Romo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
I hate the Cowboys and even I believe this is true.This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.
Romo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
AGrred totally , he had that 5 TD game and now he is nt the next Marino but the next Favre .
You know what by end of next season he wont be starting anymore.
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
How many QBs in the league do you see with a lot of 4 and 5 td games coming on? And which ones? i need a winnerI don't foresee many more 4 or 5 TD games out of him.
Dude, it was Bledsoe. A statue behind an o-line who couldn't protect him, with a lot of offensive talent. Let's keep it real here - he didn't "unseat" him so much as Bledsoe suckedRomo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
Yeah really people saying he has had one good game. Man I tell you and saying that the media only wants to report on good things that happen to the them. Get it straight the media will always overdue any news from the Cowboys good or bad cause there are ton of people that love or hate them. Romo is a great story and a possible great future. Fact is you are just a hater and that is that. ROMO'S STATS ________________________ int-tdNYG L 22-36 73.7 14 25 227 9.1 53 2 3 bad game- came in off the bench and just did not have a good feel. bad gameCAR W 35-14 86.6 24 36 270 7.5 28 1 1 d tore Carolina up in the second half GOOD GAMEWAS L 19-22 109.0 24 36 284 7.9 48 0 2 GOOD game in a hostile nfc east rivalry game took them down the field for a game winning fg attempt that was blocked . He did all he could to win that game GOOD GAMEARI W 27-10 126.8 20 29 308 10.6 51 0 2 whata you know another GOOD GAME Crushed this teamIND W 21-14 89.5 19 23 226 9.8 33 1 0 one incompletion in the second half and he made all the throws when he had to. I was there for this game and he made one bad throw all game. No td's but that was the game plan to wear the Colts down and run in the red zone. GOOD GAME TAM W 38-10 148.9 22 29 306 10.6 45 0 5 He could have easily had 6td's but Parcells called the dogs off. GOOD GAME@ NYG W 23-20 58.1 20 34 257 7.6 42 2 0 he made some bad mistakes in this game but when it was on the line ask the Giants about that bomb to Witten for the game clinching fg. BAD GAME He has that extra something that makes him a winner even in bad performances.NOR L 17-42 58.8 16 33 249 7.5 50 2 1 this was a bad game for the whole team. NO kicked ### and this game was not all on Romo as the whole team just got spanked. Hmm I wonder how ROMO will bounce back after such a game in a huge game on the road vs a team needing to win for their playoff lives. BAD GAME@ ATL W 38-28 113.9 22 29 278 9.6 51 1 2 well here is your answer. He came back very good and just won baby GOOD GAMEYEAH they are some terrible stats int td's98.4 183 276 2440 8.8 53 10 16So by my count he had 3 bad games 1 win 2 losses6 good games 5 wins 1 lossAnyway you look at it he has put the COWBOYS back in contention. Before he came into the lineup the Cowboys were on their way to a 6-10 season. Lovem hatem does not matter just don't talk crap when it is obvious he is doing a good job.STUPID #### COWBOY HATERSAh, the smell of Haterism.![]()
Hey if he can win a Super Bowl I would not mindMaybe he's the next Ben Roethlisberger.
Grad is probably in the best O? Do you mean Gradkowski?Jesus H Christ man, do you even know who Rivers or Leinart play for?And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
Here's his stats from his starts only:Note: Admitted Cowboys homer.Yes, Romo is that good. Look at his numbers on the season; on a per-game basis.Att - 31Comp - 20Yds - 271TDs - 1.8Int - 1.1That would project to a full season stats of:Att - 496Comp - 320Yds - 4336TDs - 29Int - 17Those numbers would get him in the pro bowl regardless of what team he played.However, those aren't even Romo's most telling numbers.8.84 - That's his yards per attempt. Drew "Posiible MVP" Brees is seconf best in the league at an average of 8.2 yards per attempt. The bottom line is the guy can throw the ball downfield. That is a major factor seperating the top-tier QBs (McNabb, palmer, Brady, Brees, Manning...) from the rest of the pack.72.2 - That's his completion percentage on third downs; a truly amazing stat. The Cowboys have clinched a playoff spot because they have an offense that can move the ball and hasn't been sputtering on third downs; unlike when Bledsoe wa at the helm.86.8 - Romo's QB rating when behind. Although it's 10 points less than his overall rating, it proves he can handle pressure and doesn't fold or make stupid mistakes when trailing.I was not a believer in the beginning; I was glad they benched Bledsoe, but had no clue that Romo would be 50% of what he is. We haven't had a QB this good since Aikman.to the haters.
