What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Steelers offering Big Ben for a top-10 pick (1 Viewer)

Absoluetly no way a team (minus Oakland) would be dumb enough to give up a 1st Ben, baggage or not.
Without the baggage, I think the Steelers could easily get a first round pick for Ben. He's a very good qb still in his prime with superbowl experience. The only reason that they probably can't get a first round pick is because of the baggage..........
 
Absoluetly no way a team (minus Oakland) would be dumb enough to give up a 1st Ben, baggage or not.
Without the baggage, I think the Steelers could easily get a first round pick for Ben. He's a very good qb still in his prime with superbowl experience. The only reason that they probably can't get a first round pick is because of the baggage..........
Without the baggage the Steelers wouldn't even think of trading him. The Bears gave up two number 1's to get Cutler -- without baggage a QB with Roethlisberger's statistics and accomplishments would be through the roof.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why would they draft Clausen?

They just brought in Leftwich, he can be a solid backup, and Tomlin and co. have talked up Dennis Dixon for 2 years. Let's not forget if not for a major injury, Dixon probably would have been a 2nd round pick and maybe even a 1st rounder. He looked very good against a tough Ravens defense last year. Why couldn't they just trade Ben for a top-10 pick and then go in with Dixon/Leftwich/Batch?

Then with their new top-10 pick they grab some stud defensive player, since defense was actually a biiger problem than offense last season.

As for who would give up a top-10 pick, my first instinct tells me this would be an Al Davis move, especially after they couldn't get McNabb.

Buffalo has the need at QB, but it seems like an unlikely fit. Strictly from a football aspect they are the best fit, but they seem to want to distance themselves from troubled players more than most teams.

Maybe Jacksonville? Getting a 2-time Super Bowl winning QB who is in his prime would be one way to get butts in the seats.

Definitely not teams:

St. Louis

Detroit

Tampa

Washington

Possible but unlikely:

Kansas City

Seattle

Buffalo

Favorites:

Oakland

Jacksonville

Darkhorse:

Cleveland

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absoluetly no way a team (minus Oakland) would be dumb enough to give up a 1st Ben, baggage or not.
Without the baggage, I think the Steelers could easily get a first round pick for Ben. He's a very good qb still in his prime with superbowl experience. The only reason that they probably can't get a first round pick is because of the baggage..........
Without the baggage the Steelers wouldn't even think of trading him. The Bears gave up two number 1's to get Cutler -- without baggage a QB with Roethlisberger's statistics and accomplishments would be through the roof.
Exactly. It's silly to think that they couldn't get a first for Ben without the baggage.
 
Even with baggage, a first round pick is not out of the question. Young franchise QB for a 1st round pick with two SB wins behind him. He immediately steps into the locker room and helps some of these teams....

QB seems to be one of the most volatile positions in terms of success rate and he's a proven commodity. I would not be surprised to see teams like Buffalo, Oakland, Tampa, Cleveland, Oakland or Jax. I really can't see him being dealt within the division, so I would rule out Cleveland. Buffalo/Jax/Oakland seem to be a viable place. Oakland was heavy in trying to get McNabb (based on other posts) and Schein/Gannon is reporting on NFL blitz that he fits the Al Davis model and would be a perfect place. In addition, with all of the QB troubles Oakland has had for years, they would be foolish to pass up this opportunity.

 
If I'm running any of these teams I'd trade a first for Ben without a second thought.

Seattle

Buffalo

Oakland

Jacksonville

Cleveland

 
Why would they draft Clausen?They just brought in Leftwich, he can be a solid backup, and Tomlin and co. have talked up Dennis Dixon for 2 years. Let's not forget if not for a major injury, Dixon probably would have been a 2nd round pick and maybe even a 1st rounder. He looked very good against a tough Ravens defense last year. Why couldn't they just trade Ben for a top-10 pick and then go in with Dixon/Leftwich/Batch?
I agree the Steelers probably wouldn't go after Clausen if they got a top 10 pick but the prospect of Dixon/Leftwich/Batch quaterbacking the Steelers does not paint a rosey future.Leftwich is a capable backup, nothing more and Batch should have retired. Dixon was okay in his first start but I certainly wouldn't characterize his performance as "very good". He looked very much like Kordell Stewart.This team is built to win now, not three or four years from now. Trading Ben means you are blowing up and starting over. If that is what the Rooneys feel they need to do then I am all for it but let's not kid ourselves into thinking they will be contending for the division title with that groupd of QBs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I'm running any of these teams I'd trade a first for Ben without a second thought.SeattleBuffaloOaklandJacksonvilleCleveland
agreed.One first round pick will be tremendous value for the team that lands Ben.
I would think seattle and oakland would be major league chomping at the bit on this one. Especially seattle (I know they went after whitehurst but this is an automatic upgrade and they have 2 first rounders).
 
