so let me get this - the first part of the season you get zero points out of that position. and it works. so why would you pick one up at all?In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
do you start the season without a kicker? and wait to see who is hot or do you pick one up before the first game?In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
Does that really work? I remember looking up Gould's stats from last year and it seems like right around the point everyone would have been jumping on him, his scoring came down to about average. He scored 66 points in his first 5 games, 77 in his next 11. Ditto with Rackers. He scored 50 points in his first 4 games, 90 in his next 12. That's averages of 7 and 7.5, good but not great numbers. Just taking the top 32 kickers in total points from last year and figuring their per game average, I get 7 as good for 14th and 7.5 for 7th. But most every kicker anyone would use is between about 6.7 and 7.5. By the time you would know to jump on Gould or Rackers, they would be coming back to the pack.I guess it works in the sense that you ended up with a K you could play, but it seems like when I see people bring up these examples, they imply - not saying you are - that they got a top kicker that way.In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
Amen.I like teams with a Good D and subpar O. Bironas and Stover have been money this year.
Top-10 kickers are more likely to come from a top-10 offense than a top-10 defense. The best strategy is just to grab the kicker on the best offense who isn't currently snagged.I like teams with a Good D and subpar O. Bironas and Stover have been money this year.
Doesn't this strategy dictate you keep 2 kickers on your roster then?It's a crapshoot. My favorite NFL kicker is Jason Hanson, I think he's one of the all time greats. Throw in that he plays in a dome with another dome game at Minnesota, and that's good enough for me to usually snag him as ~ the #10-12 kicker overall.
But when I get Hanson, I usually just start him at home and if on the road, in division games. This is not a foolproof strategy, but i usually get 2+ FGA's from him, a couple from 50+ (BIG bonus for that in my league), and he's awesomely accurate indoors. Mike Martz hasn't hurt his value in turf games ether!
Oh, and he's MONEY on Thanksgiving! Plus you're watching that (usual STINKER) anyway, right? Might as well have a rooting interest.
Caveat: I would NEVER recommend that anyone choose their fantasy football lineups based on TV schedules. That would be very, very wrong. RIGHT???
I pick one up just before the week one game.do you start the season without a kicker? and wait to see who is hot or do you pick one up before the first game?In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
Without looking back for sure, they were plenty considering people used draft picks on kickers even earlier than the final round. I know for sure they each gave me some very nice weeks, especially Rackers.Does that really work? I remember looking up Gould's stats from last year and it seems like right around the point everyone would have been jumping on him, his scoring came down to about average. He scored 66 points in his first 5 games, 77 in his next 11. Ditto with Rackers. He scored 50 points in his first 4 games, 90 in his next 12. That's averages of 7 and 7.5, good but not great numbers. Just taking the top 32 kickers in total points from last year and figuring their per game average, I get 7 as good for 14th and 7.5 for 7th. But most every kicker anyone would use is between about 6.7 and 7.5. By the time you would know to jump on Gould or Rackers, they would be coming back to the pack.I guess it works in the sense that you ended up with a K you could play, but it seems like when I see people bring up these examples, they imply - not saying you are - that they got a top kicker that way.In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
Well that strategy should work well with your QB too right?I'll sometimes go with a kicker that is on the same team as one of my starting RBs. The logic here is that if your RB has a tough day, it means that his team probably didn't convert so well in the redzone, and they ended up with a few field goals. Obviously this doesn't always work, but seeing your RB get stuffed at the goal line isn't so horrible when you end the drive with 3 pts from the kicker. This past Sunday I started Rudi and S. Graham. Got crap from Rudi, but Graham made up for him big time -- this is an extreme example though.
