So?
I wasn't here for that, the only thing I'll say, the worst part of drafting walker in different leagues is I reached on Charbs as insurance. Usually a 3rd rounder and then I was nabbing Charbs in the 7th/8th. So it was a bad opportunity cost since both are healthyI dont know what the concept of people not accepting is that you're referring too. We knew there was a strong 1/1a dynamic entering the season and with KW3 hurt her might have been in the 1a/1b slot.It's really simple and it's amazing how many people just won't accept it.
When Walker operates as a workhorse, he sucks and doesn't break off long runs and gets hurt.
When Walker splits time, he is efficient and spry and makes big dynamic plays.
Hence, they are happy to have Walker splitting time and getting good dynamic Walker on half the carries instead of none of them.
Walker is happy with it because it's better for his next contract for him to split time and look good than it is to be a workhorse and look bad and get injured again, which if it had happened again this year would have been the end of any hope of him ever getting a big 2nd contract.
So everyone is happy. Except fantasy owners who keep banging their heads against the wall and asking the coaches to make the same mistake that they made for two straight years before giving up on it and changing to something that is working.
That's the exact opposite of what people thought this offseason, at least in this thread.
All offseason long it was people constantly saying the feature role is Walker's and "the coaches have made it clear that Walker is the feature back". Over and over and over again.
I know because I said all offseason that a split was likely and got consistently dismissed or even roasted for it. This thread is full of people saying Walker is obviously the guy and the only/primary risk is that he gets hurt again at some point, in which case Charbs makes a good handcuff, but is nothing more.
I dont know what the concept of people not accepting is that you're referring too. We knew there was a strong 1/1a dynamic entering the season and with KW3 hurt her might have been in the 1a/1b slot.It's really simple and it's amazing how many people just won't accept it.
When Walker operates as a workhorse, he sucks and doesn't break off long runs and gets hurt.
When Walker splits time, he is efficient and spry and makes big dynamic plays.
Hence, they are happy to have Walker splitting time and getting good dynamic Walker on half the carries instead of none of them.
Walker is happy with it because it's better for his next contract for him to split time and look good than it is to be a workhorse and look bad and get injured again, which if it had happened again this year would have been the end of any hope of him ever getting a big 2nd contract.
So everyone is happy. Except fantasy owners who keep banging their heads against the wall and asking the coaches to make the same mistake that they made for two straight years before giving up on it and changing to something that is working.
That's the exact opposite of what people thought this offseason, at least in this thread.
All offseason long it was people constantly saying the feature role is Walker's and "the coaches have made it clear that Walker is the feature back". Over and over and over again.
I know because I said all offseason that a split was likely and got consistently dismissed or even roasted for it. This thread is full of people saying Walker is obviously the guy and the only/primary risk is that he gets hurt again at some point, in which case Charbs makes a good handcuff, but is nothing more.
Except he's complained after almost every game this year about them not being able to run the ball effectively, clearly seems frustrated about it.McDonald is perfectly happy right now.
Underdog NFL
Seahawks OC Kubiak on Kenneth Walker III potentially getting more reps:
"That's something that we want to keep getting him more opportunities. He's doing a heck of a job but I don't want to discount Zach (Charbonnet), and I don't want to discount George (Holani)."
One of the more ill-founded rumors I can recall. Would not give it a second thought.Then again, rumors of trying to acquire D. Achane has me spooked.
Well then you really don’t want to get him “more” opportunities. We need straight shooters and not these corny answers.Underdog NFL
Seahawks OC Kubiak on Kenneth Walker III potentially getting more reps:
"That's something that we want to keep getting him more opportunities. He's doing a heck of a job but I don't want to discount Zach (Charbonnet), and I don't want to discount George (Holani)."
Like a parent, the coaches love everyone the same in some instances.Well then you really don’t want to get him “more” opportunities. We need straight shooters and not these corny answers.Underdog NFL
Seahawks OC Kubiak on Kenneth Walker III potentially getting more reps:
"That's something that we want to keep getting him more opportunities. He's doing a heck of a job but I don't want to discount Zach (Charbonnet), and I don't want to discount George (Holani)."
In Walker's 47 games playedIt's really simple and it's amazing how many people just won't accept it.
When Walker operates as a workhorse, he sucks and doesn't break off long runs and gets hurt.
When Walker splits time, he is efficient and spry and makes big dynamic plays.
Hence, they are happy to have Walker splitting time and getting good dynamic Walker on half the carries instead of none of them.
Walker is happy with it because it's better for his next contract for him to split time and look good than it is to be a workhorse and look bad and get injured again, which if it had happened again this year would have been the end of any hope of him ever getting a big 2nd contract.
