What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

STAR WARS: EP 7 ***SPOILER ZONE*** - Go here if you've seen it (1 Viewer)

lol - I did not pay attention to casting - just assumed Maz was played by Linda Hunt
The difference in size/proportion between Lupita and Maz is part of the technical challenge of remapping facial mocap from actor to target character. All interesting technical and creative achievements. And her body/costume is fully digital too. Not just a "little person" with head replacement.

 
My 8 year old daughter watched Return of the Jedi on the way to the beach today. She loved it and loves SW now. I'm a very happy dad. Pretty sure that is one thing we can all agree on.

She cant wait until SW land at Disney is complete. I need to figure out a way to have both my kids do the Jedi Academy. We got to the beach and my 6 year old "found" his jedi academy done with Mickey ears. You would have thought it was Christmas again.

We can argue plot holes, we can argue story lines and similarities, we can argue incest and birth parents. Episode 7 brought my kids into the SW world. For that, I love it (I already loved it) and can not wait to go see 8 with them.

 
Realized while watching that "modern trailer" for Empire that is has been WAY to long since I've watched it.. guess what will be on the T.v. tomorrow night :)

Then Saturday going to see Awaken for the 2nd viewing. :thumbup:

 
Buddy Ball 2K3 said:
Sandeman said:
I'm sure it's been said. It's like A New Hope II. So similar. I expected more.
Not sure I get this. Where you alive for the last three steaming piles of crap we saw that were called Star Wars films? The bar was set exceptionally low and at worst Awakens is on par with Jedi.
Pretty damn low bar here. No wonder you are so weird about this movie.

 
dparker713 said:
Insein said:
Fin being Luke's trainee also would be too much.

Also, isn't it weird to have a force flash back to a point in time when the object you're touching wasn't even there? Why would Luke's light saber that fell on Bespin contain anything that would jog Reys memories? The cave on Degobah contained an immense amount of dark side energy that trigger a hallucination in Luke to show him a metaphor of what he may become. He meditated to see past places and future of Han and Leia in the clouds but it wasn't tied to an object.

I mean objects have had force latency in the former EU before but usually tied to a point in time that the object experienced. Unless Luke somehow found his light saber shortly after ROTJ and then gave it to Maz after Ren killed his students.

Either way, its unusual.
You're complaining about how magic works.
I told you my brain can't ignore all the Star Wars things I know.
Sadly, they scrapped a whole bunch of that stuff.

 
Anyone see that when Rey was fixing the poison gas leak on the Falcon and was pointing at pieces for Finn to hand her, one of them was the little flying ball that shot bolts at Luke when he was trying to learn how to use the Force?

 
Anyone see that when Rey was fixing the poison gas leak on the Falcon and was pointing at pieces for Finn to hand her, one of them was the little flying ball that shot bolts at Luke when he was trying to learn how to use the Force?
Someone mentioned that earlier in the thread. That was a very cool throw back bit.

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.

 
Buddy Ball 2K3 said:
Sandeman said:
I'm sure it's been said. It's like A New Hope II. So similar. I expected more.
Not sure I get this. Where you alive for the last three steaming piles of crap we saw that were called Star Wars films? The bar was set exceptionally low and at worst Awakens is on par with Jedi.
Just cause 1-3 sucked doesn't give them a pass to make TFA too similar to ANH.

My point is that there are stark similarities between ANH and TFA that made it predictable. I was hoping for a twist that would have made it more interesting from a plot sense (the action was great). Killing off Han isn't good enough. That was predictable too. Granted, that scene was striking similar to The Empire Strikes Back.
There are a surprising number of catwalks in the EU. Those things are dangerous.
Yeah but they save a ton of money on flooring, which they can then use to shore up the exhaust ports.
"Hey Supreme Leader, we're trying to get this star killer thing going but, well we're over budget. Don't panic, we can get it done, we just need to take the hand rails off that cat walk suspended over a thousand foot drop though. We cool?"

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
Nice to see you GB. Also, congrats on having a great father. ;)

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
I actually think the final moments, after he's stabbed but before he falls down the shaft is the best acting Ford did all movie.

