Joe Summer
Footballguy
In before Ted Nugent.
When Caesar is portrayed as the current President of the United States.In what way can Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" be classified as 'assassination porn'?
FYPWhen Caesar is portrayed as the current President of the United States and you're a crybaby Republican snowflake since the exact same thing happened with Obama and probably most other American presidents and nobody cared. Also it helps if you have no idea what you're talking about since the theme of the play isn't "yay let's all enjoy the joyous and consequence-free murder of Julius Caesar!"
I'm sure somebody, somewhere, has jerked off to it.In what way can Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" be classified as 'assassination porn'?
not remotely close.Me too. Because it happened. And there weren't any.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/shakesblog/obamas-ides-of-march/
This has been your umpteeth episode of "Conservatives are the real snowflakes." Join us next week when the right throws a hissy fit about a Pride Week promotion or some other nonsense.
Link to the play where that redneck somewhere out there that had Barak in a noose and it's corporate sponsors
Who is stabbing "Trump"?Context matters. It's a Republican stabbing Obama.
I don't get it and I don't think I want to.Probably an Estonian whore.
Fwiw I'm rather conservative and think this isn't worth getting upset about.Link to the play where that redneck somewhere out there that had Barak in a noose and it's corporate sponsors
Oh yeah that's right it's bull#### and never happened.
Never in a play picturing his murder much less sponsored by corporate America. Bush? Never saw it. Clinton! No.
But of course you get the nonchalant this is nothing reaction from the party of tolerance. ####### liberals.
Conservative ≠ imbecile TrumpetteFwiw I'm rather conservative and think this isn't worth getting upset about.
Yeah, if you watch/read to the end, it's not a good thing that Caesar gets killed. Not sure how anyone could argue it's glorifying assassination in any way.How can a production of Julius Casear advocate for murdering someone? You get what happens to Brutus, right?
Obviously none of us have seen either production, but in reading reviews of each production, each has cast Brutus as an ideological opponent of Caesar. The review in the (conservative) journal posted makes it clear that the production present Brutus sympathetically. The new production might no work, but it's hard to imagine it being "assassination porn." When Caesar is assassinated, you still have over half a play to go! The entire play is about the consequences of assassinating Caesar.
Definitely breaks from the original and adds a new spin but it doesn't seem more offensive than the Obama version.A collection of women and minorities.
Keep in mind that's just casting and wardrobe. There's apparently only one textual addition to the text. A three word joke about Trumps statement about how he could kill a guy on 5th Avenue. Brutus, by the way, is played by Corey Stoll, who is a white man.Definitely breaks from the original and adds a new spin but it doesn't seem more offensive than the Obama version.
Oh so you mean actresses and ninority actors are playing the Senators? That's not really a significant change to the interpretation of the story.Keep in mind that's just casting and wardrobe. There's apparently only one textual addition to the text. A three word joke about Trumps statement about how he could kill a guy on 5th Avenue. Brutus, by the way, is played by Corey Stoll, who is a white man.
Obviiusly, I'm not defending the production. I haven't seen the production. Modern updates of Shakespeare can go very right i or very, very wrong.
Yes. And if I understand correctly some of the "mob" for the funeral scene wear ##### hats.Oh so you mean actresses and ninority actors are playing the Senators? That's not really a significant change to the interpretation of the story.
What kind of hats?Yes. And if I understand correctly some of the "mob" for the funeral scene wear ##### hats.
Wow. This is really tough to parse. It would take a while.I'm really confused how @rockaction is interpreting the same play in two different ways? I support both projects. This is why we don't have a king. This is freedom of speech. They are bringing classic art into our world. This is important and rebellious stuff. @rockaction thought you were punk rock and anti authority?
I disagree about public funding of the arts but the rest of this is right on.I think it's depressing how predictable this debate is. Yes, this is ok as artistic license. No, it's not ok as wishcasting. Yes, it's part of free speech so it must be protected. No, government shouldn't be funding anything with a particular political POV. Yes, government should be funding the arts. See Giuliani 1999.