So everyone is happy. Except fantasy owners who keep banging their heads against the wall and asking the coaches to make the same mistake that they made for two straight years before giving up on it and changing to something that is working.
And in games where Charbs has 16+ carries, he is averaging 4.8 yards per carry - it's only a 3 game sample thoughIn Walker's 47 games playedIt's really simple and it's amazing how many people just won't accept it.
When Walker operates as a workhorse, he sucks and doesn't break off long runs and gets hurt.
When Walker splits time, he is efficient and spry and makes big dynamic plays.
Hence, they are happy to have Walker splitting time and getting good dynamic Walker on half the carries instead of none of them.
Walker is happy with it because it's better for his next contract for him to split time and look good than it is to be a workhorse and look bad and get injured again, which if it had happened again this year would have been the end of any hope of him ever getting a big 2nd contract.
So everyone is happy. Except fantasy owners who keep banging their heads against the wall and asking the coaches to make the same mistake that they made for two straight years before giving up on it and changing to something that is working.
1-5 carries - 6 games = 4.9 yards per carry
6-10 carries - 11 games = 4.4 yards per carry
11-15 carries - 8 games = 4.5 yards per carry
16+ carries - 22 games = 4.1 yards per carry
I know some may say small sample sizes, but that is his entire 4 year NFL career. Can't get any larger sample size.
You can't just give Walker points because Charbs "stole" from him. As you said, he's healthy, on a good team, and the lead back. He's played every game and is averaging 14 touches per game. But Charbs isn't going away without injury, and is averaging 13 touches per game. Even when Charbs missed week 3, Holani took his spot and got 12 touches to Walker's 17. I wouldn't consider that plenty of ceiling, especially when Walker only has 8 catches. In PPR leagues, he is currently RB26. If Charbs were to get injured, I do think Walker's touches with Holani as his running mate will go up a decent amount. Walker is RB24 in touches, and he's not going to be RB12 if that remains. The top 12 PPR RB's are all over 100 touches.Charbs stole about 2 TD's and a handful of yards. 1 of them on Walker for that stupid penalty.
Add 12-15 pts to Walkers numbers and he's RB12-14 ish which is exactly what he is.
He's healthy, on a good team and the lead back. Plenty of ceiling.
You make a great argument to get Walker 5 more carries per game. An increase of 50% over the past couple of games.In Walker's 47 games playedIt's really simple and it's amazing how many people just won't accept it.
When Walker operates as a workhorse, he sucks and doesn't break off long runs and gets hurt.
When Walker splits time, he is efficient and spry and makes big dynamic plays.
Hence, they are happy to have Walker splitting time and getting good dynamic Walker on half the carries instead of none of them.
Walker is happy with it because it's better for his next contract for him to split time and look good than it is to be a workhorse and look bad and get injured again, which if it had happened again this year would have been the end of any hope of him ever getting a big 2nd contract.
So everyone is happy. Except fantasy owners who keep banging their heads against the wall and asking the coaches to make the same mistake that they made for two straight years before giving up on it and changing to something that is working.
1-5 carries - 6 games = 4.9 yards per carry
6-10 carries - 11 games = 4.4 yards per carry
11-15 carries - 8 games = 4.5 yards per carry
16+ carries - 22 games = 4.1 yards per carry
I know some may say small sample sizes, but that is his entire 4 year NFL career. Can't get any larger sample size.
Charbs stole about 2 TD's and a handful of yards. 1 of them on Walker for that stupid penalty.
Add 12-15 pts to Walkers numbers and he's RB12-14 ish which is exactly what he is.
He's healthy, on a good team and the lead back. Plenty of ceiling.
I'd consider taking that. Dowdle is fun now, but Hubbard will come back and then it's another RBBC. I'd rather have the full Seahawks headache than half of two.Who has more value ROS? K. Walker or R. Dowdle?
Was just offered Walker in a deal for Dowdle. Also own Z. Charbs.
Not sure I'm really ready for the true SEA RB headache, but if Walker does emerge down the stretch it would be huge.
The more interesting part of Kubiaks comments IMO was when he went on a spiel about Walker doing well in practice. That was strange to me, it's the kind of comments you usually hear for rookies, unproven players, etc,etc. Not what you typically hear about a 4 year starter.Underdog NFL
Seahawks OC Kubiak on Kenneth Walker III potentially getting more reps:
"That's something that we want to keep getting him more opportunities. He's doing a heck of a job but I don't want to discount Zach (Charbonnet), and I don't want to discount George (Holani)."
