Caddy and Pittman have a certain history.Im curious, has Graham had these type of problems?graham gets hurt next week, darby gets hurt the week after... that is very obvious at this point
To start...do not spin this thread into me being happy Pittman is hurt...Pittman is a great guy and model teammate...he does what he's asked to no matter what...but that ankle looked pretty bad...this thread is assuming he'll be out a few weeks minimum...Now...I love what I saw from this kid in preseason...we all know he did it against players who are mostly not on any rosters...but the way he ran...his vision and cutbacks...and his receiving out of the backfield...this kid has some skills...In college he was regarded as an upper tear RB his junior year...he fell off his senior year (to injury I think but don't quote me on that)...so he fell all the way to us in the 7th...with our top 2 RB's on the shelf...I would love to see this kid get a fair shot...Graham is doing well and I hope he keeps it up (minus today of course)...but I see good things from Darby in the future...He fits the system...he can run and catch...which makes him a viable every down back assuming he can stay healthy...Anyone have any scouting reports on Darby? What kind of player is he?Signed,Too lazy to research it myself![]()
Thanks!To start...do not spin this thread into me being happy Pittman is hurt...Pittman is a great guy and model teammate...he does what he's asked to no matter what...but that ankle looked pretty bad...this thread is assuming he'll be out a few weeks minimum...Now...I love what I saw from this kid in preseason...we all know he did it against players who are mostly not on any rosters...but the way he ran...his vision and cutbacks...and his receiving out of the backfield...this kid has some skills...In college he was regarded as an upper tear RB his junior year...he fell off his senior year (to injury I think but don't quote me on that)...so he fell all the way to us in the 7th...with our top 2 RB's on the shelf...I would love to see this kid get a fair shot...Graham is doing well and I hope he keeps it up (minus today of course)...but I see good things from Darby in the future...He fits the system...he can run and catch...which makes him a viable every down back assuming he can stay healthy...Anyone have any scouting reports on Darby? What kind of player is he?Signed,Too lazy to research it myself![]()
only 3-4 weeks for a cracked fibula? seems a bit optimistic.Arschloch said:From rotoworld:The Tampa Tribune reports Michael Pittman slightly cracked his fibula in Sunday's loss to Indianapolis. He is expected to be out 3-4 weeks.
Yeah, Pittman is a great guy.BustedKnuckles said:To start...do not spin this thread into me being happy Pittman is hurt...Pittman is a great guy and model teammate...he does what he's asked to no matter what...but that ankle looked pretty bad...this thread is assuming he'll be out a few weeks minimum...Avery said:Anyone have any scouting reports on Darby? What kind of player is he?
Signed,
Too lazy to research it myself![]()
Yeah, Pittman is a great guy.BustedKnuckles said:To start...do not spin this thread into me being happy Pittman is hurt...Pittman is a great guy and model teammate...he does what he's asked to no matter what...but that ankle looked pretty bad...this thread is assuming he'll be out a few weeks minimum...Avery said:Anyone have any scouting reports on Darby? What kind of player is he?
Signed,
Too lazy to research it myself![]()
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/06/02/Columns/...it_past_t.shtml
Bump...I would also like to knowI didn't see this game yesterday so can someone fill me in on what happened with Graham? I know the Colts jumped out to an early lead but Pittman left in the second quarter and all Graham got were 11 yards rushing on six carries. That's pretty pathetic. Did he look terrible; were the Colts stacking the box against him? What happened? Thanks for the info in advance.
That happened 4 years ago and he's been clean since. The main point about Pittman is that he's a great teammate to have as he puts the team before himself.
http://blogs.tampabay.com/bucs/2007/10/gruden-pittman-.htmlGruden: Pittman could be out 6-8 weeks
Bucs running back Michael Pittman could be out six to eight weeks with an ankle injury, coach Jon Gruden said in his weekly news conference on Monday.
Pittman injured his right ankle during the second quarter of Sunday's 33-14 loss to the Indianapolis Colts. Gruden described the injury as "a pretty good sprain,'' but said the Bucs will know more when they receive the results of an MRI later today.
