JohnnyU
Footballguy
They seem to like White more than Tucker in the recent past, but I suppose that could change. White may be wearing out his welcome.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
RB Sean Tucker, TB (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Faust
- Start date
BLOCKED_PUNT
Footballguy
but isn't White the best pass blocker?
BigTex
Don't mess with Texas
Grahamburn
Footballguy
They’re all cheap and good. Those aren’t the guys that get traded/cut in the NFL.
I know all of you want some movement for your fantasy team(s), but there’s no logical reason for the Bucs to do you any favors.
I know all of you want some movement for your fantasy team(s), but there’s no logical reason for the Bucs to do you any favors.
rockaction
Footballguy
This was silly. Tucker is going nowhere via being cut unless he asks or something goes on behind the scenes. I have no shares of him, so it's not wishful thinking. As others have pointed out, what's the logic of cutting him to save a couple hundred grand and then turn around and use a draft pick to replace him?
No. That would be colossally stupid. Draft picks have monetary value also. You'd have to pay the player you made the pick with and give up the value of a pick. No.
Again, just . . . not really in the realm of reality.
No. That would be colossally stupid. Draft picks have monetary value also. You'd have to pay the player you made the pick with and give up the value of a pick. No.
Again, just . . . not really in the realm of reality.
Last edited:
rockaction
Footballguy
Mr. Irrelevant (the very last pick of the draft) makes almost exactly what Tucker makes a year. He'll make 30,000 fewer dollars than Tucker. So you would hope to replace Tucker with a seventh-round talent that costs you the same against the cap and you also burn a pick that way? There's no logic in that. It gets worse if you assume the Bucs take an RB with their fourth or fifth round pick. Then they net out much worse in terms of the cap. They do not have a sixth-round pick this year.
In short, I spent way too much time on this topic, but I know the parameters of rookie deals for each round now, so there's that.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Late night/early morning spent well.
Perhaps there's a back they like a whole lot better than Tucker. That's possible. But it's highly unlikely they're going to spend a few million more in cap space for the year on a third-string running back when the one they have went off every time he touched the ball this year the game they gave him the rock. Just seems . . . extraordinarily far-fetched. The numbers don't add up and the talents likely don't, either. They could draft a guy to replace Irving as the starter, and in doing so replace Tucker, but other than that, I'm just not seeing how they cut Tucker as a cost-cutting move. Nothing in these scenarios cuts the cost of the RB room other than cutting White, really.
In short, I spent way too much time on this topic, but I know the parameters of rookie deals for each round now, so there's that.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Late night/early morning spent well.
Perhaps there's a back they like a whole lot better than Tucker. That's possible. But it's highly unlikely they're going to spend a few million more in cap space for the year on a third-string running back when the one they have went off every time he touched the ball this year the game they gave him the rock. Just seems . . . extraordinarily far-fetched. The numbers don't add up and the talents likely don't, either. They could draft a guy to replace Irving as the starter, and in doing so replace Tucker, but other than that, I'm just not seeing how they cut Tucker as a cost-cutting move. Nothing in these scenarios cuts the cost of the RB room other than cutting White, really.
EBF
Footballguy
Yes, impressive waste of energy for a situation that seems very concrete. I thought Tucker had a chance to earn a role last season, but Irving came in and looked fantastic. White is a great pass catcher. The situation could not be simpler. Irving is the top back, White will get some part-time work, and Tucker is the cheap insurance policy. There is no urgency for TB to add another RB unless they see something they can't pass up in the draft.
In deep dynasty, Tucker is a hold in case he lands on a new team or gets elevated because of injuries. He's not in that Michael Turner class where you know someone is eventually going to give him a starting role, but he flashed some talent and RB is a spot with high injury turnover. You hope for a situation like Chase Brown or Chuba Hubbard where the opportunity clears up for him somewhere.
