What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Romeo and Juliet Laws, The Decline of Childbirth in The West, and Your Personal Thoughts. Anonymous and Free Space Here. (1 Viewer)

rockaction

Footballguy
I'd like this to be free range. I was thinking of this because of the recent Apple commercial. 

How young is too young and what do you guys think are the appropriate age ranges for teenage dating?

How does this jibe with your state's stat law? 

Are you even willing to look it up?

What does that say about our downward pressures on our birth replacement rates, our cultural standards, progressivism's influence, and immigration patterns? 

Free form. Go. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to this article, Australia offers a $5000 baby bonus in the form of a stipend.
The baby bonus in Australia is no longer since 2014.   We still have the family tax benefit which is means tested, prorated to your income and paid out in fortnightly payments.   Before 2014 you used to be able to get both the baby bonus and the family tax benefit.  Basically if your family earns less than $51K per year you get the full payment but between $51K and a maximum income based on the number and ages of your children, you get a pro-rated amount.

https://www.humanservices.gov.au/customer/services/centrelink/family-tax-benefit

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised that everybody didn't jump at the chance to talk about our sub-fertility, its causes, and what we can do about it. 

I'm also surprised that people think there are too many people on the planet, especially in the West. 

According to most demographers and institutes we're going to need more people and soon, otherwise we'll have to rely on mass immigration or cutting social programs.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised that everybody didn't jump at the chance to talk about our sub-fertility, its causes, and what we can do about it. 

I'm also surprised that people think there are too many people on the planet, especially in the West. 

According to most demographers and institutes we're going to need more people and soon, otherwise we'll have to rely on mass immigration or cutting social programs.  
He said too many people on the planet.  Not too many people in America.  Two different statements.  Two different pieces of analysis. 

 
He said too many people on the planet.  Not too many people in America.  Two different statements.  Two different pieces of analysis. 
True, that's why I clarified and said the West. His statement implied that we shouldn't be worried about sub-fertility because we had too many people on the planet already, and much like carbon emissions, it wouldn't be bad if we bore the brunt of it for the world. 

That's how I took it, anyway.  

 
Too many humans in the wrong countries more accurately. The democratic socialist states with low childbirth rates are in trouble long-term. 
Yeah this.  Japan and the USA could use more kids.  Africa and South America not so much.

250 years ago Brazil would take a good look at us doughy white folks kicking around America with our unlimited food and water and would war with us and take us out and steal our resources.  Only technology is preventing that sort of war from happening.  

 
Anybody interested in this should read the fascinating book "Overpopulation in Asia" by the Chinese author We Fookem Yung.
I was sort of trying to avoid intergenerational dating discussions and more focusing on both male/female delays from traditional marriage pairing and childbirth, which is why I went with Romeo and Juliet laws, but that sort of thing is inevitable to discussion, too. 

 
I wonder if older models of marriage in more patriarchal times ensured childbirth and childbearing and that the birth rate decline we see in the West is possibly an overcorrection by both custom and statute and industry. Anecdotally, none of the women I knew well that went to college had a baby before thirty. None. Nada. Not one. Many chose to remain childless and unmarried well into their thirties. 

That's not good, IMO.   

 
I was sort of trying to avoid intergenerational dating discussions and more focusing on both male/female delays from traditional marriage pairing and childbirth, which is why I went with Romeo and Juliet laws, but that sort of thing is inevitable to discussion, too. 
you might want to take another look at his post

 
you might want to take another look at his post
Oh, it's a joke, I know. But "We Fookum Yung" implies a generational aspect to it, IMO. 

You usually don't tell a seventeen year-old sleeping with a sixteen year-old that they're "blanking" young people. You tell them they're both too young, maybe, but his joke implied a patriarchal aspect in Asia of older men and younger women. 

Believe me, I'm not missing the joke nor (I think, and I could be wrong) its implication.  

eta* And stuff like this is why I dryly stated I was surprised people didn't want to talk about fertility and sub-fertility replacement.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's a very good argument that society would function far better if we had like 2 billion people total.  Most of the fundamental tenets of religions (be fruitful and multiply, no birth control) date from a time when infant mortality rates made it so maybe 1/2 your kids made it to adulthood and even then adulthood was a life expectancy of 40.  

Demographics are very different as our demands on work force change.  is it good to have a country with 500 million people that has more and more jobs being replaced by automation, ignoring resource distribution?  

I used to think the China one child policy was insane and evil but I sort of understand the merits to it.  I would be in favor of the American system not allowing additional tax benefits after your second kid.  Not saying we should punish for additional kids but we don't need to incentivize either. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top