What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Match Ups to Exploit/Avoid Week 7 (1 Viewer)

Ministry of Pain

Footballguy
Little late this week...let's jump right into it.

RB that are popping up in the top 10 that I think are overrated this weekend.

Larry Johnson: Maybe the sites are just happy to be able to rank him #1 in their weekly cheatsheets. I understand Oakland has been gashed on their run defense with T Bell getting 80/TD, Henry with 128, Ronnie Brown 134/TD, and then LT just went hypernuts on them last week for about 200/4 TDs…however…those that look at what LJ did last week might want to take into account that he had almost all that yardage on the 1st 15-18 carries in the game…so basically after the defense was worn down he managed 12 more carries for about 10 yds…that’s not very inspiring to me. Owners could get very frustrated on Sunday.

Ronnie Brown: When did New England become a must start against? Marshawn Lynch had the most success of anyone with about 70/TD. The Miami Dolphins traded their WR1, Chambers this week…I don’t like Cleo Lemon and that offense will be worse this week. And NE has a good rush defense. They kept Barber and JJ in check last week. Brown should not be in the top5 this week.

LaMont Jordan: Kansas City gave up 100+ on the ground to the likes of Cedric Benson, ADP, and LT early on but they did a nice job of shutting down Jax and Cinci last week. Plus they have a chance to get a win on Sunday and get themselves to 4-3 on the season…I’m just saying. Jordan did practice fully this week but I think he is a somewhat shaky start right now.

Frank Gore: The Giants have given up 5 rushing TD on the season but they also have not been getting run over wither. Norwood had a big gain the other night but for the most part they have held opposing RB in check. My problem is that Dilfer/Smith are getting nothing done in the passing game, it has an impact on Gore. The Ginats will be keyed in on him and I think Gore on the road will have very average numbers in the Meadowland on Sunday.

Joseph Addai: Jax has been brutal against the run the past few weeks. Addai is coming off an injury, I don’t expect him to tear it up on MNF against the Jags on the road as well.

Players that have an exploit match up and can deliver.

Shaun Alexander: The Rams are dreadful against the run and this game is at home for the Seahawks. I know Shaun has been pretty subpar and I didn’t like what I saw against NO this past week, but the fact is they are limited just a bit in the passing game right now and also in the middle of a tight playoff run with AZ. Both teams have severe injuries that can cripple parts of their offense, however Seattle still has its starting QB and RB…they will win that division almost by default. I like Shaun and crew to get things going this week against the Rams…almost everyone else has.

Brian Leonard: Also should do well this weekend. Seattle allowed Reggie Bush to run all over them, and while Leonard is no Bush, he has some talent and should be able to rack up 100+ yds and a score on Sunday. I expect this game to be fairly high scoring.

Earnest Graham: Detroit has looked really bad at time son defense, they will likely be trying to shut down Garcia as much as possible, and I like Graham to be a sneaky play this weekend. He had a bad game against a great defense last week, the Bucs still managed to eke out the win, and I expect Graham to get a full load again this weekend. I wouldn’t let the acquisition of Michael Bennett worry you. Had the Bucs obtained Mewelde Moore, I would have been much more worried if I were a Graham owner.

Maurice Jones Drew: Taylor has been almost nonexistent this season, and MJD seems to be back on track. I understand he is somewhat limited in touches but this is a huge game, and I expect the Jags to give Indy a real fight on their hands on MNF. I wouldn’t hesitate to insert MJD this weekend.

Thomas Jones: Suddenly looking like a decent option. The Bengals allowed Larry Johnson to look like his old self. You almost have to find room for Thomas Jones this weekend on your roster.

Best of the rest…

Willie Parker: Denver has been allowing the opposition to move the ball on the ground, I always worry though when the game is in Denver. I expect the game to be fairly tight, that should actually bode well for FWP as they will need him in the 4th. Parker is always a threat to explode but he has come up short on several good match ups this season.

Kevin Faulk: Hard to not think he is capable of racking up 100 yards in a laugher in Miami. NE actually can use him and Heath Evans if they need to on Sunday. I expect Faulk to be active in the short passing game but I also think Brady and the air assault will put this game away quickly.

Brian Westbrook: I know Chicago has been bad but it’s never automatic that the starting RB going against them is going to go off. Westy is pretty high on most sites cheatsheets this week. I tend to think people are chasing those numbers of ADP last week and I don’t see Westy hitting those by a long shot.

