As a Colts fan, I have no trouble saying the better team won, and the better coached team won. While its hard to rip on a coach who wins his first 14 games, Caldwell clearly had the "deer in the headlights" look last night every time a CBS camera panned to him. Payton's onsides kick call was brilliant, and the Colts clearly were unprepared. And after the first 10-12 minutes of the first quarter, the Colts seemed to be tentative.How bad did Las Vegas and offshores screw up? Bad. Big time. As a Colts fan, I didn't want to wager against them, but there's no way I could justify laying 4 1/2 or more (up to 5 1/2 at one point). They lined the game as if it was in Indianapolis, not on a neutral field. Which brings to mind the next question: was it really a neutral field? According to a couple friends I have who were in Miami for several days and at the game, the mood down there was basically about 5 to 1 with Saint backers/rooters outnumbering Colts fans. Getting back to the spread, its obvious too much weight was put on the Minnesota game; the Saints got dominated on the line of scrimmage getting massacred statistically in yardage and first downs but the +4 turnover edge for the Saints was the main factor. If you look at the Saints signature wins, they had some of the more impressive wins during the season and playoffs. The Monday Night throttling of the Patriots stands out. The final margin was 38-17 and the 3 TD differential was NOT misleading. An unbeaten Giants team came into NO in mid October, and got buried....once again by a 21 point margin. Granted, the Giants were NOT the team many thought they would be, but at the time it seemed impressive. HOw about week 2 going into Philly? The Saints went into Philly and hung up 48 on them. Pretty damned impressive. In the playoffs, the Saints absolutely murdered Arizona. It wasn't a surprise that their offense ran roughshod, but they limited the Cardinals offense. Along with Baltimore's win over the Pats, these were the two most dominant playoff performances.The Colts signature wins were a pair of squeakers, a 35-34 win over the Patriots in which they came back from a 31-14 deficit and then going into Baltimore and prevailing 17-15. The Colts handled the Ravens much easier in the playoffs. But still, does that resume justify the difference in the spread?Finally, just how good were the Vikings? I heard a thesis earlier in the week that the Saints would win because they beat the Vikings, who the writer claimed were the best team in the NFL.