Staley seems like the logical choice, but he's never struck me as a good short yardage/goal-line guy. He never had more than 5 TDs in Philly, and he tends to dance at the line.I drafted Duce Staley in the 11th round of a recent redraft with the expectation he'll be taking some of Parker's carries and definitely getting the goalline work.
Haynes I think is the biggest threat to Staley.
Agreed about his time in Philly, but hes put on about 25 lbs and looked like a different type of runner in his 2004 work as a Steeler.Staley seems like the logical choice, but he's never struck me as a good short yardage/goal-line guy. He never had more than 5 TDs in Philly, and he tends to dance at the line.I drafted Duce Staley in the 11th round of a recent redraft with the expectation he'll be taking some of Parker's carries and definitely getting the goalline work.
Haynes I think is the biggest threat to Staley.
good point, NFL.com is listing him at 242 right now.Agreed about his time in Philly, but hes put on about 25 lbs and looked like a different type of runner in his 2004 work as a Steeler.Staley seems like the logical choice, but he's never struck me as a good short yardage/goal-line guy. He never had more than 5 TDs in Philly, and he tends to dance at the line.I drafted Duce Staley in the 11th round of a recent redraft with the expectation he'll be taking some of Parker's carries and definitely getting the goalline work.
Haynes I think is the biggest threat to Staley.
Unfortunately -- they have never used him out of the backfield --- somebody please send the FO some old Eagles' tapes.GOAL LINE (agreeing with one of the above)Remember that he is also probably the best recieving RB in the Steelers offense.
Duce likely.
Next - Verron Haynes.
Dark Horse - Cedric Humes.
I still don't see Duckett in Pittsburgh, I think a more likely landing place, if any, is in Denver. Parker is unbdoubtedly the starting RB between the 10s unless he struggles, then they'll run Duce for a series or two. Last year, there were certain teams against which Parker was very effective, but when teams started keying on the run and leaving Willie little room to operate, he got bottled up. In those instances, they'll bring in Duce to soften up the defense. I see Parker as a legit #2 in non-PPR leagues for sure, despite his likely lack of TDs.Evilgrin
What is the story with these Duckett rumors - I figured since it didn't happen at the draft it would not happen - why does this have legs? Even with Duce/Duckett, etc - do you still see Parker as the undisputed starting RB between the 10s and a legit #2/very good #3 RB in leagues?
What I've heard is that ATL was reluctant to trade Duckett until they saw what they had in Norwood. Now that the ATL brass is impressed with Norwood and believe he can carry the load should Dunn slip, Duckett is being viewed as expendable. I believe he was mentioned in a couple 3 way trades involving Den, ATL, and the Pats. The bottom line is that ATL is in no hurry to trade Duckett but they aren't gonna give him away either.Evilgrin
What is the story with these Duckett rumors - I figured since it didn't happen at the draft it would not happen - why does this have legs? Even with Duce/Duckett, etc - do you still see Parker as the undisputed starting RB between the 10s and a legit #2/very good #3 RB in leagues?
I think Staley. The Steelers have gotten into having a 3rd down back and Haynes is a much better pass-blocker than Duce.Sort of a hi-jack, but it FWP does get injured, would the next in line for the between the 10s main guy be Haynes or Staley?
Agree 100%. I think you'd see Duce with Haynes in on 3rd down and in the 4th quarter if the Steelers have a comfortable lead.I think Staley. The Steelers have gotten into having a 3rd down back and Haynes is a much better pass-blocker than Duce.Sort of a hi-jack, but it FWP does get injured, would the next in line for the between the 10s main guy be Haynes or Staley?
I still don't see Duckett in Pittsburgh, I think a more likely landing place, if any, is in Denver. Parker is unbdoubtedly the starting RB between the 10s unless he struggles, then they'll run Duce for a series or two. Last year, there were certain teams against which Parker was very effective, but when teams started keying on the run and leaving Willie little room to operate, he got bottled up. In those instances, they'll bring in Duce to soften up the defense. I see Parker as a legit #2 in non-PPR leagues for sure, despite his likely lack of TDs.Evilgrin
What is the story with these Duckett rumors - I figured since it didn't happen at the draft it would not happen - why does this have legs? Even with Duce/Duckett, etc - do you still see Parker as the undisputed starting RB between the 10s and a legit #2/very good #3 RB in leagues?
Anytime, man... thanks. Most of my stuff is simply my own hunches based on years of watching the team, but there are a lot of other Steeler fans with great insight, and several in the Iron City with an even better finger on the pulse of the franchise (i.e. Godsbrother, Frenchy Fuqua).I still don't see Duckett in Pittsburgh, I think a more likely landing place, if any, is in Denver. Parker is unbdoubtedly the starting RB between the 10s unless he struggles, then they'll run Duce for a series or two. Last year, there were certain teams against which Parker was very effective, but when teams started keying on the run and leaving Willie little room to operate, he got bottled up. In those instances, they'll bring in Duce to soften up the defense. I see Parker as a legit #2 in non-PPR leagues for sure, despite his likely lack of TDs.Evilgrin
What is the story with these Duckett rumors - I figured since it didn't happen at the draft it would not happen - why does this have legs? Even with Duce/Duckett, etc - do you still see Parker as the undisputed starting RB between the 10s and a legit #2/very good #3 RB in leagues?evilgrin is my trusted source for all Steeler insight, thanks & keep it coming!