Willis McGahee: Never has that “IT” game whatever that is. He gets the Bills this weekend, should have no problem getting about 80-100 yds this week. TD have been hard to come by for him. Baltimore kicked 5 FG last week. Some of those drives should have been rushing TD for McGahee.

Clinton Portis: (Muzzled)

Rudi Johnson/Kenny Watson: Whoever is getting the carries should have a pretty solid match up here. However the Cinci rushing game in general has been pretty subpar all year.

Reggie Bush: Can he put another good effort forward? Sure couldn’t close the deal in Seattle as he was bottled up during the last 2-3 drives giving Hasselbeck and crew ample opps to rack yards in that 4th quarter…to the delight of yours truly. Bush should have a great game against the Falcons…don’t let where he is being entered in this report have an impact on whether you start him or not. Green light all the way here.

Kevin Jones: The Bucs will have their hands full with Roy, Calvin, Shaun, and Mike…I don’t think they are game planning for Kevin Jones. The word is that he will get 15-20 carries…I’ll believe it when I see it but there is a likelihood he could be set up for a TD plunge as he had some other weeks with the passing game.

Good RB with difficult situations this weekend

Edge: Don’t like his QB situation none, don’t like him on the road, don’t like him in DC, don’t like the fact the Skins have been playing really tough against just about everything. I would say the Skins, although not flashy are one of the better defenses in the NFL right now. Their secondary sets the tone for the rest of the defense believe it or not. Sean Taylor is a ManChild and can disrupt everything, he is really playing up to his potential.

Adrian Peterson: The reason I don’t like this match up is simple. Dallas is steaming after last week…Crayton and Owens were ready to suit up on Monday. I know they don’t play defense but that front 7 and the secondary just got torn apart by the best Qb in the NFL…now they are going to face about the worst starting Qb in the NFL…Christmas!!! They won’t be gashed the way Chicago was last weekend. ADP will get his touches but I also expect MN to be behind in this game…maybe some garbage time for ADP to pad very average numbers from him this week.

Travis Henry: 2 words…Pittsburgh Defense.

MB III: Forget that he hasn’t produced a TD the past 3 weeks, this is just a bad match up for him and Julius Jones this week. I do expect Dallas to win handily in this game though so MB III might still be able to knock in a short TD form some long gains set up by the passing game.

Bench ‘em

Ahman Green: Can’t trust him in your line up. We’ll take him seriously when he actually can finish a game and isn’t on the injury report…not knocking him as a RB in general but you can’t afford for him to limp off to the sideline during the game and not return.

Cedric Benson: Philly will be all over him on Sunday.

Marshawn Lynch: The kid has run hard all season but Baltimore is a terrible macth up and he should be on the FF pine this weekend.

Jerious Norwood: Great that he had that long run this past week. Not much else happened…I wouldn’t expect him to repeat this week. In fact I expect Warrick Dunn to end up with more carries again this week. If Norwood can start getting 12-15 carries minimum or 15+ touches with receptions then we can start taking him seriously. Otherwise he is simply not a starting RB…how many people really played him last week? A few because of bye weeks but seriously not many.

LenDale White: If Vince Young is out I look for the Titans to be pretty awful on offense. White is an iffy start to begin with but Young out is like Vick out in Atlanta. The offense is geared around Vince.

Finally…

The New York Giants have a very interesting situation now. Brandon Jacobs is the starter but they can give him a breather with Derrick Ward but I am a little hesitant to lean either way. Droughns also had some nice stats at the end of the game on MNF, mostly because of the score and situation. I would not start Droughns at all. You have to go with Jacobs as he is the named starter but I think some weeks that Ward might outshine him. The Niners are not going to win this weekend and I expect the Giants to be able to run the ball either early or the 2nd half to keep the clock moving.

Please post your thoughts for the games…Good Luck this weekend.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From your mouth to God's ear, I hope ...

My opponent has Addai, Brown and Peterson starting against me this week, and I'm countering with MJD, Leonard and Fatdale. I'd probably swap Fatty out for Jacobs, but after seeing him get dinged up a bit again last week, I wouldn't be at all surprised for his carries to be limited even more than normal. As long as Ward and Droughns are producing when they're in, I expect them to increase his workload slowly.

