Rhythmdoctor said:
Who defines protypical NFL WR size? I'd say AJ Green and Reggie Wayne are prototypical WR1s based on their performance for sure. Let's not pick nits though because judging by height, Matthews is prototypical size at 6-3 and he only lacks in the weight category using your definition of prototypical. Most men don't get their "man weight" until 25ish so I'm not buying that Matthews can't grow into his 6-3 frame. I also don't think he needs to grow into his frame. Heavier guys seem to get injured more frequently... or maybe they don't. Either way, I think Matthews is near prototypical size some may say he is prototypical size. There have been a lot of stud WRs who are not beefy like a T.O. or Michael Irvin. In fact, none of the top 5 WRs of all time would be considered prototypical by your definition:
Jerry Rice
Randy Moss
Chris Carter
Marvin Harrison
Isaac Bruce
So again, who/what defines "prototypical" size for an NFL WR?
I'm not sure how relevant guys like Rice and Bruce are today. That might sound silly since it wasn't that long ago that they were producing, but the league is constantly getting bigger, faster, and more explosive. You definitely see that at WR with a new breed dominating the position in recent years.
Last year I looked closely at the workout numbers for the elite NFL WRs and was surprised by how uniform they are overall.
I'm not going to rewrite everything, so I'll just quote my old posts on that topic:
EBF said:
JohnnyU said:
keep doubting Woods

Marvin Harrison didn't have good "physical traits" either.
You are discounting the importance of Woods' burst in and out of his breaks. He may not have long speed, but he has plenty of burst when he runs his routes. He runs perfect routes and has strong hands. Keep doubting....
I am discounting it because it doesn't seem to be that important. I took a closer look at WR combine numbers this offseason and was surprised to find that success at the position hinges on elite physical talent to an even greater degree than it does at RB. I've posted this in a few threads already, but it might be worth posting again.
Here are the top receivers in the league right now and how they rate in terms of BMI/40/vertical/broad jump.
Andre Johnson - 29.5 (4.41 - 39" - 11'0")
Vincent Jackson - 28.9 (4.46 - 39" - 10'9")
Dez Bryant - 28.8 (4.52 - 38" - 11'1")
Victor Cruz - 28.3 (4.47 - 41.5" - 10'5")
Calvin Johnson - 28.3 (4.35 - 42.5" - 11'7")
Larry Fitzgerald - 28.3 - results not available
Hakeem Nicks - 28.3 (4.51, 36", ??)
Michael Crabtree - 28.1 - did not work out before the draft
Demaryius Thomas - 27.8 - did not work out before the draft
Julio Jones - 27.8 (4.34 - 38.5" - 11'3")
Brandon Marshall - 27.6 (4.52 - 37" - 10'0")
Roddy White - 27.2 (4.46 - 41" - 10'6")
Steve Smith - 27.2 (4.41 - 38.5" - 10'1")
Reggie Wayne - 26.9 (4.45 - 36" - ???)
Marques Colston - 26.9 (4.50 - 37" - 10'3")
Percy Harvin - 26.7 (4.39 - 37.5" - 10'1")
AJ Green - 26.0 (4.48 - 34.5" - 10'6")
There's a pretty narrow range of successful body types (26.0-29.5 BMI). What really stands out is that almost all of these guys had solid speed (they all ran 4.52 or better) and exceptional numbers in the jumping drills (the average vertical is about 37.5" and the average broad jump about 10'6"). For the sake of comparison, here's how Woods stacks up:
Robert Woods - 27.2 (4.51 - 33.5" - 9'9")
Everything there is average. With just average physical ability, he won't have any real edge over NFL corners.
Having said that, not every successful pro WR was a workout warrior. Anquan Boldin ran slow and had bad jump numbers. Even so, he still had an elite trait. 28.9 BMI, which is near the top of the list. Chad Johnson had bad numbers across the board. He's an example of a guy who clearly had explosiveness and speed on the field, but for whatever reason didn't test well. By and large though, all of the elite WR1 types to enter the league within the past decade also had very good workout numbers. The guys who don't quite stack up like Jordy Nelson, Steve Johnson, and Mike Williams are more of your system-dependent WR2 types. And that's what I think Woods will be. He can be a solid complementary player, but right off the bat his numbers make it really unlikely that he's going to reach the top level. That's also how I feel about Hopkins and Patton, who have similar qualities.