Very clever (and somewhat devious). I think I'll try that next year!So, do you play week 1 with no kicker? Or do you just use the extra time to hold/decide on which position player to drop?Also, could this "technique" also be applied to DST? Seems to me like I always end up dropping the DST I drafted and picking up a better one off waivers.In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
yeah, I've done the same on and off for the past few years.Don't draft a kicker, take an extra skill position guy, then rightbefore week 1, drop the "worst" upside position player and grab a kicker.Funny how with all positions, the later I wait to take a guy, themore chance I have to grab someone who unexpectedly comesout of the gate hot. The guy who drafted Vinatieri "early" will mostlikely not jump on Folk as a free agent since he drafted "one of thebest kickers in the league". This happens to me even more oftenwith skill position guys. For example, this year, a guy who draftedBulger and Rivers probably didn't give up on them fast enough tograb Anderson this year. I hate in week 3 when I'm staring at aguy on the waiver wire but just can't bear to part with any of my"sure things that will come around soon" on my roster.massive tangent. sorryVery clever (and somewhat devious). I think I'll try that next year!So, do you play week 1 with no kicker? Or do you just use the extra time to hold/decide on which position player to drop?In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
I have Farve as my QB and picked up Hanson last week but tempted to pick up Crosby since he's out there just to have the K there whenever the offense stalls out.yeah, I've done the same on and off for the past few years.Don't draft a kicker, take an extra skill position guy, then rightbefore week 1, drop the "worst" upside position player and grab a kicker.Funny how with all positions, the later I wait to take a guy, themore chance I have to grab someone who unexpectedly comesout of the gate hot. The guy who drafted Vinatieri "early" will mostlikely not jump on Folk as a free agent since he drafted "one of thebest kickers in the league". This happens to me even more oftenwith skill position guys. For example, this year, a guy who draftedBulger and Rivers probably didn't give up on them fast enough tograb Anderson this year. I hate in week 3 when I'm staring at aguy on the waiver wire but just can't bear to part with any of my"sure things that will come around soon" on my roster.massive tangent. sorryVery clever (and somewhat devious). I think I'll try that next year!So, do you play week 1 with no kicker? Or do you just use the extra time to hold/decide on which position player to drop?In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.![]()
Fairly decent D and an utterly inept O seems to have resulted in Stover falling right off the map in terms of worth. I question whether this BAL team can turn it around to get Stover's value back to where it was at the beginning of the season.Amen.I like teams with a Good D and subpar O. Bironas and Stover have been money this year.![]()
you dont use a PK for the first part of the season (zero points from that position?) and if that works why pick one up later?Bingo. Fill the roster, trhen part way through the year, pick up the hot one.The last three seasons, this has worked for me.
yes.Well that strategy should work well with your QB too right?I'll sometimes go with a kicker that is on the same team as one of my starting RBs. The logic here is that if your RB has a tough day, it means that his team probably didn't convert so well in the redzone, and they ended up with a few field goals. Obviously this doesn't always work, but seeing your RB get stuffed at the goal line isn't so horrible when you end the drive with 3 pts from the kicker. This past Sunday I started Rudi and S. Graham. Got crap from Rudi, but Graham made up for him big time -- this is an extreme example though.
if you have a QB or RB with redzone struggles, pick up the kicker for that team... that way, you always come away with points on every scoring drive.
Top-10 kickers are more likely to come from a top-10 offense than a top-10 defense. The best strategy is just to grab the kicker on the best offense who isn't currently snagged.I like teams with a Good D and subpar O. Bironas and Stover have been money this year.
interested in which kicker you picked up for gost....NEMy stratedgy is to find the K on the best offense with the latest bye. ( This year SGostowski).Since you have a K with the last bye you can pick off someone else's good K when they cut them because their K is on a bye. You get good scoring and never have to worry about your K being on a bye.
I like Gostkowski. The guy consistently gives you 7-10 points every week and I'd be amazed if he lays an egg this year (that would require shutting out the Pats, which looks impossible.)Also, its nice when you're watching the games, the Pats are always in the red zone. Yeah, most of them are extra points but at least you know you're gonna get something for your troubles.My stratedgy is to find the K on the best offense with the latest bye. ( This year SGostowski).Since you have a K with the last bye you can pick off someone else's good K when they cut them because their K is on a bye. You get good scoring and never have to worry about your K being on a bye.