 
Clinton Portis: (muzzled)

What does that mean?
No comment
Well, I'll comment: With Dansby out and the Washington Defense controlling this game, I think Portis is going to go for his best game of the season. Thinking 100+ all purpose and a TD.
You got that right
I dont think you can run on Ariz anymore. Im nto syaing bench him, but temper you expectations
 
Thanks, lots to think about. I've got all sorts of questions for you.

1. So do you ever bench Adrian Peterson? He seems like a "must start" until further notice.

2. Does facing his old team help or hurt McGahee? I'd argue that it's bad for him as the fans will boo and the defense will be fired up to stop him. Even if he's pumped up to prove the fans wrong, I'm not sure that OL can open up the holes. The offense has been putrid.

3. Are we over-rating MJD this week? INDY is coming off a bye. The Jags always play them tough, so they won't take them lightly. I think division games are always hard-fought and low scoring. Sure, MJD gashed INDY twice last year, but that was last year. The INDY run defense has been good this season and if Jax falls behind, they won't be able to run. And, of course, MJD is always boom-or-bust because of the carries.

(Can you tell that I can't decide which 2 to start between AD, McGahee, and MJD?)

 
MOP,as always,a good read. I guess my only bone of contention is with SA. I've believed the last couple games that he could right the ship but I have to admit,I think it's over for him. Struggles w/ the oline,loss of Mack Strong and emergence of Weaver seem to have setup a perfect storm for a bust season for SA. I honestly believed his running style would extend his stud numbers through this season but I'm jumping ship. I have MBIII and would start him before SA just so I won't have to sit there,watching and cringing every time he carries the ball.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
MOP,

As always, I appreciate all of your hard work and insight into weekly games.

Rotoworld is reporting: Brandon Jacobs was listed as "questionable" after being limited in practice for a third straight day on Friday.

There has been almost no indication that Jacobs would miss this week's game, but there now seems to be a slight chance. His official status will probably not be determined until Sunday morning, and owners should have a backup plan just in case. Derrick Ward is also listed as questionable, so there are a number of possibilities Sunday. In Jacobs' favor: Plaxico Burress plays every week listed as questionable. Oct. 19 - 5:38 pm et

I'm not sure how much you can rely on the NYG backfield on a weekly basis to give you solid production.

 
Clinton Portis: (muzzled)

What does that mean?
No comment
Well, I'll comment: With Dansby out and the Washington Defense controlling this game, I think Portis is going to go for his best game of the season. Thinking 100+ all purpose and a TD.
You got that right
I dont think you can run on Ariz anymore. Im nto syaing bench him, but temper you expectations
I think my joke went over everyone's head...I net Redman could figure it out. Best Game= 100/TD...best case scenario...I was agreeing...I see a ceiling that is not real high with Portis right now.

 
Thanks, lots to think about. I've got all sorts of questions for you.1. So do you ever bench Adrian Peterson? He seems like a "must start" until further notice.2. Does facing his old team help or hurt McGahee? I'd argue that it's bad for him as the fans will boo and the defense will be fired up to stop him. Even if he's pumped up to prove the fans wrong, I'm not sure that OL can open up the holes. The offense has been putrid.3. Are we over-rating MJD this week? INDY is coming off a bye. The Jags always play them tough, so they won't take them lightly. I think division games are always hard-fought and low scoring. Sure, MJD gashed INDY twice last year, but that was last year. The INDY run defense has been good this season and if Jax falls behind, they won't be able to run. And, of course, MJD is always boom-or-bust because of the carries.(Can you tell that I can't decide which 2 to start between AD, McGahee, and MJD?)
1. ADP probably is a must start in most leagues but people are chasing points form last week...and I just think Dallas will be wanting to act out some frustration.2. I think Mcgahee will be fine, the setting only makes him want to do better.3. MJD is on a roll, ride the wave.
 