+----------+--------------------------+----------------+| WK OPP | CMP ATT PYD TD INT | RSH YD TD |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+| 8 car | 24 36 270 1 1 | 4 18 0 || 9 was | 24 36 284 2 0 | 1 1 0 || 10 ari | 20 29 308 2 0 | 2 7 0 || 11 ind | 19 23 226 0 1 | 5 3 0 || 12 tam | 22 29 306 5 0 | 3 -4 0 || 13 nyg | 20 34 257 0 2 | 1 10 0 || 14 nor | 16 33 249 1 2 | 4 1 0 || 15 atl | 22 29 278 2 1 | 3 -1 0 |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+| TOTAL | 167 249 2187 13 7 | 23 35 0 |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+
Hard to say. It didn't happen to Kurt Warner. After a full offseason to prepare to be the Cowboys' starting QB, maybe Romo gets better?redman said:I do think it's fair to say, however, that he will likely perform worse than his current "rate" if you will across 16 starts next season. He has probably benefitted from the fact that much of the film that the Cowboys' opponents have became outdated the moment that they switched from Bledsoe to him midseason. An entire offseason of study by opposing defensive coaches will rectify that, a view that's reinforced by noting that his last three starts are far inferior to his first five. He'll still be good, but he won't be "334/498 4374 26/14" good.
Jesus H Christ man yeah, Grad plays in a WCO that produced guys like Favre, Montana and Young. Gruden is known in some places to be very good with QB's in his O. Ever hear of Rich Gannon? And yes, I am also fortunate enough to know where Rivers and Leinhart play.Limp Ditka said:Grad is probably in the best O? Do you mean Gradkowski?Jesus H Christ man, do you even know who Rivers or Leinart play for?Slider said:And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.mbuehner said:They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.
No, the Tom Brady story in 2001 was the most fascinating QB story since Kurt Warner.This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.
The best O and the best offensive system are two entirely differnent things.And if I'm not mistaken, the SD O just produced an Pro Bowl QB. I'd say its worked rather well.Jesus H Christ man yeah, Grad plays in a WCO that produced guys like Favre, Montana and Young. Gruden is known in some places to be very good with QB's in his O. Ever hear of Rich Gannon? And yes, I am also fortunate enough to know where Rivers and Leinhart play.Limp Ditka said:Grad is probably in the best O? Do you mean Gradkowski?Jesus H Christ man, do you even know who Rivers or Leinart play for?Slider said:And you can see Grad is probably in the best O. Romo sat for a lot longer than who you're comparing him to. And yes, until a team can get some tape the QB has an advantage. You see the team that got Romo the best was NO who's HC coached him and knew his flaws.mbuehner said:They are?First 5 games started:Andrew Walter: 58/116 735y 3TD 6INT 57.2Bruce Gradkowski: 96/180 837y 6TD 1INT 74.7 Matt Leinart: 63/182 1061y 5TD 6INT 50.6 Vince Young: 59/125 629y 4TD 6INT 53.0 Jason Campbell: 76/150 917y 7TD 5INT 71.4 Phil Rivers: 99/144 1064y 7TD 2INT 100.6 Tony Romo: 125/180 1394y 10TD 2INT 106.1Guess which 2 are going to the Pro Bowl?QB's are usually good their first 5 or 6 until teams get some tape and can pick out their flaws.They have great players with them but I'm not so sure the SD O is favorable to a QB. Maybe having LT and Gates helps but I was talking O's.How many TD's they have with the WR's again? Jesus H Christ are you 12?
What SD QB was an All-Pro? You know that making the Pro Bowl and being an All-Pro are two different things, right?And if I'm not mistaken, the SD O just produced an All Pro QB. I'd say its worked rather well.
Yes, you are right. Pro Bowl is what I meantWhat SD QB was an All-Pro? You know that making the Pro Bowl and being an All-Pro are two different things, right?And if I'm not mistaken, the SD O just produced an All Pro QB. I'd say its worked rather well.
Kurt Warner was also in one of the great (and certainly the most explosive) offenses of all time. The Cowboys are good on offense, but not that good. I also think that Warner circa '99-'01 is better than Romo is now, and I say that with a lot of respect for Romo (who I've compared to Rich Gannon - no slouch in his own right). Romo's already a four-year veteran, so another offeseason for him means less than it does to a QB who is newer to the league. I just look at those numbers projected to 16 games and I don't see it, especially the yardage numbers (and especially for a QB playing for Parcells). Just for comparison's sake, take a look at Rich Gannon's MVP year of 2002 (and the rest of his career, for that matter):Hard to say. It didn't happen to Kurt Warner. After a full offseason to prepare to be the Cowboys' starting QB, maybe Romo gets better?redman said:I do think it's fair to say, however, that he will likely perform worse than his current "rate" if you will across 16 starts next season. He has probably benefitted from the fact that much of the film that the Cowboys' opponents have became outdated the moment that they switched from Bledsoe to him midseason. An entire offseason of study by opposing defensive coaches will rectify that, a view that's reinforced by noting that his last three starts are far inferior to his first five.
