Baby needs a new pair of shoes!If my wife bets $100 on a football game, I'll guarantee she becomes as big of a fan as me. This is a win-win.
Honestly, I think Vegas has really low profit margin on sports books. They are universally the lowest profitable area per square foot that is sure.I think what states do might vary but New Jersey it is going to be full on sports books.
The Canada model is what they have in Delaware (but only because that is what was legal under the old law - the 4 states that were allowed to have sports gambling were restricted to what they had previously offered - which in Delaware's case was though parlay style tickets and nothing else.
Vegas books will feel a hit on this for sure
-QG
Vegas copies the lines from offshore (bookmaker, betonline). Maybe once in awhile you will see Wynn with football openers. Sometimes Vegas will open the football season win totals (South Point will for all FBS teams, and CTG used to for the power 5 but looks like BetDSI has already beat them this year).As it turns out most online books simply just steal the lines from vegas, pay nothing, then operate in a tiny office for pennies of SG&A of what Vegas does.
The law is the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA). It seems hyper-technical, but the law does not ban or outlaw sports gambling as such, but rather prohibits the states from enacting laws that legalize gambling. The topic headline, "Supreme Court Rules Sports Betting Legal" is technically incorrect in a lawgeek sense, but it may have that practical effect. The ruling involves the underrated, rarely cited, but extremely important "anti-commandeering" doctrine derived from the 10th amendment (“powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”) The slightly interesting twist in this case, an argument the court of appeals actually bought, is that PASPA didn't force the states to do anything. Rather, it prohibited them from passing laws legalizing sports gambling. Thankfully, that argument failed at the scotus. Credit to New Jersey for carrying the water on this battle.From the SI article linked upthread:
I hadn't realized there was a federal ban on sports betting -- thought for sure that was regulated solely at the state level.
You are correct, but the sportsbook makes the Vegas casino a lot of money indirectly, because it brings people into the casino that otherwise wouldn't be there. And even when a person wins a large sports wager, they can lose it all and more on their way out of the book playing table games.Honestly, I think Vegas has really low profit margin on sports books. They are universally the lowest profitable area per square foot that is sure.
BetOnline opens MLB fyi.Vegas copies the lines from offshore (bookmaker, betonline). Maybe once in awhile you will see Wynn with football openers. Sometimes Vegas will open the football season win totals (South Point will for all FBS teams, and CTG used to for the power 5 but looks like BetDSI has already beat them this year).
I'm talking football here, I assume most other sports are the same.
I cared way more about fantasy when i gambled on nfl.Fantasy Football will be destroyed by this. It was a run.
I think the casual players will just bet on their favorite team instead of getting owned in your leagues now.I cared way more about fantasy when i gambled on nfl.
When teaser lines went to shot I gave up on both.
Maybe I'm naive about this but I always thought traditional fantasy football (not DFS) was more about entertainment between friends, family and neighbors than about gambling.Fantasy Football will be destroyed by this. It was a run.
I don't think fantasy is done, but it's a hit. Leagues with friends will still be a thing for current FF players, but it could get difficult to attract new players.Fantasy Football will be destroyed by this. It was a run.
Sandra Day O'Connor narrowly beats out David Souter and then Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Kagen did not get a single vote nor did Sotowhatever.CNN said controlled by states now unless Congress steps in and decides to regulate.
When is SCOTUS going to rule on who's hottest?
What if your favorite team sucks? I still think there is a place for fantasy football.I think the casual players will just bet on their favorite team instead of getting owned in your leagues now.
We should see online poker within the next 27 to 30 years then!Amazing. First Marijuana passing more and more each day, and now sports book betting legally! What a time to be alive!
Interstate commerceFrom the SI article linked upthread:
I hadn't realized there was a federal ban on sports betting -- thought for sure that was regulated solely at the state level.
LMAO @ Ohio...Late tot he party with lottery. Late to the party with casino games. No way they pass anything this year. They will wait and see how things go elsewhere, spend a bunch of money trying to convince the bible thumpers it is OK, and several years down the road, after the windfall has long passed something will be enacted. And then it will be controlled by those who already have the power and $$$.https://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2018/01/09/sports-betting-gambling-legalize-states-bills
From the article
"The report listed 11 states as having a good chance of enacting sports betting bills this year: Massachusetts; Rhode Island; New York; New Jersey; West Virginia; Ohio; Michigan; Illinois; Oklahoma; Kentucky and Indiana.
