So I'm working on a 37 man onslaught (1 Viewer)

[jwvdcw]

Put this together tonight...total rough draft here. Tried to go heavy on the Perkinisms.............

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 37

5

2

4 13

37

3

3 3 3 1

36

10 11 19

17 32 18 14 13 16 12 11 10 10 9 9 9 15 35 34

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 11 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 33

22

21 19 20 21 21

31

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33

29 27 28 25

26

23 23 24

22 30

 

[HarryManback]

Incredible formulation.

J. Johnston Hughes would be proud.

 

[Parmcat]

PLEASE bring back online poker to the USA

 

[Wingnut]

looks like a 40 man onslaught to me.

You doubled up on the 3rd flank. Does the skip cover that?

 

[redman]

I am proud of the fact that I have absolutely no idea what this is about. to me.

 

[shuke]

Tried to go heavy on the Perkinisms.............

A little too much, don't you think?I'm pretty sure this was covered ad nauseum in the Morcheux papers.

 

[Keys Myaths]

Seriously. What. The. ????

 

[dickey moe]

Have you considered attempting the Hovenfeld maneuver with the fourth "3" in line 11?

 

[dickey moe]

"Working"? Damn. That looks finished to me. Very nice slaught. Heavy on the Perks is right but you didn't lay it on too thick. Sweet balance with that and the Kyoto bend especially around the mids.

It's spelled "Kiyoto." You're thinking of that treaty.

 

[McBokonon]

21 19 20 21 21

This is where it all falls apart. If you don't see how, there's no need for me to discuss this further. In fact, I'm never revisiting this thread again.

 

[MrPhoenix]

This is all Japanese to me.

 

[shuke]

Have you considered attempting the Hovenfeld maneuver with the fourth "3" in line 11?

 

[Random]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

 

[QUEZILLA]

21 19 20 21 21

This is where it all falls apart. If you don't see how, there's no need for me to discuss this further. In fact, I'm never revisiting this thread again.

 

[ScottNorwood]

Dante Hicks: You said you only had sex with three different guys; you never mentioned him!

Veronica Loughran: Because I never HAD sex with him.

Dante Hicks: You sucked his ####!

Veronica Loughran: We went out a few times. We never had sex but we fooled around.

Dante Hicks: Oh my God, WHY did you tell me you only had sex with three different guys?

Veronica Loughran: Because I DID only have sex with three different guys; that doesn't mean I didn't just go with people.

Dante Hicks: Oh my God, I feel so nauseous!

Veronica Loughran: I'm sorry, Dante, I thought you understood!

Dante Hicks: I did understand! I understood that you had sex with three different guys and that's all you said!

Veronica Loughran: Please calm down.

Dante Hicks: How many?

Veronica Loughran: Dante...

Dante Hicks: How many ##### have you sucked?

Veronica Loughran: Let it go!

Dante Hicks: How many?

Veronica Loughran: All right, shut up a second and I'll tell you! Jesus! I didn't freak out like this when you told me how many girls you ####ed!

Dante Hicks: This is different, this is important. How many?

[long pause as customer buys something]

Dante Hicks: Well?

Veronica Loughran: Something like... 36.

Dante Hicks: What? Something like 36?

Veronica Loughran: Lower your voice.

Dante Hicks: Wait a minute, what is that anyway, something like 36? Does that INCLUDE me?

Veronica Loughran: Ummm... 37.

Dante Hicks: I'm 37?

 

[ScottNorwood]

Dante Hicks: 37! My girlfriend's sucked 37 #####!

Customer with Diapers: In a row?

 

[opticution]

 

[3 out of 5]

Put this together tonight...total rough draft here. Tried to go heavy on the Perkinisms.............

3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 37

5

2

4 13 13 13

37

3

3 3 3 1

36

10 11 19

17 32 18 14 13 16 12 11 10 10 9 9 9 15 35 34

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 11 3 3 21 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 3 33 3 3 3 33

22

21 19 20 21 21 25 25

31

3 3 3 31 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33

29 27

26

23 23 24

22 30

If by "rough draft" what you really mean is "total rip off from the Düsseldorf theorem," then yes, I totally agree with you. You're going to get caught up with the triple-flank errors like in the Arecibo conundrum. I've tried to make some changes above, but really, as people have said, this is not a good way to go about the onslaught.Dickey Moe was right on with the Hovenfeld in line 11. He knows his stuff.

 

[phrozen]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

 

[Draftnik]

Dante Hicks: 37! My girlfriend's sucked 37 #####!

Customer with Diapers: In a row?

Now we're talking onslaught...

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Please explain how this differs substantially from nutting on a guy's back as he pistons his crank in your girl's mouth.

 

[Tough As Nails]

Please explain how this differs substantially from nutting on a guy's back as he pistons his crank in your girl's mouth.

Same thing. Just a creative description.

 

[Spladow!]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

I remember that classic match vividly. The over/under was 36 for the onslaughts in that match, and I put down $1,000 on the over to barely cover by one onslaught. It was a good day for me and Costica.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Please explain how this differs substantially from nutting on a guy's back as he pistons his crank in your girl's mouth.

