ManningPalmerBreesBulgerMcNabbLTSjaxLJWesty (ppr)SalexSSmithChadJFitzTOHoltMarvGatesKW2ShockeyGonzoHeap
QBPalmerManningBreesMcNabbVick (was 3rd QB in my league last yr w/ the rushing yds)RBLTLJSJWestbrookAlexanderWRChadSteveMarvinLarry FitzTorry HoltI'd prefer to hear who auction leaguers are targeting, but either way. Just wondering (OK and bored).
No way I'd rank Ronnie Brown that high.RBLTLJSJWestbrookAlexanderI'd prefer to hear who auction leaguers are targeting, but either way. Just wondering (OK and bored).
I can't call you a liar my friend. I'm imagining a world where he can stay healthy for a season. In that scenario, he fits right in under Peyton. Me personally, if I can live with having to use a pick for insurance, I have no problem with him at 2.You guys are too high on McNabb.
If he's healthy, then yes he deserves a high ranking. I just don't think he will be.I can't call you a liar my friend. I'm imagining a world where he can stay healthy for a season. In that scenario, he fits right in under Peyton. Me personally, if I can live with having to use a pick for insurance, I have no problem with him at 2.You guys are too high on McNabb.
curious. Do you put Portis in the same category?If he's healthy, then yes he deserves a high ranking. I just don't think he will be.I can't call you a liar my friend. I'm imagining a world where he can stay healthy for a season. In that scenario, he fits right in under Peyton. Me personally, if I can live with having to use a pick for insurance, I have no problem with him at 2.You guys are too high on McNabb.
How so? Ranked high if healthy? Yes.curious. Do you put Portis in the same category?If he's healthy, then yes he deserves a high ranking. I just don't think he will be.I can't call you a liar my friend. I'm imagining a world where he can stay healthy for a season. In that scenario, he fits right in under Peyton. Me personally, if I can live with having to use a pick for insurance, I have no problem with him at 2.You guys are too high on McNabb.
Man I'd love to see that. Just too many damn picks though. It would'nt be a shock; he got pretty damn near close last year. Seems like, offensively at least, everything's a bit better than last year. Hopes are always high this time of year though.Manning
Brees
Palmer
Kitna
Brady (I don't see him throwing for more than 4000 yards like the 4 players above)
You guys are too high on McNabb.
And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
He has been in the top eight 6 out of 8 years however. I'll take that consistancy all day. Find me another guy that has been that consistent except Marvin Harrison.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
Yet Harrison is not even in your top 5....I went through this debate last year, don't really feel like it again. Bottom line, draft Harrison if consistency is what you are after. He offers it 10 fold over Holt and actually has #1 WR potential.He has been in the top eight 6 out of 8 years however. I'll take that consistancy all day. Find me another guy that has been that consistent except Marvin Harrison.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
I can't disagree with you. Marvin is the ageless wonder and I keep thinking Wayne will take over but Harrison is just great. However back to the Holt arguement just cause one guy tops his #'s doesn't mean you should bash on him.Yet Harrison is not even in your top 5....I went through this debate last year, don't really feel like it again. Bottom line, draft Harrison if consistency is what you are after. He offers it 10 fold over Holt and actually has #1 WR potential.He has been in the top eight 6 out of 8 years however. I'll take that consistancy all day. Find me another guy that has been that consistent except Marvin Harrison.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
I'm not bashing. I just don't see any reason for him to be in the top 3. Year after year we see him not just in the top 3, but #1. It just doesn't make sense. I've got no problem with Holt at 5 or so.I can't disagree with you. Marvin is the ageless wonder and I keep thinking Wayne will take over but Harrison is just great. However back to the Holt arguement just cause one guy tops his #'s doesn't mean you should bash on him.Yet Harrison is not even in your top 5....I went through this debate last year, don't really feel like it again. Bottom line, draft Harrison if consistency is what you are after. He offers it 10 fold over Holt and actually has #1 WR potential.He has been in the top eight 6 out of 8 years however. I'll take that consistancy all day. Find me another guy that has been that consistent except Marvin Harrison.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
this debate again? Marv vs holt ? both will be top 8. PeriodAnd Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
Fantasy finishes over career:Harrison:this debate again? Marv vs holt ? both will be top 8. PeriodAnd Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
Year Value Pos. Rank Overall Rank--------------------------------------------------1996 17 21 541997 7 25 661998 0 31 811999 119 1 72000 115 2 72001 114 1 52002 119 1 62003 83 5 152004 74 5 172005 70 9 182006 92 1 8
Year Value Pos. Rank Overall Rank--------------------------------------------------1999 0 35 862000 90 7 172001 49 8 292002 36 15 442003 138 2 62004 70 7 192005 71 6 152006 63 6 19
Tough call man. You know, I said the same of LJ Smith last year (not saying he's a 'stud'). I personally think it's the nature of the position. Most are going to be inconsistent at times.BigRed said:Of the ones consistently listed, Shockey is my head-scratcher. As inconsistent and unreliable of a "stud" as you can find. Will never be on my team again.