It also listed states where the introduction, much less adoption, of a sports betting bill is considered unlikely: Tennessee; Alabama; Arkansas; Texas; Kansas; Nebraska; North and South Dakota; Wyoming; Utah; Idaho; Alaska and Hawaii."
Yes, much like the current interstate lotto named Mega Millions.Interstate commerce
Absolutely bizarre that Connecticut is not on this list. Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun are already getting killed and the Massachusetts casinos will probably knock one of them out eventually. If Massachusetts and New York get legalized sports betting and they don't... good luck.https://www.si.com/extra-mustard/2018/01/09/sports-betting-gambling-legalize-states-bills
From the article
"The report listed 11 states as having a good chance of enacting sports betting bills this year: Massachusetts; Rhode Island; New York; New Jersey; West Virginia; Ohio; Michigan; Illinois; Oklahoma; Kentucky and Indiana.
It also listed states where the introduction, much less adoption, of a sports betting bill is considered unlikely: Tennessee; Alabama; Arkansas; Texas; Kansas; Nebraska; North and South Dakota; Wyoming; Utah; Idaho; Alaska and Hawaii."
Conn and Pa already passed laws allowing itAbsolutely bizarre that Connecticut is not on this list. Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun are already getting killed and the Massachusetts casinos will probably knock one of them out eventually. If Massachusetts and New York get legalized sports betting and they don't... good luck.
Only time will tell. I think you're right that there's a place for it just will be harder to find IMO.What if your favorite team sucks? I still think there is a place for fantasy football.
They'll probably turn around and outsource to Cantor, William Hill, etc., the way that Vegas does.I mean am I gonna have a bunch of Indian betting apps or what?
There's a transition in my mind.I don't think fantasy is done, but it's a hit. Leagues with friends will still be a thing for current FF players, but it could get difficult to attract new players.
Yes, and the federal ban on sports betting is still in place. The case today struck down a federal law requiring states to ban sports betting (or, more accurately, prohibiting states from legalizing it). But the federal ban -- which applies to bets made across state lines using a modem -- is still in place.From the SI article linked upthread:
I hadn't realized there was a federal ban on sports betting -- thought for sure that was regulated solely at the state level.
The case today said, essentially: "Hey Congress. If you want something regulated, you should regulate it yourself. Don't try to make the states do it for you."So what makes the current law unconstitutional? The court leaves room for congress to enact a new law.
Is a VPN across a state line? Asking for a friend.Yes, and the federal ban on sports betting is still in place. The case today struck down a federal law requiring states to ban sports betting (or, more accurately, prohibiting states from legalizing it). But the federal ban -- which applies to bets made across state lines using a modem -- is still in place.
If you win $1, you're supposed to report it as income and pay taxes on it.So i heard on Mike Francesa mention 299:1 in NJ with regards to paying taxes.
Basically if you win 300 for every dollar you wager on a ticket you will be dealing with taxes.
I have 2 sites i uses and we settle via cash after a balance quota is reached on a certain date.
In this case, i guess it will be like horses and vegas? If the single ticket is at a ceetain amount you will be dealing with taxes at that point?
So if i have 30 tickets winning 100 each for 3k i get 3k and no tax repercussions?
But if i have a future that i laid 50 and won 1500 i will have to deal with taxes?
Is this the way it works?
And that’s offset against your lossesIf you win $1, you're supposed to report it as income and pay taxes on it.
I think the threshold for getting a 1099 is $600.
I've looked into this, also for a friend of course. VPN is a no-go, location has to be turned on to bet from a phone, and you have to be geo-located in a legit state. Apparently there's no real way around it.culdeus said:Is a VPN across a state line? Asking for a friend.
If you itemize, which due to tax reform is now 2x more difficult.Smack Tripper said:And that’s offset against your losses
Geo location spoofing is easy.I've looked into this, also for a friend of course. VPN is a no-go, location has to be turned on to bet from a phone, and you have to be geo-located in a legit state. Apparently there's no real way around it.
This is way low for what they actually do. 10500 is the usual lineMaurile Tremblay said:If you win $1, you're supposed to report it as income and pay taxes on it.
I think the threshold for getting a 1099 is $600.
A company called Locaid is used primarily. Dunno if they can be beaten, from what I gleaned recently, it doesn't seem that way.Geo location spoofing is easy.
If you win big enough, it is easy for the casino to bust you, and not pay.Geo location spoofing is easy.