What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Romo (1 Viewer)

UW72

Footballguy
Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?

 
Not sure of anyone thinking he's the next Marino but I agreen with you. It's just what the media does with these things. A guy gets hot and they cling to him like there's no one else, especially when he's a Cowboy. The media always wants to find something good they can say about the Cowboys, regardless of what's happening(TO not included).

 
Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
Romo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.
 
AGrred totally , he had that 5 TD game and now he is nt the next Marino but the next Favre .

You know what by end of next season he wont be starting anymore.

 
QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws. He'll come down to earth (probably already has) but he's in a nice O with some weapons. That's more than half of the battle.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
Romo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.
:thumbup:I don't see anywhere in which people are comparing him to Marino, but you have to give Romo credit considering how he's performed. And with so much at stake for the team, it's that much more commendable.
 
QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?
 
He's better than Bledsoe and did provide a spark to that team.

But I do totally agree that he is overrated. The two weeks prior to last week he came back down to Earth again. I don't foresee many more 4 or 5 TD games out of him.

Marion Barber is the second coming of Moe Williams. :yes:

 
I don't foresee many more 4 or 5 TD games out of him.
How many QBs in the league do you see with a lot of 4 and 5 td games coming on? And which ones? i need a winner :yes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously, is this conversation for real?

"Yeh, you know, Romo just isnt going to throw for 350 yards, 5 TDs every week. Maybe once or twice a year, but the rest of the time we're talking 2 and 250. Yawn"

Take a look at that guy in Indianapolis's game to game stats. I dont believe he throws 5 TDs every week.

I think there is a team or two in the NFL that would kill for the 'down to earth' version of Romo.

 
Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
Romo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.
Dude, it was Bledsoe. A statue behind an o-line who couldn't protect him, with a lot of offensive talent. Let's keep it real here - he didn't "unseat" him so much as Bledsoe sucked :unsure: I'll admit he's had a good run, but I think the point is it's a little early to elect him to the HOF. Things change quickly in this league. It wasn't so long ago that Gradkowski looked pretty good.

Oh, and let me end with my obligatory cry of "TO-NY HO-MO".

 
you guys are absolutely nuts

Its not Romo's fault that the media is all over him. The guy is humble as hell and has never said once that he's the next big thing or he's great. Parcells knocks him down every chance he gets. Don't hate on a guy because the talking heads latch onto him. There are probably 25 other teams in the NFL right now wishing they had Tony Romo under center this week

 
Note: Admitted Cowboys homer.

Yes, Romo is that good. Look at his numbers on the season; on a per-game basis.

Att - 31

Comp - 20

Yds - 271

TDs - 1.8

Int - 1.1

That would project to a full season stats of:

Att - 496

Comp - 320

Yds - 4336

TDs - 29

Int - 17

Those numbers would get him in the pro bowl regardless of what team he played.

However, those aren't even Romo's most telling numbers.

8.84 - That's his yards per attempt. Drew "Posiible MVP" Brees is seconf best in the league at an average of 8.2 yards per attempt. The bottom line is the guy can throw the ball downfield. That is a major factor seperating the top-tier QBs (McNabb, palmer, Brady, Brees, Manning...) from the rest of the pack.

72.2 - That's his completion percentage on third downs; a truly amazing stat. The Cowboys have clinched a playoff spot because they have an offense that can move the ball and hasn't been sputtering on third downs; unlike when Bledsoe wa at the helm.

86.8 - Romo's QB rating when behind. Although it's 10 points less than his overall rating, it proves he can handle pressure and doesn't fold or make stupid mistakes when trailing.

I was not a believer in the beginning; I was glad they benched Bledsoe, but had no clue that Romo would be 50% of what he is. We haven't had a QB this good since Aikman.

:eek: to the haters.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?
:owned:
 
QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?
And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.
 
