What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seabags Might Have a Chance (1 Viewer)

ScottyDog

Footballguy
I didn't see a thread about this yet so I thought I would start one. Chris Ivory-gone, Pierre Thomas-gone, Colston-hurt knee, Jimmy Graham-doubtful, Jenkins the CB - doubtful, game is in Seattle with bad weather. All the pressure is on the Saints as they play against THE WORST PLAYOFF TEAM IN THE HISTORY OF THE NFL. Do the Saints play to win or do they play not to lose? If they play not to lose, the 'Hawks have a chance. The 12th man will be at the game and hopefully as someone else joked, they will make up for the other 11. What do you guys think?

 
Fwiw, Brees really wasn't "lights out" last weekend either, and he's throwin some picks this year... It's not totally out of the question the saints beat themselves and self destruct with turnovers and a one dimensional game plan.

 
Good point, I meant to mention that also, Brees has not been himself lately.

Fwiw, Brees really wasn't "lights out" last weekend either, and he's throwin some picks this year... It's not totally out of the question the saints beat themselves and self destruct with turnovers and a one dimensional game plan.
 
f#$% it, it's over...Hass is starting.

Pete Carroll has just fell huge in my eyes. In Seattle, Hass is like a demi-god when it comes to the media. The fans, they aren't big Hass fans. But the media, it is really ridiculous. His old backup, Brock Huard, is his BFF and has 3 hours of air time each morning on the local ESPN radio channel. It's basically an infomercial for Hass and a political campaign ad against Whitehurst. This same radio channel actually brings an "analyst" named Tim Hasselbeck to talk about Hass vs Whitehurst --for those wondering why their names are similar, yes, Tim is Matt's own BROTHER. How the hell do you bring a brother to "analyse" the situation? Then, another former teammate and great friend, Dilfer comes on to talk about Hass. At the very least, Dilfer admitted that he was biased.

Anyways, I think the issue is that Pete didn't have the balls to start Charlie and sit Hass this game. He would have been fried by Hass' BFF Brock Huard, his brother, his mother, his aunt and his girlfriend who all probably have radio shows in Seattle, if he started Charlie and they lost. If Pete starts Hass and the Hawks lose, then it is an easy thing to say: "i started my veteran, the guy who's been here before, blah blah blah."

I think with Hass the chances of a victory go to ZERO. With Whitehurst, the potential was there to turn this into a low scoring, few possession, no turnover game at home. But now? No chance.

PRediction: Hass is sacked 5 times and has 3-4 TOs.

 
I guess you can kinda make an argument for hasselbeck... He has some playoff experience. Either way they're going to have to run the ball a lot... Although I havent seen much from either QB this year I find it hard to believe based on what I've heard that Charlie is a significant upgrade over the vet... Especially with little starting experience and no playoff experience. Either way, with so little faith in the QB play surrounding this team, you're in bad shape.

 
Interesting perspective you have. For some reason I was thinking the exact opposite. I feel with his big game experience (he did lead Seattle to the Super Bowl) Hass gives Seattle the best chance of winning this game. Charlie with the exception of the 1st drive of the St. Louis game did not look all that good.

f#$% it, it's over...Hass is starting.Pete Carroll has just fell huge in my eyes. In Seattle, Hass is like a demi-god when it comes to the media. The fans, they aren't big Hass fans. But the media, it is really ridiculous. His old backup, Brock Huard, is his BFF and has 3 hours of air time each morning on the local ESPN radio channel. It's basically an infomercial for Hass and a political campaign ad against Whitehurst. This same radio channel actually brings an "analyst" named Tim Hasselbeck to talk about Hass vs Whitehurst --for those wondering why their names are similar, yes, Tim is Matt's own BROTHER. How the hell do you bring a brother to "analyse" the situation? Then, another former teammate and great friend, Dilfer comes on to talk about Hass. At the very least, Dilfer admitted that he was biased.Anyways, I think the issue is that Pete didn't have the balls to start Charlie and sit Hass this game. He would have been fried by Hass' BFF Brock Huard, his brother, his mother, his aunt and his girlfriend who all probably have radio shows in Seattle, if he started Charlie and they lost. If Pete starts Hass and the Hawks lose, then it is an easy thing to say: "i started my veteran, the guy who's been here before, blah blah blah."I think with Hass the chances of a victory go to ZERO. With Whitehurst, the potential was there to turn this into a low scoring, few possession, no turnover game at home. But now? No chance. PRediction: Hass is sacked 5 times and has 3-4 TOs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Fwiw, Brees really wasn't "lights out" last weekend either, and he's throwin some picks this year... It's not totally out of the question the saints beat themselves and self destruct with turnovers and a one dimensional game plan.
22 picks this year for Brees a new career high for him
Do you have this posted all over your home or something? It seems this is all you care to repeat in thread after thread as if this stat is of supreme importance and supersedes anything else.
 
