Well let's put it this way, you can't accept the internet and the atom until you do stop burning witches, they are mutually incompatible.
Obviously there are muslim nations that embrace advanced technology and yet you cannot question whether Muhammed was actually a prophet, and you can't draw a cartoon of his face for fear of offending the power above or rather the powers that be. You can have an F-35 fighter but you can't let a woman drive. Now you can say that's cultural but there is no doubt the culture is so entwined with the religion that in some aspects it does look a lot like medieval Europe.
That's ridiculous. Plenty of countries have internet and burn witches. Tanzania is 60% Christian, 13% of the population are internet users, and two months ago
seven people were burned to death as witches.
Yes. The culture in some places is entwined with religion so much that it looks like an unenlightened Europe.
Which is an argument against religious government, not against Islam. When people rule by the authority of an infallible God, bad things happen.
Oddly, I think most "bigots" are prescribed the argument of arguing against Islam in particular, rather than adopting it. Yes, I've said negative things about the Koran, but my concern is with theocracy. It is not with their scripture. Indeed, if the social, political, and cultural aspect of Islam weren't leading to this constantly, and the moderates were set about condemning these acts rather than trying to minimize them, we'd be a lot better off.
It's odd. I feel like those on the left are trying to do battle on two mutually exclusive fronts, and often come out looking worse for wear or endorsing a slippery slope about America, federalism, and religion with respect to the Bill of Rights.