Gruden said the Bucs will "look to see what's out there,'' in terms of a replacement. In the meantime, Earnest Graham will become the starting tailback, and rookie Kenneth Darby will be elevated on the depth chart.
http://www.tboblogs.com/index.php/sports/c...gruden-quotes1/(On RB Kenneth Darby)
“He made some really good runs. I thought he did a great a job running the football. He’s got to continue to make real strides in other areas, but he ran the ball well and made some really magnificent runs. That’s exactly what we saw at Alabama. He’s running the ball well, he’s getting better in all areas, but he still has a long way to go.”
(On if Darby’s performance has created a battle with RB Earnest Graham)
“We’ve got a lot of battles going on. Special teams is going to have a big say in every matter, and [Darby] certainly is going to be in the mix.”
(On if Graham will be used as a fullback)
“Earnest [Graham] and Mike Pittman and a various casts of characters will perform that position.”
http://www.tboblogs.com/index.php/sports/c...ted-investment/Even if it’s a late-round pick, there is always value in a draft pick. Just look at seventh-rounders such as Paris Warren and Kenneth Darby. Why, without them the Bucs might not have beaten the New England Patriots in their preseason opener last week.
Seriously, though, Warren is coming around and seems capable now of at least pushing some of those above him on the wide receiver depth chart. And Darby was getting second-team tailback reps in practice here Monday. Looks like he may be the one backing up Cadillac Williams this season.
Bama fan hereAvery said:Anyone have any scouting reports on Darby? What kind of player is he?Signed,Too lazy to research it myself![]()
From Matt Waldman at FFToday.comhttp://www.fftoday.com/articles/waldman/07_rookies_rbs.htmAvery said:Anyone have any scouting reports on Darby? What kind of player is he?
Signed,
Too lazy to research it myself![]()
The Buc Offense couldn't get on the Field I think they only had 40 offensive plays all game and they only had THREE in the 3rd Quarter. There was no way to evaluate GrahamTillmanisahero said:Bump...I would also like to knowpackersfan said:I didn't see this game yesterday so can someone fill me in on what happened with Graham? I know the Colts jumped out to an early lead but Pittman left in the second quarter and all Graham got were 11 yards rushing on six carries. That's pretty pathetic. Did he look terrible; were the Colts stacking the box against him? What happened? Thanks for the info in advance.
Thanks. What about Graham's six carries? Did he look terrible or was there nowhere to run? 6 for 12 is pretty pathetic so I'm curious as to whether that was a result of Graham running poorly or the Colts not giving him anything. Without Bob Sanders I'm surprised his numbers were so bad - even with limited carries.The Buc Offense couldn't get on the Field I think they only had 40 offensive plays all game and they only had THREE in the 3rd Quarter. There was no way to evaluate GrahamTillmanisahero said:Bump...I would also like to knowpackersfan said:I didn't see this game yesterday so can someone fill me in on what happened with Graham? I know the Colts jumped out to an early lead but Pittman left in the second quarter and all Graham got were 11 yards rushing on six carries. That's pretty pathetic. Did he look terrible; were the Colts stacking the box against him? What happened? Thanks for the info in advance.
Whoa....I watched the whole game, and have it Tivo'd to watch again. Graham proved to me that he was hanging around as a 3rd/4th back for a few years for a simple rason. He's not that good.This was Pittmans game as the starter, Graham looked average playing against a good D'.Here's how I'll evaluate him: Incomplete, some things are good-his strait line speed is good.Some thigs are not good-No elusiveness and not "sudden" as he broke to holes.The Buc Offense couldn't get on the Field I think they only had 40 offensive plays all game and they only had THREE in the 3rd Quarter. There was no way to evaluate GrahamTillmanisahero said:Bump...I would also like to knowpackersfan said:I didn't see this game yesterday so can someone fill me in on what happened with Graham? I know the Colts jumped out to an early lead but Pittman left in the second quarter and all Graham got were 11 yards rushing on six carries. That's pretty pathetic. Did he look terrible; were the Colts stacking the box against him? What happened? Thanks for the info in advance.