Ah, the smell of Haterism. :yawn:
Yeah really people saying he has had one good game. Man I tell you and saying that the media only wants to report on good things that happen to the them. Get it straight the media will always overdue any news from the Cowboys good or bad cause there are ton of people that love or hate them. Romo is a great story and a possible great future. Fact is you are just a hater and that is that. ROMO'S STATS ________________________ int-tdNYG L 22-36 73.7 14 25 227 9.1 53 2 3 bad game- came in off the bench and just did not have a good feel. bad gameCAR W 35-14 86.6 24 36 270 7.5 28 1 1 d tore Carolina up in the second half GOOD GAMEWAS L 19-22 109.0 24 36 284 7.9 48 0 2 GOOD game in a hostile nfc east rivalry game took them down the field for a game winning fg attempt that was blocked . He did all he could to win that game GOOD GAMEARI W 27-10 126.8 20 29 308 10.6 51 0 2 whata you know another GOOD GAME Crushed this teamIND W 21-14 89.5 19 23 226 9.8 33 1 0 one incompletion in the second half and he made all the throws when he had to. I was there for this game and he made one bad throw all game. No td's but that was the game plan to wear the Colts down and run in the red zone. GOOD GAME TAM W 38-10 148.9 22 29 306 10.6 45 0 5 He could have easily had 6td's but Parcells called the dogs off. GOOD GAME@ NYG W 23-20 58.1 20 34 257 7.6 42 2 0 he made some bad mistakes in this game but when it was on the line ask the Giants about that bomb to Witten for the game clinching fg. BAD GAME He has that extra something that makes him a winner even in bad performances.NOR L 17-42 58.8 16 33 249 7.5 50 2 1 this was a bad game for the whole team. NO kicked ### and this game was not all on Romo as the whole team just got spanked. Hmm I wonder how ROMO will bounce back after such a game in a huge game on the road vs a team needing to win for their playoff lives. BAD GAME@ ATL W 38-28 113.9 22 29 278 9.6 51 1 2 well here is your answer. He came back very good and just won baby GOOD GAMEYEAH they are some terrible stats int td's98.4 183 276 2440 8.8 53 10 16So by my count he had 3 bad games 1 win 2 losses6 good games 5 wins 1 lossAnyway you look at it he has put the COWBOYS back in contention. Before he came into the lineup the Cowboys were on their way to a 6-10 season. Lovem hatem does not matter just don't talk crap when it is obvious he is doing a good job.STUPID #### COWBOY HATERS :wall:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?
And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.
Grad is probably in the best O? Do you mean Gradkowski?Jesus H Christ man, do you even know who Rivers or Leinart play for?
 
Note: Admitted Cowboys homer.Yes, Romo is that good. Look at his numbers on the season; on a per-game basis.Att - 31Comp - 20Yds - 271TDs - 1.8Int - 1.1That would project to a full season stats of:Att - 496Comp - 320Yds - 4336TDs - 29Int - 17Those numbers would get him in the pro bowl regardless of what team he played.However, those aren't even Romo's most telling numbers.8.84 - That's his yards per attempt. Drew "Posiible MVP" Brees is seconf best in the league at an average of 8.2 yards per attempt. The bottom line is the guy can throw the ball downfield. That is a major factor seperating the top-tier QBs (McNabb, palmer, Brady, Brees, Manning...) from the rest of the pack.72.2 - That's his completion percentage on third downs; a truly amazing stat. The Cowboys have clinched a playoff spot because they have an offense that can move the ball and hasn't been sputtering on third downs; unlike when Bledsoe wa at the helm.86.8 - Romo's QB rating when behind. Although it's 10 points less than his overall rating, it proves he can handle pressure and doesn't fold or make stupid mistakes when trailing.I was not a believer in the beginning; I was glad they benched Bledsoe, but had no clue that Romo would be 50% of what he is. We haven't had a QB this good since Aikman. :shrug: to the haters.
Here's his stats from his starts only:
Code:
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+| WK  OPP  |  CMP  ATT   PYD  TD  INT |  RSH	YD  TD |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+|  8  car  |   24   36   270   1   1  |	4	18   0 ||  9  was  |   24   36   284   2   0  |	1	 1   0 || 10  ari  |   20   29   308   2   0  |	2	 7   0 || 11  ind  |   19   23   226   0   1  |	5	 3   0 || 12  tam  |   22   29   306   5   0  |	3	-4   0 || 13  nyg  |   20   34   257   0   2  |	1	10   0 || 14  nor  |   16   33   249   1   2  |	4	 1   0 || 15  atl  |   22   29   278   2   1  |	3	-1   0 |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+|  TOTAL   |  167  249  2187  13   7  |   23	35   0 |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
Spread across 16 games that comes to 334/498 4374 26/14.Whether you're talking statistically or in terms of his "real life" effect upon his team, Romo's been excellent. I do think it's fair to say, however, that he will likely perform worse than his current "rate" if you will across 16 starts next season. He has probably benefitted from the fact that much of the film that the Cowboys' opponents have became outdated the moment that they switched from Bledsoe to him midseason. An entire offseason of study by opposing defensive coaches will rectify that, a view that's reinforced by noting that his last three starts are far inferior to his first five. He'll still be good, but he won't be "334/498 4374 26/14" good.
 