Fwiw, Brees really wasn't "lights out" last weekend either, and he's throwin some picks this year... It's not totally out of the question the saints beat themselves and self destruct with turnovers and a one dimensional game plan.
22 picks this year for Brees a new career high for him
Do you have this posted all over your home or something? It seems this is all you care to repeat in thread after thread as if this stat is of supreme importance and supersedes anything else.
Brees also broke the single season record for completions this year............................................
 
Interesting perspective you have. For some reason I was thinking the exact opposite. I feel with his big game experience (he did lead Seattle to the Super Bowl) Hass gives Seattle the best chance of winning this game. Charlie with the exception of the 1st drive of the St. Louis game did not look all that good.

This is so true. And the big play to Ruvell was broken coverage that Charlie left hanging in the air otherwise if thrown accurately it would have gone for a touchdown. His one good throw in the first was the touchdown pass to Big Mike. Mostly checkdowns and screens that inflated his performance. I would rather take my chances with Hasselhoff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't see a thread about this yet so I thought I would start one. Chris Ivory-gone, Pierre Thomas-gone, Colston-hurt knee, Jimmy Graham-doubtful, Jenkins the CB - doubtful, game is in Seattle with bad weather. All the pressure is on the Saints as they play against THE WORST PLAYOFF TEAM IN THE HISTORY OF THE NFL. Do the Saints play to win or do they play not to lose? If they play not to lose, the 'Hawks have a chance. The 12th man will be at the game and hopefully as someone else joked, they will make up for the other 11. What do you guys think?
As a long suffering Saints fan I admire your hope and enthusiasm for your team. This game however is going to be a tough one for you guys though. The Super bowl Champs are ready and focused and have not in any way looked passed the Seahawks. They are the better team in every category and will come and play like it. They are a very confident team and will not be playing not to lose as you hope. In fact, they will be hitting on all cylinders because Sean Payton now has his crisis. If you read his book you would know why creating the crisis was huge for them last year.
"Bill [Parcells] understood the power of confrontation,the value of creating a crisis. Most people prefer to be pleasant. Most people would rather get along. But sometimes it really is more valuable to create a crisis, to face the confrontation...On a number of occasions in New Orleans, I would find myself doing much the same thing," said Payton.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/418793-...bestseller-listThey will be more than focused I promise you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like the Seahawks alot in this game. Alot.
:yes: I agree.. when was the last time the Saints won on the road?... they never have.. and I think Seattle comes together and pulls out a close one. That said if Seattle does lose it will be by a large margin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brees also broke the single season record for completions this year............................................
No he didn't. He came up 2 short of breaking Manning's record.
Brees broke the single season record right before Manning broke Brees' record.
Brees was within 15 yards (and one pass where Lance Moore did not turn around) of breaking Marino's record.He ties or sets or practically matches records for completion percentage, completions too. He has a Super Bowl ring. You've got a perennial sub-.400 franchise and this guy comes in, wins 2 division crowns, has 3 10+ win seasons, an NFL championship, brings in the 2nd best record in the NFC, all in 5 years.The complaining about the Saints getting too much / too little recognition does get tired, but come on the perception of Brees leading this battered team is not the same as we would be getting with P. Manning or some other great QB's, but that is indeed the tier Brees is on.
 
