If you have never seen her pee in public she's a keeper.No ex wife for this guy.![]()
20 years with the same woman, if I ever wonder what else is out there I see videos like this and know I'm going nowhere.
They might get some leeway if several people testify he threw the first punch but chances are there will be several drinkers on that jury and I hope they throw the book at these two.It was ruled a homicide. The case is going to a grand jury.
It's not whether she'll pee in public, it's the forum.If you have never seen her pee in public she's a keeper.
A classy broad is hard to come by these days.
i just slammed a few beers to celebrate my recent good fortuneIt's not whether she'll pee in public, it's the forum.
Pancakes are probably a little stale by now.I figured their menu would have changed in the past 20 years. I remember we would stop there for breakfast once a year on our way to the beach. My grand slam always came with a baseball card. Still have them too![]()
nothing 15 seconds in a microwave and some butter cant fix!!DallasDMac said:Pancakes are probably a little stale by now.
I agree. Will be interesting to see what he's actually charged with. I'd guess manslaugther, but it could go many different ways.This will be an interesting follow thanks for the updated. Honestly, i don't see how he is acquitted. Whether the guy took a swing at him or not he choked him for 10-min. That goes well beyond self defense.
I don't think this is an adequate defense. A 10 year old can tell you choking someone for an extended period of time is a recipe for death.Thompson probably is not a bad guy, but it sounds like he is going to get in some big trouble for this and that is sad. One of the articles said he had some MMA training, which is a recipe for disaster. He knew enough to make the hold but not enough of how dangerous it was. Sad all the way around.
I am in no way claiming it as a defense or an excuse!!!I don't think this is an adequate defense. A 10 year old can tell you choking someone for an extended period of time is a recipe for death.
He needs a rectal exam given by someone trained enough to know how to insert it, but not enough of how dangerous it is.I am in no way claiming it as a defense or an excuse!!!
I don't think his intent was to murder the man but it certainly appears that he deserves man slaughter.
MurderBeef Ravioli said:What was he charged with?
They were. A couple of other people were as well.And this article makes it sound like the guy who was killed's wife and 3 year old were there begging them to stop. Geez.
This is exactly why I stopped strangling random Mexicans. Too risky these days.The wife was a police woman. 3-5 seems light for someone that is supposed to be protecting the public. 15-20 for the husband. 10-15 for the wife. IMHO.
The thing that I keep trying to wrap my head around is whether they would have been charged at all without the video. Seems like once the video surfaced things started moving. Before cell phones and video cameras everywhere, how much #### like this did people get away with?
But ##### grabbing is fine. Noted.Dr Oadi said:Yeah the guy whipped out his #### in front of his kids. Give the guy a medal.
My uncle in law was killed in a bar fight. It was manslaughter and the defendant was only given 5 years. The guy served 3 and was out. I just dont think manslaughter holds the same weight.10-15 is way too light for me
The definitions of 1st and 2nd degree murder vary by state. Here, first degree murder is Capital Murder. This case doesn't really qualify. Hence, a muder charge.I've read two articles and the charge I saw was "murder" in both. So this is being tried on the husband and wife as 2nd degree murder, can't imagine 1st?
If that is the case, I would assume the prosecutor is doing that in hopes of copping a manslaughter plea, with 15-20 years for the husband and 3-5 for the wife, I think that would be fair.
I doubt the DA would have brought the murder charge if she thought she couldn't prove the charge.aggressive charge. Wonder if they can pull it off. Manslaughter would have been an easier conviction.
pathetic use of aggression when it wasn't needed though. I'm fine with whatever they convict these people of, unless some shocking news comes out like the guy pulled a gun or something.
You need to unpack this one a bit for us. Please elaborate.My uncle in law was killed in a bar fight. It was manslaughter and the defendant was only given 5 years. The guy served 3 and was out. I just dont think manslaughter holds the same weight.