What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Supreme Court Rules Sports Betting Legal (1 Viewer)

Since the Florida casinos are owned by native Indian Tribes they would stand a good chance of making the cut if Florida passed the law and the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the opening gaming up to areas outside of Nevada.  The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida owns and operates one casino, the Miccosukee Resort & Gaming in Miami. The Seminole Tribe of Florida owns and operates seven casinos located in Clewiston, Coconut Creek, Hollywood, Immokalee, Okeechobee, and Tampa.

At this point joining Florida in as likely states to introduce sports betting bill are: Massachusetts; Rhode Island; New York; New Jersey; West Virginia; South Carolina; Georgia; Illinois; Michigan; Iowa; Minnesota; Louisiana; Mississippi; Oklahoma and California. Indiana and Kentucky already have introduced bills.

You can also add Pennsylvania and Connecticut to the list of states that have already passed bills

According to the Associated Press – The U.S. Supreme Court this year will decide a case brought by New Jersey that seeks to overturn a ban on sports betting in all but four states: Delaware, Montana, Nevada, and Oregon. A favorable ruling, in that case, could open the floodgates in terms of states adopting a new form of gambling.

“Assuming a Supreme Court decision or action by Congress permits it, we could see the largest simultaneous expansion of regulated gambling in U.S. history with sports betting in 2018,” said Chris Grove, the managing director for Eilers & Krejcik Gaming,

The court is expected by June to decide New Jersey’s case, which seeks to overturn a ban on sports betting by any state that did not meet a 1991 deadline to legalize it. States and private companies in the U.S. and abroad are already moving quickly to position themselves for a favorable ruling.

With states across the nation looking for new sources of revenue the adding or expanding gambling is seen as an attractive option for many. While not vouching for the political likelihood of any particular state adopting gambling legislation, David Schwartz, director of the Center for Gaming research at the University of Nevada Las Vegas, said the predictions are “definitely in line with the historical trend of states turning more to gambling.”

Sports betting is seen as most likely to be offered through commercial and tribal casinos, or state lotteries. Some analysts and industry observers also feel that a Supreme Court ruling legalizing sports betting nationwide would prompt a rapid expansion of internet betting, as states will move to allow it to be offered online.

This was pre-ruling, but provides more info on the states that wanted it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think what states do might vary but New Jersey it is going to be full on sports books. 

The Canada model is what they have in Delaware (but only because that is what was legal under the old law - the 4 states that were allowed to have sports gambling were restricted to what they had previously offered - which in Delaware's case was though parlay style tickets and nothing else.

Vegas books will feel a hit on this for sure

-QG
Honestly, I think Vegas has really low profit margin on sports books.  They are universally the lowest profitable area per square foot that is sure.  

A lot of places now contract out the actual day to day operation to Cantor or similar type gigs and don't even take real action and instead rent the floor.

As it turns out most online books simply just steal the lines from vegas, pay nothing, then operate in a tiny office for pennies of SG&A of what Vegas does.

 
As it turns out most online books simply just steal the lines from vegas, pay nothing, then operate in a tiny office for pennies of SG&A of what Vegas does.
Vegas copies the lines from offshore (bookmaker, betonline). Maybe once in awhile you will see Wynn with football openers. Sometimes Vegas will open the football season win totals (South Point will for all FBS teams, and CTG used to for the power 5 but looks like BetDSI has already beat them this year). 

I'm talking football here, I assume most other sports are the same.

 
The future of sports betting and most gambling will be digital IMO. Brick and  mortar casinos are in trouble longterm. Even now in NJ the casinos get a virtual license from the state and you can gamble through their apps and sites as long as your location data shows that you are in NJ. Soon, that will spread throughout most of the US. Nobody will bother with going to actual casinos when you can sit at home and clickclickclick away all their money.