Until he rapes another chick.

OK, that was a bit harsh and misleading. But the point is all "baggage" is not the same.

Any team willing to invest in BB right now better do a lot of research on who this guy really is off the field b/c it's a HUGE red flag that Pitt is willing to unload him in his prime.

And don't give me any of this Clausen or Dixon hype. Without the repeat rape/sex assault incidents, those players aren't worth Ben's salt.

 
If you were an owner, would you sign off on a trade for Ben? I wouldn't.

(Look at me! I have scruples!)

 
Sounds like this is a horrible time for the Panthers to not have a 1st round draft pick. Good thing they used it to nab Everette Brown.

For all but a handful of teams, there would be absolutely no better use of a 1st round pick than to acquire Roethlisberger.

This is getting insane with fans and execs apparently not thinking Roethlisberger should warrant a top 10 pick.

 
Sounds like this is a horrible time for the Panthers to not have a 1st round draft pick. Good thing they used it to nab Everette Brown. For all but a handful of teams, there would be absolutely no better use of a 1st round pick than to acquire Roethlisberger. This is getting insane with fans and execs apparently not thinking Roethlisberger should warrant a top 10 pick.
As a 49er fan, I'd approve swapping that Panthers pick for Ben.
 
Sounds like this is a horrible time for the Panthers to not have a 1st round draft pick. Good thing they used it to nab Everette Brown. For all but a handful of teams, there would be absolutely no better use of a 1st round pick than to acquire Roethlisberger. This is getting insane with fans and execs apparently not thinking Roethlisberger should warrant a top 10 pick.
As a 49er fan, I'd approve swapping that Panthers pick for Ben.
:shrug:
 
Any team willing to invest in BB right now better do a lot of research on who this guy really is off the field b/c it's a HUGE red flag that Pitt is willing to unload him in his prime.
Yeah, a huge red flag that the Pittsburgh front office have lost their minds.
 
Here are teams that Steelers have called about Roethlisberger: Rams, 49ers, Raiders, Bills, Jaguars, Seahawks and Browns.
Here are the known "no's" on interest in Roethlisberger right now: Rams, Bills. Others might not be, just not known yet. 16 minutes ago via UberTwitter
Adam SchefterThat leaves the 49ers, Raiders, Jaguars, Seahawks, and Browns.

 
DarkhorseNo shot in hell:

Cleveland
Fixed that for you.
Why? just because they are rivals?Top ten pick, check

Football Hell, check

Perfect for all.
No, for these reasons1. Riots in Pittsburgh

2. BGP's head would explode with nuclear force and destroy Cleveland.
Steelers' fans need to make up their minds. Do they want to get rid of Roethlisberger or not? If he's a bad guy who isn't worthy of being a Steeler it seems to me that they'd love to have him go to Cleveland.
 
Teams would be crazy NOT to give up a 1st for him (even with baggage). If a team comes out of the NFL draft with a top 8 QB who has 2 superbowls and is only 28, that would be a succesful draft.

ps I'd love to see Big Ben in SF with VD and Crabs (he may already have these anyways).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mort just tweeted that there's be no interest from the Cardinals despite them needing a QB and being coached by Whisenhunt. That's pretty bad when you've won multiple SBs and even a former coach doesn't want anything to do with you.

 
Some of these teams simply may not be able to afford Ben. They may have some big contracts out to other players right now. No cap I know, but it has been said most teams are going to stick right around what the cap would have been.

 
Mort just tweeted that there's be no interest from the Cardinals despite them needing a QB and being coached by Whisenhunt. That's pretty bad when you've won multiple SBs and even a former coach doesn't want anything to do with you.
Local reports always were that Roeth and Whisenhunt weren't exactly the 'bestest of buddies.' I wouldn't read that much into it.
 