MOP,as always,a good read. I guess my only bone of contention is with SA. I've believed the last couple games that he could right the ship but I have to admit,I think it's over for him. Struggles w/ the oline,loss of Mack Strong and emergence of Weaver seem to have setup a perfect storm for a bust season for SA. I honestly believed his running style would extend his stud numbers through this season but I'm jumping ship. I have MBIII and would start him before SA just so I won't have to sit there,watching and cringing every time he carries the ball.
I like Shaun much better than MB III this week.
 
i get the muzzled part

you are censoring your cussing, just like i do when i watch Portis kill my fantasy team when i start him

 
Thanks, lots to think about. I've got all sorts of questions for you.1. So do you ever bench Adrian Peterson? He seems like a "must start" until further notice.2. Does facing his old team help or hurt McGahee? I'd argue that it's bad for him as the fans will boo and the defense will be fired up to stop him. Even if he's pumped up to prove the fans wrong, I'm not sure that OL can open up the holes. The offense has been putrid.3. Are we over-rating MJD this week? INDY is coming off a bye. The Jags always play them tough, so they won't take them lightly. I think division games are always hard-fought and low scoring. Sure, MJD gashed INDY twice last year, but that was last year. The INDY run defense has been good this season and if Jax falls behind, they won't be able to run. And, of course, MJD is always boom-or-bust because of the carries.(Can you tell that I can't decide which 2 to start between AD, McGahee, and MJD?)
1. ADP probably is a must start in most leagues but people are chasing points form last week...and I just think Dallas will be wanting to act out some frustration.2. I think Mcgahee will be fine, the setting only makes him want to do better.3. MJD is on a roll, ride the wave.
If you ride the wave with MJD, are you riding the tsunami with ADP? In comparison to both, McGahee looks pedestrian. Probably means that people should try to buy low on Willis.
 
Clinton Portis: (muzzled)

What does that mean?
No comment
Well, I'll comment: With Dansby out and the Washington Defense controlling this game, I think Portis is going to go for his best game of the season. Thinking 100+ all purpose and a TD.
You got that right
I dont think you can run on Ariz anymore. Im nto syaing bench him, but temper you expectations
Karlos Dansby = outAdrian Wilson = likely out, or very limited.

Call me on it if I'm wrong, but Portis goes for 100+ and a TD this week, minimally.

 
Clinton Portis: (muzzled)

What does that mean?
No comment
Well, I'll comment: With Dansby out and the Washington Defense controlling this game, I think Portis is going to go for his best game of the season. Thinking 100+ all purpose and a TD.
You got that right
I dont think you can run on Ariz anymore. Im nto syaing bench him, but temper you expectations
Karlos Dansby = outAdrian Wilson = likely out, or very limited.

Call me on it if I'm wrong, but Portis goes for 100+ and a TD this week, minimally.
how many games has it been that Portis ran for 100+ yards? It has been 11 games. It was week four in 2006 against Jacksonville. Portis is 0 for 5 in 2007 for 100+. In 2006, he was 1 for 8 games over 100+. I am not saying Clinton Portis will not eclipse the 100 rushing yard mark, but it has not been easy for him in the recent past.
 
1. ADP probably is a must start in most leagues but people are chasing points form last week...and I just think Dallas will be wanting to act out some frustration.

2. I think Mcgahee will be fine, the setting only makes him want to do better.

3. MJD is on a roll, ride the wave.
:blackdot: Seems a bit inconsistent. Anyway, ADP's lowest yardage output so far is 118 so even though Dallas isn't a great matchup I think you have to keep "riding the wave".

Agree on MJD, though. Nice post, as always :thumbup:

 
ronnie brown is going to get his points vs. NE. Cameron knows how to get him the ball, and he has the talent to produce. the team might be terrible, but cameron has turned RB into LT.

look at LTs receiving stats last year vs this year, and do the same for ronnie.

even down 20 points, the dolphins will get ronnie the ball- via the pass.

which makes him a must start every week, and a top 5 RB

 
i also think portis is not going to produce.

he has not been healthy all year, and lacks the explosiveness he had in years past. if you watched the game last week, you know the redskins o-line is in terrible shape. in addition, moss and randel el are both banged up. theyll start, but they arent 100%. i think if anyone produces ont he ground, its betts- who would be a very good waiver wire pickup at this point.

 
MB II and mr. jonesno comments on Dallas in Minn.???
i would maybe consider MBII a RB2. Would stay away from JonesMinnesota is too good against the run and too poor versus the pass. with such a good passing game, i dont see why the cowboys would waste their time trying to establishing a running game.
 
Like the post and say I have to agree for the most part.

As it stands right now I am starting Graham and Kenny Watson (also have Palmer) so I am covered for almost all Cinci scoring which I hope is high.