redman said:
I do think it's fair to say, however, that he will likely perform worse than his current "rate" if you will across 16 starts next season. He has probably benefitted from the fact that much of the film that the Cowboys' opponents have became outdated the moment that they switched from Bledsoe to him midseason. An entire offseason of study by opposing defensive coaches will rectify that, a view that's reinforced by noting that his last three starts are far inferior to his first five. He'll still be good, but he won't be "334/498 4374 26/14" good.
Hard to say. It didn't happen to Kurt Warner. After a full offseason to prepare to be the Cowboys' starting QB, maybe Romo gets better?
 
Limp Ditka said:
Slider said:
mbuehner said:
QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?
And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.
Grad is probably in the best O? Do you mean Gradkowski?Jesus H Christ man, do you even know who Rivers or Leinart play for?
Jesus H Christ man yeah, Grad plays in a WCO that produced guys like Favre, Montana and Young. Gruden is known in some places to be very good with QB's in his O. Ever hear of Rich Gannon? And yes, I am also fortunate enough to know where Rivers and Leinhart play. :shock: They have great players with them but I'm not so sure the SD O is favorable to a QB. Maybe having LT and Gates helps but I was talking O's.How many TD's they have with the WR's again? Jesus H Christ are you 12?
 
Limp Ditka said:
Slider said:
mbuehner said:
QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?
And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.
Grad is probably in the best O? Do you mean Gradkowski?Jesus H Christ man, do you even know who Rivers or Leinart play for?
Jesus H Christ man yeah, Grad plays in a WCO that produced guys like Favre, Montana and Young. Gruden is known in some places to be very good with QB's in his O. Ever hear of Rich Gannon? And yes, I am also fortunate enough to know where Rivers and Leinhart play. :deadhorse: They have great players with them but I'm not so sure the SD O is favorable to a QB. Maybe having LT and Gates helps but I was talking O's.How many TD's they have with the WR's again? Jesus H Christ are you 12?
The best O and the best offensive system are two entirely differnent things.And if I'm not mistaken, the SD O just produced an Pro Bowl QB. I'd say its worked rather well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds like a lot of Romo envy. He is hitting Jessica Simpson and QBing America's team into the playoffs. Deal with it.

 
I've said it before (before he ever played a regular season NFL game in fact) and I'll say it again - he looks like a player to me. I think he'll be a good one from here on out. Maybe a little over hyped right now, but not outrageously so.

 
Let me start by saying I am greatful that Romo is who he is. I thought my season was over when McNabb went down but I was lucky to grab Romo the week he was annouced the starter. He saved my season and I am in the super bowl becuase of him. So to me, he is GREAT!!!

 
redman said:
I do think it's fair to say, however, that he will likely perform worse than his current "rate" if you will across 16 starts next season. He has probably benefitted from the fact that much of the film that the Cowboys' opponents have became outdated the moment that they switched from Bledsoe to him midseason. An entire offseason of study by opposing defensive coaches will rectify that, a view that's reinforced by noting that his last three starts are far inferior to his first five.