EBF said:
For the sake of comparison, here is what some of the top NFL receivers did at the combine/pro day. The first figure is the BMI. The next three numbers are the 40 time, vertical, and broad jump:
Andre Johnson - 29.5 (4.41 - 39" - 11'0")
Vincent Jackson - 28.9 (4.46 - 39" - 10'9")
Dez Bryant - 28.8 (4.52 - 38" - 11'1")
Victor Cruz - 28.3 (4.47 - 41.5" - 10'5")
Calvin Johnson - 28.3 (4.35 - 42.5" - 11'7")
Larry Fitzgerald - 28.3 - results not available
Hakeem Nicks - 28.3 (4.51, 36", ??)
Michael Crabtree - 28.1 - did not work out before the draft
Demaryius Thomas - did not work out before the draft
Julio Jones - 27.8 (4.34 - 38.5" - 11'3")
Brandon Marshall - 27.6 (4.52 - 37" - 10'0")
Roddy White - 27.2 (4.46 - 41" - 10'6")
Steve Smith - 27.2 (4.41 - 38.5" - 10'1")
Reggie Wayne - 26.9 (4.45 - 36" - ???)
Marques Colston - 26.9 (4.50 - 37" - 10'3")
Percy Harvin - 26.7 (4.39 - 37.5" - 10'1")
AJ Green - 26.0 (4.48 - 34.5" - 10'6")
What this list tells me:
- Elite workout numbers are not sufficient in order to become an elite pro WR, but almost all elite NFL WRs were standout performers.
- You'll note that every single WR on this list ran below 4.55 and jumped at least 34.5" in the vert and 10'0" in the broad jump.
- 13 of the 14 WRs tested in the vertical jump matched or exceeded the 36" mark set by Hopkins.
- 14 of 14 WRs had a faster 40 time than Hopkins.
- 12 of 12 WRs had a longer broad jump than Hopkins.
I would argue that "size" is poorly understood by most football fans because they tend to isolate one of the two key variables (height or weight) without looking at the two as a whole, which is a lot more informative. Hence you get people arguing that Darren McFadden is "big" because he's 217 pounds or that Jordan Matthews has "prototypical size" because he's 6'3". If you look closer, you'll see that both players are quite light relative to their height.
To answer your question, I would say prototypical size is guys like Andre Johnson, Vincent Jackson, Demaryius Thomas, and Larry Fitzgerald. They're not just tall. They also have great strength for their size. Physicality is extremely important in the NFL today. Especially with receivers. Here are the top 10 ppg receivers in my league from last season:
Gordon
Julio
Calvin
Demaryius
A Brown
AJ Green
Blackmon
Marshall
Bryant
Jeffery
There are a few different flavors in there, but in general you can see that size/strength are king. Even more so than sheer speed.
If you look at the top FF WRs of the past decade, you will see more of the same. Fitz, Andre, Calvin, Marshall, VJax, Boldin. Even Steve Smith is a really strong dude for his height. So while you do have some less than huge WRs like Chad Johnson and Reggie Wayne mixed in there, the big WRs dominate the scoring charts. The pattern is so clear that you can basically use it as a predictive tool. Someone made a thread last year asking which WR2/WR3 guys could become WR1s. This was my response:
EBF said:
Some names that come to mind:
Justin Blackmon
Josh Gordon
Michael Floyd
Alshon Jeffery
Nick Toon
Cordarrelle Patterson
Justin Hunter
Chris Harper
Da'Rick Rogers
Those guys kind of fit the general mold for a true #1 target.
There are others that I like such as Cecil Shorts, Andre Roberts, Rueben Randle, Markus Wheaton, and Josh Boyce. They have a lot of talent, but might work best as WR1B/WR2 options opposite another quality starter.
