Not in crunch time it didn't.Bears D looks vulerable and the Saints have too many weapons. Let alone a VERY good D themselves. Saints in a rout.
which side you on?
FixedNO Fred Thomas is quite susceptible to the big play, as shown by Stallworth and Westbrook.
Berrian's in for a big day next week.
How do you figure Saint have a VERY good defense?Ranked 11th overall.Bottom 3rd against the run.Tied for 2nd to last in takeaways.Saint have a very AVERAGE defense at best.Bears D looks vulerable and the Saints have too many weapons. Let alone a VERY good D themselves. Saints in a rout.
I think with McAllister and Bush, the Saints can grind out the clock just as easily.I think the Bears play more of a ball control game next week (behind Benson), grinding clock, shortening the game, keeping the ball out of Brees' hands. If they can win time of possession and keep the Bears D fresh, then Urlacher and the defense will manage enough timely stops and turnovers to win the game despite the number of playmakers on the NO offense.Bears 24Saints 20![]()
Bears D is much faster and better at tackling than Philly. Brees has played in San Diego and New Orleans, two areas with nice weather. Next week, it's supposed to be 20 degrees outside. Bears over Saints 20-14Bears D looks vulerable and the Saints have too many weapons. Let alone a VERY good D themselves. Saints in a rout.
Brees played college football at Purdue. It's cold there. He has also played in cold weather places while playing for San Diego. He'll be just fine in cold weather conditions.Brees has played in San Diego and New Orleans, two areas with nice weather. Next week, it's supposed to be 20 degrees outside. Bears over Saints 20-14
No doubt they're better than Philly, but how well can they handle Deuce led by Karney? Throw in Bush reverse motion and that's alot to deal with for a banged up, struggling defense.Bears D is much faster and better at tackling than Philly. Brees has played in San Diego and New Orleans, two areas with nice weather. Next week, it's supposed to be 20 degrees outside. Bears over Saints 20-14Bears D looks vulerable and the Saints have too many weapons. Let alone a VERY good D themselves. Saints in a rout.
Dude, we know as you say this in every thread about the Saints. Give it up already.Saints win because of Hurricane support.
Dont forget the power and size of colston and the burning speed of devery henderson, bears D will have their hands full next week.No doubt they're better than Philly, but how well can they handle Deuce led by Karney? Throw in Bush reverse motion and that's alot to deal with for a banged up, struggling defense.Bears D is much faster and better at tackling than Philly. Brees has played in San Diego and New Orleans, two areas with nice weather. Next week, it's supposed to be 20 degrees outside. Bears over Saints 20-14Bears D looks vulerable and the Saints have too many weapons. Let alone a VERY good D themselves. Saints in a rout.
I'm a Saints season ticket holder - this year and now I've signed on for next. I think that contractually obligates me to root for the Saints.But I've been a Bears fan all my life, as has every member of my family since the Chicago Staleys in 1921. Essentially, this game is my worst nightmare.I'm pulling for the Saints. I have to. This is my city now. However, my family's going to kill me. Probably rightfully so.At least I didn't change teams while the Bears sucked for the majority of my life. I did it while they're favorites.####.which side you on?
From a Purdue season ticket holder living in Chicagoomally said:Brees played college football at Purdue. It's cold there. He has also played in cold weather places while playing for San Diego. He'll be just fine in cold weather conditions.f360spyder said:Brees has played in San Diego and New Orleans, two areas with nice weather. Next week, it's supposed to be 20 degrees outside.
Bears over Saints 20-14
Doesnt matter. Their offense makes up for all that the defense falls short of. I tell you one thing, the bears do not have an offense like Philly that allow them the BIG PLAY. Average but efficient. Kick ### Saints.HULLOBUDMAN said:How do you figure Saint have a VERY good defense?Ranked 11th overall.Bottom 3rd against the run.Tied for 2nd to last in takeaways.Saint have a very AVERAGE defense at best.Bears D looks vulerable and the Saints have too many weapons. Let alone a VERY good D themselves. Saints in a rout.