Maybe people are prognosticating a possible suspension for Vick & are unsure of the offenses direction under Petrino?Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
Fixed.Gore + Norv Turner =Andy Dufresne said:You guys are too high on McNabb Gore.
What scoring system are you using? Per fbg's (and their scoring system is fairly standard), Holt finished as the #5 wr last year. If you're checking his stats on a ppg basis then he finished as the wr #8.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
I'd be okay if that was the reason people were dropping Vick in their rankings. I tend to think most people are simply underestimating the value of a scrambling qb but the possible suspension is a concern.Maybe people are prognosticating a possible suspension for Vick & are unsure of the offenses direction under Petrino?Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!
What in the world are you talking about? Here is where I'm getting the stats. I believe FBG uses this same scoring system as profootballreference.What scoring system are you using? Per fbg's (and their scoring system is fairly standard), Holt finished as the #5 wr last year. If you're checking his stats on a ppg basis then he finished as the wr #8. That's quite different from the 16th best wr you have listed in your stats below.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!![]()
I'm with you jurbWhat in the world are you talking about? Here is where I'm getting the stats. I believe FBG uses this same scoring system as profootballreference.What scoring system are you using? Per fbg's (and their scoring system is fairly standard), Holt finished as the #5 wr last year. If you're checking his stats on a ppg basis then he finished as the wr #8. That's quite different from the 16th best wr you have listed in your stats below.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!![]()
The 16th best was a mistype and I've already corrected that error. I fail to see how picking Holt would be a mistake. Prior to last year, picking Tomlinson with the #1 overall pick would have been a mistake. He had never actually finished as the top rb! At a certain point you realize part of what makes a player worthy of spending a top pick is their guaranteed consistency.What in the world are you talking about? Here is where I'm getting the stats. I believe FBG uses this same scoring system as profootballreference.What scoring system are you using? Per fbg's (and their scoring system is fairly standard), Holt finished as the #5 wr last year. If you're checking his stats on a ppg basis then he finished as the wr #8. That's quite different from the 16th best wr you have listed in your stats below.No and he only has 1 top 5 finish in his career.Holt didn't finish as a top 5 wr last year?And Holt will be overrated again.Looks like Vick will be undervalued yet again!![]()
..and most are therefore relatively cheap in price/drafted position. Guess that's what I'm saying, ie Shockey isn't worth the money for those 1 or 2 weeks he blows up.Tough call man. You know, I said the same of LJ Smith last year (not saying he's a 'stud'). I personally think it's the nature of the position. Most are going to be inconsistent at times.BigRed said:Of the ones consistently listed, Shockey is my head-scratcher. As inconsistent and unreliable of a "stud" as you can find. Will never be on my team again.
Fair enough. I'm expecting him to benefit from the loss of Tiki, by getting his fair share of Tiki's 58 receptions. The RBs aren't good receivers, Plaxico is inconsistent, and the youngsters haven't stepped up yet...and most are therefore relatively cheap in price/drafted position. Guess that's what I'm saying, ie Shockey isn't worth the money for those 1 or 2 weeks he blows up.Tough call man. You know, I said the same of LJ Smith last year (not saying he's a 'stud'). I personally think it's the nature of the position. Most are going to be inconsistent at times.BigRed said:Of the ones consistently listed, Shockey is my head-scratcher. As inconsistent and unreliable of a "stud" as you can find. Will never be on my team again.
I'm not so sure. The injury last year seemed a fluke. I think he'll dial back the running some and be OK.If he's healthy, then yes he deserves a high ranking. I just don't think he will be.I can't call you a liar my friend. I'm imagining a world where he can stay healthy for a season. In that scenario, he fits right in under Peyton. Me personally, if I can live with having to use a pick for insurance, I have no problem with him at 2.You guys are too high on McNabb.