What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

SUPER BOWL MVP ELI MANNING (1 Viewer)

MONKEY

Footballguy
He needs a new nick name...the window licker, #######, and MR. Have u seen my baseball just dont fit a 2 time SB MVP

Platinum Boy, since he beats the golden boy regularly

MR 4th QTR

Peyton's Big Bro

MR CLUTCH

Eli the GREAT

Hall of Famer

 
Going 30 for 40 and close to 300 yards and a touchdown with no interceptions warrants MVP consideration. I don't know of any other player whose performance warranted such consideration. Weatherford had a great game, but he only punted 3 times (?) and you don't give the MVP to a special teamer. Brady had very good numbers but was on the losing team and didn't outplay Manning IMO. Tuck played well but his sack at the end of the game was more a reflection of the pressure of Osi on the outside (forcing Brady up in the pocket, thus allowing Tuck to sack him). On other boards, other people have thrown out Manningham as a MVP. Manningham had an awesome catch, but it was an equally awesome throw - although the announcers really didn't give Manning his due. I also don't think his numbers were great and, he had a very makeable catch on the sideline a couple of series earlier and all I could think was that if it was Toomer out there, he'd have made the catch with a foot (12 inches) to spare.

My vote therefore goes to Eli.

 
'kentric said:
Going 30 for 40 and close to 300 yards and a touchdown with no interceptions warrants MVP consideration. I don't know of any other player whose performance warranted such consideration. Weatherford had a great game, but he only punted 3 times (?) and you don't give the MVP to a special teamer. Brady had very good numbers but was on the losing team and didn't outplay Manning IMO. Tuck played well but his sack at the end of the game was more a reflection of the pressure of Osi on the outside (forcing Brady up in the pocket, thus allowing Tuck to sack him). On other boards, other people have thrown out Manningham as a MVP. Manningham had an awesome catch, but it was an equally awesome throw - although the announcers really didn't give Manning his due. I also don't think his numbers were great and, he had a very makeable catch on the sideline a couple of series earlier and all I could think was that if it was Toomer out there, he'd have made the catch with a foot (12 inches) to spare. My vote therefore goes to Eli.
Originally I thought it might go to the defensive line as a group award - but really you can't argue with Eli as the MVP. Had the drive stalled out and Tynes kicked a 3rd FG - it might have wound up being Tynes as the MVP. He led the team in scoring with 7 points.
 
'kentric said:
Going 30 for 40 and close to 300 yards and a touchdown with no interceptions warrants MVP consideration. I don't know of any other player whose performance warranted such consideration. Weatherford had a great game, but he only punted 3 times (?) and you don't give the MVP to a special teamer. Brady had very good numbers but was on the losing team and didn't outplay Manning IMO. Tuck played well but his sack at the end of the game was more a reflection of the pressure of Osi on the outside (forcing Brady up in the pocket, thus allowing Tuck to sack him). On other boards, other people have thrown out Manningham as a MVP. Manningham had an awesome catch, but it was an equally awesome throw - although the announcers really didn't give Manning his due. I also don't think his numbers were great and, he had a very makeable catch on the sideline a couple of series earlier and all I could think was that if it was Toomer out there, he'd have made the catch with a foot (12 inches) to spare.

My vote therefore goes to Eli.
Sure you do...Desmond Howard.Either way, I think we need MORE Eli threads...ASAP...gllll peasssssss.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top