What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Start McNabb this week (1 Viewer)

thehornet

Footballguy
His FBG Week 1 Ranking is an absolute disgrace. I cant even count how many times this guy has been a top 10 QB, yet you have guys like stafford, noodle arm palmer and kolb(!) ranked ahead oh him.

this guy is going big this week. 250+ with 3 total scores

 
His FBG Week 1 Ranking is an absolute disgrace. I cant even count how many times this guy has been a top 10 QB, yet you have guys like stafford, noodle arm palmer and kolb(!) ranked ahead oh him. this guy is going big this week. 250+ with 3 total scores
You ever heard of Demarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer? McNabb is still battling an ankle injury and was massacred by Dallas in consecutive games last year with a better supporting cast. I think his ranking is on point.
 
His FBG Week 1 Ranking is an absolute disgrace. I cant even count how many times this guy has been a top 10 QB, yet you have guys like stafford, noodle arm palmer and kolb(!) ranked ahead oh him. this guy is going big this week. 250+ with 3 total scores
I just don't see how.
 
I'm playing McNabb this week in a 2-QB league but it's not like I've got much in the way of other options.

The alternatives are Matt Hasselbeck or Dennis Dixon.

If you can provide a compelling argument to dump Hass and pick up Dixon to start while relegating McNabb to the bench, I'd love to hear them.

(Incidentally, Dixon is ranked higher than McNabb by FBG at the moment.)

 
His FBG Week 1 Ranking is an absolute disgrace. I cant even count how many times this guy has been a top 10 QB, yet you have guys like stafford, noodle arm palmer and kolb(!) ranked ahead oh him. this guy is going big this week. 250+ with 3 total scores
Stafford plays Chicago. Stafford's WRs are Calvin Johnson and Nate Burleson. Chicago was the 25th best pass defense last year. Stafford is healthy.Kolb plays GB. Kolb's WRs are DeSean Jackson and Jeremy Maclin. GB was the 21st best pass defense last year. Kolb is healthy.Palmer plays NE. Palmer's WRs are Terrell Owens and Chad Ochocinco. NE was the 15th best pass defense last year. Palmer is healthy.McNabb plays Dallas. McNabb's WRs are Santana Moss and some guy off the street. Dallas was the 13th best pass defense last year. McNabb is injured.
 
Actually Stafford's Fbg ranking for this week is very low. I can't figure it out as they had Farve ranked higher than Stafford. I also don't understand how they think Stafford has the potential to be a top 5-7 qb this year but then against the Bears, the easiest team the Lions face in the division and Stafford is ranked way down in the teens. I don't get it, those two statements don't add up to me. I know I'm glad that I sat Farve and Started Stafford this week. 250 and 2 Td's is Stafford's floor this week.

 
I like McNabb alot this season. I hope he does well...but as someone stated, they're playing Dallas...250 +3 scores sounds optimistic.

 
Couple points:

Skeletor likes to run

McNabb still building rapport with his receivers

Wait...did I say receivers? Who are they again?

Dallas pass rush will trample an OL that is still learning the finer points of the new system.