I do this, too. Try to get one of the kickers on one of my best players' team. With Gostkowski on bye, I grabbed Reed since I was starting Roethlisberger and Parker. It worked out just fine. But in a keeper/dynasty league, I value consistency, which usually means a kicker on a good offense. I like a kicker I can pretty much pencil in for 6-9 points a week and don't have to worry about those 2 point stinkers. Kickers on bad struggling offenses might get you the occasional 14 point game, but that'll come with a 1 point bomb. Look at Stover. He was doing really well to start the year but has put up 4 points in 3 games. Yuck. He seems to have three of those games a year along with three monster games. Kickers on bad offenses will do that and it can help you or hurt you, especially in the playoffs, but fantasy football is enough of a gamble already that I want little more security at kicker. It took me about 10 minutes to gather numbers over the last four years for some kickers/teams, calculate the averages and standard deviations, and add up the number of big games and flops -- games above 11 points or below 5 points. Ghost/NE didn't have the highest per game, but NE kickers had the lowest standard deviation over the last four seasons and the fewest numbers of monster/flop games. So I targeted Gostkowski in my contract/auction league and made him the second highest paid kicker in the league (which was above many projections heading into the year) and I've been happy with the results.I'll sometimes go with a kicker that is on the same team as one of my starting RBs. The logic here is that if your RB has a tough day, it means that his team probably didn't convert so well in the redzone, and they ended up with a few field goals. Obviously this doesn't always work, but seeing your RB get stuffed at the goal line isn't so horrible when you end the drive with 3 pts from the kicker. This past Sunday I started Rudi and S. Graham. Got crap from Rudi, but Graham made up for him big time -- this is an extreme example though.
I do the same strategies as in your first 2 paragraphs there. Thought I'd second that to give the thread a bump and give someone a chance to explain how it's wrong - if it is.I do this, too. Try to get one of the kickers on one of my best players' team. With Gostkowski on bye, I grabbed Reed since I was starting Roethlisberger and Parker. It worked out just fine. But in a keeper/dynasty league, I value consistency, which usually means a kicker on a good offense. I like a kicker I can pretty much pencil in for 6-9 points a week and don't have to worry about those 2 point stinkers. Kickers on bad struggling offenses might get you the occasional 14 point game, but that'll come with a 1 point bomb. Look at Stover. He was doing really well to start the year but has put up 4 points in 3 games. Yuck. He seems to have three of those games a year along with three monster games. Kickers on bad offenses will do that and it can help you or hurt you, especially in the playoffs, but fantasy football is enough of a gamble already that I want little more security at kicker. It took me about 10 minutes to gather numbers over the last four years for some kickers/teams, calculate the averages and standard deviations, and add up the number of big games and flops -- games above 11 points or below 5 points. Ghost/NE didn't have the highest per game, but NE kickers had the lowest standard deviation over the last four seasons and the fewest numbers of monster/flop games. So I targeted Gostkowski in my contract/auction league and made him the second highest paid kicker in the league (which was above many projections heading into the year) and I've been happy with the results.I'll sometimes go with a kicker that is on the same team as one of my starting RBs. The logic here is that if your RB has a tough day, it means that his team probably didn't convert so well in the redzone, and they ended up with a few field goals. Obviously this doesn't always work, but seeing your RB get stuffed at the goal line isn't so horrible when you end the drive with 3 pts from the kicker. This past Sunday I started Rudi and S. Graham. Got crap from Rudi, but Graham made up for him big time -- this is an extreme example though.