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
The script tried to show Kylo Rens inferiority complex, but with so many people upset that Ren is a weak villain, this message was lost on a lot. Perhaps people viewing the movie over and over again will bring to light just how important his inferiority complex is to his character. But really, my only complaint about the movie is how this important aspect about such an important character was left to just a few lines to establish. It would have been much better if perhaps when Han and Leia were talking, a flash back is shown where Ben is young and can't seem to please his father (Han), or believes he is a failure even though Han doesn't think he is. Then, in the scene where Ren kills Han, it would have been better if Ren surrendered even more than he did in the movie. Perhaps completely let go of the lightsaber... they hug... and then begin walking side by side, leading the audience to believe Han succeeded... perhaps then switch to a scene of the X-wings making progress... then go back to Ren and Han, where Ren says something like "I'm sorry I failed you" to which Han replies "Son, you never failed me", which hearing it infuriates Ren so much that in a split second the light saber is in his hand and in Han's gut. That would have done a much better job of establishing Ren's inferiority complex than him changing his mind with no dialogue. With such a weak death of Han scene, Ren just comes across as a ####, and we're left to Rey telling him that he's afraid he'll never be as powerful as Darth Vader to understand why he's such a weak villain. The lines are there explaining why he's so weak, which makes him such an interesting character. But it could have been built up better so he doesn't come across as a weak character like so many are comprehending him to be. Again, perhaps repeated viewings will help people understand how interesting he is because of his weaknesses.

 
Somehow my bother said he hated it for the reasons Andy listed. Which begs the ?, Andy you're not from Columbus are you?

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
I actually don't mind that Han's death had an artificial feel, because it helps to desensitize my connection to the character. Instead of feeling devastated about the loss of a beloved character, my attitude was more like "Oh, I guess Harrison Ford didn't want to do another sequel."

Also, the prequels had already set a precedent for indiscriminate killings. It's hard to care when a Star Wars character dies anymore.

 
People saying/guessing that Fin is related to Mace Windu or Lando are basically saying that there can only be two black people in space. There's no other reason to say that other than that we feel like everyone has to be someone's kid. Who is Po's father? Wedge Antilles?

It will be annoying enough (to me) if Rey is someone's daughter, especially Luke's. That means that a droid carrying a map to Luke Skywalker happened to roll by Luke Skywalker's secret, brainwashed daughter's AT-AT hut on some planet. It will change how I look at that movie.

And yes, I'm aware that something very close to that happened in ANH, but at least it was a message to Kenobi who was living near Luke (we later found out) specifically to keep an eye on Luke. But even still, allowing for a coincidence in the old movies doesn't mean it just should be repeated.

I hope Ray is nobody, just a force-gifted nobody on the side of the galactic road who ends up growing into a powerful, significant figure. But I guess that's too much to ask for.

I really hope she hasn't been mind-wiped because that's just ######ed.

I gave this movie an 8.5 out of 10, with the only significant qualms being the third spherical planet destroying device being destroyed by an X-Wing pew-pewing at a structure vulnerability, and the weird non-explanation as to what the Resistance is. Depending on where they go in the next one, that my retroactively bring that number down.

 
A trip to Ireland maybe in order :)

The island's craggy and vertiginous peaks are uninhabited -- but were once the site of a sixth-century Christian monastery.
There's am interesting video in that page which shows the reactions of four CNN staffers seeing ANH for the first time. It highlights some stuff that is, I think, being missed by Insein, AD, and others who are big OT and EU fans but unhappy with the gaps in the plot of TFA; namely, how hugely important the shared experience was when the OT came out. The one gal has a complaint about what kind of farming they were doing on Tatooine. When everyone was talking about SW in 1977, she would have asked one of her friends about that and they would have been able to tell her maybe because they read the book. Another viewer complains about how easy it was to blow up the death star and the overlay is like "duh, because of the Force!"Shared experience and speculation/discussion is a HUGE part of the magic, and whatever flaws you see in TFA, you must admit that's happening now in reaction to this movie...and that's a good thing imo. It makes this special like many movies can't be, and the mystery is crucial to that experience. You give up some precision and let in some flaws when you leave some space for mystery. The payoff is worth it imo. And I'd posit that this space, this specialness, is not only where the magic comes from, it allowed the EU to exist and flourish for all these years - the desire to know more, to fill in those holes with depth, collectively, IS the magic.