115 yards, 0 TDs, 3 INTs, 39.4 QB rating

 
Couple points:Skeletor likes to runMcNabb still building rapport with his receiversWait...did I say receivers? Who are they again?Dallas pass rush will trample an OL that is still learning the finer points of the new system.115 yards, 0 TDs, 3 INTs, 39.4 QB rating
:mellow: Now who's being overly optimistic? I can see McNabb getting some garbage stats, but not enough to move him into this weeks top ten. Something along the lines of 18 of 31 for 210 yards, 1 TD, 1 Int.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
250+ with 3 scores LMAOhes not on the eagles anymore bud the redskins dont throw literally 65% of the time
I have no idea what McNabb will to this week, but I don't think PHIL has thrown on 65% of their plays, in the last 2 years anyways. Plus, Shanny Sr. & Jr. seem to have a similar mix to what PHIL has had, when you compare the 2008 & 2009 PHIL stats to that of the 2008 DEN stats (w/ Sr) and the 2009 HOUS stats (w/ Jr)(According to Data Dominator)2008 - PHIL - 606 pass / 421 run = 59% pass2009 - PHIL - 553 pass / 375 run = 59.6% pass2008 - DEN - 619 pass / 380 run = 62% pass2009 - HOUS - 591 pass / 419 run = 58.5% passSo, while I know more goes into it (players on the roster, etc...) I don't think there is any evidence, to date, that the system McNabb is now in, in WASH will pass far less then the system he was in, in PHIL. I know WASH does not have a great group of WR's, but I also do not feel they have a group of RB's that will allow them to pound teams for victories. Not saying Shanny Sr. would not do that if he could, but with Portis and LJ I don't think he has the RB's to run like he did in 2006 & 2007.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
250+ with 3 scores LMAOhes not on the eagles anymore bud the redskins dont throw literally 65% of the time
I have no idea what McNabb will to this week, but I don't think PHIL has thrown on 65% of their plays, in the last 2 years anyways. Plus, Shanny Sr. & Jr. seem to have a similar mix to what PHIL has had, when you compare the 2008 & 2009 PHIL stats to that of the 2008 DEN stats (w/ Sr) and the 2009 HOUS stats (w/ Jr)(According to Data Dominator)2008 - PHIL - 606 pass / 421 run = 59% pass2009 - PHIL - 553 pass / 375 run = 59.6% pass2008 - DEN - 619 pass / 380 run = 62% pass2009 - HOUS - 591 pass / 419 run = 58.5% passSo, while I know more goes into it (players on the roster, etc...) I don't think there is any evidence, to date, that the system McNabb is now in, in WASH will pass far less then the system he was in, in PHIL. I know WASH does not have a great group of WR's, but I also do not feel they have a group of RB's that will allow them to pound teams for victories. Not saying Shanny Sr. would not do that if he could, but with Portis and LJ I don't think he has the RB's to run like he did in 2006 & 2007.
You would be hard pressed to find a better duo of receiving TE's in the league. They'll have some mismatches in the passing game even without great WR's.
 
Couple points:

Skeletor likes to run

McNabb still building rapport with his receivers

Wait...did I say receivers? Who are they again?

Dallas pass rush will trample an OL that is still learning the finer points of the new system.

115 yards, 0 TDs, 3 INTs, 39.4 QB rating
;) Now who's being overly optimistic? I can see McNabb getting some garbage stats, but not enough to move him into this weeks top ten. Something along the lines of 18 of 31 for 210 yards, 1 TD, 1 Int.
That would be me :confused:
 
His FBG Week 1 Ranking is an absolute disgrace. I cant even count how many times this guy has been a top 10 QB, yet you have guys like stafford, noodle arm palmer and kolb(!) ranked ahead oh him. this guy is going big this week. 250+ with 3 total scores
You ever heard of Demarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer? McNabb is still battling an ankle injury and was massacred by Dallas in consecutive games last year with a better supporting cast. I think his ranking is on point.
McNabb WAS a top 10 QB. Those days are long gone. He cant stay healthy. If you are going to bump someone it may end up being Rex Grossman.Dallas is going to eat these guys alive on defense. I would bet the under in this game for sure.
 
Where is all this bravado from the Cowboy fans coming from? Isn't this the same team that finished 20th against the pass in 2009? The same Dallas team that got destroyed by Minnesota 34-3 in the playoffs?

I think Cowboy fans have talked themselves into a juggernaut this off-season, and Sunday night could very well be a bigtime reality check for the Cowboys.

Dallas did hold the Skins to 6 points in TWO games last year, but that was without Donovan McNabb and Mike Shanahan.

I don't expect McNabb's best game of the year, but let's not get carried away...he'll play well and the Skins will score some points.

 
This will be a better game than expected. Dallas is really hurting right now on the OL. Donovan (and even Grossman) bring something that Campbell never had. I expect you will see a lot of Cooley/Davis short in the middle of the field, and maybe a couple of long attempts to Moss/Armstrong. It's just questionable if they can sustain drives.