Mike Williams is your game changer and a mismatch on most corners due to his size. He was on his way to a VERY nice game before getting injured in the Dome against New Orleans earlier this year. Plain and simple, Whitehurst and BMW don't have any chemistry. Hass knows where and how to throw it to Williams to be successful, and if you are going to have any shot in this game, I think he is going to need to see somewhere around the 7/90/1 mark.

Hass is your only shot to win this one, imo.

 
I like the Seahawks getting 10.5 I'm not saying they'll win, but I expect them to keep it close and cover. Forty degrees and rain doesn't benefit the Saints, and I'm not sold on Bush as a 20+ carry RB. The Saints are going to be one-dimensional and as good as Brees is, it's hard to be an efficient offense when an opponent doesn't have to respect your run. Also, Saints have not been great outside of late, losing at Baltimore and squeaking past Cincy and Dallas (quasi-outside).

As bad as Seattle has been, they're still 5-3 at home on the season. I think this will be a much more competitive game than a lot of people think.

 
Any given Sunday is correct, like "any given Sunday Jessica Biel is coming over my house to cook me supper in the nude then we will shag all night in front of a fire, she wakes up cooks me breakfast and off we go."

Thats about the same chances of happening as the Shizhawks winning a playoff game.

 
Fwiw, Brees really wasn't "lights out" last weekend either, and he's throwin some picks this year... It's not totally out of the question the saints beat themselves and self destruct with turnovers and a one dimensional game plan.
22 picks this year for Brees a new career high for him
Do you have this posted all over your home or something? It seems this is all you care to repeat in thread after thread as if this stat is of supreme importance and supersedes anything else.
ok, I think ten fumbles are a career high for Brees something new for you. You just want to see blue sky when it comes to Brees, but the fact is his numbers are not that good this year. You seem to think INT's don't matter, the team with the most turnovers typically lose in NFL games, in case your not aware of that.
 
Fwiw, Brees really wasn't "lights out" last weekend either, and he's throwin some picks this year... It's not totally out of the question the saints beat themselves and self destruct with turnovers and a one dimensional game plan.
22 picks this year for Brees a new career high for him
Do you have this posted all over your home or something? It seems this is all you care to repeat in thread after thread as if this stat is of supreme importance and supersedes anything else.
ok, I think ten fumbles are a career high for Brees something new for you. You just want to see blue sky when it comes to Brees, but the fact is his numbers are not that good this year. You seem to think INT's don't matter, the team with the most turnovers typically lose in NFL games, in case your not aware of that.
Oh, I'm aware. I watched the NFC championship game last year :mellow:
 
greenroom said:
Mr. Retukes said:
I like the Seahawks alot in this game. Alot.
:popcorn: I agree.. when was the last time the Saints won on the road?... they never have.. and I think Seattle comes together and pulls out a close one. That said if Seattle does lose it will be by a large margin
While technically not a road game they did win the Superbowl away. That Monday night game two weekends ago in Atlanta for all purposes was a glorified playoff game because of what was at stake for both teams. The Saints have not been bad on the road except for the Arizona game way earlier in the season. This is not the 2006 Saints. These guys have traveled well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't see a thread about this yet so I thought I would start one. Chris Ivory-gone, Pierre Thomas-gone, Colston-hurt knee, Jimmy Graham-doubtful, Jenkins the CB - doubtful, game is in Seattle with bad weather. All the pressure is on the Saints as they play against THE WORST PLAYOFF TEAM IN THE HISTORY OF THE NFL. Do the Saints play to win or do they play not to lose? If they play not to lose, the 'Hawks have a chance. The 12th man will be at the game and hopefully as someone else joked, they will make up for the other 11. What do you guys think?
Don't hold your breath
 
oh, ok, thanks, good advice.