 
People saying/guessing that Fin is related to Mace Windu or Lando are basically saying that there can only be two black people in space. There's no other reason to say that other than that we feel like everyone has to be someone's kid. Who is Po's father? Wedge Antilles?

It will be annoying enough (to me) if Rey is someone's daughter, especially Luke's. That means that a droid carrying a map to Luke Skywalker happened to roll by Luke Skywalker's secret, brainwashed daughter's AT-AT hut on some planet. It will change how I look at that movie.

And yes, I'm aware that something very close to that happened in ANH, but at least it was a message to Kenobi who was living near Luke (we later found out) specifically to keep an eye on Luke. But even still, allowing for a coincidence in the old movies doesn't mean it just should be repeated.

I hope Ray is nobody, just a force-gifted nobody on the side of the galactic road who ends up growing into a powerful, significant figure. But I guess that's too much to ask for.

I really hope she hasn't been mind-wiped because that's just ######ed.

I gave this movie an 8.5 out of 10, with the only significant qualms being the third spherical planet destroying device being destroyed by an X-Wing pew-pewing at a structure vulnerability, and the weird non-explanation as to what the Resistance is. Depending on where they go in the next one, that my retroactively bring that number down.
At the risk of completely detailing this thread, I humbly suggest that perhaps the Force has something to do with these hard to believe coincidences.Like in real life.

I believe this is another big factor in what makes the magic in this franchise - it taps into faith.

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
The script tried to show Kylo Rens inferiority complex, but with so many people upset that Ren is a weak villain, this message was lost on a lot. Perhaps people viewing the movie over and over again will bring to light just how important his inferiority complex is to his character. But really, my only complaint about the movie is how this important aspect about such an important character was left to just a few lines to establish. It would have been much better if perhaps when Han and Leia were talking, a flash back is shown where Ben is young and can't seem to please his father (Han), or believes he is a failure even though Han doesn't think he is. Then, in the scene where Ren kills Han, it would have been better if Ren surrendered even more than he did in the movie. Perhaps completely let go of the lightsaber... they hug... and then begin walking side by side, leading the audience to believe Han succeeded... perhaps then switch to a scene of the X-wings making progress... then go back to Ren and Han, where Ren says something like "I'm sorry I failed you" to which Han replies "Son, you never failed me", which hearing it infuriates Ren so much that in a split second the light saber is in his hand and in Han's gut. That would have done a much better job of establishing Ren's inferiority complex than him changing his mind with no dialogue. With such a weak death of Han scene, Ren just comes across as a ####, and we're left to Rey telling him that he's afraid he'll never be as powerful as Darth Vader to understand why he's such a weak villain. The lines are there explaining why he's so weak, which makes him such an interesting character. But it could have been built up better so he doesn't come across as a weak character like so many are comprehending him to be. Again, perhaps repeated viewings will help people understand how interesting he is because of his weaknesses.
He didn't change his mind imo. Just needed the strength to embrace the Dark Side (which is established in a couple prior scenes).
 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
I actually don't mind that Han's death had an artificial feel, because it helps to desensitize my connection to the character. Instead of feeling devastated about the loss of a beloved character, my attitude was more like "Oh, I guess Harrison Ford didn't want to do another sequel."

Also, the prequels had already set a precedent for indiscriminate killings. It's hard to care when a Star Wars character dies anymore.
I wasn't really shocked at all by Han's death. He's the ANH version of Ben Kenobi, as Luke is the same as Yoda.

