What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Steelers (2007) (1 Viewer)

I guess it's up to Okobi now. Seems like his neck wasn't bothering him too badly after the season started. Marvin Philip stuck on the active roster all year last year though he was deactivated much of the time. Anybody know how well the team regards him?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
With 4.94 cap space and a 1/3 or that going to rookies, this looks to be enough to resign Polamalu before the season starts and account for his contract and bonus. Need to release/retire/rework a couple more players to have any impact on free agency additions.

 
I guess it's up to Okobi now. Seems like his neck wasn't bothering him too badly after the season started. Marvin Philip stuck on the active roster all year last year though he was deactivated much of the time. Anybody know how well the team regards him?
There's some talk too of moving Kendall Simmons over to center. He has practiced there in pre-season the last couple of camps.
 
Hartings served us very well and we got a lot more mileage out of him than I thought we would. Was that 4 or 5 years ago that going into the offseason we all thought his knees were shot?

Thanks for the run, JH. :moneybag:

Also, I know a lot of people are not on board with Okkobi, but I'm a fan.

 
I guess it's up to Okobi now. Seems like his neck wasn't bothering him too badly after the season started. Marvin Philip stuck on the active roster all year last year though he was deactivated much of the time. Anybody know how well the team regards him?
There's some talk too of moving Kendall Simmons over to center. He has practiced there in pre-season the last couple of camps.
I've heard that too...if they can get a guard to replace Simmons, whether that guy's on the roster now or someone they pick up/draft.
 
I'm glad Santonio started showing some promise, because I was LIVID that the Steelers didn't grab Mangold in the draft last year.

 
AhrnCityPahnder said:
Memphis Foundry said:
I guess it's up to Okobi now. Seems like his neck wasn't bothering him too badly after the season started. Marvin Philip stuck on the active roster all year last year though he was deactivated much of the time. Anybody know how well the team regards him?
I don't know what the team thinks of him. there's a little discussion on him here from the Steel City Insiders board:

http://forums.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=68#S=68&...897&T=40853
They liked him enough to sign him to a pretty good contract for a backup center that didnt play much IIRC.Also, if they didnt like Okobi, I think they would have drafted Mangold last year (that's who I wanted them to get, but Santonio seems legit).

 
Grass won't be greener (or new)

Dan Rooney defends Steelers' disliked turf

Saturday, February 03, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

MIAMI BEACH, Fla. -- The Steelers have no plans to change their grass field despite its poor showing in a survey of NFL players, Dan Rooney said yesterday.

"You're looking for beauty rather than practicality," said Rooney, the team chairman. "We have the best field as far as traction that you can have. You didn't see anybody slip, or very few slips during the year."

That wasn't how the players saw it when they rated Heinz Field the worst of the 18 current grass fields in the league.

The Steelers installed a grass surface when they opened Heinz Field in 2001, and have resurfaced it many times. In 2003, they installed DD GrassMaster, which contains grass with some synthetic fibers that helps anchor it. They resurfaced the field again in 2005 with DD GrassMaster.

Rooney said they have no plans to change it.

"Not at this time, nope," Rooney said.

He disputed the survey, which includes a majority of his own players saying Heinz Field has a poor surface.

"Our field is fine. I have no complaints about our field, and we've looked into it."

The Steelers have considered artificial turf, such as the FieldTurf they have on the surface of their UPMC indoor facility.

"We could do that, but we'd lose something," Rooney said. "We would lose the basic thing as far as our players playing on regular grass, having a good, safe field, things like that."

The Steelers and Pitt share Heinz Field, which also is the site for five high school championship games each year. An occasional concert is held there.

"It receives a lot of wear and tear, but it's been OK," Rooney said.

Rooney also said he took no meaning from NFLPA executive director Gene Upshaw's comments Thursday congratulating him because he "walked the walk" when he hired a minority head coach, Mike Tomlin.

"Gene's a good friend of mine. I am very proud of the Steelers' handling [of] minorities from the beginning. We had a minority on our very first team, 1933. We had the first coach in Lowell Perry [1957]. We had the first coordinator in Tony Dungy [1984]. I'm extremely proud."

 
Grass won't be greener (or new)

Dan Rooney defends Steelers' disliked turf

Saturday, February 03, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

MIAMI BEACH, Fla. -- The Steelers have no plans to change their grass field despite its poor showing in a survey of NFL players, Dan Rooney said yesterday.