People think I am crazy for benching my studs, Brandon Jacobs, Ronnie Brown, Travis Henry, and Mashawn Lynch. But they all either have bad match ups or questionable playing time in Jacobs. May still change my mind but this is what I am thinking right now. I can use Henry at night if Rudi ends up the GTD. Which, as you say may not be a bad decision anyway, given my choices.

I have SJax and no one has picked up Leonard since I dropped him, so I could pick him up again but don't really have a spot for him in my line up.

 
LenDale White: If Vince Young is out I look for the Titans to be pretty awful on offense. White is an iffy start to begin with but Young out is like Vick out in Atlanta. The offense is geared around Vince.
I disagree.. I think White is a great start. with Young out they will have to try and get white going...and there is no chris brown to get in the way this week.,
 
Clinton Portis: (muzzled)

What does that mean?
No comment
Well, I'll comment: With Dansby out and the Washington Defense controlling this game, I think Portis is going to go for his best game of the season. Thinking 100+ all purpose and a TD.
You got that right
I dont think you can run on Ariz anymore. Im nto syaing bench him, but temper you expectations
Karlos Dansby = outAdrian Wilson = likely out, or very limited.

Call me on it if I'm wrong, but Portis goes for 100+ and a TD this week, minimally.
how many games has it been that Portis ran for 100+ yards? It has been 11 games. It was week four in 2006 against Jacksonville. Portis is 0 for 5 in 2007 for 100+. In 2006, he was 1 for 8 games over 100+. I am not saying Clinton Portis will not eclipse the 100 rushing yard mark, but it has not been easy for him in the recent past.
Can I get an Amen?
 
MB II and mr. jonesno comments on Dallas in Minn.???
i would maybe consider MBII a RB2. Would stay away from JonesMinnesota is too good against the run and too poor versus the pass. with such a good passing game, i dont see why the cowboys would waste their time trying to establishing a running game.
I did post thoughts about MB III...MN has the best yds against average on rush defense...not a good match up for MB III however I think he might punch one in with the passing game set up by Romo and crew.
 
Clinton Portis: (muzzled)

What does that mean?
No comment
No offense, but you kinda bring your own article down with something like that. I enjoy reading your stuff, at least put something more thoughtful, like you do with every player.

Keep up the good work.
Hi WE,If you read the rest of the thread I do pretty much express how I feel and JT really sums up Portis. I was accused of being a Skins hater earlier in the week so it was actually an inside joke for Fatness and Redman...it is my post btw so I think I can take some liberties...it was really a joke. You know I will answer later in the thread as people have questions.

Sorry you didn't like my joke but I thouht it was rather funny. Good luck this weekend friend.

 
how many games has it been that Portis ran for 100+ yards? It has been 11 games. It was week four in 2006 against Jacksonville. Portis is 0 for 5 in 2007 for 100+. In 2006, he was 1 for 8 games over 100+. I am not saying Clinton Portis will not eclipse the 100 rushing yard mark, but it has not been easy for him in the recent past.
Can I get an Amen?
As usual - excellent post MOP :) ... and Jeff, your input is always appreciated on my part... but I have to respectfully disagree with you guys on that one...(disclaimer - I own Portis in one dynasty league - but I will do my best to keep the rose glasses away here)...

First of all, I do think that the vast majority of FF league account for receiving yards also... and looking at the yards from scrimmage CP has gone over 90 in 4 of the last 7 games (not that much we might say - but we can't disregard him for not getting some good yardage week-in / week-out)...

Also, in that active 10 game span where Portis has not run for 100yds - he only had 2 games of 20 or more carries.. and lately (all of '07 for that matter) - his carries total are: 17, 17, 14, 18 and 20... I like the trend I see here - we made sure that Betts was out of the picture (6, 7, 8 and 3 carries) - so the RBBC we all were afraid of at the start of the season is out of the picture...

Finally, we can't also disregard the TDs / redzone looks in considering if Portis is a good start this week or not (or for that matter - any week!)... Portis has had 12 rz looks this year (Betts-7, Sellers-4, Cartwright-2)... and CP has scored 7 TDs in his last 9 games - surely not LTlike - but not totals that should make you turn your head on the guy... (I know that this was not part of the discussion earlier - just needed to point it out)

I think that Portis is victim of his early years production in Denver - when everyone thinks a 1700/11 season is not that great ('05 in Wsh)... he was in FF heaven back then - he's still a great young (26) RB... and a good buy-low candidate for that matter... because I really love the trend that I see in the past few weeks (which was probably helped by Gibbs dumb call at the end of the Giants game)...