 
A trip to Ireland maybe in order :)

The island's craggy and vertiginous peaks are uninhabited -- but were once the site of a sixth-century Christian monastery.
There's am interesting video in that page which shows the reactions of four CNN staffers seeing ANH for the first time. It highlights some stuff that is, I think, being missed by Insein, AD, and others who are big OT and EU fans but unhappy with the gaps in the plot of TFA; namely, how hugely important the shared experience was when the OT came out. The one gal has a complaint about what kind of farming they were doing on Tatooine. When everyone was talking about SW in 1977, she would have asked one of her friends about that and they would have been able to tell her maybe because they read the book. Another viewer complains about how easy it was to blow up the death star and the overlay is like "duh, because of the Force!"Shared experience and speculation/discussion is a HUGE part of the magic, and whatever flaws you see in TFA, you must admit that's happening now in reaction to this movie...and that's a good thing imo. It makes this special like many movies can't be, and the mystery is crucial to that experience. You give up some precision and let in some flaws when you leave some space for mystery. The payoff is worth it imo. And I'd posit that this space, this specialness, is not only where the magic comes from, it allowed the EU to exist and flourish for all these years - the desire to know more, to fill in those holes with depth, collectively, IS the magic.
Very :goodposting:

Just using the FFA as an example.. How many other Movie threads are 49 pages( well at least on my screen ;) ) and counting??

Wonder what the number of pages will end at seeing as we have 18 months to go before the next one and this one has only been around for a couple of weeks?

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
The script tried to show Kylo Rens inferiority complex, but with so many people upset that Ren is a weak villain, this message was lost on a lot. Perhaps people viewing the movie over and over again will bring to light just how important his inferiority complex is to his character. But really, my only complaint about the movie is how this important aspect about such an important character was left to just a few lines to establish. It would have been much better if perhaps when Han and Leia were talking, a flash back is shown where Ben is young and can't seem to please his father (Han), or believes he is a failure even though Han doesn't think he is. Then, in the scene where Ren kills Han, it would have been better if Ren surrendered even more than he did in the movie. Perhaps completely let go of the lightsaber... they hug... and then begin walking side by side, leading the audience to believe Han succeeded... perhaps then switch to a scene of the X-wings making progress... then go back to Ren and Han, where Ren says something like "I'm sorry I failed you" to which Han replies "Son, you never failed me", which hearing it infuriates Ren so much that in a split second the light saber is in his hand and in Han's gut. That would have done a much better job of establishing Ren's inferiority complex than him changing his mind with no dialogue. With such a weak death of Han scene, Ren just comes across as a ####, and we're left to Rey telling him that he's afraid he'll never be as powerful as Darth Vader to understand why he's such a weak villain. The lines are there explaining why he's so weak, which makes him such an interesting character. But it could have been built up better so he doesn't come across as a weak character like so many are comprehending him to be. Again, perhaps repeated viewings will help people understand how interesting he is because of his weaknesses.
He didn't change his mind imo. Just needed the strength to embrace the Dark Side (which is established in a couple prior scenes).
I'll grant that I'm not a Star Wars nerd to the degree that I've read as much EU stuff (can't believe I just typed that) as others here. So I could easily be wrong here.

But what you said goes contrary to my understanding of the dark side. Yoda told Luke that the dark side is "easier":

Luke: "Is the dark side stronger?"

Yoda: "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive."

If Ren is being torn between both sides like the scene suggests he was, he needed strength to choose his father over the dark side. He didn't need strength to embrace the dark side. He embraced the dark side in the scene because he was too weak not too.

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
The script tried to show Kylo Rens inferiority complex, but with so many people upset that Ren is a weak villain, this message was lost on a lot. Perhaps people viewing the movie over and over again will bring to light just how important his inferiority complex is to his character. But really, my only complaint about the movie is how this important aspect about such an important character was left to just a few lines to establish. It would have been much better if perhaps when Han and Leia were talking, a flash back is shown where Ben is young and can't seem to please his father (Han), or believes he is a failure even though Han doesn't think he is. Then, in the scene where Ren kills Han, it would have been better if Ren surrendered even more than he did in the movie. Perhaps completely let go of the lightsaber... they hug... and then begin walking side by side, leading the audience to believe Han succeeded... perhaps then switch to a scene of the X-wings making progress... then go back to Ren and Han, where Ren says something like "I'm sorry I failed you" to which Han replies "Son, you never failed me", which hearing it infuriates Ren so much that in a split second the light saber is in his hand and in Han's gut. That would have done a much better job of establishing Ren's inferiority complex than him changing his mind with no dialogue. With such a weak death of Han scene, Ren just comes across as a ####, and we're left to Rey telling him that he's afraid he'll never be as powerful as Darth Vader to understand why he's such a weak villain. The lines are there explaining why he's so weak, which makes him such an interesting character. But it could have been built up better so he doesn't come across as a weak character like so many are comprehending him to be. Again, perhaps repeated viewings will help people understand how interesting he is because of his weaknesses.
He didn't change his mind imo. Just needed the strength to embrace the Dark Side (which is established in a couple prior scenes).
I'll grant that I'm not a Star Wars nerd to the degree that I've read as much EU stuff (can't believe I just typed that) as others here. So I could easily be wrong here.

