That is quite a conundrum. Cassel played very well in place of Brady and we later saw he wasn't much of a QB. The offense is likely to be less effective, but it seems like there are examples of lesser quality QBs relying heavily on star receiving weapons. My biggest concern with Gronk was last year their offensive line was so bad at times that Gronk had to play as an extra OL on far too many plays.abbottjamesr said:What are you guys doing for projections on Gronk for the first four games with out Brady?
I tend to draft for the first 4-6 weeks of the season so he is not as appealing to me this year.
Touchdown there? lolThe game where they sat Brady against the Chiefs and Jimmy came in he nailed Gronk for a beautiful touchdown.
According to the Boston Globe's Ben Volin, Rob Gronkowski has been "incredible" through five days of Patriots camp.
Just Gronk being Gronk. Quipped Volin, "(Gronkowski) has been absolutely dominant at practice, to the point that we hope it doesn’t ruin the confidence of Patrick Chung or Jordan Richards, the poor saps who have been forced to cover him." This is to be expected, of course. Squarely in his prime at age 27, Gronkowski enters the 2016 season with 29 touchdowns over his last 35 games.
Source: Boston Globe
Aug 2 - 8:24 PM
Seriously. Who's the biggest WR they actually use there?How Bennett wasn't rostered already is the more curious thing.
Week 1 of the regular season.Is he back at practice yet? If not when should we expect to see him back?
What is his injury? I can't seem to find any place that has said specifically what it is.Week 1 of the regular season.
No reports. Saw speculation it was a bruise. Reporters have seen him in the locker room, said he looks fine.What is his injury? I can't seem to find any place that has said specifically what it is.
Yes, speculation had him with a bruise. From Jeff Howe of the Boston Hearld on 8/18:What is his injury? I can't seem to find any place that has said specifically what it is.
Yep.http://boston.cbslocal.com/2016/09/08/patriots-injury-report-rob-gronkowski-hamstring/
Anything to be worried about?
He's got a sore hamstring. It could get better or it could get worse. It could linger all season. Or he could play full strength on Sunday and never mention it again. I don't see this as game playing, its one of the most notorious injuries out there.Feel like the Pats are playing with the injury report and I don't expect it to stop.
I thought this new rule was because Bill hated the way the old way worked.Feel like the Pats are playing with the injury report and I don't expect it to stop.
Yep, just traded away Virgil Green for James just to take advantage of James' Monday night start.Pats playing Sunday night isnt helping.
I'm looking at Jesse James as a sneaky emergency backup Monday night. Heath is gone, Laderius is on PUP, the only other tight end on the roster is a chronic underachiever. In the tune up game, Ben targeted James 9 times and tossed him a TD. And its a good matchup against Washington.
If Gronk plays, im starting him, if he's a last minute scratch, i can roll with James and at least figure he's going to see a lot of targets.
Two sources tell the Boston Herald that Rob Gronkowski (hamstring) will play Sunday "barring an unexpected setback."
This figures to be the first of many "Report:"s, but the tea leaves have indeed suggested that Gronk will suit up. Gronk referring to it as a "coaching decision" suggests he believes he's ready to play. Owners can cautiously keep their TE1 penciled in.
Source: Jeff Howe on Twitter
Sep 8 - 6:22 PM
Droppable in all formats?He's done. He'll be competitive but he lost the fear factor. Looks like Tony Gonzalaz might be out of the woods.
My biggest fear with him this week is that he will be announced as active but not actually play.Doubt he plays if he didn't travel with the team, but holy #### if he did - serious comedy.