I didn't see a thread about this yet so I thought I would start one. Chris Ivory-gone, Pierre Thomas-gone, Colston-hurt knee, Jimmy Graham-doubtful, Jenkins the CB - doubtful, game is in Seattle with bad weather. All the pressure is on the Saints as they play against THE WORST PLAYOFF TEAM IN THE HISTORY OF THE NFL. Do the Saints play to win or do they play not to lose? If they play not to lose, the 'Hawks have a chance. The 12th man will be at the game and hopefully as someone else joked, they will make up for the other 11. What do you guys think?
Don't hold your breath
 
Gopher State said:
ok, I think ten fumbles are a career high for Brees something new for you. You just want to see blue sky when it comes to Brees, but the fact is his numbers are not that good this year. You seem to think INT's don't matter, the team with the most turnovers typically lose in NFL games, in case your not aware of that.
It's not all on Brees and that's been explained to you in other threads. He's the same player he's always been, but the pieces around him have been inconsistent compared to last year. Interesting that when Manning's supporting cast declines, the prevailing wisdom is that he's carrying the team and any mistakes are just him trying to win the game on his own. When Brees' supporting cast declines, people decide there's something wrong with him.
 
Have you guys lost any receivers this year to injury? Have you lost your #1 stud TE? Maybe that could be it.

Gopher State said:
ok, I think ten fumbles are a career high for Brees something new for you. You just want to see blue sky when it comes to Brees, but the fact is his numbers are not that good this year. You seem to think INT's don't matter, the team with the most turnovers typically lose in NFL games, in case your not aware of that.
It's not all on Brees and that's been explained to you in other threads. He's the same player he's always been, but the pieces around him have been inconsistent compared to last year. Interesting that when Manning's supporting cast declines, the prevailing wisdom is that he's carrying the team and any mistakes are just him trying to win the game on his own. When Brees' supporting cast declines, people decide there's something wrong with him.
 
Have you guys lost any receivers this year to injury? Have you lost your #1 stud TE? Maybe that could be it.
Manning never lost Wayne, his hall of fame receiver who just happened to have a massive year. Regardless, I said nothing about receivers. As has been said several times in several threads, the Saints went from 6th in rushing to 28th and from two stud tackles to two matadors just letting pass rushers through all day. That's the difference with the offense. We're now back to the 2007-2008 version of the offense.

Further, if anyone would bother to look at Brees' career, you'd see his turnovers this year are not outlandishly high compared to his history. He averaged 22.5 turnovers his 1st four seasons in New Orleans. So I take umbrage with the insinuation that something has changed with Brees. He has not changed - he's the same player who completes upward of 70% of his passes for 4500 yards and 30 touchdowns along with 20-something turnovers. And Saints fans will take that all day.

If you want to say the Saints offense is struggling, I would absolutely agree. If you want to say Brees is struggling, I would posit you haven't been watching him the last 5 years.

 
Have you guys lost any receivers this year to injury? Have you lost your #1 stud TE? Maybe that could be it.
Manning never lost Wayne, his hall of fame receiver who just happened to have a massive year. Regardless, I said nothing about receivers. As has been said several times in several threads, the Saints went from 6th in rushing to 28th and from two stud tackles to two matadors just letting pass rushers through all day. That's the difference with the offense. We're now back to the 2007-2008 version of the offense.

Further, if anyone would bother to look at Brees' career, you'd see his turnovers this year are not outlandishly high compared to his history. He averaged 22.5 turnovers his 1st four seasons in New Orleans. So I take umbrage with the insinuation that something has changed with Brees. He has not changed - he's the same player who completes upward of 70% of his passes for 4500 yards and 30 touchdowns along with 20-something turnovers. And Saints fans will take that all day.

If you want to say the Saints offense is struggling, I would absolutely agree. If you want to say Brees is struggling, I would posit you haven't been watching him the last 5 years.
:thumbup:
 
Don't be so down on the Saints just becasue they got spanked by the Bucs week 17. The same thing happened last season and they won the SB.

 
if Clemons/Curry and the rest of their pass rushers play out of their minds they have a realistic shot. the Saints will be one dimensional and as mentioned Brees hasn't been quite himself this year. He's missed alot of his weapons due to injury and lets not forget Brees himself has a torn MCL(or something similar) he's played thru for most the year. if they can get good pressure and Trufant is feeling well they got a shot to make some plays on defense. and either Brees will burn young Earl Thomas or Earl will show he belongs

 
Don't be so down on the Saints just becasue they got spanked by the Bucs week 17. The same thing happened last season and they won the SB.
Spanked? Good one Quez. The Saints backed off by the time they found out Atlanta was up 14-0 with 4 minutes left in the first Quarter with the Panthers. The Saints would have rested their starters if it were not for the hope Carrolina might do something in foxes last game. They saw early it was hopeless and after Jenkins,Ivory and Graham sustained costly injuries early in the game it was just wise to call off the dogs at that point and save it for when it counts. The Bucs were in the game at that point so I am not saying it wouldnt be a fight with the Saints coming off a short week after a physical Monday night game against Atlanta but I have no doubt that if Atlanta were actually trailing in that other game things would have went a bit different for your Bucs. The Bucs have been the fortunate recipients of catching the Saints twice now after the Saints had clinched the playoffs and the games were meaningless so pound your chest if you like but it wont help you this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Am I the only person that thinks that if the Saints turn the ball over and the Seabirds manage the clock they can win?

I mean, im a realist, but if there were a scenario I would imagine it would be the ball getting away from brees and the seabirds sitting on it.

 
f#$% it, it's over...Hass is starting.Pete Carroll has just fell huge in my eyes. In Seattle, Hass is like a demi-god when it comes to the media. The fans, they aren't big Hass fans. But the media, it is really ridiculous. His old backup, Brock Huard, is his BFF and has 3 hours of air time each morning on the local ESPN radio channel. It's basically an infomercial for Hass and a political campaign ad against Whitehurst. This same radio channel actually brings an "analyst" named Tim Hasselbeck to talk about Hass vs Whitehurst --for those wondering why their names are similar, yes, Tim is Matt's own BROTHER. How the hell do you bring a brother to "analyse" the situation? Then, another former teammate and great friend, Dilfer comes on to talk about Hass. At the very least, Dilfer admitted that he was biased.Anyways, I think the issue is that Pete didn't have the balls to start Charlie and sit Hass this game. He would have been fried by Hass' BFF Brock Huard, his brother, his mother, his aunt and his girlfriend who all probably have radio shows in Seattle, if he started Charlie and they lost. If Pete starts Hass and the Hawks lose, then it is an easy thing to say: "i started my veteran, the guy who's been here before, blah blah blah."I think with Hass the chances of a victory go to ZERO. With Whitehurst, the potential was there to turn this into a low scoring, few possession, no turnover game at home. But now? No chance. PRediction: Hass is sacked 5 times and has 3-4 TOs.
Wat
 
The Saints blew their wad against Atlanta and played their best game of the year and almost lost and then gave up 6 days later against Tampa (watched that game between plays of Atlanta vs. Carolina). Since the Falcon played both (Seahawks and Saints) in weeks 14 and 15 I got to see that the Saints aren't all that "Super" (or the Packers for that matter). The Saints on the road, outdoors with injuries this year like the other teams may be in for more than they expect

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't be so down on the Saints just becasue they got spanked by the Bucs week 17. The same thing happened last season and they won the SB.
Spanked? Good one Quez. The Saints backed off by the time they found out Atlanta was up 14-0 with 4 minutes left in the first Quarter with the Panthers. The Saints would have rested their starters if it were not for the hope Carrolina might do something in foxes last game. They saw early it was hopeless and after Jenkins,Ivory and Graham sustained costly injuries early in the game it was just wise to call off the dogs at that point and save it for when it counts. The Bucs were in the game at that point so I am not saying it wouldnt be a fight with the Saints coming off a short week after a physical Monday night game against Atlanta but I have no doubt that if Atlanta were actually trailing in that other game things would have went a bit different for your Bucs. The Bucs have been the fortunate recipients of catching the Saints twice now after the Saints had clinched the playoffs and the games were meaningless so pound your chest if you like but it wont help you this year.
Watched both games back and forth- also heard the Superdome was not allowed to show the Atlanta score on their boards and the announcers made it sound like the players were not to know either. What I saw was the Saints found themselves in a game they were not going to win and THEN gave up and "rested" some starters
 
The Saints blew their wad against Atlanta and played their best game of the year and almost lost and then gave up 6 days later against Tampa (watched that game between plays of Atlanta vs. Carolina). Since the Falcon played both (Seahawks and Saints) in weeks 14 and 15 I got to see that the Saints aren't all that "Super" (or the Packers for that matter). The Saints on the road, outdoors with injuries this year like the other teams may be in for more than they expect
Keep holding on to hope Falcons but your team can be beat even in your dome with Matty Ice at the helm and like Dilfer said, it can happen again.. Saints are pretty good against the Falcons recently. haven't they won 9 out of the last 11 games played? Im hoping for a rematch myself. Its going to be good.
 
Don't be so down on the Saints just becasue they got spanked by the Bucs week 17. The same thing happened last season and they won the SB.
Spanked? Good one Quez. The Saints backed off by the time they found out Atlanta was up 14-0 with 4 minutes left in the first Quarter with the Panthers. The Saints would have rested their starters if it were not for the hope Carrolina might do something in foxes last game. They saw early it was hopeless and after Jenkins,Ivory and Graham sustained costly injuries early in the game it was just wise to call off the dogs at that point and save it for when it counts. The Bucs were in the game at that point so I am not saying it wouldnt be a fight with the Saints coming off a short week after a physical Monday night game against Atlanta but I have no doubt that if Atlanta were actually trailing in that other game things would have went a bit different for your Bucs. The Bucs have been the fortunate recipients of catching the Saints twice now after the Saints had clinched the playoffs and the games were meaningless so pound your chest if you like but it wont help you this year.
Watched both games back and forth- also heard the Superdome was not allowed to show the Atlanta score on their boards and the announcers made it sound like the players were not to know either. What I saw was the Saints found themselves in a game they were not going to win and THEN gave up and "rested" some starters
This is utter nonsense. The score was in the Dome and Payton kept up with it every step of the way he even admitted so in a press conference. Thats his business and he will only test fate (injury) when it means something.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Saints blew their wad against Atlanta and played their best game of the year and almost lost and then gave up 6 days later against Tampa (watched that game between plays of Atlanta vs. Carolina). Since the Falcon played both (Seahawks and Saints) in weeks 14 and 15 I got to see that the Saints aren't all that "Super" (or the Packers for that matter). The Saints on the road, outdoors with injuries this year like the other teams may be in for more than they expect
Keep holding on to hope Falcons but your team can be beat even in your dome with Matty Ice at the helm and like Dilfer said, it can happen again.. Saints are pretty good against the Falcons recently. haven't they won 9 out of the last 11 games played? Im hoping for a rematch myself. Its going to be good.
Dilfer is a paid ESPN tool to take sides and he has been on the other side of Atlanta each week of their 13 victories. We aren't talking Falcons Saints in this thread. We are talking Seattle vs New Orleans
 
The Saints blew their wad against Atlanta and played their best game of the year and almost lost and then gave up 6 days later against Tampa (watched that game between plays of Atlanta vs. Carolina). Since the Falcon played both (Seahawks and Saints) in weeks 14 and 15 I got to see that the Saints aren't all that "Super" (or the Packers for that matter). The Saints on the road, outdoors with injuries this year like the other teams may be in for more than they expect
Keep holding on to hope Falcons but your team can be beat even in your dome with Matty Ice at the helm and like Dilfer said, it can happen again.. Saints are pretty good against the Falcons recently. haven't they won 9 out of the last 11 games played? Im hoping for a rematch myself. Its going to be good.
Dilfer is a paid ESPN tool to take sides and he has been on the other side of Atlanta each week of their 13 victories. We aren't talking Falcons Saints in this thread. We are talking Seattle vs New Orleans
That Tool correctly predicted the Saints would win the Superbowl last year when the other tools didnt. Falcon fans dont like him but I can understand that since he isnt a fanboy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top