Could be. But I think all 3 had things to be concerned about going into draft dayLJ - Never played a whole year. Willie Roaf goneSA - Hutch gone. Extra wear and tear last year playing extra gamesLT2 - How's Rivers going to performIt appears that SA has the concerns becoming a reality.I only had one league with a top 3 draft spot and it was 2. I've been kicking myself in the ### since draft day for taking SA over LT2.drafted in the top 3 in all redraft leagues, bust of the year
And yet he didn't have much to do with the blowout.It was a huge blowout (until the 4th quarter obviously)
I disagree.It seems to me his production is pretty steady throughout the year historically, and I note that his only 3 and 4 TD games all occurred during the first half of the season. I don't see any evidence of slow starts.Panic. Panic. Panic.
SA has had a history of starting slow outside of last year. link
No one should have expected a year like he had in 2005 anyway but I think he'll still finish with numbers similiar to 2003 with four or five more TDs.
Agreed. And I think that means he'll take some lumps early this year. But in the end...I still think he finishes top 5 if not top 3 in fantasy RB scoring and those that trade him away will deeply regret it.His schedule is in his favor as is the fact that they will likely be in the lead frequently which will lead to more rushing attempts. I don't have a big problem with Holmgren spelling him for Morris/Strong, last year SA had to be worn out. But the Seattle running game always finds it's groove...even without Hutch...they'll find it again. Just a matter of time. I expect after the bye week you'll see better production from SA if not before.It's pretty obvious that his hurt foot (or whatever it is) is worse than Seattle is letting on and that it's hurting his play. He doesn't have the same burst he had last year and won't until his foot heals.
I think Eli had much to do with the early blowout. SA scored out of the gate and then was used sparringly during the game. Why have your superstar out there when the game is in hand (especially when he has been nicked up)? I would not be worried about SA just yet.And yet he didn't have much to do with the blowout.It was a huge blowout (until the 4th quarter obviously)
EDMADN RECUS
joffer didn'tYou guys forget the "Madden Cover Curse"?
Looks like someone didn't get to see the game yesterday. SA has lost more than a step and I for one think it has more to do with the foot injury than the changes in the O-Line. He looked very slow to hit the hole and wasn't even trying to make cuts. I hope they sit him this week and give him a chance to heal. My concern is that if the injury is affecting him that much and they aren't sitting him, they are reserved to the fact that he will be like this all year.I'm trying to trade him if I can get a top RB2 out of him I'll be happy. I'll pick up MoMorris and hope I was right.Panic. Panic. Panic.
SA has had a history of starting slow outside of last year. link
No one should have expected a year like he had in 2005 anyway but I think he'll still finish with numbers similiar to 2003 with four or five more TDs.
20 carries in 3 quarters is being used sparringly?I think Eli had much to do with the early blowout. SA scored out of the gate and then was used sparringly during the game. Why have your superstar out there when the game is in hand (especially when he has been nicked up)? I would not be worried about SA just yet.And yet he didn't have much to do with the blowout.It was a huge blowout (until the 4th quarter obviously)
I disagree.It seems to me his production is pretty steady throughout the year historically, and I note that his only 3 and 4 TD games all occurred during the first half of the season. I don't see any evidence of slow starts.Panic. Panic. Panic.
SA has had a history of starting slow outside of last year. link
No one should have expected a year like he had in 2005 anyway but I think he'll still finish with numbers similiar to 2003 with four or five more TDs.
Good luck with that.Looks like someone didn't get to see the game yesterday. SA has lost more than a step and I for one think it has more to do with the foot injury than the changes in the O-Line. He looked very slow to hit the hole and wasn't even trying to make cuts. I hope they sit him this week and give him a chance to heal. My concern is that if the injury is affecting him that much and they aren't sitting him, they are reserved to the fact that he will be like this all year.I'm trying to trade him if I can get a top RB2 out of him I'll be happy. I'll pick up MoMorris and hope I was right.Panic. Panic. Panic.
SA has had a history of starting slow outside of last year. link
No one should have expected a year like he had in 2005 anyway but I think he'll still finish with numbers similiar to 2003 with four or five more TDs.
Unfortunately, that slow start is going to last through 5 games. Bears game next week then a bye. So we really can't expect anything from SA until week 6?Kind of sucks for a top 3 pick.I disagree.It seems to me his production is pretty steady throughout the year historically, and I note that his only 3 and 4 TD games all occurred during the first half of the season. I don't see any evidence of slow starts.Panic. Panic. Panic.
SA has had a history of starting slow outside of last year. link
No one should have expected a year like he had in 2005 anyway but I think he'll still finish with numbers similiar to 2003 with four or five more TDs.O RLY?
In 2004 he had 135, 45, and 52 the first three weeks.
In 2003 he had 108, 51, and 58 in the first three weeks.
In 2002 he 36, 37, and 37 in the first three weeks.
When I say "start" I mean the first three weeks since that is where we are now. If we are talking strictly fantasy he did have 4 TDs in 2004 but those weren't great performances against the likes of the 49ers.
I had him ranked #3. I still say he finishes 3rd or better.Unfortunately, that slow start is going to last through 5 games. Bears game next week then a bye. So we really can't expect anything from SA until week 6?Kind of sucks for a top 3 pick.I disagree.It seems to me his production is pretty steady throughout the year historically, and I note that his only 3 and 4 TD games all occurred during the first half of the season. I don't see any evidence of slow starts.Panic. Panic. Panic.
SA has had a history of starting slow outside of last year. link
No one should have expected a year like he had in 2005 anyway but I think he'll still finish with numbers similiar to 2003 with four or five more TDs.O RLY?
In 2004 he had 135, 45, and 52 the first three weeks.
In 2003 he had 108, 51, and 58 in the first three weeks.
In 2002 he 36, 37, and 37 in the first three weeks.
When I say "start" I mean the first three weeks since that is where we are now. If we are talking strictly fantasy he did have 4 TDs in 2004 but those weren't great performances against the likes of the 49ers.
:buyersremorse:
Lauryn Hill said:the guy is limping all over the place bigger than hell and running gingerly and people are saying it's the line or that he's just washed up now.it amazes me how few people here actually WATCH the games.