I give Donovan 2 TDs, 1 INT, 1 Fubmle, 210 yards passing, and 25 yards rushing. Cowgirls over Redskins 27 - 20.

 
Where is all this bravado from the Cowboy fans coming from? Isn't this the same team that finished 20th against the pass in 2009? The same Dallas team that got destroyed by Minnesota 34-3 in the playoffs?I think Cowboy fans have talked themselves into a juggernaut this off-season, and Sunday night could very well be a bigtime reality check for the Cowboys.Dallas did hold the Skins to 6 points in TWO games last year, but that was without Donovan McNabb and Mike Shanahan.I don't expect McNabb's best game of the year, but let's not get carried away...he'll play well and the Skins will score some points.
Dallas will not go into Washington and dominate. It will be a hard fought game as the Redskins should be able to give the patchwork Dallas offense line fits. As far as bravado the defense came on strong towards the end of the year with the emergence of Anthony Spencer, Dallas fans are licking thier chops imagining what this defense is going to do to a hobbled McNabb and a questionable offensive line. Also its not just Cowboys fans with bravado alot of national media pundits have picked Dallas to advance to the Superbowl.
 
I see both offenses struggling. A 17-14 game would not surprise me. There are some bad o-line matchups on both sides. Expect this to be an ugly game.

 
Good thoughts but you guys are off. Some of you are predicting a bad game because they are playing the cowboys, but the coqboys look like trash right now. Some of you are predicting a bad game because McNabb is hurt, yet he has practiced fully this week and appears crisp and ready to go. Some of you are saying he has no one to throw to, but I see at least 4 capable pass catchers in Moss, Cooley, Fred Davis and Portis. Some of you say McNabb's time as a top QB are over because he's old, not on Philly's offense, but Washington didnt sign an all-pro to run the ball 50 times a game with LJ and Portis; and he's only 33, not 40.

McNabb is a warrior and knows how to win. If the Skins are down, Shanny knows McNabb can sling it. Three total TD's is optomistic obviously, but that's why this is an "I told you so" thread.

 
I personally think the coach he has now can scheme better than almost anyone. He will find a way to make the talent work on that team.

I wouldnt expect huge numbers because Shanny likes more of a run-Pass mix, but McNabb will be fine. I have him as my 12th rated QB on the board and I think this is reasonable.

I just wouldnt start him against the toughest defenses.

 
would any redskins fans or anyone high on mcnabb mind posting what they project the WRs to do this year? Because other than moss who i envision getting 900 or so yards I cant see any of these guys going over like 500 yards

 
would any redskins fans or anyone high on mcnabb mind posting what they project the WRs to do this year? Because other than moss who i envision getting 900 or so yards I cant see any of these guys going over like 500 yards
classic preseason statement. how many yards do you think mcnabb will throw for?
 
thehornet said:
His FBG Week 1 Ranking is an absolute disgrace. I cant even count how many times this guy has been a top 10 QB, yet you have guys like stafford, noodle arm palmer and kolb(!) ranked ahead oh him.

this guy is going big this week. 250+ with 3 total scores
:thumbup:
 
if i had to project it -- i dont really know much about the redskins but;

moss 900

cooley 700

davis 300

galloway/armstrong/roydell/thomas 1000 combined

and another 500 to the RBs

so 3400 ?

 
and i asked the question not to #### on the redskins receivers but because i could really use a WR and there seems to be a pretty huge opportunity here at WR2 or even WR1 if this offense actually manages to click.

 
Nightly Mistake said:
Hastur said:
Skeletor likes to run
Son of Skeletor likes to pass. I think this team runs a lot out of necessity, but the truth is we've never see Shanny and Shanny, Jr. operate together so there's a lot we need to learn on this.
I'm looking forward to seeing the game plan too. Actually think McNabb is an intriguing prospect this season with a lot of potential. It's a tough matchup to start out with but should give a good indication of that their philosophy is going to be.
 
thehornet said:
Good thoughts but you guys are off. Some of you are predicting a bad game because they are playing the cowboys, but the coqboys look like trash right now. Some of you are predicting a bad game because McNabb is hurt, yet he has practiced fully this week and appears crisp and ready to go. Some of you are saying he has no one to throw to, but I see at least 4 capable pass catchers in Moss, Cooley, Fred Davis and Portis. Some of you say McNabb's time as a top QB are over because he's old, not on Philly's offense, but Washington didnt sign an all-pro to run the ball 50 times a game with LJ and Portis; and he's only 33, not 40.