Agree, but what's the political POV here? The drama of JC is a million shades of gray. Neither Brutus nor Caesar are heroes or villains really. There are many complex ways to analyze the drama so I don't see it as a definitive anti- Trump message as much as a deep complicated examination of power, loyalty, duty, fate, etc.I think it's depressing how predictable this debate is. Yes, this is ok as artistic license. No, it's not ok as wishcasting. Yes, it's part of free speech so it must be protected. No, government shouldn't be funding anything with a particular political POV. Yes, government should be funding the arts. See Giuliani 1999.
Agree, but what's the political POV here? The drama of JC is a million shades of gray. Neither Brutus nor Caesar are heroes or villains really. There are many complex ways to analyze the drama so I don't see it as a definitive anti- Trump message as much as a deep complicated examination of power, loyalty, duty, fate, etc.
Admittedly I haven't seen the play as interpreted here but it sounds pretty anti-Trump, which I'd likely share but I think the principle here is state funded speech shouldn't be taking a slant re: any current political landscape.Last month, Gregg Henry, who stars in the play as the Trump-like Julius Caesar, told the website Backstage that he believed the comparison was apt because the Roman ruler “became drunk with ego, drunk with power, drunk with ambition and the belief that he and he alone must rule the world.”
Agree. Now can we discuss healthcare? Where is that much more important discussion?Admittedly I haven't seen the play as interpreted here but it sounds pretty anti-Trump, which I'd likely share but I think the principle here is state funded speech shouldn't be taking a slant re: any current political landscape.
I think dems are split on how to handle issues these days. Some of them are deeply worried that if they dont reach across the aisle soon, the great lakes will turn red forever. Others just dont care and want to act like #######s.You libs love your assassination fantasies. You keep doing them. Even though I'm not a Trump guy, I'll play one for this thread: "Trump thanks you for re-electing him in 2020."
I think there's enough decent people on the Left that - while very active - see this kind of stuff as not being helpful. Griffin already handed Trumpers the signature photo to encapsulate the Left's hate for him. IMO - and I hope I'm wrong - is that we've not seen the last of that photo.I think dems are split on how to handle issues these days. Some of them are deeply worried that if they dont reach across the aisle soon, the great lakes will turn red forever. Others just dont care and want to act like #######s.
It's not helpful because Republican sheep fall for the spin just like you and rockaction and the usual suspects did. When it's pointed out that this exact same play was cast with Obama years ago, instead of retreating and admitting you erred, you double down and blame those who had the facts as being the reason Trump will be re-elected.I think there's enough decent people on the Left that - while very active - see this kind of stuff as not being helpful. Griffin already handed Trumpers the signature photo to encapsulate the Left's hate for him. IMO - and I hope I'm wrong - is that we've not seen the last of that photo.
The democrat problem is that republicans get their news more from alt right sources, so this activity will get highlighted and remembered more. Meanwhile, the good things dems do wont get mentioned. Its just going to cascade.I think there's enough decent people on the Left that - while very active - see this kind of stuff as not being helpful. Griffin already handed Trumpers the signature photo to encapsulate the Left's hate for him. IMO - and I hope I'm wrong - is that we've not seen the last of that photo.
You're funny.The democrat problem is that republicans get their news more from alt right sources, so this activity will get highlighted and remembered more. Meanwhile, the good things dems do wont get mentioned. Its just going to cascade.
I think it's a little distasteful that this play was done with Obama as Julius Caesar. I'm extremely familiar with the play, and I know that in context it is not a pro-assassination message, but I think that as a general principle, it is probably best for our national discourse not to enact the assassination of a current president. I wasn't aware of the Guthrie production of this play. Now that my kids are older, my wife and I have been able to attend a few of their plays, including this year's King Lear, and I am a big fan of their work. But I would not have been 100% comfortable with the Obama play, even though I get what they're doing.It's not helpful because Republican sheep fall for the spin just like you and rockaction and the usual suspects did. When it's pointed out that this exact same play was cast with Obama years ago, instead of retreating and admitting you erred, you double down and blame those who had the facts as being the reason Trump will be re-elected.
Do you realize how insane that is?
Obama as Othello? That'd be a stretch. But, he's the only character of color I can remember from any of Shakespeare's plays. Wait, was Shakespeare racist?If they pushed the limits on Obama, can you imagine the media hysterics?
I can.
Unfortunately true.Riversco said:The democrat problem is that republicans get their news more from alt right sources, so this activity will get highlighted and remembered more. Meanwhile, the good things dems do wont get mentioned. Its just going to cascade.