Same thing. Just a creative description.

But our GB knew nothing about it, which makes me believe they might be different. After all, if anyone would know these things, you would expect it to be him.

 

[3MTA3]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.

 

[Random]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.

It was not a TRUE 37. Trust me, I was there.

 

[phrozen]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.

You could be correct, my details are a little fuzzy of the '98 Romanian Championship. I just remember seeing Eshkanazi for the first time and being blown away at his skills at the allmighty onslaught.I know one thing, us Americans have a lot of catching up to do against Eastern European competition. They are a dominant force in the onslaught world.

 

[3MTA3]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.

You could be correct, my details are a little fuzzy of the '98 Romanian Championship. I just remember seeing Eshkanazi for the first time and being blown away at his skills at the allmighty onslaught.I know one thing, us Americans have a lot of catching up to do against Eastern European competition. They are a dominant force in the onslaught world.

 

[Random]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.

You could be correct, my details are a little fuzzy of the '98 Romanian Championship. I just remember seeing Eshkanazi for the first time and being blown away at his skills at the allmighty onslaught.I know one thing, us Americans have a lot of catching up to do against Eastern European competition. They are a dominant force in the onslaught world.

It is still in its infancy in the US. There are a few Highlemoresonian players here though, and they are bound to light things up for us in the next WOC.

 

[3MTA3]

Anybody catch the results of the Rosomov/Jones match last night?

 

[Mr Capicollo]

This thread has all the dynamics to be considered for thread of the year.

Mystery

Intrigue

Random shots

Innerweb convo

and Bob Sacamano

 

[Green94]

 

[valhallan]

 

[Assani Fisher]

LogistX: 200

SF

ATL

KC

Miami

Houston

Detroit

CardSharpCook: 3000(2000 owed)

ATL

SF

STL

Miami

Oak

Detroit

Shantanut: 200

Miami

Balt

KC

SF

Cincy

Chicago

jalapenoguy: 600

Atl

Balt

KC

Mia

Oak

SF

kdog: 200

Atl

Balt

KC

Mia

Oak

SF

MyTurn2Raise: 300

Atl

Det

Miami

Oak

Stl

SF

frostbrn: 100

Miami

Atl

Oak

KC

Houston

Baltimore

Jimboozie #1: 250

KC

Chi

Miami

Cincy

NY Giants

Tenn

Jimboozie #2: 250

KC

Chi

Miami

Cincy

Stl

Atl

Teams taken:

Miami: 9

ATL: 7

KC: 7

SF: 6

Oak: 5

Balt: 4

Det: 3

STL: 3

Chicago: 3

Cincy: 3

Houston: 2

Tenn: 1

NYG: 1

 

[McJose]

Interesting

 

[Moe Green]

Great stuff in here. I ran into William Cragsworth on a train ride up to Berkeley last summer, of all things. He proposed the following opening in the third round of a best of five set*:

543643 999 232434 01

01 01 34354 22

6

6

453

I asked him about the use of consecutive 6's in the 3rd and 4th lines and he winked and just said "That's the secret." I never got more out of him and we moved on to lesser things.

*Edit to add that this would be in tournament play.

 

[Mr. Chumley]

A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.

It was not a TRUE 37. Trust me, I was there.

He's right it was cheap trick and wasn’t really a 37 man onslaught. Eshkenazi used a simple 13 man onslaught and a 14 man onslaught back to back. He used the rashminov maneuver to link them so technically it wasn't a 37 man onslaught. This would never fly under international onslaught rules.

 

[piratemike]

Jalapenoguy should've known better with that Balt pick.

 

[fasteddie_21]

Atlanta &/or Miami, plzkthx.

 

[fasteddie_21]

Atlanta &/or Miami, plzkthx.

Ship the $$$!

 

[Buckychudd]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

 

[Tom Servo]

Still have no idea what's going on here.

 

[mquinnjr]

I am proud of the fact that I have absolutely no idea what this is about. to me.

Thought this was a WetDream Friday thread.

 

[tdoss]

Bucky...I don't want to call you a liar...but this exact onslaught principal was proposed in last year's OOC.

I assume you're disguising it as your own and bringing it here just to start this damned tired debate again.

 

[Franknbeans]

that's what she said

 

[yellowdog]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

Any progress made on the Trovsky maneuver in line 3 is negated by the run of 1s in line 4. You could've gotten by with it had you concluded with a 2 level Willhelm after line 4.

 

[tdoss]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

Any progress made on the Trovsky maneuver in line 3 is negated by the run of 1s in line 4. You could've gotten by with it had you concluded with a 2 level Willhelm after line 4.

He's obviously just baiting you, yellow.

I refuse to believe he posted this on accident.

 

[TheIronSheik]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

It's the 198 that interests me. Can't tell if that's dumb, or if it's genius.

 

[Thorn]

Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

Any progress made on the Trovsky maneuver in line 3 is negated by the run of 1s in line 4. You could've gotten by with it had you concluded with a 2 level Willhelm after line 4.

He's obviously just baiting you, yellow.

I refuse to believe he posted this on accident.

didn't even format it correctly.

 

[[icon]]

Genius