 
From the SI article linked upthread:

I hadn't realized there was a federal ban on sports betting -- thought for sure that was regulated solely at the state level.
The law is the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA). It seems hyper-technical, but the law does not ban or outlaw sports gambling as such, but rather prohibits the states from enacting laws that legalize gambling.  The topic headline, "Supreme Court Rules Sports Betting Legal" is technically incorrect in a lawgeek sense, but it may have that practical effect.  The ruling involves the underrated, rarely cited, but extremely important "anti-commandeering" doctrine derived from the 10th amendment (“powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”)  The slightly interesting twist in this case, an argument the court of appeals actually bought, is that PASPA didn't force the states to do anything.  Rather, it prohibited them from passing laws legalizing sports gambling. Thankfully, that argument failed at the scotus.  Credit to New Jersey for carrying the water on this battle.

 
Honestly, I think Vegas has really low profit margin on sports books.  They are universally the lowest profitable area per square foot that is sure.  
You are correct, but the sportsbook makes the Vegas casino a lot of money indirectly, because it brings people into the casino that otherwise wouldn't be there.  And even when a person wins a large sports wager, they can lose it all and more on their way out of the book playing table games.

 
Vegas copies the lines from offshore (bookmaker, betonline). Maybe once in awhile you will see Wynn with football openers. Sometimes Vegas will open the football season win totals (South Point will for all FBS teams, and CTG used to for the power 5 but looks like BetDSI has already beat them this year). 

I'm talking football here, I assume most other sports are the same.
BetOnline opens MLB fyi.

 
Amazing.  First Marijuana passing more and more each day, and now sports book betting legally!   What a time to be alive!    

Wonder how this will hurt Vegas?   Going to be a big revenue boost for states

 
https://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2018/01/09/sports-betting-gambling-legalize-states-bills

From the article

"The report listed 11 states as having a good chance of enacting sports betting bills this year: Massachusetts; Rhode Island; New York; New Jersey; West Virginia; Ohio; Michigan; Illinois; Oklahoma; Kentucky and Indiana.

It also listed states where the introduction, much less adoption, of a sports betting bill is considered unlikely: Tennessee; Alabama; Arkansas; Texas; Kansas; Nebraska; North and South Dakota; Wyoming; Utah; Idaho; Alaska and Hawaii."

 ​
LMAO @ Ohio...Late tot he party with lottery.  Late to the party with casino games.  No way they pass anything this year.   They will wait and see how things go elsewhere, spend a bunch of money trying to convince the bible thumpers it is OK, and several years down the road, after the windfall has long passed something will be enacted.  And then it will be controlled by those who already have the power and $$$.  

 
I imagine Missouri will get it eventually, but it will take a few years.

Still wack to me that sports gambling and fantasy sports and lotteries are ok while online poker never made it back.

 
https://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2018/01/09/sports-betting-gambling-legalize-states-bills

From the article

"The report listed 11 states as having a good chance of enacting sports betting bills this year: Massachusetts; Rhode Island; New York; New Jersey; West Virginia; Ohio; Michigan; Illinois; Oklahoma; Kentucky and Indiana.

It also listed states where the introduction, much less adoption, of a sports betting bill is considered unlikely: Tennessee; Alabama; Arkansas; Texas; Kansas; Nebraska; North and South Dakota; Wyoming; Utah; Idaho; Alaska and Hawaii."

 ​
Absolutely bizarre that Connecticut is not on this list. Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun are already getting killed and the Massachusetts casinos will probably knock one of them out eventually. If Massachusetts and New York get legalized sports betting and they don't... good luck. 

 
Absolutely bizarre that Connecticut is not on this list. Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun are already getting killed and the Massachusetts casinos will probably knock one of them out eventually. If Massachusetts and New York get legalized sports betting and they don't... good luck. 
Conn and Pa already passed laws allowing it

 
I don't think fantasy is done, but it's a hit. Leagues with friends will still be a thing for current FF players, but it could get difficult to attract new players.
There's a transition in my mind. 

