This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
You have not made anyone look silly.its not shocking you can't answer to what I posted...just as you could not point out where I have ever stated the Seahawks cheated in week 3.So basically, you like throwing around allegations you can't back up...and when you get called on it...you deflect as you did here.
Another person had already tested positive during the same sampling. There were empty cups already out that were not sealed of which one was used capture the remaining sample. Furthermore, this is the 7th test that needed to be thrown out for this tester in the last 6 months. Obviously, this guy is doing something wrong.I'm not saying it's the most likely scenario (as I suspect your next move is to call out Occam's Razor). But I do find it interesting that in this case people are very willing to choose findings over process--there's a reason why the process exists and it's to eliminate times where findings are incorrect. This is the perfect storm of why the process needs to win.
If you keep going I'm going to have to charge for therapy.
First part of the bolded is based only on the testimony of Sherman after the fact as read in the letter linked earlier from his lawyers.2nd part of it we have heard in here...but there has yet to be anything shown to back this up as far as the tester is concerned.
Id keep doing til you back up anything you have claimed...but, we all know you won't ever do that.
What's my excuse for what? You implied I didn't read your post, yet I directly replied to the end of your second sentence, clearly marking it as read. I don't even realize what excuse I'm making, though based on your last several posts, it'll probably be either non existent or not actually an excuse and you just can't figure out what you're talking about. Excelsior!Thats your excuse...yeah...go with that I guess.I was hoping you'd post something silly, thank you for the morning gift. I could not have written the bolded sentence above without reading the end of your second.... sentence (or whatever it is). Thank you for proving my point for me. When you need someone to throw you a rope to get you out of your ever deepening hole, let me know.So you don't read my entire post right...just that first sentence? Gotcha.Oh, the bolded above was a question? Guess I missed the question mark.
You realize that using just the term drug is more common to the substance abuse usage, and in the context of my statements is clearly the substance abuse usage. Because it was clear in the context of your post that you didn't know what you were talking about. PEDs is used for performance enhancers (that's what the P and E stand for, btw).
You don't need to tell me what the policy is, I know. That's how I knew that you didn't.
The funniest part is that you don't even realize that I'm mocking you about it even further.
Did you ever figure out what "if" means?
Got any more genius level posts to mock?
Because he's still butthurt. He keeps claiming I'm not answering any of his questions but he's the one that started by not seriously answering any of mine. I was going to keep playing with him until he got bored but there's no end in sight. I guess I'm going to let him ride off into the sunset with his hate.
Butthurt....not at all. This does not change anything about the season...I started it? What are you, 12?Btw...still waiting foe you to show where I have called the Hawks cheaters...which was one of your first posts to me.And what question of yours have I not answered?But again...typical of you...make assertions. ..then fail to back them up and run and hide.
I understand that there's enough doubt to lift the suspension, but not enough doubt in my mind to make me think he didn't take adderall. I still say he got lucky and got off on a technicality.
We are all 12, actuallyThis thread is as bad as religion threads in the FFA at this point.
If he was right, Sherman would be suspended.
Yes. What do I win?
Who was the guy from the Redskins that punched him after the game? Trent Williams? He's my new hero.
karma's a #####. I love how Williams took a bottle to the head.
Hero? Yeah, this is why people think the internet is filled with morons--because people say moronic #### like this. You're probably normal in real life, but on the internet you're a ########.
Pretty funny...the guy with the high pitched voice when he found out it was sherman was pretty annoying.
You mean like a guy calling someone a moron and throwing out cusswords?Yeah, seems like you are the one being more of a keyboard cowboy here throwing out stuff on the internet than he was.
Love this kid. Smart, humble, really good at football. Glad he's on the team I root for.
I know skip bayless is terrible, and I'd never spend a minute watching or listening to one of his shows, but I can't fathom anyone thinking Sherman got the better of this. The whole "I'm better at life than you" was shockingly immature. Im glad you enjoy having him on your team, because I certainly wouldn't.Love this kid. Smart, humble, really good at football. Glad he's on the team I root for.
I know skip bayless is terrible, and I'd never spend a minute watching or listening to one of his shows, but I can't fathom anyone thinking Sherman got the better of this. The whole "I'm better at life than you" was shockingly immature. Im glad you enjoy having him on your team, because I certainly wouldn't.Love this kid. Smart, humble, really good at football. Glad he's on the team I root for.