McNabb is a warrior and knows how to win. If the Skins are down, Shanny knows McNabb can sling it. Three total TD's is optomistic obviously, but that's why this is an "I told you so" thread.
:hifive: They return a pro bowl nose tackle, pass rushing linebacker and 2 pro bowl corners. They appear to have everyone healthy for this game. What exactly is looking like trash?

Their performance in the preseason? How long exactly have you been watching pro football? The preseason is the primary indicator?

You think they were showing anything at all in that game against Houston whom they play week 3 regular season?

Having said all of this, Dallas does tend to start slow defensively and they will be a bit unfamiliar with this new look Redskins offense. McNabb has lit them up early before.

But trash? C'mon man.

 
would any redskins fans or anyone high on mcnabb mind posting what they project the WRs to do this year? Because other than moss who i envision getting 900 or so yards I cant see any of these guys going over like 500 yards
IMO, leading receivers will be, in order: Moss, Cooley, Davis, and Portis. So, for WRs, I don't see anyone other than Moss going over 500. I have Galloway and Armstrong in the 30-35 reception range. That could push Galloway over 500 since I think he'll be a deep target. Armstrong more in the 400-450 yard range.
 
thehornet said:
Good thoughts but you guys are off. Some of you are predicting a bad game because they are playing the cowboys, but the coqboys look like trash right now. Some of you are predicting a bad game because McNabb is hurt, yet he has practiced fully this week and appears crisp and ready to go. Some of you are saying he has no one to throw to, but I see at least 4 capable pass catchers in Moss, Cooley, Fred Davis and Portis. Some of you say McNabb's time as a top QB are over because he's old, not on Philly's offense, but Washington didnt sign an all-pro to run the ball 50 times a game with LJ and Portis; and he's only 33, not 40.

McNabb is a warrior and knows how to win. If the Skins are down, Shanny knows McNabb can sling it. Three total TD's is optomistic obviously, but that's why this is an "I told you so" thread.
:( They return a pro bowl nose tackle, pass rushing linebacker and 2 pro bowl corners. They appear to have everyone healthy for this game. What exactly is looking like trash?

Their performance in the preseason? How long exactly have you been watching pro football? The preseason is the primary indicator?

You think they were showing anything at all in that game against Houston whom they play week 3 regular season?

Having said all of this, Dallas does tend to start slow defensively and they will be a bit unfamiliar with this new look Redskins offense. McNabb has lit them up early before.

But trash? C'mon man.
not sure what you want here? the team has look like trash so far. i didnt say they were a trash team. i've been watching football a longtime and see some problems right now. deal with it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
McNabb was certainly decent enough in Philly in the years he didn't have top notch receivers. Of course, he was younger then and ran a lot more.

But Shanahan Sr. has turned a couple of nobodies into all pros before. It's not like Shannon Sharpe or Rod Smith were highly regarded studs, yet they had great year after great year for Shanny.

And Shanahan Jr. has built a solid passing game reputation. So there are some positives.

However, the Dallas pass rush is probably the worst fit for the Skins. The o-line is very suspect, and no QB looks good when they are running for their life. So there's reason for optimism on both sides.

I think Cooley might get the most catches and TDs for the Skins this year. If I owned one Skins receiver, it'd be him.

First games are tricky. But I suspect McNabb will look all right, at least.

21-36, 2 TDs, 2 INT. 282 yards. 3 sacks by Dallas.