He'll still be good, but he won't be "334/498 4374 26/14" good.
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+ | Passing | Rushing |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| 1987 min | 5 | 2 6 33.3 18 3.0 0 1 | 0 0 0 || 1988 min | 3 | 7 15 46.7 90 6.0 0 0 | 4 29 0 || 1990 min | 14 | 182 349 52.1 2278 6.5 16 16 | 52 268 1 || 1991 min | 15 | 211 354 59.6 2166 6.1 12 6 | 43 236 2 || 1992 min | 12 | 159 279 57.0 1905 6.8 12 13 | 45 187 0 || 1993 was | 8 | 74 125 59.2 704 5.6 3 7 | 21 88 1 || 1995 kan | 2 | 7 11 63.6 57 5.2 0 0 | 8 25 1 || 1996 kan | 4 | 54 90 60.0 491 5.5 6 1 | 12 81 0 || 1997 kan | 9 | 98 175 56.0 1144 6.5 7 4 | 33 109 2 || 1998 kan | 12 | 206 354 58.2 2305 6.5 10 6 | 43 173 3 || 1999 oak | 16 | 304 515 59.0 3840 7.5 24 14 | 46 298 2 || 2000 oak | 16 | 284 473 60.0 3430 7.3 28 11 | 89 529 4 || 2001 oak | 16 | 361 549 65.8 3828 7.0 27 9 | 63 231 2 || 2002 oak | 16 | 418 618 67.6 4689 7.6 26 10 | 50 156 3 || 2003 oak | 7 | 125 225 55.6 1274 5.7 6 4 | 6 18 0 || 2004 oak | 3 | 41 68 60.3 524 7.7 3 2 | 5 26 0 |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| TOTAL | 158 | 2533 4206 60.2 28743 6.8 180 104 | 520 2454 21 |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
Romo is leading the NFL in completion percentage (66.3), yards per attempt (8.8) and QB rating (98.4). I'm not sure what your standard is but by mine, he's had a lot more than one outstanding game.Next Marino? No. But Tony Romo entered the season as an unheralded nobody from Eastern Illinois who had never thrown an NFL pass. He has now unseated a veteran with a long track record to become the NFL's best passer statistically, and his struggling team is now playoff-bound. This is the most fascinating QB story in the league since Kurt Warner, and it deserves all the attention it's getting.Romo had one outstanding game, some medicore games and three horrible games, why the heck is everyone thinking he is the next Dan Marino?
Well, I also remember the 1999 Rams never got an ounce of credit for what they did until they won the super bowl. The mantra that entire year was that they had a soft schedule and would never make it. They didn't get credit for being an explosive offense until the following season.These Cowboys are going to score about 450 points, which is definitely explosive. It ranks up there among the most prolific offenses we've seen in that regard.Kurt Warner was also in one of the great (and certainly the most explosive) offenses of all time. The Cowboys are good on offense, but not that good. I also think that Warner circa '99-'01 is better than Romo is now, and I say that with a lot of respect for Romo (who I've compared to Rich Gannon - no slouch in his own right). Romo's already a four-year veteran, so another offeseason for him means less than it does to a QB who is newer to the league.
Warner averaged 2.3 TD's and 293 yards per game from '99-'01. Those are all-time great passing numbers over a three-year stretch. Just so we're clear here, I'm not down on Romo - I grabbed him late in the preseason in dynasty, and am happy as can be that I got him.Well, I also remember the 1999 Rams never got an ounce of credit for what they did until they won the super bowl. The mantra that entire year was that they had a soft schedule and would never make it. They didn't get credit for being an explosive offense until the following season.These Cowboys are going to score about 450 points, which is definitely explosive. It ranks up there among the most prolific offenses we've seen in that regard.Kurt Warner was also in one of the great (and certainly the most explosive) offenses of all time. The Cowboys are good on offense, but not that good. I also think that Warner circa '99-'01 is better than Romo is now, and I say that with a lot of respect for Romo (who I've compared to Rich Gannon - no slouch in his own right). Romo's already a four-year veteran, so another offeseason for him means less than it does to a QB who is newer to the league.