Boo Hoo HooA win again ov said:Saints win because of Hurricane support.
Too bad those nasty New Orleans fans held a gun to your head and made you buy season tickets.Pygmy Marmoset said:I'm a Saints season ticket holder - this year and now I've signed on for next. I think that contractually obligates me to root for the Saints.But I've been a Bears fan all my life, as has every member of my family since the Chicago Staleys in 1921. Essentially, this game is my worst nightmare.I'm pulling for the Saints. I have to. This is my city now. However, my family's going to kill me. Probably rightfully so.At least I didn't change teams while the Bears sucked for the majority of my life. I did it while they're favorites.####.which side you on?
What the #### are you babbling about?Too bad those nasty New Orleans fans held a gun to your head and made you buy season tickets.Pygmy Marmoset said:I'm a Saints season ticket holder - this year and now I've signed on for next. I think that contractually obligates me to root for the Saints.But I've been a Bears fan all my life, as has every member of my family since the Chicago Staleys in 1921. Essentially, this game is my worst nightmare.I'm pulling for the Saints. I have to. This is my city now. However, my family's going to kill me. Probably rightfully so.At least I didn't change teams while the Bears sucked for the majority of my life. I did it while they're favorites.####.which side you on?![]()
Is there any such thing when the Bears play the Packers??As it stands now, the weather won't even come into play.
It's supposed to be in the low 30s, with very little wind and a 10% chance of precipitation.
If this game was in New Orleans, there would be a definite advantage (noise and turf) for Nawlins.
As it stands now, with the Bears a 1.5 to 3 point favorite, the gambling public clearly think Nawlins has a slight edge - as the home team is typically a 3 point favorite.
Does New Orleans play any better or worse on grass vs. artificial surfaces?
I see they lost at Pittsburgh and Carolina, but I don't recall their playing surfaces. Hell, the Bears lost a couple of games at home on grass.... against Miami's defense with Ronnie Brown racking up huge yardage, and in a meaningless game against Green Bay.
will mckenzie be on berrian or does he stick to one side of the field?bears will try to isolate berrian and rashied davis on fred thomas. that's appears to be what grossman does best.although desmond clark should have success too.Tiger Fan said:FixedNO Fred Thomas is quite susceptible to the big play, as shown by Stallworth and Westbrook.
Berrian's in for a big day next week.
Only when the Bears lose to Green Bay, then in the minds of Bear fans, it was a meaningless game.And for the record, if the Grossman plays like he did yesterday, I don't see NO winning the game.Is there any such thing when the Bears play the Packers??As it stands now, the weather won't even come into play.
It's supposed to be in the low 30s, with very little wind and a 10% chance of precipitation.
If this game was in New Orleans, there would be a definite advantage (noise and turf) for Nawlins.
As it stands now, with the Bears a 1.5 to 3 point favorite, the gambling public clearly think Nawlins has a slight edge - as the home team is typically a 3 point favorite.
Does New Orleans play any better or worse on grass vs. artificial surfaces?
I see they lost at Pittsburgh and Carolina, but I don't recall their playing surfaces. Hell, the Bears lost a couple of games at home on grass.... against Miami's defense with Ronnie Brown racking up huge yardage, and in a meaningless game against Green Bay.![]()
Carolina's turf is grass, and it never seems to hinder the Saints. They usually play well when they come to Carolina. I hope they play well in Chicago on Sunday. I'll be cheering for them.Does New Orleans play any better or worse on grass vs. artificial surfaces?