My 2 cents (sorry - this went overboard - considering you guys were talking about him getting 100yds...)

 
You Da Man brother.

I do however think Clinton has a very good game this week (homer)

22 rushes

125 yards

2 td's

3 catches

25 yards

:no:

 
Clinton Portis: (muzzled)

What does that mean?
No comment
No offense, but you kinda bring your own article down with something like that. I enjoy reading your stuff, at least put something more thoughtful, like you do with every player.

Keep up the good work.
Hi WE,If you read the rest of the thread I do pretty much express how I feel and JT really sums up Portis. I was accused of being a Skins hater earlier in the week so it was actually an inside joke for Fatness and Redman...it is my post btw so I think I can take some liberties...it was really a joke. You know I will answer later in the thread as people have questions.

Sorry you didn't like my joke but I thouht it was rather funny. Good luck this weekend friend.
I couldn't have known it was a joke, and it's not about me liking a joke or not. It just stood out to me in an article where you have a sound analysis for each player you discuss and it was missing for this one particular player, which seemed odd to me, that's all. Of course it's your post and you can do with it whatever you want, it just stood out to me. No biggie.Keep up the good work and good luck to you too. I am a Portis owner btw :no: , not a Skins homer. And no, that's not why I reacted. :unsure:

 
how many games has it been that Portis ran for 100+ yards? It has been 11 games. It was week four in 2006 against Jacksonville. Portis is 0 for 5 in 2007 for 100+. In 2006, he was 1 for 8 games over 100+. I am not saying Clinton Portis will not eclipse the 100 rushing yard mark, but it has not been easy for him in the recent past.
Can I get an Amen?
As usual - excellent post MOP :no: ... and Jeff, your input is always appreciated on my part... but I have to respectfully disagree with you guys on that one...(disclaimer - I own Portis in one dynasty league - but I will do my best to keep the rose glasses away here)...

First of all, I do think that the vast majority of FF league account for receiving yards also... and looking at the yards from scrimmage CP has gone over 90 in 4 of the last 7 games (not that much we might say - but we can't disregard him for not getting some good yardage week-in / week-out)...

Also, in that active 10 game span where Portis has not run for 100yds - he only had 2 games of 20 or more carries.. and lately (all of '07 for that matter) - his carries total are: 17, 17, 14, 18 and 20... I like the trend I see here - we made sure that Betts was out of the picture (6, 7, 8 and 3 carries) - so the RBBC we all were afraid of at the start of the season is out of the picture...

Finally, we can't also disregard the TDs / redzone looks in considering if Portis is a good start this week or not (or for that matter - any week!)... Portis has had 12 rz looks this year (Betts-7, Sellers-4, Cartwright-2)... and CP has scored 7 TDs in his last 9 games - surely not LTlike - but not totals that should make you turn your head on the guy... (I know that this was not part of the discussion earlier - just needed to point it out)

I think that Portis is victim of his early years production in Denver - when everyone thinks a 1700/11 season is not that great ('05 in Wsh)... he was in FF heaven back then - he's still a great young (26) RB... and a good buy-low candidate for that matter... because I really love the trend that I see in the past few weeks (which was probably helped by Gibbs dumb call at the end of the Giants game)...

My 2 cents (sorry - this went overboard - considering you guys were talking about him getting 100yds...)
I also think Portis is a victim of practically missing the entire offseason and preseason action. I don't remember him being so prone to fumble as he's been in the last couple of weeks. He doesn't appear to be in gameshape either, which, again, can be attributed to missing most of the offseason program.
 
Good read MOP. Thanks.

I'm a little biased (Steeler fan) but I'd add Henry to that bench em list. That toker is the one gettin' smoked this week.

 
LenDale White: If Vince Young is out I look for the Titans to be pretty awful on offense. White is an iffy start to begin with but Young out is like Vick out in Atlanta. The offense is geared around Vince.
I disagree.. I think White is a great start. with Young out they will have to try and get white going...and there is no chris brown to get in the way this week.,
:confused: Not to mention he'll get all the goal line action with Young out..

 
MOP- good info again. I have a question, are the RB's in the "expliot match up" a better play than the "best of the rest" Just a little confusing for me plus I'm scraping the bottom of the barrel this week due to LT's bye. Trying to decide between faulk, leonard, or davenport. Pretty sad,huh?

