Pats drafted a CB Chris Canty a few years ago. He was great at shutting down whatever side of the field he wasn't covering.Seriously though, this is a phrase that is either a) tossed around casually by the media; or b) conversely, lambasted by the media for being "over-used".Either way, both these viewpoints I believe stem from it being a subjective term that has never been clearly defined.I think the first step towards clearing up the whole Shutdown Corner (SDC) situation is to clearly quantify what makes up a SDC.One thing people seem to be able to universally agree on in regards to SDCs is that Deion Sanders in his prime was the epitome of the SDC.So if we go and look at Deion's stats during his glory days, I think you get a pretty good baseline of what an SDC should look like on paper.Paradoxically, even though SDCs are DBs, I don't think that INTs are really the best stat based on pure volume, since in theory no one throws at a SDC.The stats I think are relevant are:# of pass plays on field for# of times thrown at# of completed passes# of passes for first downs# of passes for TDs# of Passes Defended# of INTs# of penalties againstI think its then of course logical to look at the completions, INTs, PDs, etc. on a % of overall passes thrown at basis to get an idea of what happened more often when a QB threw at an alleged SDC.I think looking at what those stats were for Deion in his prime gives you a solid view of what a true SDC is. And I think what you will find is no one comes close to those stats, so you want to lower what those are to define a modern day SDC, since many feel Deion was a one-in-a-lifetime player.Anyway, I don't have the time or resources to do such an exercise but I would think if anyone really wanted to define an SDC it would be as good a starting point as any.