"really good"?4 really good years makes a HOF'er?
No question in my mind.he does belong.
I see 8 really good years, 2x NFL MVP and SB MVP.4 really good years makes a HOF'er?
Eight? Maybe I'm missing something. I was just browsing and noticed this and didn't strike me as HOF.I see the SB MVP argument, but don't you think many QB's could have won that SB with that 49ers team?
| 1991 sfo | 11 | 180 279 64.5 2517 9.0 17 8 | 66 415 4 || 1992 sfo | 16 | 268 402 66.7 3465 8.6 25 7 | 76 537 4 || 1993 sfo | 16 | 314 462 68.0 4023 8.7 29 16 | 69 407 2 || 1994 sfo | 16 | 324 461 70.3 3969 8.6 35 10 | 58 293 7 || 1995 sfo | 11 | 299 447 66.9 3200 7.2 20 11 | 50 250 3 || 1996 sfo | 12 | 214 316 67.7 2410 7.6 14 6 | 52 310 4 || 1997 sfo | 15 | 241 356 67.7 3029 8.5 19 6 | 50 199 3 || 1998 sfo | 15 | 322 517 62.3 4170 8.1 36 12 | 70 454 6 |
link pleasethat would be interesting considering Rice caught more TD balls from Young than Montana, would be a very interesting read on why he thought that.There is no case to be made that Young > Montana..... Montana was superior.. Even Jerry Rice says so, and he should know.
Yeah, and Montana may not have been successful if Bill Walsh stayed in college football coaching at Stanford.We work with what we have.Somehow I bet if Steve had stayed in TB he wouldnt be in the HOF.
49'ers record with Young > Montana. When given the choice between the two, head coach George Seifert traded Montana and kept Young.There is no case to be made that Young > Montana..... Montana was superior.. Even Jerry Rice says so, and he should know.
That is up for debate. What Isn't up for debate was how bad Young was in TB. Thats fact. HTHYeah, and Montana may not have been successful if Bill Walsh stayed in college football coaching at Stanford.Somehow I bet if Steve had stayed in TB he wouldnt be in the HOF.
I personally think Montana was a better QB by a decent margin. However, from 1992 to 1994, Steve Young and Mike Shanahan took the 49ers' offense to levels it had never reached under Joe Montana and Bill Walsh. That particularly offensive stretch was the best in 49ers' history and among the best in league history.Rice was on record as stating that he didn't think Steve Young was as good at reading defenses as Joe Montana, which rings true to me. However, Young's added mobility did bring something to the table to offset that at least to some degree.49'ers record with Young > Montana. When given the choice between the two, head coach George Seifert traded Montana and kept Young.There is no case to be made that Young > Montana..... Montana was superior.. Even Jerry Rice says so, and he should know.
He's got more Super Bowl rings than Elway.I say no. He was good.. Was he Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Sid Luckman, Bart Starr, or John Elway good?No.
He's going to get you on the technicality that Young won 2 rings as a backup to Montana (although he did contribute some to their regular season campaigns).Brian Griese has more rings than Dan Marino, too.He's got more Super Bowl rings than Elway.I say no. He was good.. Was he Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Sid Luckman, Bart Starr, or John Elway good?No.
only if you count the SB he didn't play in and/or the SB where he only saw mop-up duty.He's got more Super Bowl rings than Elway.I say no. He was good.. Was he Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Sid Luckman, Bart Starr, or John Elway good?No.
1989, 1990, 1995.Please correct me if I am wrong.moleculo said:this is incorrect.He's got more Super Bowl rings than Elway.I say no.
He was good.. Was he Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Sid Luckman, Bart Starr, or John Elway good?
No.
I say no.
He was good.. Was he Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Sid Luckman, Bart Starr, or John Elway good?
No.
Not according to TommyGilmore's Calculations of Goodness via Super Bowl Rings. 4 Super Bowl Rings > 3 Super Bowl Rings - Thus Bradshaw is better then Young.I say no.
He was good.. Was he Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Sid Luckman, Bart Starr, or John Elway good?
No.Steve Young was far better than Bradshaw.
Are you not the one who claimed Bradshaw was better than Young?Not according to TommyGilmore's Calculations of Goodness via Super Bowl Rings. 4 Super Bowl Rings > 3 Super Bowl Rings - Thus Bradshaw is better then Young.I say no.
He was good.. Was he Terry Bradshaw, Johnny Unitas, Joe Montana, Sid Luckman, Bart Starr, or John Elway good?
No.Steve Young was far better than Bradshaw.
Sure, as soon as he gets 4 more Pro-Bowls, 2 more Super-Bowl rings, and about 130 more TDs.Couple more good seasons for Kurt Warner and he's in too, right?
Jerry Rice's opinion is not the determining factor, even if he did play with both for a long time.There is no case to be made that Young > Montana..... Montana was superior.. Even Jerry Rice says so, and he should know.
Yeah but do those TB teams count as "professional"?It is the Pro Football Hall of Fame, so the USFL counts.
also - a case can be made that Young > Montana.If Montana = HOF, than young must also.
Excellent post. Young shouldn't be penalized because he backed up Joe Montana for such a long time. Once he got his shot, he was supercalifragilisticexpeallodosius good. Definitely HOF material.I counted 7 seasons where he had 20+ total TDs between passing and rushing.Career 64% passer with a career 8.0 YPA, that's after being a starter on a bad team and a backup for 6 years.Career 5.87 YPC with 43 rushing TDs.He had a career 2.17 TD to INT Ratio (2.57 excluding his TB seasons).Had arguably his best season ever statistically the year before he was forced to retire due to concussion.Has 2 Super Bowl rings and 1 Super Bowl MVP award.Also had his NFL career "delayed" a few years by playing in the USFL. He debuted in the NFL at 24 years old.I'd say he was a lock.
You left out about 40 more rushing TD's and about 1,500 rushing yards.Young was almost as accurate as Montana (I'd still give Joe the edge in "passer ability" - i.e. reading defenses, accuracy, etc.) but Steve Young was as mobile as Michael Vick. Imagine how good Vick would have been if he could actually pass (and had Jerry Rice to throw toSure, as soon as he gets 4 more Pro-Bowls, 2 more Super-Bowl rings, and about 130 more TDs.Couple more good seasons for Kurt Warner and he's in too, right?![]()
Ha ha. If Jim Sorgi comes in after Manning is retired and accomplishes what Steve Young did, then I'll be all for him going to the HOF too. The point I was making is that Young was a world class QB once he got his shot. Did you ever watch him play? I did...He was as dominant in his time as Tom Brady is this year.You can't penalize players for sitting the bench? Well then I'm starting the Jim Sorgi bandwagon right now!!
From Rice's Sirius Satellite Radio Show. Heard it with my own ears. A called called in and simply asked "Who was better- Montana or Young?" Rice actually mentioned what you just said about the TD catches. He said as close to a quote as I can remember "I actually caught more passes and TD's from Steve, but to me Joe Montana will always be the best QB I ever played with and in the history of the NFL. "We had a special connection... etc... He also said that when Young became the QB- it was hard to adjust to the way he threw the ball. He said that Montana had an amazing ability to put the ball where Jerry was GOING to be and where only he could catch it, while Young would throw it up and Rice would have to GO get it to make the play.... Several members of the board have talked about the quotes from Rice before, I think in one of the greatest QB ever threads...link pleasethat would be interesting considering Rice caught more TD balls from Young than Montana, would be a very interesting read on why he thought that.There is no case to be made that Young > Montana..... Montana was superior.. Even Jerry Rice says so, and he should know.
Its no lie and you are flat out wrong. Rice did say that, I heard it, have read it several places, and have actually heard Jerry say similar things in other interviews.... How do you know Jerry would NEVER say that--- because Young played with Rice longer and in Rice's true prime- theres no way Rice could think Montana was a better QB?? That makes no sense... Call Jerry on his radio show and ask him....By the way, I do think Young is a hall of famer and great QB.. He's just not as good as Montana...BusterTBronco said:Seeing as how Young and Rice hooked up for an NFL record 84 touchdowns, I think your statement is a flat out lie. Jerry Rice would never say that Montana was superior to Young.Montana was superior.. Even Jerry Rice says so, and he should know.
Are you really asking this???