 
"Thomas Jones: Suddenly looking like a decent option. The Bengals allowed Larry Johnson to look like his old self. You almost have to find room for Thomas Jones this weekend on your roster"

Great writeup as usual. I agree "you almost have to find room for TJ this weekend." BUT, when you are riding the "waves" with MJD and ADP on your roster it sure is difficult to jump on this wagon. I really want to, but I think I have to let this wagon go on by!!!

 
ADP is averaging about 20 FP/week. If he's going to get "average" numbers this week, I'll take 20 points from my RB any week! I don't expect him to get 40 again like last week.

 
MoP.. How do you feel about Kenny Watson this week with Rudi Johnson listed as inactive? What kind of numbers can we expect?

 
Shaun Alexander: The Rams are dreadful against the run and this game is at home for the Seahawks. I know Shaun has been pretty subpar and I didn’t like what I saw against NO this past week, but the fact is they are limited just a bit in the passing game right now and also in the middle of a tight playoff run with AZ. Both teams have severe injuries that can cripple parts of their offense, however Seattle still has its starting QB and RB…they will win that division almost by default. I like Shaun and crew to get things going this week against the Rams…almost everyone else has.
I keep seeing comments like the bolded one above. Can someone explain where it comes from? Yes, the Rams haven't won a game, but is it really because of their run D? When I look at the stats below the first thing I notice is that nobody has put a 100 yard game on St. Louis yet. Is anyone expecting Alexander to fare better than these other backs have done? I seriously doubt that will happen. The Seattle running game is is very bad shape.
Code:
All RB against STL in 2007Week	Rsh	RshYD	RshTD	Rec	RecYd	RecTD	FantPtWillis McGahee	6	25	61	1	4	9	0	17.00Edgerrin James	5	26	88	0	1	9	0	10.70Julius Jones	4	13	52	1	1	11	0	13.30Marion Barber III	4	8	50	0	2	22	0	9.20Earnest Graham	3	8	75	2	0	0	0	19.50Michael Pittman	3	7	56	0	3	35	0	12.10Cadillac Williams	3	12	46	1	1	3	0	11.90Frank Gore	2	20	81	2	2	4	0	22.50Maurice Hicks	2	2	10	0	2	21	0	5.10DeShaun Foster	1	17	94	0	1	7	0	11.10DeAngelo Williams	1	15	62	0	1	13	0	8.50
 
how many games has it been that Portis ran for 100+ yards? It has been 11 games. It was week four in 2006 against Jacksonville. Portis is 0 for 5 in 2007 for 100+. In 2006, he was 1 for 8 games over 100+. I am not saying Clinton Portis will not eclipse the 100 rushing yard mark, but it has not been easy for him in the recent past.
Can I get an Amen?
As usual - excellent post MOP :mellow: ... and Jeff, your input is always appreciated on my part... but I have to respectfully disagree with you guys on that one...(disclaimer - I own Portis in one dynasty league - but I will do my best to keep the rose glasses away here)...

First of all, I do think that the vast majority of FF league account for receiving yards also... and looking at the yards from scrimmage CP has gone over 90 in 4 of the last 7 games (not that much we might say - but we can't disregard him for not getting some good yardage week-in / week-out)...

Also, in that active 10 game span where Portis has not run for 100yds - he only had 2 games of 20 or more carries.. and lately (all of '07 for that matter) - his carries total are: 17, 17, 14, 18 and 20... I like the trend I see here - we made sure that Betts was out of the picture (6, 7, 8 and 3 carries) - so the RBBC we all were afraid of at the start of the season is out of the picture...

Finally, we can't also disregard the TDs / redzone looks in considering if Portis is a good start this week or not (or for that matter - any week!)... Portis has had 12 rz looks this year (Betts-7, Sellers-4, Cartwright-2)... and CP has scored 7 TDs in his last 9 games - surely not LTlike - but not totals that should make you turn your head on the guy... (I know that this was not part of the discussion earlier - just needed to point it out)

I think that Portis is victim of his early years production in Denver - when everyone thinks a 1700/11 season is not that great ('05 in Wsh)... he was in FF heaven back then - he's still a great young (26) RB... and a good buy-low candidate for that matter... because I really love the trend that I see in the past few weeks (which was probably helped by Gibbs dumb call at the end of the Giants game)...

