Once I got past the torture scenes, which left me conflicted in a real sense, this movie was awesome.
(paraphrased)
Gandolfini: So what else have you done for us?
Her: Nothing. I've done nothing else.
That line blew me away. To be recruited out of high school and to have only focused on Bin Laden and a couple of ####ty Middle East leads. Where does your faith come from?
Awesome movie. Bigelow is the best thing going right now, hands down. The plane ride back is so unceremonious, and it's like a dead soldier's flight back. She's unreal at juxtaposition.
The torture scenes were really hard to watch. And much as I'm done with torture as a film device, the scenes seemed very realistic. Overall, I think this movie is fantastic. So many military movies and thrillers are written for a broad audience. The writing and story in Zero Dark is refreshingly mature.
I aborted the first mission because of the torture scenes. I didn't want to do that to myself. Plus, I knew its length and must have been ornery that night.
Once you get past the torture scenes, the movie is an unbelievable character study that slides into a smartly written action movie, with the character study in the background. Bigelow gives us the sweet spot between Point Break and The Hurt Locker, both of which are now movies I need to see again, even though I've seen them several times. For all of The Hurt Locker's genius -- and bless my friend for dragging me to a theater in NY to see it (extra large popcorn for twenty-five cents more, sir? "Always! More butter, please.") Zero Dark Thirty might have been a better movie. I walked out of Hurt Locker blown away (no pun) and thought it should win Best Picture.
Perhaps I'm hyper-intellectualizing and out of my depth here, but I think the movement from character study to action movie is what happens, and helps make the movie so effective.
Or, I'm just shooting the #### before the Sweden/Canada game.