I've been playing fantasy football since I was 15 (I'm 39 now) and I used to be pretty obsessed with it..but that's b/c of the allure of winning the prize at the end of the day.  But overtime, I realized how much luck was involved, and how I would be pissed someone woke up before me to grab some guy from the free agent pool once the waivers were processed.  Then the 4 nights of games per week.  The NFL has actually made it more tedious to play fantasy football....and so many attribute the NFLs success to fantasy football.  The only reason I still play fantasy football is b/c I don't want to be that guy who quits the league and that the draft day is a blast.  Everything else, I'm just going through the motions.

In my mind, the NFL is too blind to see (or doesn't want to admit) is that the reason fantasy football is such a success is b/c most leagues offer a monetary prize for it.  Overtime, fantasy players realize the time that it takes and the luck involved in a win/loss every week is nuts, so they gravitate to the next thing that they can have to achieve that monetary prize....hence the success of DFS.  It provides a more instant gratification, and takes away most of the pain points of a traditional fantasy league.

Legalized Sports Gaming is the next phase.  It will bring a huge amount of visibility to all sports.  I'll watch any game if I have money on it.  Oh, and by default, my kids are now watching the game too.  The leagues need to embrace this with open arms.

 
From the SI article linked upthread:

I hadn't realized there was a federal ban on sports betting -- thought for sure that was regulated solely at the state level.
Yes, and the federal ban on sports betting is still in place. The case today struck down a federal law requiring states to ban sports betting (or, more accurately, prohibiting states from legalizing it). But the federal ban -- which applies to bets made across state lines using a modem -- is still in place.

 
So what makes the current law unconstitutional?  The court leaves room for congress to enact a new law. 
The case today said, essentially: "Hey Congress. If you want something regulated, you should regulate it yourself. Don't try to make the states do it for you."

Right now, federal regulation of sports betting is somewhat limited. (It consists of the Wire Act linked in my previous post.) If Congress wants to regulate it more extensively, it can.

 
Yes, and the federal ban on sports betting is still in place. The case today struck down a federal law requiring states to ban sports betting (or, more accurately, prohibiting states from legalizing it). But the federal ban -- which applies to bets made across state lines using a modem -- is still in place.
Is a VPN across a state line?  Asking for a friend. 

 
So i heard on Mike Francesa mention 299:1 in NJ with regards to paying taxes.

Basically if you win 300 for every dollar you wager on a ticket you will be dealing with taxes.

I have 2 sites i uses and we settle via cash after a balance quota is reached on a certain date. 

In this case, i guess it will be like horses and vegas? If the single ticket is at a ceetain amount you will be dealing with taxes at that point? 

So if i have 30 tickets winning 100 each for 3k i get 3k and no tax repercussions?

But if i have a future that i laid 50 and won 1500 i will have to deal with taxes?

Is this the way it works?

 
So i heard on Mike Francesa mention 299:1 in NJ with regards to paying taxes.

Basically if you win 300 for every dollar you wager on a ticket you will be dealing with taxes.

I have 2 sites i uses and we settle via cash after a balance quota is reached on a certain date. 

In this case, i guess it will be like horses and vegas? If the single ticket is at a ceetain amount you will be dealing with taxes at that point? 

So if i have 30 tickets winning 100 each for 3k i get 3k and no tax repercussions?

But if i have a future that i laid 50 and won 1500 i will have to deal with taxes?

Is this the way it works?
If you win $1, you're supposed to report it as income and pay taxes on it.

I think the threshold for getting a 1099 is $600.

 
culdeus said:
Is a VPN across a state line?  Asking for a friend. 
I've looked into this, also for a friend of course. VPN is a no-go, location has to be turned on to bet from a phone, and you have to be geo-located in a legit state. Apparently there's no real way around it.

 
Maurile Tremblay said:
If you win $1, you're supposed to report it as income and pay taxes on it.

I think the threshold for getting a 1099 is $600.
This is way low for what they actually do. 10500 is the usual line 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top