Dallas wins 27-24.

 
thehornet said:
Good thoughts but you guys are off. Some of you are predicting a bad game because they are playing the cowboys, but the coqboys look like trash right now. Some of you are predicting a bad game because McNabb is hurt, yet he has practiced fully this week and appears crisp and ready to go. Some of you are saying he has no one to throw to, but I see at least 4 capable pass catchers in Moss, Cooley, Fred Davis and Portis. Some of you say McNabb's time as a top QB are over because he's old, not on Philly's offense, but Washington didnt sign an all-pro to run the ball 50 times a game with LJ and Portis; and he's only 33, not 40.

McNabb is a warrior and knows how to win. If the Skins are down, Shanny knows McNabb can sling it. Three total TD's is optomistic obviously, but that's why this is an "I told you so" thread.
:confused: They return a pro bowl nose tackle, pass rushing linebacker and 2 pro bowl corners. They appear to have everyone healthy for this game. What exactly is looking like trash?

Their performance in the preseason? How long exactly have you been watching pro football? The preseason is the primary indicator?

You think they were showing anything at all in that game against Houston whom they play week 3 regular season?

Having said all of this, Dallas does tend to start slow defensively and they will be a bit unfamiliar with this new look Redskins offense. McNabb has lit them up early before.

But trash? C'mon man.
not sure what you want here? the team has look like trash so far. i didnt say they were a trash team. i've been watching football a longtime and see some problems right now. deal with it.
Who do you envision winning these matchups?Ware vs Rookie LT Trent Williams

Spencer vs Jamal Brown (who hasnt played in a long time)

Ratliff vs C. Rabach

M. Jenkins vs J Galloway

 
thehornet said:
Good thoughts but you guys are off. Some of you are predicting a bad game because they are playing the cowboys, but the coqboys look like trash right now. Some of you are predicting a bad game because McNabb is hurt, yet he has practiced fully this week and appears crisp and ready to go. Some of you are saying he has no one to throw to, but I see at least 4 capable pass catchers in Moss, Cooley, Fred Davis and Portis. Some of you say McNabb's time as a top QB are over because he's old, not on Philly's offense, but Washington didnt sign an all-pro to run the ball 50 times a game with LJ and Portis; and he's only 33, not 40.

McNabb is a warrior and knows how to win. If the Skins are down, Shanny knows McNabb can sling it. Three total TD's is optomistic obviously, but that's why this is an "I told you so" thread.
:goodposting: They return a pro bowl nose tackle, pass rushing linebacker and 2 pro bowl corners. They appear to have everyone healthy for this game. What exactly is looking like trash?

Their performance in the preseason? How long exactly have you been watching pro football? The preseason is the primary indicator?

You think they were showing anything at all in that game against Houston whom they play week 3 regular season?

Having said all of this, Dallas does tend to start slow defensively and they will be a bit unfamiliar with this new look Redskins offense. McNabb has lit them up early before.

But trash? C'mon man.
not sure what you want here? the team has look like trash so far. i didnt say they were a trash team. i've been watching football a longtime and see some problems right now. deal with it.
Who do you envision winning these matchups?Ware vs Rookie LT Trent Williams

Spencer vs Jamal Brown (who hasnt played in a long time)

Ratliff vs C. Rabach

M. Jenkins vs J Galloway
warespencer

ratliff

jenkins

good thing it's a team game and mismatches can be created anywhere on the filed with the right strategy and opportunity. Shannahan knows how to exploit holes and he is a far better coach than the fatboy on dallas's sideline.

 
would any redskins fans or anyone high on mcnabb mind posting what they project the WRs to do this year? Because other than moss who i envision getting 900 or so yards I cant see any of these guys going over like 500 yards
I cant trully say Im a fan, but Devin Thomas probably hits 500. Ive read the coach is moving him in slow (maybe just rtns this 1st game) for refernce in one of the 4th qtr leads that was lost games Thomas had 100 yds vs. the Saints last season... The only knock on McNabb is he doesnt throw if the WR is not open (not counting Inj. risk) The Washington-Dallas game is a rivalry game. I would almost be more worried about Dallas line (Romo's arm) and guys like B. Orkapo...I kinda hope the game comes down to the Coaches (my eyes Coach is 3 points) The Skins may not have have that 3 points, but odds is up from last season period. Wk 15 lets pull this post back up!
 