But what you said goes contrary to my understanding of the dark side. Yoda told Luke that the dark side is "easier":

Luke: "Is the dark side stronger?"

Yoda: "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive."

If Ren is being torn between both sides like the scene suggests he was, he needed strength to choose his father over the dark side. He didn't need strength to embrace the dark side. He embraced the dark side in the scene because he was too weak not too.
:thumbup:

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
The script tried to show Kylo Rens inferiority complex, but with so many people upset that Ren is a weak villain, this message was lost on a lot. Perhaps people viewing the movie over and over again will bring to light just how important his inferiority complex is to his character. But really, my only complaint about the movie is how this important aspect about such an important character was left to just a few lines to establish. It would have been much better if perhaps when Han and Leia were talking, a flash back is shown where Ben is young and can't seem to please his father (Han), or believes he is a failure even though Han doesn't think he is. Then, in the scene where Ren kills Han, it would have been better if Ren surrendered even more than he did in the movie. Perhaps completely let go of the lightsaber... they hug... and then begin walking side by side, leading the audience to believe Han succeeded... perhaps then switch to a scene of the X-wings making progress... then go back to Ren and Han, where Ren says something like "I'm sorry I failed you" to which Han replies "Son, you never failed me", which hearing it infuriates Ren so much that in a split second the light saber is in his hand and in Han's gut. That would have done a much better job of establishing Ren's inferiority complex than him changing his mind with no dialogue. With such a weak death of Han scene, Ren just comes across as a ####, and we're left to Rey telling him that he's afraid he'll never be as powerful as Darth Vader to understand why he's such a weak villain. The lines are there explaining why he's so weak, which makes him such an interesting character. But it could have been built up better so he doesn't come across as a weak character like so many are comprehending him to be. Again, perhaps repeated viewings will help people understand how interesting he is because of his weaknesses.
He didn't change his mind imo. Just needed the strength to embrace the Dark Side (which is established in a couple prior scenes).
I'll grant that I'm not a Star Wars nerd to the degree that I've read as much EU stuff (can't believe I just typed that) as others here. So I could easily be wrong here.

But what you said goes contrary to my understanding of the dark side. Yoda told Luke that the dark side is "easier":

Luke: "Is the dark side stronger?"

Yoda: "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive."

If Ren is being torn between both sides like the scene suggests he was, he needed strength to choose his father over the dark side. He didn't need strength to embrace the dark side. He embraced the dark side in the scene because he was too weak not too.
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.