Hmmmm...interesting. Some people advocate taking the dome kicker over the outside kicker especially as the FF playoffs loom near. Ghost isn't even in the top 5 kickers in my league. He's available and so is Cosby and Brown who are top 3 and 4 respectively.I do this, too. Try to get one of the kickers on one of my best players' team. With Gostkowski on bye, I grabbed Reed since I was starting Roethlisberger and Parker. It worked out just fine. But in a keeper/dynasty league, I value consistency, which usually means a kicker on a good offense. I like a kicker I can pretty much pencil in for 6-9 points a week and don't have to worry about those 2 point stinkers. Kickers on bad struggling offenses might get you the occasional 14 point game, but that'll come with a 1 point bomb. Look at Stover. He was doing really well to start the year but has put up 4 points in 3 games. Yuck. He seems to have three of those games a year along with three monster games. Kickers on bad offenses will do that and it can help you or hurt you, especially in the playoffs, but fantasy football is enough of a gamble already that I want little more security at kicker. It took me about 10 minutes to gather numbers over the last four years for some kickers/teams, calculate the averages and standard deviations, and add up the number of big games and flops -- games above 11 points or below 5 points. Ghost/NE didn't have the highest per game, but NE kickers had the lowest standard deviation over the last four seasons and the fewest numbers of monster/flop games. So I targeted Gostkowski in my contract/auction league and made him the second highest paid kicker in the league (which was above many projections heading into the year) and I've been happy with the results.I'll sometimes go with a kicker that is on the same team as one of my starting RBs. The logic here is that if your RB has a tough day, it means that his team probably didn't convert so well in the redzone, and they ended up with a few field goals. Obviously this doesn't always work, but seeing your RB get stuffed at the goal line isn't so horrible when you end the drive with 3 pts from the kicker. This past Sunday I started Rudi and S. Graham. Got crap from Rudi, but Graham made up for him big time -- this is an extreme example though.
Rackers was gold, but I think I picked him up in week 2 (I know I got his huge game). Also, the 7.5 average for Rackers is wrong. He missed a game, so it was really an 8.2 average. Also, my league rewards extra points for long FGs, and Rackers had 13 40-49 and 6 50+ FGs, and 11 of those 19 were after week 4, so even though he was studly in weeks 1-4, he was still well above average after that. In my case, I know he helped me win numerous games that year and he wasn't the K I drafted.One thing that seems very consistent with kickers is that the best ones year N are usually not the best ones in N+1. I tend to comb the waivers for kickers a lot more because of the pickup of Rackers and the difference he actually made. A lot of teams ignore that because they don't think it matters.Also, if you are having kicker issues, it pays to look at who the FA kickers are playing. I picked up Josh Brown this past week knowing he was playing SF. He finished with 3 XPs and 1 FG, but he had 2 FGs that he made erased by penalties and they punted once and he missed a 54 yarder the other team. Even though I didn't get as many points as I hoped for, he did end up getting the opportunities that I figured he would. It is rare to have 2 FGs wiped out by penalties, so that part was just unlucky. No penalties and Brown has a 12 point game, which is very good for a kicker.Without looking back for sure, they were plenty considering people used draft picks on kickers even earlier than the final round. I know for sure they each gave me some very nice weeks, especially Rackers.Does that really work? I remember looking up Gould's stats from last year and it seems like right around the point everyone would have been jumping on him, his scoring came down to about average. He scored 66 points in his first 5 games, 77 in his next 11. Ditto with Rackers. He scored 50 points in his first 4 games, 90 in his next 12. That's averages of 7 and 7.5, good but not great numbers. Just taking the top 32 kickers in total points from last year and figuring their per game average, I get 7 as good for 14th and 7.5 for 7th. But most every kicker anyone would use is between about 6.7 and 7.5. By the time you would know to jump on Gould or Rackers, they would be coming back to the pack.I guess it works in the sense that you ended up with a K you could play, but it seems like when I see people bring up these examples, they imply - not saying you are - that they got a top kicker that way.In my redraft leagues I rarely even draft a kicker, I just wait till the season starts and use the roster spot for a position player. Its worked out well the past few years with Folk, Gould, Rackers, etc.
Stover's actually had a bad year, thanks to that mighty Ravens O..I like teams with a Good D and subpar O. Bironas and Stover have been money this year.
You don't want a team that's offense can't score at all because they get behind in the game and abandon FGs altogether.Stover's actually had a bad year, thanks to that mighty Ravens O..I like teams with a Good D and subpar O. Bironas and Stover have been money this year.