Someone has also posted this exact comment 287 times in the past 3 years. To answer your question we have legit internet NFL scouts on these boards. Ha haWe’ve actually got people here who are convinced that they know more about evaluating and using NFL RBs than Kubiak. The lack of self awareness is astounding.
There's also people here that know what a run-on sentence is.We've actually got people here who are convinced an NFL coach has never misevaluated talent or how to use his RB's and have come here to criticize people on a football message board for questioning the decision making. The lack of self awareness is outstanding.
Their's also peeple hear that no how to speel sentance.There's also people here that know what a run-on sentance is.We've actually got people here who are convinced an NFL coach has never misevaluated talent or how to use his RB's and have come here to criticize people on a football message board for questioning the decision making. The lack of self awareness is outstanding.
"touchie"Their's also peeple hear that no how to speel sentance.There's also people here that know what a run-on sentance is.We've actually got people here who are convinced an NFL coach has never misevaluated talent or how to use his RB's and have come here to criticize people on a football message board for questioning the decision making. The lack of self awareness is outstanding.
We've never lost a game, palWe’ve actually got people here who are convinced that they know more about evaluating and using NFL RBs than Kubiak. The lack of self awareness is astounding.
Monday morning QB coupled with fantasy and betting stakes. It was one thing when fans just questioned moves coaches made when they didn't work out. Now we've got people questioning how coaches are succeeding because it didn't help them win their fantasy matchup or prop betsWe’ve actually got people here who are convinced that they know more about evaluating and using NFL RBs than Kubiak. The lack of self awareness is astounding.
I'd consider taking that. Dowdle is fun now, but Hubbard will come back and then it's another RBBC. I'd rather have the full Seahawks headache than half of two.Who has more value ROS? K. Walker or R. Dowdle?
Was just offered Walker in a deal for Dowdle. Also own Z. Charbs.
Not sure I'm really ready for the true SEA RB headache, but if Walker does emerge down the stretch it would be huge.
Agreed, my reply needs tuning.You can't just give Walker points because Charbs "stole" from him. As you said, he's healthy, on a good team, and the lead back. He's played every game and is averaging 14 touches per game. But Charbs isn't going away without injury, and is averaging 13 touches per game. Even when Charbs missed week 3, Holani took his spot and got 12 touches to Walker's 17. I wouldn't consider that plenty of ceiling, especially when Walker only has 8 catches. In PPR leagues, he is currently RB26. If Charbs were to get injured, I do think Walker's touches with Holani as his running mate will go up a decent amount. Walker is RB24 in touches, and he's not going to be RB12 if that remains. The top 12 PPR RB's are all over 100 touches.Charbs stole about 2 TD's and a handful of yards. 1 of them on Walker for that stupid penalty.
Add 12-15 pts to Walkers numbers and he's RB12-14 ish which is exactly what he is.
He's healthy, on a good team and the lead back. Plenty of ceiling.
As long as both Walker and Charbonnet are healthy, I would classify Walker as a decent flex and Charbs as a flex2 type, in a 12-team league. If Charbs goes down, Walker easily moves into decent RB2 status, but I don’t think he moves up to low RB1 status. I just don’t believe the staff wants to give him the volume required to be in the top 12.Agreed, my reply needs tuning.You can't just give Walker points because Charbs "stole" from him. As you said, he's healthy, on a good team, and the lead back. He's played every game and is averaging 14 touches per game. But Charbs isn't going away without injury, and is averaging 13 touches per game. Even when Charbs missed week 3, Holani took his spot and got 12 touches to Walker's 17. I wouldn't consider that plenty of ceiling, especially when Walker only has 8 catches. In PPR leagues, he is currently RB26. If Charbs were to get injured, I do think Walker's touches with Holani as his running mate will go up a decent amount. Walker is RB24 in touches, and he's not going to be RB12 if that remains. The top 12 PPR RB's are all over 100 touches.Charbs stole about 2 TD's and a handful of yards. 1 of them on Walker for that stupid penalty.
Add 12-15 pts to Walkers numbers and he's RB12-14 ish which is exactly what he is.
He's healthy, on a good team and the lead back. Plenty of ceiling.
Walker is doing the heavy lifting but coach likes Charb near the GL probably because on the way K9 did some hard work and Charb's does appear to have that nose on inside the 10 runs.
So he's a sketchy *** RB2 and really a middling-flex depending on your league. Bye week, injuries, etc....he's at least useful so far.
Buuuuttt, well he's healthy, on a good team, the lead back, and has some ceiling. You're starting him in the Kamara/DMo range or so?