Saints have a problem with quick backs breaking it to the the outside after the inside hole was not there. Ala Westbrook, FWP. Containment on the defense was horrible. I don't think the bears will be able to do that. Westbrook was not able to run up the middle. Fred Thomas was replaced by Jason Craft in the second half for the most part, and did a great job. Garcia to have success the second half needed time to make his progressions to Basket and Smith. Garcia also had his success gaining time by scrambling out of the pocket. Something that Grossman does not do. Grossman will need to be patient and find the open man. The saints will spread the bears defense out, make the LBs cover someone and see if they can run the ball with Duece. Or if the LBs step up to gaurd the run, the seem will be open for the TE. Brees has actually played better on the road this season, I think it will be if the supposting cast will come focused to catch the ball or hold on to it in Chicago.I think the Bears play more of a ball control game next week (behind Benson), grinding clock, shortening the game, keeping the ball out of Brees' hands. If they can win time of possession and keep the Bears D fresh, then Urlacher and the defense will manage enough timely stops and turnovers to win the game despite the number of playmakers on the NO offense.Bears 24Saints 20![]()
Duece not turning it over is a tall order for him.The Saints are very capable of beating the Bears.In fact, I think the Saints match up better with the Bears than they do with Philly. Neither of the Bears RB's are game breakers like Westbrook and Grossman is not even in Garcia's league. Berrian is a threat and the one thing that Grossman seems to do well is throw the deep ball. That could hurt the Saints, but does anybody really think the Bears are gonna make a living driving the ball 80 yards all game?If the Saints don't turn the ball over, I think they win this one. The key is to run Deuce and don't turn the ball over. Make Grossman have to drive the Bears the length of the field consistently and don't let Devon Hester make any plays.
Why? Deuce is not a fumbler. Never has been.Duece not turning it over is a tall order for him.The Saints are very capable of beating the Bears.In fact, I think the Saints match up better with the Bears than they do with Philly. Neither of the Bears RB's are game breakers like Westbrook and Grossman is not even in Garcia's league. Berrian is a threat and the one thing that Grossman seems to do well is throw the deep ball. That could hurt the Saints, but does anybody really think the Bears are gonna make a living driving the ball 80 yards all game?If the Saints don't turn the ball over, I think they win this one. The key is to run Deuce and don't turn the ball over. Make Grossman have to drive the Bears the length of the field consistently and don't let Devon Hester make any plays.
I assume that's sarcasm, as Deuce has turned the ball over only once in the last two years.Why? Deuce is not a fumbler. Never has been.Duece not turning it over is a tall order for him.The Saints are very capable of beating the Bears.In fact, I think the Saints match up better with the Bears than they do with Philly. Neither of the Bears RB's are game breakers like Westbrook and Grossman is not even in Garcia's league. Berrian is a threat and the one thing that Grossman seems to do well is throw the deep ball. That could hurt the Saints, but does anybody really think the Bears are gonna make a living driving the ball 80 yards all game?If the Saints don't turn the ball over, I think they win this one. The key is to run Deuce and don't turn the ball over. Make Grossman have to drive the Bears the length of the field consistently and don't let Devon Hester make any plays.
Bush will be a non-factor rushing in this game. His strength running the ball is to the outside, and the sideline-to-sideline speed of the Bears D makes that all but silly to even try. Now, screen passes.... that's a little more likely.Oops, i meant Bush. That guy puts it on the ground a lot. And in a dome no less.
That won't happen. Thomas and McKenzie don't switch sides of the field. Unless they feel like they need to bring pressure on Grossman, it shouldn't be that big of a problem because they'll have a safety play over the top on Thomas' side.The Saints have shown they will give up a big play, but they've shown over and over again that they can rebound from it. Giving up A big play doesn't concern me. Unless the Chicago defense from the first half of the season shows up, I think the Saints match up very well.There's a better than average chance, in my opinion, that McKenzie goes on Berrian, Craft comes in to cover Moose, and Thomas doesn't start but rather plays nickel for the game. At least I hope hat's what happens.
See, I disagree with that. If the Bears play exactly like they did yesterday, I see the Saints winning this game going away.The Bears are going to need a much better game out of their defense...which of course, they are capable of.If Grossman plays bad, it will take a Herculean effort by the bears defense and special teams to win.And for the record, if the Grossman plays like he did yesterday, I don't see NO winning the game.But the Chicago DEF has to play much better too.
Why not?They can't grind it on the grass.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=oYn0IrToijMSee 0:23, 0:32, 3:06-3:12. And just for fun 3:18FYI, Seattle had no play over 25 yards. That's the game plan and they executed. No big plays for Saints, no wins. They can't grind it on the grass.