Rookie WR's in a dynasty format (2 Viewers)

[PR Sparty]

All of them were overlooked which means I can grab someone for $1 and sign them for up to 5 years ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5).

Does Hardy have the most upside?

 

[Nathan R. Jessep]

I like Hardy best for the long haul, and he might even make some plays this year for you. I also think Early Doucet might make some waves down the road.

 

[maxwelledison]

Eddie Royal is probably a good pick at that price. Denver loves him from everything I hear.

 

[Chunky Soup]

Royal + DeJax

 

[zamboni]

Granted, it was pre-season, but I%d still keep an eye on Josh Morgan. He seems to have some skills and already opened Martz%s eyes. Plus, it%s not like he has major WR obstacles ahead of him, and is already being considered to possibly start over Bryant Johnson.

 

[Illegal Pants Downfield]

All of them were overlooked which means I can grab someone for $1 and sign them for up to 5 years ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5). Does Hardy have the most upside?

I know the WR class was weak this year, but what kind of respectable dynasty format has --zero-- WRs drafted?

 

[Topes]

All of them were overlooked which means I can grab someone for $1 and sign them for up to 5 years ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5). Does Hardy have the most upside?

I know the WR class was weak this year, but what kind of respectable dynasty format has --zero-- WRs drafted?

My thoughts exactly. My presumption is that it's a keeper league, rather than a dynasty league.To my mind, if a league doen't allow at least 12 players to be kept year to year, it ain't dynasty.Others' definitions vary.

 

[Scooby1974]

Royal and DeSean have actual QB's throwing to them. Hardy and Morgan have average to below average QB's. I'd give the nod to Royal, DeSean, and then to Hardy.

Size wise...Hardy

 

[Restricted]

All of them were overlooked which means I can grab someone for $1 and sign them for up to 5 years ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5). Does Hardy have the most upside?

I know the WR class was weak this year, but what kind of respectable dynasty format has --zero-- WRs drafted?

My thoughts exactly.

3thed. Even if a dynasty start-up, one or more is getting selected unless it's a 4 teamer.

 

[Two Deep]

Jerome Simpson: Cincy will most certainly unload Housh or Johnson after this year.

Keenan Burton: Holt getting older Bennett complete suckage

Josh Morgan: Bruce old nobody else established.

Lime Disease Sweed: Ward washing up.

 

[PR Sparty]

All of them were overlooked which means I can grab someone for $1 and sign them for up to 5 years ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5). Does Hardy have the most upside?

I know the WR class was weak this year, but what kind of respectable dynasty format has --zero-- WRs drafted?

My thoughts exactly. My presumption is that it's a keeper league, rather than a dynasty league.To my mind, if a league doen't allow at least 12 players to be kept year to year, it ain't dynasty.Others' definitions vary.

This is a dynasty league. You sign players to 1-5 year contracts. Only problem is that we have a limited roster. 16 spots with 8 starters and 8 bench. It's nice to grab the rook who's gonna be a stud, but then you gotta sacrifice somewhere else. IE...If i pick up Hardy i'd have to drop one of the following bench players...BulgerM MorrisR WilliamsC TaylorDriverB MarshallHeap Steelers DAnd on top of that i'd have to take a 25% cap hit on the dropped players salary.

 

[Topes]

This is a dynasty league. You sign players to 1-5 year contracts. Only problem is that we have a limited roster. 16 spots with 8 starters and 8 bench. And on top of that i'd have to take a 25% cap hit on the dropped players salary.

Sounds like a contract keeper league to me.16-player rosters are small for redraft leagues, and not a feature of what most here would deem a Dynasty league.Personally, I'd never consider a league where players must be thrown back into the pool due to expiration of their contract to be a Dynasty lleague. Most would consider a Dynasty league to be a deep league in which you keep a player until you cut or trade him.All that said, I'd probably not be inclined to cut any of the players you list for any of the rookie WRs. With rosters that shallow, the rookies make little sense to your situation. Were your rosters deeper, we'd need more information about the rest of your roster and the mechanics of the salary cap in your league.

 

[FavreCo]

Eddie Royal is probably a good pick at that price. Denver loves him from everything I hear.

Not only that, if Marshall does something stupid again, he becomes #1. I have him on my dynasty roster as E-15 insurance.