 
The big moment of the film, Ben killing Han carries way to little weight because of the lack of any basis of their relationship. I felt no connection or emotion in Han's death scene other than Han is dead. Not why Ren killed him or why Solo loved him. Sure there's some exposition about their relationship but exposition doesn't give us an emotional connection, it isn't character development. It's just information. Leia was just explaining things to the audience, that was it. It would have been nice to have seen some kind of reciprocal love existing in that family - between father and son - before that final act irredeemably ripped it apart forever. If we could have seen Ben's love and admiration for his father, then his final hateful act would have carried a tragic weight. As is, it's too artificial, we know it's supposed to heartbreakingly tragic, but the biggest complaint I see from fans is that most people didn't feel it. I didn't feel it. It was just a shock to see a nostalgic hero die.
The script tried to show Kylo Rens inferiority complex, but with so many people upset that Ren is a weak villain, this message was lost on a lot. Perhaps people viewing the movie over and over again will bring to light just how important his inferiority complex is to his character. But really, my only complaint about the movie is how this important aspect about such an important character was left to just a few lines to establish. It would have been much better if perhaps when Han and Leia were talking, a flash back is shown where Ben is young and can't seem to please his father (Han), or believes he is a failure even though Han doesn't think he is. Then, in the scene where Ren kills Han, it would have been better if Ren surrendered even more than he did in the movie. Perhaps completely let go of the lightsaber... they hug... and then begin walking side by side, leading the audience to believe Han succeeded... perhaps then switch to a scene of the X-wings making progress... then go back to Ren and Han, where Ren says something like "I'm sorry I failed you" to which Han replies "Son, you never failed me", which hearing it infuriates Ren so much that in a split second the light saber is in his hand and in Han's gut. That would have done a much better job of establishing Ren's inferiority complex than him changing his mind with no dialogue. With such a weak death of Han scene, Ren just comes across as a ####, and we're left to Rey telling him that he's afraid he'll never be as powerful as Darth Vader to understand why he's such a weak villain. The lines are there explaining why he's so weak, which makes him such an interesting character. But it could have been built up better so he doesn't come across as a weak character like so many are comprehending him to be. Again, perhaps repeated viewings will help people understand how interesting he is because of his weaknesses.
He didn't change his mind imo. Just needed the strength to embrace the Dark Side (which is established in a couple prior scenes).
I'll grant that I'm not a Star Wars nerd to the degree that I've read as much EU stuff (can't believe I just typed that) as others here. So I could easily be wrong here.

But what you said goes contrary to my understanding of the dark side. Yoda told Luke that the dark side is "easier":

Luke: "Is the dark side stronger?"

Yoda: "No, no, no. Quicker, easier, more seductive."

If Ren is being torn between both sides like the scene suggests he was, he needed strength to choose his father over the dark side. He didn't need strength to embrace the dark side. He embraced the dark side in the scene because he was too weak not too.
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
I agree. The whole "you were right... tell your sister you were right" last words of Vader are paramount to his character as a whole from beginning to end. Luke was right that there was still good in him. Vader's weakness was he was a control freak. He wanted control over things he had no control over. His mother dying. His fear of Padme dying. Obi Wan telling him what to do. He wasn't strong enough to overcome the emperor who was wise enough to manipulate Vader's control freak weakness. As the scene with Han and Ren showed, there is still good in Ren, but his inferiority complex doesn't need someone wise to manipulate. It manifests on it's own, which is why he has temper tantrums and randomly smashes things, where as Vader would choke people and kill people because he wants control over them.

 
I liked Ren as a character, and I thought Adam Driver did a fine job. it seems like he's always just a hair away from completely losing it, and sometimes he does lose it...RIP control panels. and he also wants to be just like his grandpappy, but isn't there yet, which is a pretty big source of angst for him. add in the daddy issues, and he's a messed up dude. I thought he conveyed that pretty well.
I actually liked him even better the second time around.

 
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
Vader couldn't bring himself to kill Luke, nor did he kill Han or Chewie when he had the chance on Bespin. That's what made him redeemable. He was a bad guy, but he wasn't evil in the way that the Emperor or Grand Moff Tarkin were.That's a stark contrast to Kylo Ren, who had little problem killing his own father (not to mention the way he coldheartedly ordered the execution of innocent villagers on Jakku).

 
So imagine we find out Rey is Luke's daughter. She gets some training from Luke as does Kylo with Snoke's help.

Now we get a rematch between the two. They are fighting and Darth Vader's force ghost appears and Kylo is ecstatic that his grandfather is there to help guide him. Instead he shocks Kylo and tells him what an ### and fool he is and helps Rey instead. I could see that happening. He did redeem himself after all in saving Luke from the Emperor.

 
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
Vader couldn't bring himself to kill Luke, nor did he kill Han or Chewie when he had the chance on Bespin. That's what made him redeemable. He was a bad guy, but he wasn't evil in the way that the Emperor or Grand Moff Tarkin were.That's a stark contrast to Kylo Ren, who had little problem killing his own father (not to mention the way he coldheartedly ordered the execution of innocent villagers on Jakku).
He slaughters the Jedi children at the temple. Even if you don't consider sand people real people (racist), killing hundreds of children in cold blood is pretty evil.