I thought Sherman was supposed to be trash talker. That was the best he's got? He sounded like me in my 9th grade public speaking class.Talk about some of the worst sportsmanship i've ever seenI know skip bayless is terrible, and I'd never spend a minute watching or listening to one of his shows, but I can't fathom anyone thinking Sherman got the better of this. The whole "I'm better at life than you" was shockingly immature. Im glad you enjoy having him on your team, because I certainly wouldn't.Love this kid. Smart, humble, really good at football. Glad he's on the team I root for.
Maybe he hasn't been the same since Silverback slapped the taste out his mouth.
Amen to that. He tried to outdo Skip Bayless at his own game, and it comes across extremely poorly (as does Skip Bayless' schtick, obviously). There's no denying that Sheman is an incredible football player, but this exchange with Bayless only served to make him look like more of a toolbox than Bayless himself.I know skip bayless is terrible, and I'd never spend a minute watching or listening to one of his shows, but I can't fathom anyone thinking Sherman got the better of this. The whole "I'm better at life than you" was shockingly immature. Im glad you enjoy having him on your team, because I certainly wouldn't.Love this kid. Smart, humble, really good at football. Glad he's on the team I root for.
Let's agree that you are wrong.
Talk about some of the worst sportsmanship i've ever seenI know skip bayless is terrible, and I'd never spend a minute watching or listening to one of his shows, but I can't fathom anyone thinking Sherman got the better of this. The whole "I'm better at life than you" was shockingly immature. Im glad you enjoy having him on your team, because I certainly wouldn't.Love this kid. Smart, humble, really good at football. Glad he's on the team I root for.
Maybe he hasn't been the same since Silverback slapped the taste out his mouth.
Sherman was way out of line.Good for Sherman for stooping to Skip Bayless' level? What has this world come to? I don't get your take at all. If Sherman was there to kick off a promotion of charities, don't you take the high road (look Mr. Bayless, I'm here to talk about this promotion of charities, not be attacked by you") which would make Bayless look like an even bigger ######? And Sherman's "sound argument" was that he is an "All-Pro Standford graduate which is something that Skip Bayless will never accomplish" and that he is "better at life than Skip?" That's embarrassing, and on the opposite end of what I'd consider a sound argument because Skip isn't going to attend Stanford nor play professional football, and "I'm better than life at you" is just a moronic thing to say to anyone in any argument. Just a childish exchange by Sherman, which is exactly what Bayless was looking for. Bayless is in general a loser. But Sherman lost this "debate" without much question.
We'll see how good Sherman is at life when he's out of the league in 5 years, broke and forgotten.
Perhaps you missed the part bolded. And I was specific enough that I wasn't condoning it, but appreciating the approach of using logic instead of opinion.
Smart? You're being sarcastic, right? He seriously sounded like he's in middle school.Roided up, immature punk. I've never sided with Bayless before but definitely did this time.'proninja said:Love this kid. Smart, humble, really good at football. Glad he's on the team I root for.'Craig_MiamiFL said:
I understood that you weren't condoning what he said, and believe me, I'm always in favor of someone laying the smack down on that clown Bayless. I just don't think that Sherman came close to accomplishing that. A great majority of what Sherman said wasn't based on any sort of "logic." I'm an All-Pro and you'll never be? Since Bayless isn't a professional football player, that's not logical. It's idiotic. Same goes for being a Stanford grad. Yeah, I'm sure those Stanford grads are real proud of how you're representing their University. Claiming that he was better at life than Bayless will ever be sure wasn't a statement that was logical in nature. Resorting to calling Bayless names....ehhh, I think you get my point. Most of what he said was nowhere near logical. As childish and immature as Bayless typically is, Sherman just came across as looking like an insecure fool from this.'biju said:
Well, you kinda picked all of the stuff that was circumstantial and not part of the real discussion.Bayless was asking Sherman if he thinks he's the best corner in the NFL. Sherman replied with stats and asked for a comparison of stats against other corners. Bayless' argument was simply "you're not in the same league as Revis". Explain to me what is qualitative about Sherman's point and/or what is quantitative about Bayless' point. Again, keep it to the question that started the rants and not the actual rant.
nobody has argued bayless was making a solid quantitative argument, just that Sherman's rant made him seem like a 9 year old, and that Sherman's "logic" would not exactly support a doctoral thesis either.