"You're looking for beauty rather than practicality," said Rooney, the team chairman. "We have the best field as far as traction that you can have. You didn't see anybody slip, or very few slips during the year."

That wasn't how the players saw it when they rated Heinz Field the worst of the 18 current grass fields in the league.
This may be the first sign that Dan Rooney is going senile.
 
We'll get an early look at the team this year -- the Steelers and Saints have been selected to play in the HOF game August 5.

Link

 
Grass won't be greener (or new)

Dan Rooney defends Steelers' disliked turf

Saturday, February 03, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

MIAMI BEACH, Fla. -- The Steelers have no plans to change their grass field despite its poor showing in a survey of NFL players, Dan Rooney said yesterday.

"You're looking for beauty rather than practicality," said Rooney, the team chairman. "We have the best field as far as traction that you can have. You didn't see anybody slip, or very few slips during the year."

That wasn't how the players saw it when they rated Heinz Field the worst of the 18 current grass fields in the league.
This may be the first sign that Dan Rooney is going senile.
What's funny is most of the slips I noticed happened early in the year when the field was still grass.There is no hope and someday mark my word and capture this post....the Steelers will lose a playoff game because of a slip and pressure will be too high from fans, players and coaches and Rooney will have to make a change.

 
everyone catch the 2 steelers episodes of america's game? cant miss tv. rocky tells one hell of a story

 
I must say that I am even happier with the Tomlin hire today than I was 2 days ago.

Rivera really blew it for the Bears last night IMHO. How many times did the Bears rush more than 4 players? Maybe 5 times the entire game? Way too conservative on defense. Their gameplan looked horrible.

 
I must say that I am even happier with the Tomlin hire today than I was 2 days ago.Rivera really blew it for the Bears last night IMHO. How many times did the Bears rush more than 4 players? Maybe 5 times the entire game? Way too conservative on defense. Their gameplan looked horrible.
I was thinking the exact same thing last night.
 
Hall game perk: more practice for Steelers

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

By Gerry Dulac, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

HOF Game:

Steelers opener

The matchup: Steelers vs. New Orleans Saints in the 2007 Hall of Fame game.

When: Aug. 5, time TBA.

Where: Fawcett Stadium, Canton, Ohio.

TV: NFL Network.

The Steelers and new coach Mike Tomlin will get plenty of extra practice time with which to get acquainted this season.

The announcement that the Steelers and New Orleans Saints will open the NFL preseason Aug. 5 in the Pro Football Hall of Fame Game in Canton, Ohio, means more than just an additional preseason game for both teams.

It also means the Steelers will be allowed to open training camp a week earlier than usual. The Steelers have not officially identified their first day of training camp in Latrobe, but NFL rules allow the team to open camp two weeks before its first preseason game.

That means they likely will report to St. Vincent College the weekend of July 20-22, rather than July 27-29. The Steelers have not participated in the Hall of Fame game since they opened the preseason against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 1999.

In addition, because of Tomlin, the Steelers are allowed to hold an extra minicamp this year. League rules allow teams with a new head coach an extra offseason minicamp.

Tomlin has not set a date for the minicamp, either.

 
I'm wondering where we go for a return man draft, free agency? Some good field position and some points from the special teams sure would be nice this comming season.

 
I'm wondering where we go for a return man draft, free agency? Some good field position and some points from the special teams sure would be nice this comming season.
The Steelers thought they had drafted their return man last year: Willie Ried. He looked decent in preseason but was injured for almost the entire 2006 season so we really don't know what we have there.One thing is for certain: Ricardo Colclough and Santonio Holmes aren't going to cut it as return men.
 
One thing is for certain: Ricardo Colclough and Santonio Holmes aren't going to cut it as return men.
Amen to that. I hope we don't settle with Reid. Maybe he's a good return man, maybe not. He hasn't really proved himself, too much of a risk if you ask me. I hope we can pick up someone who can hang onto the ball and get past the 35 on a fairly consistent basis, and heck....who knows, maybe even break a few. :whistle:
 
I liked Reid alot before the season. He seemed smart and ready to play. He had a general good vibe about him and I liked him.

Now I hate his effing guts. He was such a Puhn that we were stuck with sanadropio holmes and ricky ricardodidtoomuchCokely. Both of those guys sucked like straws all year. Every kick/punt return i saw took months off of my life. It was funny by the end of the year we were cheering for touchbacks or kicks that were downed by the other team.

We need help.

 
I liked Reid alot before the season. He seemed smart and ready to play. He had a general good vibe about him and I liked him.

Now I hate his effing guts. He was such a Puhn that we were stuck with sanadropio holmes and ricky ricardodidtoomuchCokely. Both of those guys sucked like straws all year. Every kick/punt return i saw took months off of my life. It was funny by the end of the year we were cheering for touchbacks or kicks that were downed by the other team.

We need help.
I like Willie Reid, although I hated seeing this live and in person.
 
east2west said:
Godsbrother said:
One thing is for certain: Ricardo Colclough and Santonio Holmes aren't going to cut it as return men.
Amen to that. I hope we don't settle with Reid. Maybe he's a good return man, maybe not. He hasn't really proved himself, too much of a risk if you ask me. I hope we can pick up someone who can hang onto the ball and get past the 35 on a fairly consistent basis, and heck....who knows, maybe even break a few. :confused:
I don't know how you can say Reid is anymore of a risk than when the Steelers were set to let him handle the duties after Coke's muff vs. Cincy?Reid was excellent in college, I don't think you can just give up on him and toss him aside without giving him a solid shot. I saw a lot of Randle El type movement from him during the preseason. I am excited to see what he has got.But they do need an insurance veteran to come in for sure cause Holmes will be a starter and it is rare starting WRs are allowed to return punts for the entire season. Coke is out of the question and should have been after he muffed all the punts in camp (I read about it all last camp in the pittsburgh papers, the reports figured he for sure was never gonna return punts nice move Cowher)
 
east2west said:
Godsbrother said:
One thing is for certain: Ricardo Colclough and Santonio Holmes aren't going to cut it as return men.
Amen to that. I hope we don't settle with Reid. Maybe he's a good return man, maybe not. He hasn't really proved himself, too much of a risk if you ask me. I hope we can pick up someone who can hang onto the ball and get past the 35 on a fairly consistent basis, and heck....who knows, maybe even break a few. :goodposting:
I think a healthy Reid is the answer. I'm confident he can get it done. I also hope he can break in as the #4 (maybe even #3?) WR this year.
 
east2west said:
Godsbrother said:
One thing is for certain: Ricardo Colclough and Santonio Holmes aren't going to cut it as return men.
Amen to that. I hope we don't settle with Reid. Maybe he's a good return man, maybe not. He hasn't really proved himself, too much of a risk if you ask me. I hope we can pick up someone who can hang onto the ball and get past the 35 on a fairly consistent basis, and heck....who knows, maybe even break a few. :shrug:
I think a healthy Reid is the answer. I'm confident he can get it done. I also hope he can break in as the #4 (maybe even #3?) WR this year.
:banned:
 
FWIW Reid's career NCAA punt return numbers vs. Devin Hester's:

Reid: 69 returns for 1,063 yards (15.4) and 3 TD

Hester: 41 returns for 638 yards (15.6) and 4 TD

I believe Reid was also MVP of the bowl loss to Penn State his senior year. Reid is not Devin Hester, I'm not sure anyone who has ever played the game has had a season like his...but he's probably pretty good.

 
One thing is for certain: Ricardo Colclough and Santonio Holmes aren't going to cut it as return men.
Amen to that. I hope we don't settle with Reid. Maybe he's a good return man, maybe not. He hasn't really proved himself, too much of a risk if you ask me. I hope we can pick up someone who can hang onto the ball and get past the 35 on a fairly consistent basis, and heck....who knows, maybe even break a few. :brush:
I don't know how you can say Reid is anymore of a risk than when the Steelers were set to let him handle the duties after Coke's muff vs. Cincy?Reid was excellent in college, I don't think you can just give up on him and toss him aside without giving him a solid shot. I saw a lot of Randle El type movement from him during the preseason. I am excited to see what he has got.But they do need an insurance veteran to come in for sure cause Holmes will be a starter and it is rare starting WRs are allowed to return punts for the entire season. Coke is out of the question and should have been after he muffed all the punts in camp (I read about it all last camp in the pittsburgh papers, the reports figured he for sure was never gonna return punts nice move Cowher)
The risk is the same thing that happened this year. When I would breath a sigh of relief when we just managed to hang onto a punt, and cheer like we won the game if we managed to get positive yards. (true thats not all Reid's fault, but if he where to get injured again??) Like I said maybe he's a good return man maybe not. He did some awesome things in college but really, that means nothing now. I'm with you though...we need insurance. The rest of the team is too good to be brought down by special teams. Starting from the 15, and starting from the 30 is a huge difference in my book. I think if you can give our offense consistent good returns we win ALOT more games.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Run and shoot anyone?

Arians warms to task in a hurry

New coordinator cuts playbook's size

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Bruce Arians, the Steelers' new offensive coordinator, knows how to keep warm in his new office these frigid February days. He has thrown the thick, old, patchwork playbook on the fire.

He promises the new model to be sleek, trimmed down and easy to understand for his players, particularly quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Yet he will add some personal touches, such as playing four receivers on first and second downs without putting the quarterback in a shotgun formation.

The old playbook dates to 1992, when Ron Erhardt conceived it as Bill Cowher's first offensive coordinator. As coordinators changed, they did not scrap the original but added their own stuff until it grew to become almost unwieldy.

"Bill had six or seven coordinators; the playbook is six or seven languages hodge-podged together," said Arians, promoted by new coach Mike Tomlin from his previous post as wide receivers coach. "They just kept adding because Bill kept it that way. We're going to streamline it into one language, and I hope to simplify it for our players."

Bruce Arians -- You strive for balance. I'm not a guy who's going to beat my head against the wall to run it; I love to run the football."

Fans won't necessarily see the adjustments he makes to the offense, Arians said, but they will notice one of them. Previous offenses under Cowher rarely used more than two or three wide receivers on first and second downs, preferring to use them mostly on obvious third-down passing situations with the quarterback dropping into the shotgun.

The new offense under Arians will sometimes start with four wide receivers on first-and-10 with the quarterback under center.

"The butt part of it won't change, as is the case with most generic NFL teams," Arians said. "But I love four wideouts. I like a better running game out of four wideouts where we can utilize them on first and second down, rather than just being in a shotgun and throwing it all the time. That will be an area we want to develop."

Arians took note of the offense of the Super Bowl champion Indianapolis Colts. He was Peyton Manning's quarterbacks coach with the Colts his first three years.

"When you think of the Colts, you think of a finesse offense, but, when they came down the stretch in the playoffs, they had 100 to 150 yards rushing in every game. It's just a different style.

"You don't have to line up with two tight ends and two backs to run the football. Rushing yards are rushing yards."

Tomlin said he is a proponent of running the ball and stopping the run, and Arians acknowledged that he advocates that as well, back to when he was head coach at Temple in the 1980s.

"I think, to the naked eye, it will look very similar," Arians said of his offense compared to Ken Whisenhunt's. "You strive for balance. I'm not a guy who's going to beat my head against the wall to run it; I love to run the football.

"I think people who check my history when I was the head coach at Temple, I had a little running back who led the nation in rushing, Paul Palmer. He was runner-up for the Heisman, and that's hard to do at Temple.

"I love to run the football and I like the play-action passing game, and there are games that's not to your advantage."

Arians was the coordinator in Cleveland from 2001-03, including the Jan. 5, 2003 playoff game between the Browns and Steelers at Heinz Field. Cleveland scored 33 points through the first 50 minutes of the game and held a 12-point lead with a little more than three minutes left, but lost, 36-33.

Browns quarterback Kelly Holcomb threw for 429 yards and three touchdowns, but the Browns rushed for just 38 yards (the Steelers were held to 89 yards rushing).

"We knew coming down it was going to be really tough sledding running the ball," Arians said.

"But we had a good matchup in the passing game. It was a muddy field, our quarterback didn't mind the elements. That's to your advantage -- there's no pass rush on that field. He threw for 429, and we should have won the game."

It's a game of adjustments, and that's what Arians promises to adhere to as the Steelers' coordinator.

"You have to scratch where it itches," he said.

"When it's all said and done, you'd like to be balanced. One of the best stats I've ever seen was about Joe Gibbs, in his heyday. I think he called 20-some thousand plays -- 10 thousand, 50 something passes and 10 thousand runs."

And, most important of all, three Super Bowl victories.

NOTES -- When the Steelers hire a new quality control coach on offense, he will have other duties as well, Arians said. He also will serve as the assistant offensive line coach to new line coach Larry Zierlein. Arians said he believes in two offensive line coaches. The Steelers have an opening for a quality control coach after Matt Raich was permitted to resign to join Whisenhunt's staff as quality control coach of Arizona's defense and also assistant linebackers coach. Plum native Mike Miller, the Steelers' former quality control coach who was on the staff at Robert Morris after joining the Bills' staff under Mike Mularkey, might have been a candidate here, but Whisenhunt recently hired him for that job in Arizona.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Ed Bouchette can be reached at ebouchette@post-gazette.com. )
 
Run and shoot anyone?

Arians warms to task in a hurry

New coordinator cuts playbook's size

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Bruce Arians, the Steelers' new offensive coordinator, knows how to keep warm in his new office these frigid February days. He has thrown the thick, old, patchwork playbook on the fire.

He promises the new model to be sleek, trimmed down and easy to understand for his players, particularly quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Yet he will add some personal touches, such as playing four receivers on first and second downs without putting the quarterback in a shotgun formation.

The old playbook dates to 1992, when Ron Erhardt conceived it as Bill Cowher's first offensive coordinator. As coordinators changed, they did not scrap the original but added their own stuff until it grew to become almost unwieldy.

"Bill had six or seven coordinators; the playbook is six or seven languages hodge-podged together," said Arians, promoted by new coach Mike Tomlin from his previous post as wide receivers coach. "They just kept adding because Bill kept it that way. We're going to streamline it into one language, and I hope to simplify it for our players."

Bruce Arians -- You strive for balance. I'm not a guy who's going to beat my head against the wall to run it; I love to run the football."

Fans won't necessarily see the adjustments he makes to the offense, Arians said, but they will notice one of them. Previous offenses under Cowher rarely used more than two or three wide receivers on first and second downs, preferring to use them mostly on obvious third-down passing situations with the quarterback dropping into the shotgun.

The new offense under Arians will sometimes start with four wide receivers on first-and-10 with the quarterback under center.

"The butt part of it won't change, as is the case with most generic NFL teams," Arians said. "But I love four wideouts. I like a better running game out of four wideouts where we can utilize them on first and second down, rather than just being in a shotgun and throwing it all the time. That will be an area we want to develop."

Arians took note of the offense of the Super Bowl champion Indianapolis Colts. He was Peyton Manning's quarterbacks coach with the Colts his first three years.

"When you think of the Colts, you think of a finesse offense, but, when they came down the stretch in the playoffs, they had 100 to 150 yards rushing in every game. It's just a different style.

"You don't have to line up with two tight ends and two backs to run the football. Rushing yards are rushing yards."

Tomlin said he is a proponent of running the ball and stopping the run, and Arians acknowledged that he advocates that as well, back to when he was head coach at Temple in the 1980s.

"I think, to the naked eye, it will look very similar," Arians said of his offense compared to Ken Whisenhunt's. "You strive for balance. I'm not a guy who's going to beat my head against the wall to run it; I love to run the football.

"I think people who check my history when I was the head coach at Temple, I had a little running back who led the nation in rushing, Paul Palmer. He was runner-up for the Heisman, and that's hard to do at Temple.

"I love to run the football and I like the play-action passing game, and there are games that's not to your advantage."

Arians was the coordinator in Cleveland from 2001-03, including the Jan. 5, 2003 playoff game between the Browns and Steelers at Heinz Field. Cleveland scored 33 points through the first 50 minutes of the game and held a 12-point lead with a little more than three minutes left, but lost, 36-33.

Browns quarterback Kelly Holcomb threw for 429 yards and three touchdowns, but the Browns rushed for just 38 yards (the Steelers were held to 89 yards rushing).

"We knew coming down it was going to be really tough sledding running the ball," Arians said.

"But we had a good matchup in the passing game. It was a muddy field, our quarterback didn't mind the elements. That's to your advantage -- there's no pass rush on that field. He threw for 429, and we should have won the game."

It's a game of adjustments, and that's what Arians promises to adhere to as the Steelers' coordinator.

"You have to scratch where it itches," he said.

"When it's all said and done, you'd like to be balanced. One of the best stats I've ever seen was about Joe Gibbs, in his heyday. I think he called 20-some thousand plays -- 10 thousand, 50 something passes and 10 thousand runs."

And, most important of all, three Super Bowl victories.

NOTES -- When the Steelers hire a new quality control coach on offense, he will have other duties as well, Arians said. He also will serve as the assistant offensive line coach to new line coach Larry Zierlein. Arians said he believes in two offensive line coaches. The Steelers have an opening for a quality control coach after Matt Raich was permitted to resign to join Whisenhunt's staff as quality control coach of Arizona's defense and also assistant linebackers coach. Plum native Mike Miller, the Steelers' former quality control coach who was on the staff at Robert Morris after joining the Bills' staff under Mike Mularkey, might have been a candidate here, but Whisenhunt recently hired him for that job in Arizona.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Ed Bouchette can be reached at ebouchette@post-gazette.com. )
I think this bodes well for Willie Parker, stretch out the defense and give Willie some room to get his jets going.
 
Arians warms to task in a hurry

New coordinator cuts playbook's size

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Bruce Arians, the Steelers' new offensive coordinator, knows how to keep warm in his new office these frigid February days. He has thrown the thick, old, patchwork playbook on the fire.

He promises the new model to be sleek, trimmed down and easy to understand for his players, particularly quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Yet he will add some personal touches, such as playing four receivers on first and second downs without putting the quarterback in a shotgun formation.

The old playbook dates to 1992, when Ron Erhardt conceived it as Bill Cowher's first offensive coordinator. As coordinators changed, they did not scrap the original but added their own stuff until it grew to become almost unwieldy.

"Bill had six or seven coordinators; the playbook is six or seven languages hodge-podged together," said Arians, promoted by new coach Mike Tomlin from his previous post as wide receivers coach. "They just kept adding because Bill kept it that way. We're going to streamline it into one language, and I hope to simplify it for our players."
This sounds good to me.

Fans won't necessarily see the adjustments he makes to the offense, Arians said, but they will notice one of them. Previous offenses under Cowher rarely used more than two or three wide receivers on first and second downs, preferring to use them mostly on obvious third-down passing situations with the quarterback dropping into the shotgun.

The new offense under Arians will sometimes start with four wide receivers on first-and-10 with the quarterback under center.
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.

 
Arians warms to task in a hurry

New coordinator cuts playbook's size

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Bruce Arians, the Steelers' new offensive coordinator, knows how to keep warm in his new office these frigid February days. He has thrown the thick, old, patchwork playbook on the fire.

He promises the new model to be sleek, trimmed down and easy to understand for his players, particularly quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Yet he will add some personal touches, such as playing four receivers on first and second downs without putting the quarterback in a shotgun formation.

The old playbook dates to 1992, when Ron Erhardt conceived it as Bill Cowher's first offensive coordinator. As coordinators changed, they did not scrap the original but added their own stuff until it grew to become almost unwieldy.

"Bill had six or seven coordinators; the playbook is six or seven languages hodge-podged together," said Arians, promoted by new coach Mike Tomlin from his previous post as wide receivers coach. "They just kept adding because Bill kept it that way. We're going to streamline it into one language, and I hope to simplify it for our players."
This sounds good to me.

Fans won't necessarily see the adjustments he makes to the offense, Arians said, but they will notice one of them. Previous offenses under Cowher rarely used more than two or three wide receivers on first and second downs, preferring to use them mostly on obvious third-down passing situations with the quarterback dropping into the shotgun.

The new offense under Arians will sometimes start with four wide receivers on first-and-10 with the quarterback under center.
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.
No they aren't, but Ward, Holmes, Wilson and Washington/Reid doesn't sound all that bad. :( Come to think of it, is Wilson still under contract? or was he done last year?

 
Yes -- Wilson is under contract through 2008:

2005 540000.00

2006 1475000.00

2007 1900000.00

2008 2085000.00

I like the idea of normalizing the playbook, and the sets he's talking about seem OK if we can keep the top four healthy. Hopefully one of the side benefits of the new Tomlin regime will be breaking off our annual reunion with Lee Mays.

 
Obviously there will be some growing pains while Arians implements his playbook but I am encouraged about the long term ramifications on the young players and the offense in general

 
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.
This is why I've been saying that I wouldn't be stunned to see the Steelers go WR in round 1 again this year, despite more obvious needs. I would say that every facet of their team right now is solid, if not spectacular. I don't see one unit that needs no help at all (save for maybe TE) and I don't see one that is in dire need of new blood (CB and OG would be closest, but they can get by at least another year with what they've got.)I think they're going to approach the draft with a legit BPA approach (unless they start drafting rush ends for a transition to the 4-3.) However, this draft seems weak at the top in quality pass rushers and incredibly strong at WR, unlike last year. At #15, the Steelers could easily be looking at one of : Ted Ginn, Jr., Dwayne Jarrett, Sidney Rice, Dwayne Bowe, or Robert Meachem, any of whom would potentially have been the #1 receiver off the board ahead of Santonio last year. They may go where the value is, particularly if they're looking to go more 4 wide.
 