Lansdowne
Footballguy
Sean Tucker is technically a restricted free agent in 2026 for what that's worth. As far as his place on the Bucs, or the NFL in general, that's going to depend on if he gets additional opportunities this season to showcase his skills at RB, and how productive he is upon doing so. His teammate Rachaad White is an unrestricted free agent in 2026 and there is still a wide range of outcomes as far as how the backfield behind Bucky Irving will look. If White continues to show his value as the pass-catching RB then perhaps he's retained. If Tucker shows he can do what White does reasonably well or better, then perhaps he's the one that's kept. I don't see all three staying after 2025 but who knows. Tucker is still a long shot to be anything. He is young but has no draft capital and not a big enough sample size of production. And as you alluded to, there will always be fresh new competition at RB entering the league every year, and only so few roster spots available. Whether Tucker remains in Tampa depends on if he can establish enough value to justify keeping him. He's not going anywhere this year because he's a low cost, high upside roster depth piece. If he doesn't produce then he can very easily be replaced. Can't see him going anywhere this year unless another team overpays for him via trade, or if he has a disasterous training camp and is replaced by another RB.
JohnnyU
Footballguy
You're right, my bad. He is a RFA in 2026. The big question is whether another team will make him an offer that the Bucs won't match. My guess is probably no.
Last edited:
Birdie048
Footballguy
It might require 2 injuries to get to shine ... as the team feels Bucky is the real deal.
JohnnyU
Footballguy
It's hard for me to get onboard with a player hoping for injuries to happen to give him more playing time. Unless something else happens, like trades, release, etc, how much interest is really there?
Ministry of Pain
Footballguy
White Year 4 of his rookie deal? Perfect 3rd down RB and will get 30% of the carries?
Bucky Irving is going to get his touches, he proved you cannot keep him on the bench. 250+ touches, 1500/8TD, I do think his production could come off this pace a little but it won't be for lack of touches, the Bucs seem to know what they have with him and also didn't abuse him
My bigger concern is new OC and just being able to replicate anything close to what Duuuu-Vaaaal did last season
It's easy to pencil in Baker for another 40TDs but I wouldn't do that just yet.
That could mean more chances for the RBs to score TDs which actually would give them a slight boost
Depends on who they snag in the 1st and 2nd round or the rumors of a possible Cooper Kupp landing, that would change the dynamics of this offense
Lansdowne
Footballguy
I’m stuck with Sean Tucker in dynasty because with how my luck has gone I don’t trust it not to backfire if I do drop him. He’s my roster clogger. The moment I drop him both Bucky Irving and Rachaad White will slip on banana peels at the same time and Tucker will step in and have a 2000 Broncos Mike Anderson season (another guy who flourished when the two guys ahead of him got hurt).
JohnnyU
Footballguy
I don't believe in playing fantasy with fear.
Lansdowne
Footballguy
As someone who has in recent years cut David Njoku, Nico Collins, Kyren Williams, and Jalen McMillan and then seen them immediately take off, I have good reason to fear my decision making. Tucker was in and out of my roster numerous times the last two seasons, and I had picked him back up a week before his big game in New Orleans. That felt like the universe sending me a warning. Might be misguided thinking though.
Grahamburn
Footballguy
Haven’t read anything about Kupp being an option especially if they’re trading draft capital. I think they’re just going to sign Godwin. Kupp is redundant as an option in Tampa.
They’re going to use the same scheme with Grizzard. Will there be some play calling growing pains? Maybe.
Is Godwin signing and is he full speed? Remember Baker did what he did without Godwin the majority of the year and Mike missing 4 games. Pretty impressive.
In Tucker’s case I have seen White’s name thrown around some as trade bait. He ended the year in the doghouse. I wouldn’t expect that but it’s possible if they wanted to throw him into a deal for Garrett or Hendrickson.
Tucker’s fantasy value could explode very soon if that were to materialize.
MAC_32
Footballguy
Keeping someone like Tucker is not playing with fear. It's committing to the eval knowing the path to an opportunity is more difficult than with others that may be less talented.
JohnnyU
Footballguy
Doesn’t sound like you interpreted my response correctly. Read his post first, then mine.
I too think one should hang on to Tucker for awhile longer, but I’m not afraid to drop someone thinking they could become something. If they do I just chalk it up as a “Oh well, crap happens”. People take risks because roster spot are more important in some leagues than others.
Last edited:
