SF/CHI quick impressions? (1 Viewer)

[BigRed]

Those of you who saw the game, how did the major O players look for each team?

Also where were many of the WR1s eg B Johnson for SF and Booker/Hester/etc for CHI? Hurt or teams just playing it safe?

 

[MAC_32]

Both defenses are worse than I expected, given the talent on their respective offenses that is not a good sign of things to come.

 

[Winning IS Everything]

Most all of the "starting WRs", were nursing minor injuries.

Rashied Davis looked good for the Bears as did Orton. They seem to have a connection going.

Matt Forte looked decent, but will struggle on that offense this year.

Frank Gore looks ready to go. He was amped up in that game last night.

Jason Hill looks like a player, should be a good sleeper candidate as the 49ers #3 WR.

O'Sullivan may be a sleeper QB, he looked great again this week.

 

[FTRWRTR]

The bears d is a definite disappointment but their special teams especially the return game is incredibly nice

O'sullivan = 2008's version of 2007 derek anderson

 

[Mr Capicollo]

Here's my impression.

 

[Abraham]

The bears d is a definite disappointment but their special teams especially the return game is incredibly niceO'sullivan = 2008's version of 2007 derek anderson

I would agree with the exception of the fact that the SF Oline isn't as good as Cleveland's is, IMO.

 

[Mookie Blaylock]

The bears d is a definite disappointment but their special teams especially the return game is incredibly niceO'sullivan = 2008's version of 2007 derek anderson

This is a joke, right?

 

[FTRWRTR]

The bears d is a definite disappointment but their special teams especially the return game is incredibly niceO'sullivan = 2008's version of 2007 derek anderson

I would agree with the exception of the fact that the SF Oline isn't as good as Cleveland's is, IMO.

I'm not saying he'll do as well as da did only that he'll "come out of nowhere" to be a good #

 

[corpcow]

Any IDP'ers catch the game? How did CHI d look, particularly McGowan?