 
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
Vader couldn't bring himself to kill Luke, nor did he kill Han or Chewie when he had the chance on Bespin. That's what made him redeemable. He was a bad guy, but he wasn't evil in the way that the Emperor or Grand Moff Tarkin were.That's a stark contrast to Kylo Ren, who had little problem killing his own father (not to mention the way he coldheartedly ordered the execution of innocent villagers on Jakku).
He slaughters the Jedi children at the temple. Even if you don't consider sand people real people (racist), killing hundreds of children in cold blood is pretty evil.
Yeah, even though we are to accept that Vader is evil i remember being pretty shocked that Lucas did that.

 
If yoda and the Jedi council were so strong with the force, how did they not recognize the dark side with the chancellor?
Because the dark side clouds everything.They WEREN'T very strong at that point.
When Mace Windu says "Perhaps its time to inform the Senate our ability to use the force has diminished." I felt like Yoda should have said "smack you upside the head, I must." Why would you ever admit that?

 
http://io9.gizmodo.com/a-not-so-brief-history-of-george-lucas-talking-####-abo-1750464055?rev=1451580545449&utm_campaign=socialflow_io9_twitter&utm_source=io9_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
 
Buddy Ball 2K3 said:
Sandeman said:
I'm sure it's been said. It's like A New Hope II. So similar. I expected more.
Not sure I get this. Where you alive for the last three steaming piles of crap we saw that were called Star Wars films? The bar was set exceptionally low and at worst Awakens is on par with Jedi.
Just cause 1-3 sucked doesn't give them a pass to make TFA too similar to ANH.

My point is that there are stark similarities between ANH and TFA that made it predictable. I was hoping for a twist that would have made it more interesting from a plot sense (the action was great). Killing off Han isn't good enough. That was predictable too. Granted, that scene was striking similar to The Empire Strikes Back.
There are a surprising number of catwalks in the EU. Those things are dangerous.
Yeah but they save a ton of money on flooring, which they can then use to shore up the exhaust ports.
"Hey Supreme Leader, we're trying to get this star killer thing going but, well we're over budget. Don't panic, we can get it done, we just need to take the hand rails off that cat walk suspended over a thousand foot drop though. We cool?"
"Hey, don't try that choke hold thing on me. If you don't like it you're going to have to take it up with Galactic Local 25^187".

 
http://io9.gizmodo.com/a-not-so-brief-history-of-george-lucas-talking-####-abo-1750464055?rev=1451580545449&utm_campaign=socialflow_io9_twitter&utm_source=io9_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Taking the divorce thing a little further, he sounds pissed that his kids' new dad is raising them better than he could and the neighborhood likes the kids better too.
 
If yoda and the Jedi council were so strong with the force, how did they not recognize the dark side with the chancellor?
Because the dark side clouds everything.They WEREN'T very strong at that point.
When Mace Windu says "Perhaps its time to inform the Senate our ability to use the force has diminished." I felt like Yoda should have said "smack you upside the head, I must." Why would you ever admit that?
What about when they find a bunch of clone soldiers out of nowhere and they're just like "Hey, we have a cool army now. What could possibly go wrong?"

 
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
Vader couldn't bring himself to kill Luke, nor did he kill Han or Chewie when he had the chance on Bespin. That's what made him redeemable. He was a bad guy, but he wasn't evil in the way that the Emperor or Grand Moff Tarkin were.That's a stark contrast to Kylo Ren, who had little problem killing his own father (not to mention the way he coldheartedly ordered the execution of innocent villagers on Jakku).
He slaughters the Jedi children at the temple. Even if you don't consider sand people real people (racist), killing hundreds of children in cold blood is pretty evil.
And that's part of the reason why the prequels sucked so much! It ruined the character of Darth Vader. Return Of The Jedi was a satisfying conclusion to fans in 1983 because they were able to accept the possibility of Darth Vader being redeemed. But they would not have been so willing to accept that possibility if they'd known that he murdered baby sandpeople.

I don't think Kylo Ren can be redeemed in the way that Vader was. I don't think the fans would accept it. Not after they saw what he did to so many innocent people.