Shanny's debut....McNabb in prime time trying to show that he's still got it....

I totally trust Shanny....If I recall he actually got decent production out of some real sub par QBs -

 
McNabb on a bad ankle after missing hiw many weeks against a team that hammered him not to long ago when he had better weapons......

13-25 220- 1 TD-2 INT and either hurt or sacked 6-7 times.

 
warespencerratliffjenkinsgood thing it's a team game and mismatches can be created anywhere on the filed with the right strategy and opportunity. Shannahan knows how to exploit holes and he is a far better coach than the fatboy on dallas's sideline.
Your absolutely right football is a team game so if Ware or Spencer beats their blocker and sacks McNabb even though Moss may have beat Newman it does not matter. Also something to consider is the fact that Washington may have to keep Cooley in as a blocker thus limiting one of their better recieving options, and the TE (Davis) cant block to save his life.
 
warespencerratliffjenkinsgood thing it's a team game and mismatches can be created anywhere on the filed with the right strategy and opportunity. Shannahan knows how to exploit holes and he is a far better coach than the fatboy on dallas's sideline.
Your absolutely right football is a team game so if Ware or Spencer beats their blocker and sacks McNabb even though Moss may have beat Newman it does not matter. Also something to consider is the fact that Washington may have to keep Cooley in as a blocker thus limiting one of their better recieving options, and the TE (Davis) cant block to save his life.
i didnt say washington was a better team. i am going out on a limb and saying mcnabb surprises and has a good week.
 
Shanny's debut....McNabb in prime time trying to show that he's still got it....
I would roll the dice on McNabb on this argument..if it weren't for the uncertainty of the ankle.
Who's uncertain about the ankle? Shanahan has sounded pretty certain this week that McNabb is fine.
I'm uncertain. :excited: I would not expect Shanahan or McNabb to sound anything less than certain he is 100% regardless of how fine it really is.
 
Shanny's debut....McNabb in prime time trying to show that he's still got it....
I would roll the dice on McNabb on this argument..if it weren't for the uncertainty of the ankle.
Who's uncertain about the ankle? Shanahan has sounded pretty certain this week that McNabb is fine.
I'm uncertain. :) I would not expect Shanahan or McNabb to sound anything less than certain he is 100% regardless of how fine it really is.
In addition to coach and player quotes, I've heard or read no reports indicating that McNabb is limping or anything. It's been about three weeks since he sprained his ankle. I'm assuming he's fine. :popcorn:
 
In addition to coach and player quotes, I've heard or read no reports indicating that McNabb is limping or anything. It's been about three weeks since he sprained his ankle. I'm assuming he's fine. :popcorn:
Thanks for complicating things for me. :) (Ironically my other QB is Kolb) Does a high ankle sprain really heal that quickly?
 
In addition to coach and player quotes, I've heard or read no reports indicating that McNabb is limping or anything. It's been about three weeks since he sprained his ankle. I'm assuming he's fine. :pickle:
Thanks for complicating things for me. ;) (Ironically my other QB is Kolb) Does a high ankle sprain really heal that quickly?
100%? Probably not. But, he's not a runner anymore, so I really don't think he needs it to be 100%. I'm assuming he'll be able to plant, step into throws, and move around some. I think he can do enough that I don't believe his numbers will be affected by his ankle.
 
Thanks for complicating things for me. :wall: (Ironically my other QB is Kolb) Does a high ankle sprain really heal that quickly?
Mcnabb said this a couple days ago:
"Yes, I will be starting this weekend," McNabb told ESPN980. "And I look forward to it."

McNabb sprained his left ankle 2½ weeks ago in a preseason game against Baltimore. McNabb said the injury isn't classified as a high ankle sprain — the more severe type that has more significant ligament damage and a longer recovery time — but he said it's "very close to it." He said he's getting multiple treatments each day.

"Is it 100 percent? No. ... But it's getting better," he said.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top