Mort just tweeted that there's be no interest from the Cardinals despite them needing a QB and being coached by Whisenhunt. That's pretty bad when you've won multiple SBs and even a former coach doesn't want anything to do with you.
Agreed. That's why I'm not a fan of the 49ers paying more than the 17th pick. I understand what his value should be, but you're taking on a huge risk if you trade for him. I'm still not sold that the Steelers trade him either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
GordonGekko said:
Posturing by the Steelers. They can say they want to trade him ( and not really have to) when Big Ben's leverage is the lowest. They can appear to be "doing something" and say no team wanted him enough or the offers were too lowball to take. Saying, "Wow, I'm stuck with Big Ben, so let's see what happens and hope he changes" is way different from "We have a late 20s established QB with two rings and frankly ending up like Miami/Buffalo/Denver post franchise QB is something we don't want to deal with" One of the most expensive "hidden" outlays for the Steelers will be what they will need to trade the press for the PR spin they want ( Big Ben is good for three stories now, the fall, the rise again, the redemption) What fans see and hear comes from the press. Publications and sports sites have their own agendas to serve as well. Like the ARod story ( where clearly ESPN and SI were spinning PR in divergent directions), the Steelers are going to have to horse trade to get Big Ben back in the good graces of the public via the press. You have to feel sorry for the Rooney's at some level. The cost of keeping Big Ben probably means giving some SI executives incompetent nephew a job. Or donate a big check to some ESPN executives favorite charity, which his wife happens to head. And on and on and on. As ridiculous as it is, this is how it really works, whether Big Ben can return to the public good graces depends on the press and the press will demand to wet their beaks like everyone else. It's not just the stories you do write, its the stories you don't, how you spin it, what you say and when you say it. The Steelers are not, IMHO, going to trade Big Ben at his lowest trade value while simultaneously taking the huge PR hit they are taking. Time is their friend here, it's Big Ben's biggest friend too. I suspect this is posturing, for the sake of public perception and for the Rooney's to say they did "something", nothing more.
It would be bad PR if it's leaked that the Steelers had a substantial offer and didn't pull the trigger.
 
I understand he has been a bad boy....a pattern is no doubt playing out.....but....this is shocking to me. 2 Super Bowls...franchise type of guy...shocking.

Teams will line up if this is really true.

 
the word out on the street is the Rams have declined giving up their #1 pick in exchange for Roethlisberger.
I dunno. If Ben puts his problems behind him, guaranteeing a QB of his caliber for the next 5+ years is worth a #1 overall IMO.
The problem is that no one knows if he will (or can) put the problems behind him. Maybe he's a bright young guy who just jut too insulated from the consequences of what he did, and he'll snap right out of it. Or maybe he's as capable of self-improvement as Carl Spackler is. Teams don't know which way it will go with him. They only know the league is tired of it and the Steelers are willing to give up on him for decent compensation. That's why it's hard to tell if he's worth the 1.01 pick or not.
 
Clausen would be my guess...
Wasn't the reason the Bills didn't want Clausen because of fumbling concerns in bad weather due to his small hands?
I watched Clausen a lot at ND, and I never remember cold weather being an issue with him fumbling. Buff might be blowing smoke to scare people away. Cold weather would be my least concern with Clausen. I think he, like Ben(7 years older) is immature.Some team better step it up. I just saw a pick of Ben and it made me pissed, not so much for the sexual abuse, but for acting a fool and costing his teammates more than likely another playoffs.I will always cheer the Steelers, just not #7.Raiders, Seabags, Bills...this is your chance to get good, or pay a rookie and win 4 games again and again and again.
 
Absoluetly no way a team (minus Oakland) would be dumb enough to give up a 1st Ben, baggage or not.
Without the baggage, I think the Steelers could easily get a first round pick for Ben. He's a very good qb still in his prime with superbowl experience. The only reason that they probably can't get a first round pick is because of the baggage..........
I guess I meant in the top ten picks, not 1st round overall. Sorry for not being more specific.
 
Seattle's 1.14 should get this done. Plus Seattle has plenty of money. Hasselbeck will be hurt by week six, so it works out for everybody involved.

 
the word out on the street is the Rams have declined giving up their #1 pick in exchange for Roethlisberger.
I dunno. If Ben puts his problems behind him, guaranteeing a QB of his caliber for the next 5+ years is worth a #1 overall IMO.
The problem is that no one knows if he will (or can) put the problems behind him. Maybe he's a bright young guy who just jut too insulated from the consequences of what he did, and he'll snap right out of it. Or maybe he's as capable of self-improvement as Carl Spackler is. Teams don't know which way it will go with him. They only know the league is tired of it and the Steelers are willing to give up on him for decent compensation. That's why it's hard to tell if he's worth the 1.01 pick or not.
Even with all that risk, I don't see how he's not better than the devil you don't know. We absolutely know he can play at this level, which is more than you can say for the 200+ people about to be drafted this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top