Gottabesweet
Footballguy
Any one else using a backup over Romo at NYG?
If so who
If so who
I'm going RG3 over Romo.I have Romo over RG3 thus far.
It could be ruined cause he goes for 300 and 3I'm not liking Romo this week. It could get ugly for him tonight. Right now I'm leaning towards starting Romo but I may plug in Flacco instead purely because Romo plays on Wednesday and I don't want my weekend ruined already.
Hope so, Witten and Austin will be banged up. That front 7 is deadly.It could be ruined cause he goes for 300 and 3I'm not liking Romo this week. It could get ugly for him tonight. Right now I'm leaning towards starting Romo but I may plug in Flacco instead purely because Romo plays on Wednesday and I don't want my weekend ruined already.
Yes, reported on NFLN a few minutes ago. Actually the report was "active".I'm struggling with Romo vs. RGIII. Leaning towards Romo. I just saw a Football Guys Staff tweet that "a reliable source" says Witten is playing tonight.
I don't see any of those players in your sig...please update it.Romo and RG3 over Locker.
Good post. And honestly, even if I have RG3 as my number two I would rather not roll the dice on a rookie in his first start. He could certainly blow up, but I would feel a lot safer with Romo in this scenario given that RG3 has never played a down in an NFL game that counts.Okay first of all, if Romo is on your team, you probably drafted him somewhere between Rounds 4-8 (based on scoring system).
If that's the case, some of you should probably reconsider your draft strategy if you want to play QBBC with a QB you drafted that high.
RG3 is the only player mentioned in this thread that I'd consider over Romo simply b/c of the immense upside with the possible rushing yards. If I was a huge underdog in my matchup this week, I'd start RG3 for the upside. If I'm the favorite and just need a steady 15-20 point performance from my QB, I'm going Romo.
Romo fell later than expected n my league. I waited to draft Peyton Manning as my starter so I had planned on going fairly soon after that for my backup. Romo was still sitting there in round 9 so I pulled the trigger. Of course now I'm sitting here trying to decide on Manning vs. Steelers or Romo vs. Giants.Good post. And honestly, even if I have RG3 as my number two I would rather not roll the dice on a rookie in his first start. He could certainly blow up, but I would feel a lot safer with Romo in this scenario given that RG3 has never played a down in an NFL game that counts.Okay first of all, if Romo is on your team, you probably drafted him somewhere between Rounds 4-8 (based on scoring system).
If that's the case, some of you should probably reconsider your draft strategy if you want to play QBBC with a QB you drafted that high.
RG3 is the only player mentioned in this thread that I'd consider over Romo simply b/c of the immense upside with the possible rushing yards. If I was a huge underdog in my matchup this week, I'd start RG3 for the upside. If I'm the favorite and just need a steady 15-20 point performance from my QB, I'm going Romo.
I'm actually rolling with RG3 over Flacco. Just gotta try it.As for this thread, plugged in Vick over Romo for a friend.Good post. And honestly, even if I have RG3 as my number two I would rather not roll the dice on a rookie in his first start. He could certainly blow up, but I would feel a lot safer with Romo in this scenario given that RG3 has never played a down in an NFL game that counts.Okay first of all, if Romo is on your team, you probably drafted him somewhere between Rounds 4-8 (based on scoring system).
If that's the case, some of you should probably reconsider your draft strategy if you want to play QBBC with a QB you drafted that high.
RG3 is the only player mentioned in this thread that I'd consider over Romo simply b/c of the immense upside with the possible rushing yards. If I was a huge underdog in my matchup this week, I'd start RG3 for the upside. If I'm the favorite and just need a steady 15-20 point performance from my QB, I'm going Romo.
JMO, but I think Flacco is a much different case than Romo and I might very well pull the trigger on RG3 over Flacco. Romo has been a consistently excellent fantasy producer who most have rated very closely to where they have RG3 rated going into the year. Flacco, by most rankings, is a number of spots below the two of them. So I see that as a different scenario, even given that RG3 has never played a down of a real NFL game.I'm actually rolling with RG3 over Flacco. Just gotta try it.As for this thread, plugged in Vick over Romo for a friend.Good post. And honestly, even if I have RG3 as my number two I would rather not roll the dice on a rookie in his first start. He could certainly blow up, but I would feel a lot safer with Romo in this scenario given that RG3 has never played a down in an NFL game that counts.Okay first of all, if Romo is on your team, you probably drafted him somewhere between Rounds 4-8 (based on scoring system).
If that's the case, some of you should probably reconsider your draft strategy if you want to play QBBC with a QB you drafted that high.
RG3 is the only player mentioned in this thread that I'd consider over Romo simply b/c of the immense upside with the possible rushing yards. If I was a huge underdog in my matchup this week, I'd start RG3 for the upside. If I'm the favorite and just need a steady 15-20 point performance from my QB, I'm going Romo.
Romo v the Giants last year:321 yards and 4 tds (home game)289 yards and 2 tds, 1 int (away)
good callIt could be ruined cause he goes for 300 and 3I'm not liking Romo this week. It could get ugly for him tonight. Right now I'm leaning towards starting Romo but I may plug in Flacco instead purely because Romo plays on Wednesday and I don't want my weekend ruined already.