He'll still be good, but he won't be "334/498 4374 26/14" good.
Hard to say. It didn't happen to Kurt Warner. After a full offseason to prepare to be the Cowboys' starting QB, maybe Romo gets better?
Kurt Warner was also in one of the great (and certainly the most explosive) offenses of all time. The Cowboys are good on offense, but not that good. I also think that Warner circa '99-'01 is better than Romo is now, and I say that with a lot of respect for Romo (who I've compared to Rich Gannon - no slouch in his own right). Romo's already a four-year veteran, so another offeseason for him means less than it does to a QB who is newer to the league. I just look at those numbers projected to 16 games and I don't see it, especially the yardage numbers (and especially for a QB playing for Parcells). Just for comparison's sake, take a look at Rich Gannon's MVP year of 2002 (and the rest of his career, for that matter):

Code:
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+				 |			  Passing				  |	 Rushing	 |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| Year  TM |   G |  Comp   Att   PCT	YD   Y/A  TD INT |  Att  Yards  TD |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| 1987 min |   5 |	 2	 6  33.3	18   3.0   0   1 |	 0	 0   0 || 1988 min |   3 |	 7	15  46.7	90   6.0   0   0 |	 4	29   0 || 1990 min |  14 |   182   349  52.1  2278   6.5  16  16 |	52   268   1 || 1991 min |  15 |   211   354  59.6  2166   6.1  12   6 |	43   236   2 || 1992 min |  12 |   159   279  57.0  1905   6.8  12  13 |	45   187   0 || 1993 was |   8 |	74   125  59.2   704   5.6   3   7 |	21	88   1 || 1995 kan |   2 |	 7	11  63.6	57   5.2   0   0 |	 8	25   1 || 1996 kan |   4 |	54	90  60.0   491   5.5   6   1 |	12	81   0 || 1997 kan |   9 |	98   175  56.0  1144   6.5   7   4 |	33   109   2 || 1998 kan |  12 |   206   354  58.2  2305   6.5  10   6 |	43   173   3 || 1999 oak |  16 |   304   515  59.0  3840   7.5  24  14 |	46   298   2 || 2000 oak |  16 |   284   473  60.0  3430   7.3  28  11 |	89   529   4 || 2001 oak |  16 |   361   549  65.8  3828   7.0  27   9 |	63   231   2 || 2002 oak |  16 |   418   618  67.6  4689   7.6  26  10 |	50   156   3 || 2003 oak |   7 |   125   225  55.6  1274   5.7   6   4 |	 6	18   0 || 2004 oak |   3 |	41	68  60.3   524   7.7   3   2 |	 5	26   0 |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+|  TOTAL   | 158 |  2533  4206  60.2 28743   6.8 180 104 |   520  2454  21 |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
Those just aren't numbers that you reach all that often.
 
Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
Romo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.
:sadbanana:
 
Kurt Warner was also in one of the great (and certainly the most explosive) offenses of all time. The Cowboys are good on offense, but not that good. I also think that Warner circa '99-'01 is better than Romo is now, and I say that with a lot of respect for Romo (who I've compared to Rich Gannon - no slouch in his own right). Romo's already a four-year veteran, so another offeseason for him means less than it does to a QB who is newer to the league.
Well, I also remember the 1999 Rams never got an ounce of credit for what they did until they won the super bowl. The mantra that entire year was that they had a soft schedule and would never make it. They didn't get credit for being an explosive offense until the following season.These Cowboys are going to score about 450 points, which is definitely explosive. It ranks up there among the most prolific offenses we've seen in that regard.

 
Kurt Warner was also in one of the great (and certainly the most explosive) offenses of all time. The Cowboys are good on offense, but not that good. I also think that Warner circa '99-'01 is better than Romo is now, and I say that with a lot of respect for Romo (who I've compared to Rich Gannon - no slouch in his own right). Romo's already a four-year veteran, so another offeseason for him means less than it does to a QB who is newer to the league.
Well, I also remember the 1999 Rams never got an ounce of credit for what they did until they won the super bowl. The mantra that entire year was that they had a soft schedule and would never make it. They didn't get credit for being an explosive offense until the following season.These Cowboys are going to score about 450 points, which is definitely explosive. It ranks up there among the most prolific offenses we've seen in that regard.
Warner averaged 2.3 TD's and 293 yards per game from '99-'01. Those are all-time great passing numbers over a three-year stretch. Just so we're clear here, I'm not down on Romo - I grabbed him late in the preseason in dynasty, and am happy as can be that I got him.

I just think that he's going to level off and become a consistently good QB, which is a tad more restrained than some of the hyperbole ("next Marino?") stuff that we see thrown around. If his team stays substantially the same during this offseason, I could easily see him throwing for 3500+ yards and 24 TD's or so. Those are Pro Bowl caliber numbers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top