Graham looked good, but nothing special. There was pretty much no time for a TB run game to even attempt to establish itself. One plus was that he has pretty good hands and Garcia wasn't afraid to check down to him underneath. While Graham isn't the next Dom Davis, I think he could be servicable for bye weeks and as an RB2/RB3 in deep leagues.Tillmanisahero said:Bump...I would also like to knowpackersfan said:I didn't see this game yesterday so can someone fill me in on what happened with Graham? I know the Colts jumped out to an early lead but Pittman left in the second quarter and all Graham got were 11 yards rushing on six carries. That's pretty pathetic. Did he look terrible; were the Colts stacking the box against him? What happened? Thanks for the info in advance.
Whether or not Graham looked good or not (at least in Gruden's eyes, which are the only ones that matter), the fact that Graham hasn't done anything of note until now (and really one week) makes Darby that much more interesting as a potential flier. If Graham either falters or gets hurt, Darby seems to be the only other fallback option.Whoa....I watched the whole game, and have it Tivo'd to watch again. Graham proved to me that he was hanging around as a 3rd/4th back for a few years for a simple rason. He's not that good.This was Pittmans game as the starter, Graham looked average playing against a good D'.Here's how I'll evaluate him: Incomplete, some things are good-his strait line speed is good.Some thigs are not good-No elusiveness and not "sudden" as he broke to holes.The Buc Offense couldn't get on the Field I think they only had 40 offensive plays all game and they only had THREE in the 3rd Quarter. There was no way to evaluate GrahamTillmanisahero said:Bump...I would also like to knowpackersfan said:I didn't see this game yesterday so can someone fill me in on what happened with Graham? I know the Colts jumped out to an early lead but Pittman left in the second quarter and all Graham got were 11 yards rushing on six carries. That's pretty pathetic. Did he look terrible; were the Colts stacking the box against him? What happened? Thanks for the info in advance.
you got all that from 6 carries?Whoa....I watched the whole game, and have it Tivo'd to watch again. Graham proved to me that he was hanging around as a 3rd/4th back for a few years for a simple rason. He's not that good.This was Pittmans game as the starter, Graham looked average playing against a good D'.Here's how I'll evaluate him: Incomplete, some things are good-his strait line speed is good.Some thigs are not good-No elusiveness and not "sudden" as he broke to holes.The Buc Offense couldn't get on the Field I think they only had 40 offensive plays all game and they only had THREE in the 3rd Quarter. There was no way to evaluate GrahamTillmanisahero said:Bump...I would also like to knowpackersfan said:I didn't see this game yesterday so can someone fill me in on what happened with Graham? I know the Colts jumped out to an early lead but Pittman left in the second quarter and all Graham got were 11 yards rushing on six carries. That's pretty pathetic. Did he look terrible; were the Colts stacking the box against him? What happened? Thanks for the info in advance.
I think it has more to do with the contracts. Rookie is under 3-4 years. Memo's a FA after the year. I don't see why you wouldn't part with a 5th and see if a deal can be worked out long-term (He shouldn't cost that much and would/can be a solid backup and 3rd down guy). I think he fits a John Gruden offense pretty well.Even though the Pittman injury decreases their bargaining power, I think (OPINION) they make another run @ someone like M Moore in MN. Aside from yesterday, TB is playing surprisingly well on both sides of the ball and leading the NFC South w/ CAR, NO, and ATL looking lost @ this point. They have a good shot @ winning the division and getting into the playoffs. Garcia is playing very well, along w/ the defense - all they need to stay competitve is a respectable run game.Dillon allegedly said "no thanks", and IMO they have to be more motivated to give up a better pick to get some deal done. Maybe I'm just a optimistic Moore dynasty owner, but if not him, they should do something before the pending trade deadline expires. Why they don't just pony up a 5th/4th rounder is beyond me - over half of those guys (from the draft) don't seem to make opening day rosters anyway.