos Hyde will have to compete for the 49ers' starting job. Analysis: Longtime beat writer Matt Maiocco has seen what everybody else has, reasoning Hyde's injury history, contract status and unfamiliarity with new coach Kyle Shanahan's system has him on the defensive. Maiocco also believes it's noteworthy how hard Shanahan went after fourth-rounder Joe Williams in the draft. Maiocco expects a committee to develop even if Hyde is christened "starter." Tim Hightower is in the mix with Hyde and Williams.

ETA: personally i disagree with this but I admittedly own Hyde so maybe my judgement is clouded.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't explain it but I never even considered drafting this guy and now all of a sudden I am feeling bullish.

 
Tool said:
Rotoworld) CSN Bay Area believes Carlos Hyde will have to compete for the 49ers' starting job. Analysis: Longtime beat writer Matt Maiocco has seen what everybody else has, reasoning Hyde's injury history, contract status and unfamiliarity with new coach Kyle Shanahan's system has him on the defensive. Maiocco also believes it's noteworthy how hard Shanahan went after fourth-rounder Joe Williams in the draft. Maiocco expects a committee to develop even if Hyde is christened "starter." Tim Hightower is in the mix with Hyde and Williams.

ETA: personally i disagree with this but I admittedly own Hyde so maybe my judgement is clouded.
And it you cavalierly dismiss that, like so many have in this and the Joe Williams thread, you may live to regret it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And it you cavalierly dismiss that, like so many have in this and the Joe Williams thread, you may live to regret it.
Maybe.  Teams trade up for draft picks all the time and I'm sure people are going after these players hard in a similar manner.  Does that mean they have a greater likelihood of success?  Not sure, just asking the question.

 
Maybe.  Teams trade up for draft picks all the time and I'm sure people are going after these players hard in a similar manner.  Does that mean they have a greater likelihood of success?  Not sure, just asking the question.
No, it doesn't.  

Also, people are acting like the 4th round is the 1st or 2nd round.  Joe Williams could end up being good, that is a possibility.  But it's just as likely that he'll flop or not pass Hyde, who has proven that he can perform on the NFL level.

All this "news" before camp starts is really just reporters' opinions because they have to print something and all they have is that Hyde is learning a new system, and that Shanahan wanted a 4th round RB.  Wait until training camp, that's when the real news will come out because teams will actually be doing things.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top