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.
This is why I've been saying that I wouldn't be stunned to see the Steelers go WR in round 1 again this year, despite more obvious needs. I would say that every facet of their team right now is solid, if not spectacular. I don't see one unit that needs no help at all (save for maybe TE) and I don't see one that is in dire need of new blood (CB and OG would be closest, but they can get by at least another year with what they've got.)I think they're going to approach the draft with a legit BPA approach (unless they start drafting rush ends for a transition to the 4-3.) However, this draft seems weak at the top in quality pass rushers and incredibly strong at WR, unlike last year. At #15, the Steelers could easily be looking at one of : Ted Ginn, Jr., Dwayne Jarrett, Sidney Rice, Dwayne Bowe, or Robert Meachem, any of whom would potentially have been the #1 receiver off the board ahead of Santonio last year. They may go where the value is, particularly if they're looking to go more 4 wide.
Personally I would be schocked to see us draft a WR in the 1st round. We have other glaring needs that should be addressed before we draft another WR (D & O line and MLB). With Hines, up and coming Holmes and Washigton and a servicable Wilson (and Big $ H Miller), I am very content with or WR corp as is and would look for late round value when it comes to WR. :thumbup:
 
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.
This is why I've been saying that I wouldn't be stunned to see the Steelers go WR in round 1 again this year, despite more obvious needs. I would say that every facet of their team right now is solid, if not spectacular. I don't see one unit that needs no help at all (save for maybe TE) and I don't see one that is in dire need of new blood (CB and OG would be closest, but they can get by at least another year with what they've got.)I think they're going to approach the draft with a legit BPA approach (unless they start drafting rush ends for a transition to the 4-3.) However, this draft seems weak at the top in quality pass rushers and incredibly strong at WR, unlike last year. At #15, the Steelers could easily be looking at one of : Ted Ginn, Jr., Dwayne Jarrett, Sidney Rice, Dwayne Bowe, or Robert Meachem, any of whom would potentially have been the #1 receiver off the board ahead of Santonio last year. They may go where the value is, particularly if they're looking to go more 4 wide.
Personally I would be schocked to see us draft a WR in the 1st round. We have other glaring needs that should be addressed before we draft another WR (D & O line and MLB). With Hines, up and coming Holmes and Washigton and a servicable Wilson (and Big $ H Miller), I am very content with or WR corp as is and would look for late round value when it comes to WR. :goodposting:
Agreed on their needs, but unless they trade down, I don't know if they address those areas. Levi Brown is a possibility, but only if they're not sold on Starks or Marvel in the near future. You don't draft a tackle in round 1 to ride the pine for 3-4 years. Guard/center is where the need is, and there simply aren't any players that grade out to the #15 spot. Blalock out of Texas is the top interior guy, along with Ryan Kalil at C, and Blalock's stock is slipping. Both players may well be there at 2.15. Patrick Willis is the top rated MLB (unless they love Posluzny and think he can play inside/outside) and I don't think either player goes #15 - maybe they trade down. CB is another position they may want to glance at if they're washing their hands of Colclough, but I am not thrilled with the top of this year's CB class at all. As far as D-Line goes - a guy like Carriker makes sense, but I may need to reinterpret how I view prospects in terms of how they fit the Steelers system. I always looked for undersized, athletic DEs that they could turn into 3-4 OLBs (Adams, Moses, Spencer fit the mold) and tall, powerful, stout, athletic DE or slightly undersized DTs (Carriker) to play the line. If they're going to graduate more towards a Cover 2 4-3 model, however, traditional pass rush ends make more sense. Jamaal Anderson (though he may be gone), Okoye (great DT prospect and in a 4-3, they need more than Hampton and Hoke inside) or Jarvis Moss might be the selection.Again, though - if a guy like Dwayne Jarrett or Marshawn Lynch is there, I don't know. I'm a proponent of selecting the most talented player and finding ways to use him, rather than simply drafting for need. There are always finds later in the draft.
 
FWIW Reid's career NCAA punt return numbers vs. Devin Hester's:Reid: 69 returns for 1,063 yards (15.4) and 3 TDHester: 41 returns for 638 yards (15.6) and 4 TDI believe Reid was also MVP of the bowl loss to Penn State his senior year. Reid is not Devin Hester, I'm not sure anyone who has ever played the game has had a season like his...but he's probably pretty good.
I think I heard that Reid broke Deon Sander's punt return records?
 