 
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
Vader couldn't bring himself to kill Luke, nor did he kill Han or Chewie when he had the chance on Bespin. That's what made him redeemable. He was a bad guy, but he wasn't evil in the way that the Emperor or Grand Moff Tarkin were.That's a stark contrast to Kylo Ren, who had little problem killing his own father (not to mention the way he coldheartedly ordered the execution of innocent villagers on Jakku).
He killed Kenobi, his mentor, didn't care when Alderaan was destroyed, and tortured Leia in 4. He tortured Han and the encased him in carbonite without care of the potential to kill him and then he chopped off his own sons hand in 5. And let's recall he stops the fight on Bespin to turn Luke and get him to join him in killing his master. There's every indication that he's willing to kill Luke on that bridge. Frankly, rewatching the entire first trilogy, seeing Anakin alongside Ben and Yoda at the end is rather jarring. After all the bad stuff he does his full redemption just by destroying the emperor seems a bit unearned.

 
http://io9.gizmodo.com/a-not-so-brief-history-of-george-lucas-talking-####-abo-1750464055?rev=1451580545449&utm_campaign=socialflow_io9_twitter&utm_source=io9_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
thank whatever deity you believe in that Lucas had no part of this. Sounds like a real nerfherder.
 
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
Vader couldn't bring himself to kill Luke, nor did he kill Han or Chewie when he had the chance on Bespin. That's what made him redeemable. He was a bad guy, but he wasn't evil in the way that the Emperor or Grand Moff Tarkin were.That's a stark contrast to Kylo Ren, who had little problem killing his own father (not to mention the way he coldheartedly ordered the execution of innocent villagers on Jakku).
He slaughters the Jedi children at the temple. Even if you don't consider sand people real people (racist), killing hundreds of children in cold blood is pretty evil.
And that's part of the reason why the prequels sucked so much! It ruined the character of Darth Vader. Return Of The Jedi was a satisfying conclusion to fans in 1983 because they were able to accept the possibility of Darth Vader being redeemed. But they would not have been so willing to accept that possibility if they'd known that he murdered baby sandpeople.I don't think Kylo Ren can be redeemed in the way that Vader was. I don't think the fans would accept it. Not after they saw what he did to so many innocent people.
Vader was a mass murderer even before the prequels. The officially sanctioned books of the former EU told of how he went to worlds "persuaded" them to join the Empire or else. He also hunted down the few remaining Jedi and those that stood in his way didn't really get a polite please move aside.

I get the prequels heavy handed treatment but most of us knew how much of a boogie man Vader was to the galaxy already.

 
If you recall, even Vader was conflicted. But Vader was also a Sith, with a Master that influenced and controlled him.
Vader couldn't bring himself to kill Luke, nor did he kill Han or Chewie when he had the chance on Bespin. That's what made him redeemable. He was a bad guy, but he wasn't evil in the way that the Emperor or Grand Moff Tarkin were.That's a stark contrast to Kylo Ren, who had little problem killing his own father (not to mention the way he coldheartedly ordered the execution of innocent villagers on Jakku).
He killed Kenobi, his mentor, didn't care when Alderaan was destroyed, and tortured Leia in 4. He tortured Han and the encased him in carbonite without care of the potential to kill him and then he chopped off his own sons hand in 5. And let's recall he stops the fight on Bespin to turn Luke and get him to join him in killing his master. There's every indication that he's willing to kill Luke on that bridge.Frankly, rewatching the entire first trilogy, seeing Anakin alongside Ben and Yoda at the end is rather jarring. After all the bad stuff he does his full redemption just by destroying the emperor seems a bit unearned.
Anakin was justified in killing the sandpeople because of what they did to his mother.

The Jedi were an evil organization that used clone slaves and children as fighters in their army. You could argue he shouldn't have slaughtered children but he wanted the organization destroyed and it needed to be done.

Killing the Emperor was a huge deal because it meant the end of the Empire. Anakin's anger was directed at the Jedi and with his son being the last one he was able to let go of the hatred he had for them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't realize they totally abandoned his outline. It still seems that they are borrowing from the books, all of which were ultimately approved by George Lucas.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top