My 2 cents (sorry - this went overboard - considering you guys were talking about him getting 100yds...)
It is all good. I like the discussion. I was just responding to those that think that Portis getting 100+ rushing yards is a cinch. When I wantched Portis last week against the Packers, he seemed tentative and did not hit the hole with the force that I am accustomed to seeing from him. He just seems to lack the exclosion he once had. When looking at how many carries it takes/took Portis to get 100+ rushing yards, it is difficult for me to compare this year versus last, etc. When he was in Denver, Portis ran for more yards on less carries than he has in Washington. And, he seems to have lost a step. Through five games, his longest run was for 19 yards. The 2004 season was the last time Clinton Portis broke a run for over 50 yards. I remember him doing that feat fairly regularly in the past. I know the Packers are a strong defense, but Portis had 20 carries last week ... for 64 rushing yards. Yes, he added decent receiving yards, but Portis is not the runner he used to be, imo. Also, is anyone else worried about the fumbles? Portis has fumbled three times in the last two games, losing two.

apologies to MOP for the hijack ...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm goign with Ronnie brown and Willie Parker this week and benching alexander.. although i do think alexander will do better this week i just dont liek his cast. Possibly after Seattles bye week the cast could come off? then i expect alexander to be the same back as last year.

 
MOP- good info again. I have a question, are the RB's in the "expliot match up" a better play than the "best of the rest" Just a little confusing for me plus I'm scraping the bottom of the barrel this week due to LT's bye. Trying to decide between faulk, leonard, or davenport. Pretty sad,huh?
I like Leonard the best out of your choices...Faulk will be OK but I don't think he will go bonkers in that game or anything. leonard could have a nice break out game this weekend.
 
Shaun Alexander: The Rams are dreadful against the run and this game is at home for the Seahawks. I know Shaun has been pretty subpar and I didn’t like what I saw against NO this past week, but the fact is they are limited just a bit in the passing game right now and also in the middle of a tight playoff run with AZ. Both teams have severe injuries that can cripple parts of their offense, however Seattle still has its starting QB and RB…they will win that division almost by default. I like Shaun and crew to get things going this week against the Rams…almost everyone else has.
I keep seeing comments like the bolded one above. Can someone explain where it comes from? Yes, the Rams haven't won a game, but is it really because of their run D? When I look at the stats below the first thing I notice is that nobody has put a 100 yard game on St. Louis yet. Is anyone expecting Alexander to fare better than these other backs have done? I seriously doubt that will happen. The Seattle running game is is very bad shape.
All RB against STL in 2007Week Rsh RshYD RshTD Rec RecYd RecTD FantPtWillis McGahee 6 25 61 1 4 9 0 17.00Edgerrin James 5 26 88 0 1 9 0 10.70Julius Jones 4 13 52 1 1 11 0 13.30Marion Barber III 4 8 50 0 2 22 0 9.20Earnest Graham 3 8 75 2 0 0 0 19.50Michael Pittman 3 7 56 0 3 35 0 12.10Cadillac Williams 3 12 46 1 1 3 0 11.90Frank Gore 2 20 81 2 2 4 0 22.50Maurice Hicks 2 2 10 0 2 21 0 5.10DeShaun Foster 1 17 94 0 1 7 0 11.10DeAngelo Williams 1 15 62 0 1 13 0 8.50
Let's look at those numbers another way...while it is true that no 1 back has racked 100 yds, they are easily at the bottom of the league in rush defense. 4.2 ypc allowed=21st in the NFL

134.5 yds allowed per game=27th in the NFL

9 rushing TD allowed=31st in the NFL

Even if Shaun doesn't get a great average, the likelihood he has 2 TD in this game is fairly high. Factor in that their WR are banged up and you can see that Seattle will be frothing at the mouth to want to come out at home and ram the ball down their throat. Also add in that Bulger and Bruce are supposed to play...they don't want those guys on the field all day.

St Louis is not good against the run, and I don't want to pick on your post because you are asking a credible question however this is the problem I run into with folks that look at stats in a vacuum. I have another beef with people who think a Qb that is hitting 10-12th every week is a good play...that Qb will kill you slowly over the season as every time you face a top5 Qb you are down a minimum of 5-10 points that have to be made up at another position...essentially you are operating from a position of weakness. Needs its own thread really.

Shaun will have a good day on Sunday.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top