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.
This is why I've been saying that I wouldn't be stunned to see the Steelers go WR in round 1 again this year, despite more obvious needs. I would say that every facet of their team right now is solid, if not spectacular. I don't see one unit that needs no help at all (save for maybe TE) and I don't see one that is in dire need of new blood (CB and OG would be closest, but they can get by at least another year with what they've got.)I think they're going to approach the draft with a legit BPA approach (unless they start drafting rush ends for a transition to the 4-3.) However, this draft seems weak at the top in quality pass rushers and incredibly strong at WR, unlike last year. At #15, the Steelers could easily be looking at one of : Ted Ginn, Jr., Dwayne Jarrett, Sidney Rice, Dwayne Bowe, or Robert Meachem, any of whom would potentially have been the #1 receiver off the board ahead of Santonio last year. They may go where the value is, particularly if they're looking to go more 4 wide.
Personally I would be schocked to see us draft a WR in the 1st round. We have other glaring needs that should be addressed before we draft another WR (D & O line and MLB). With Hines, up and coming Holmes and Washigton and a servicable Wilson (and Big $ H Miller), I am very content with or WR corp as is and would look for late round value when it comes to WR. :goodposting:
Agreed on their needs, but unless they trade down, I don't know if they address those areas. Levi Brown is a possibility, but only if they're not sold on Starks or Marvel in the near future. You don't draft a tackle in round 1 to ride the pine for 3-4 years. Guard/center is where the need is, and there simply aren't any players that grade out to the #15 spot. Blalock out of Texas is the top interior guy, along with Ryan Kalil at C, and Blalock's stock is slipping. Both players may well be there at 2.15. Patrick Willis is the top rated MLB (unless they love Posluzny and think he can play inside/outside) and I don't think either player goes #15 - maybe they trade down. CB is another position they may want to glance at if they're washing their hands of Colclough, but I am not thrilled with the top of this year's CB class at all. As far as D-Line goes - a guy like Carriker makes sense, but I may need to reinterpret how I view prospects in terms of how they fit the Steelers system. I always looked for undersized, athletic DEs that they could turn into 3-4 OLBs (Adams, Moses, Spencer fit the mold) and tall, powerful, stout, athletic DE or slightly undersized DTs (Carriker) to play the line. If they're going to graduate more towards a Cover 2 4-3 model, however, traditional pass rush ends make more sense. Jamaal Anderson (though he may be gone), Okoye (great DT prospect and in a 4-3, they need more than Hampton and Hoke inside) or Jarvis Moss might be the selection.Again, though - if a guy like Dwayne Jarrett or Marshawn Lynch is there, I don't know. I'm a proponent of selecting the most talented player and finding ways to use him, rather than simply drafting for need. There are always finds later in the draft.
Good pointsI am high on Jarvis Moss as well but I am concerned he may not be worth a 1st round pick.
 
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.
No they aren't, but Ward, Holmes, Wilson and Washington/Reid doesn't sound all that bad. :sarcasm: Come to think of it, is Wilson still under contract? or was he done last year?
Let's not forget about Heath Miller in this 4-wide set, especially under the guise of running the ball from it. (need good blocking receivers) Arians' past experience with the Colts may have endeared him to this with Pollard & Clark. I think Miller is our 2nd best reciever anyway.

 
They're going to need to add some depth at WR if they're going to do this. Sean Morey, Waler Young and Lee Mays aren't going to cut it.
This is why I've been saying that I wouldn't be stunned to see the Steelers go WR in round 1 again this year, despite more obvious needs. I would say that every facet of their team right now is solid, if not spectacular. I don't see one unit that needs no help at all (save for maybe TE) and I don't see one that is in dire need of new blood (CB and OG would be closest, but they can get by at least another year with what they've got.)I think they're going to approach the draft with a legit BPA approach (unless they start drafting rush ends for a transition to the 4-3.) However, this draft seems weak at the top in quality pass rushers and incredibly strong at WR, unlike last year. At #15, the Steelers could easily be looking at one of : Ted Ginn, Jr., Dwayne Jarrett, Sidney Rice, Dwayne Bowe, or Robert Meachem, any of whom would potentially have been the #1 receiver off the board ahead of Santonio last year. They may go where the value is, particularly if they're looking to go more 4 wide.
Personally I would be schocked to see us draft a WR in the 1st round. We have other glaring needs that should be addressed before we draft another WR (D & O line and MLB). With Hines, up and coming Holmes and Washigton and a servicable Wilson (and Big $ H Miller), I am very content with or WR corp as is and would look for late round value when it comes to WR. :scared:
No chit. Colston has changed the wide receiver draft landscape.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top