You'll see that I hit Gordon, Blackmon, Jeffery, and Floyd. That's not because I have any special predictive powers. That's only because this stuff really isn't rocket science. Almost all of the dominant FF WRs in the game today fit the generic mold of "Highly-drafted big body with solid mobility for his size." And so if you're looking for the next breakout WRs, it stands to reason that you should focus primarily on players who fit into that mold.
Going back to Matthews for a moment, the first thing I'd say is that being athletically parallel to AJ Green isn't necessarily such a great thing since Green is one of the worst elite NFL #1 WRs in terms of his athletic measurables. I think the typical cutoffs for a WR1 are around 4.52 in the 40, 34" in the vertical, and 10' in the broad jump. Green barely bested those marks. He does not thrive in the NFL because he's an elite height/weight/speed/explosiveness athlete. He thrives primarily because of intangibles like body control, hands, catch radius, and route fluidity. So when you say that a top WR prospect is physically parallel with AJ Green, it's actually sort of a back-handed compliment. It would be much better to have the physical talent of Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, or Vincent Jackson. Those guys are ELITE physical specimens. Green really is not. Neither is Matthews. Like Green, he's just barely above the cutoffs in most of the key drills. He does not have any one single special athletic trait.
Now you could still make an argument that if his athletic gifts are on par with AJ Green and if AJ Green is an elite WR1 in the NFL then Matthews is plenty athletic to become an elite WR1 in the NFL. That's what raises the second big red flag against the idea of Matthews as a special talent: He wasn't drafted like one. If he's so good, why did the league let him fall all the way into the middle of the second round? Here are the current elite NFL WRs and their draft rounds:
Dez Bryant - 1
Larry Fitzgerald - 1
AJ Green - 1
Percy Harvin - 1
Andre Johnson - 1
Calvin Johnson - 1
Julio Jones - 1
Demaryius Thomas - 1
Reggie Wayne - 1
Roddy White - 1
Anquan Boldin - 2
Josh Gordon? - 2
Vincent Jackson - 2
Alshon Jeffery? - 2
Jordy Nelson - 2
Steve Smith - 3
Brandon Marshall - 4
Marques Colston - 7
Victor Cruz - UDFA
First off, there is a little bit of subjectivity here. For example, you might argue that someone like Randall Cobb or Antonio Brown should be on this list. You might argue that certain players like Jordy Nelson or Alshon Jeffery don't belong. This list might not be perfect, but I think it basically captures the population of active NFL WRs with elite talent (I'm including guys like Wayne and Roddy based on lifetime achievement). As you can see, first round picks account for a huge percentage of the elite receivers. Almost half. And if you look at a lot of the non-first round names, many of them had circumstantial things unrelated to their talent that probably contributed heavily to their low draft slots (V Jackson, Colston, and Cruz played at small schools, Gordon had severe character issues, and Marshall had character issues in addition to position uncertainty because he played some safety in college).
Point being, the league is pretty good at identifying elite WR prospects. It's rare for them to slip out of the 1st round. And when they do, there's often an obvious excuse. In the absence of character issues or the small school factor, very very few of these guys slip through the cracks.
So then how do you account for Matthews sliding to the mid 2nd round? Vanderbilt is not an elite program, but they compete in the SEC. Unlike Cruz, VJax, and Colston, he had every opportunity to show his talent on a huge stage. He doesn't have any character issues. He's not recovering from injury. There's basically nothing alarming in his profile, which can only mean that he slipped for the simple reason that teams didn't view him as a special prospect.
People have talked about guys like Reggie Wayne and AJ Green not being elite athletes. Well, somehow those guys looked special enough in college to convince a team to use a first round pick on them. So even though their athletic quantifiables might not be any better than Matthews's, they were still viewed as elite prospects. Matthews was not.
I would say that fact combined with his merely "solid" athletic traits makes him highly, highly unlikely to become a true WR1 in the NFL. I think there are basically two varieties of useful FF WRs. You have your elite #1 targets who would thrive in almost any situation (i.e. Marshall, Andre, Calvin). And you have your situation-dependent WR2-WR3 types who can occasionally elevate their FF numbers to WR1 levels when the conditions are perfect (i.e. Wallace, Garcon, Cobb). To me, the best you can hope for with Matthews is that he becomes that second type of player.