Very tough to watch all those good runs for 10-25 yards only to get lifted. You'd think they want to reward him somewhere along the way.
Gb puts Jacobs back in the game as much as they can when they get close and that' gotta be a hella energy boost. If I'm walker I'm asking my agent wtf.
He's my #3 RB, I play WR at Flex. I don't like it.As long as both Walker and Charbonnet are healthy, I would classify Walker as a decent flex and Charbs as a flex2 type, in a 12-team league. If Charbs goes down, Walker easily moves into decent RB2 status, but I don’t think he moves up to low RB1 status. I just don’t believe the staff wants to give him the volume required to be in the top 12.Agreed, my reply needs tuning.You can't just give Walker points because Charbs "stole" from him. As you said, he's healthy, on a good team, and the lead back. He's played every game and is averaging 14 touches per game. But Charbs isn't going away without injury, and is averaging 13 touches per game. Even when Charbs missed week 3, Holani took his spot and got 12 touches to Walker's 17. I wouldn't consider that plenty of ceiling, especially when Walker only has 8 catches. In PPR leagues, he is currently RB26. If Charbs were to get injured, I do think Walker's touches with Holani as his running mate will go up a decent amount. Walker is RB24 in touches, and he's not going to be RB12 if that remains. The top 12 PPR RB's are all over 100 touches.Charbs stole about 2 TD's and a handful of yards. 1 of them on Walker for that stupid penalty.
Add 12-15 pts to Walkers numbers and he's RB12-14 ish which is exactly what he is.
He's healthy, on a good team and the lead back. Plenty of ceiling.
Walker is doing the heavy lifting but coach likes Charb near the GL probably because on the way K9 did some hard work and Charb's does appear to have that nose on inside the 10 runs.
So he's a sketchy *** RB2 and really a middling-flex depending on your league. Bye week, injuries, etc....he's at least useful so far.
Buuuuttt, well he's healthy, on a good team, the lead back, and has some ceiling. You're starting him in the Kamara/DMo range or so?
Very tough to watch all those good runs for 10-25 yards only to get lifted. You'd think they want to reward him somewhere along the way.
Gb puts Jacobs back in the game as much as they can when they get close and that' gotta be a hella energy boost. If I'm walker I'm asking my agent wtf.
I agree he looks a lot better than Charbs. The touch split should favor Walker a decent amount more. It’s like watching CIN pull Chase Brown out for Perine way too much. The only difference is Perine is more of a breather, because he’s not getting touches.He's my #3 RB, I play WR at Flex. I don't like it.As long as both Walker and Charbonnet are healthy, I would classify Walker as a decent flex and Charbs as a flex2 type, in a 12-team league. If Charbs goes down, Walker easily moves into decent RB2 status, but I don’t think he moves up to low RB1 status. I just don’t believe the staff wants to give him the volume required to be in the top 12.Agreed, my reply needs tuning.You can't just give Walker points because Charbs "stole" from him. As you said, he's healthy, on a good team, and the lead back. He's played every game and is averaging 14 touches per game. But Charbs isn't going away without injury, and is averaging 13 touches per game. Even when Charbs missed week 3, Holani took his spot and got 12 touches to Walker's 17. I wouldn't consider that plenty of ceiling, especially when Walker only has 8 catches. In PPR leagues, he is currently RB26. If Charbs were to get injured, I do think Walker's touches with Holani as his running mate will go up a decent amount. Walker is RB24 in touches, and he's not going to be RB12 if that remains. The top 12 PPR RB's are all over 100 touches.Charbs stole about 2 TD's and a handful of yards. 1 of them on Walker for that stupid penalty.
Add 12-15 pts to Walkers numbers and he's RB12-14 ish which is exactly what he is.
He's healthy, on a good team and the lead back. Plenty of ceiling.
Walker is doing the heavy lifting but coach likes Charb near the GL probably because on the way K9 did some hard work and Charb's does appear to have that nose on inside the 10 runs.
So he's a sketchy *** RB2 and really a middling-flex depending on your league. Bye week, injuries, etc....he's at least useful so far.
Buuuuttt, well he's healthy, on a good team, the lead back, and has some ceiling. You're starting him in the Kamara/DMo range or so?
Very tough to watch all those good runs for 10-25 yards only to get lifted. You'd think they want to reward him somewhere along the way.
Gb puts Jacobs back in the game as much as they can when they get close and that' gotta be a hella energy boost. If I'm walker I'm asking my agent wtf.
Never watched him much, got beat by him a few times rather unexpectedly so I drafted him (and Javonte Williams) near each other. What are they afraid of? He looks pretty solid on the field?