I'd say panic after 7 games seems like a good idea.Before the season, did you expect Washington to be great? They lost their biggest offensive weapon in the offseason, and didn't do much to improve in an already tough division.Yet, after a slow start, you are willing to 'dump' a 23 year old third baseman who hit .287 with 20 hr's and 110 RBI's last year for a team that went 71-91?No one is going to give you fair value right now for Ryan Zimmerman, and you're just going to get hosed in a trade. If anything you want to be targeting guys off to slow starts rather than looking to get rid of them. The only reason I'm not very high on Zimmerman is he plays in a pitchers park. Other than that, the guy looks like a very solid offensive talent for many years to come.
I'l play devil's advocate here:20 HR's and 100 RBI's in 614 AB's. That's a lot of AB's.He also had 120 K's (tied for 34th in MLB), and pitchers have had time to figure him out.Also, when Nick Johnson comes back, how effective will he be?
He's 23. I see no reason for him not to get 600+ AB's again.Strikeouts were a concern, but no player is perfect. His OBP was an acceptable .351....and this was only his first full season. If you project a regression in him, you shouldn't have drafted or kept him. I expect him to get better....it's just I don't expect him to get as good as fast as others in my leagues have, thus I felt he was moderately overvalued. Nick Johnson coming back is not going to effect Zimmerman at all. The Nats as a team are doing horribly, but they will not be this bad all year. I have to think Johnson will be a better offensive force than Dmitri Young which will help. And it's hard to run, when you are not getting on base, and constantly behind. The Nats are not going to go 10-152. I'd project Zimmerman to have 25 or so homers, 100 RBI's, .290 average, 80 runs, and 10 SBs. That's pretty respectable and I'd expect something in return according to these projections if I were going to trade him.