This may come across like sour grapes, but for the second time in three years, I've had the #1 seed heading into the playoffs and lost to the #4 seed. If I had played either the #2 or #3 seed, I'd have won and moved on.
The #1 seed is automatically entered into the Week 14-16 Championship round and that's a great reward. But I think #1 should also be rewarded more in the league playoffs, where the most realistic chance of earning $ is available. My suggestion is that the #1 seed should have their choice of who they play in the first round of the playoffs. If they don't make the call by the start of the Thursday game, it defaults to the #4 seed.
Another alternative would be to scrap the H2H for the playoffs and move to a two-week total points scenario. The top two teams of the four that qualify earn the league prizes. There also wouldn't be a meaningless third place game like there is now.
Thoughts?
The #1 seed is automatically entered into the Week 14-16 Championship round and that's a great reward. But I think #1 should also be rewarded more in the league playoffs, where the most realistic chance of earning $ is available. My suggestion is that the #1 seed should have their choice of who they play in the first round of the playoffs. If they don't make the call by the start of the Thursday game, it defaults to the #4 seed.
Another alternative would be to scrap the H2H for the playoffs and move to a two-week total points scenario. The top two teams of the four that qualify earn the league prizes. There also wouldn't be a meaningless third place game like there is now.
Thoughts?
Last edited by a moderator: