What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Team Legacy's 2008 Boom & Bust debut... (1 Viewer)

Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It is ridiculous. DA is going to play all year (barring injury) and probably next year. Then there is a QB controversy in that DA will be going into the final year of his contract. One will be moved and the other will be the starter. And Quinn will be a better QB for holding the clipboard a couple of years
 
MAC_32 said:
Pictus Cat said:
Does the hypothetical conversation go like this...

Coach, who is our best QB?

Anderson did very well last season, but

Quinn has more ability and needs time to develop it.

Coach, who should we start in 08?

Starting Quinn would allow him to get experience and develop his ability to give the team the best chance to go to the playoffs and deeper.

But coach, we might have to pay some incentives if he starts and we're the Clevelend Browns.

What do you want me to do? Start the capable back-up and not develop the future and best chance to win in the playoffs?

I'm glad we're on the same page coach.
:popcorn: My Gawd, I see we're going to be dealing with this for the next six months, I'm not tired of it yet so I'll keep saying it until you all get it. Listen to the soundbites from Romeo and Savage from the last 6 weeks, notably soon after the DA signing. He is the starting QB, there is no competition. You, and many others, obviously have not. The problem is you, and many others, are talking like they know; you don't. It's reminiscent of that commercial on ESPN last year of that guy talking out of his ###. Whether you believe DA is better than Quinn, Quinn is better than DA, they both suck, they're both Gods, Quinn is sleeping with Romeo's wife, DA is gay, your Brady Quinn posters on your wall told you 'I am starting,' or Bernie Kosar is in a never-ending alcoholic haze (sorry Bern, you sound drunk everytime I hear your voice) DA will still be the opening day starter. Now. Speculate all you want that DA will implode and Quinn will be starting by midseason, I disagree but you're entitled to your opinion.
I'm singling this post out, but it's not the only one here.Discussions are welcome, but this is heading in a bad direction.

Feel free to talk about the + and - of the CLE QB situation, but there's no need to go down the road of the items in bold.
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It's ok - just trying to keep the SP going in the right direction.
Apologies for any offense. None was intended.My point is if the Browns were shopping DA,

that should imply they would be ok with Quinn instead of DA.

If they beleive that, and I would think the coach would be the most likely to be on board with it,

why in the world would they start DA?

The hypothetical was to be clear that this was not a real conversation as far as I know.

We think Quinn is better and the future but we're starting DA (the guy we shopped because we thought we could do better without?)

What do they think they can get for DA that would make them a better team overall?

Seems like smoke and mirrors to me so they can keep his value up and still trade him.

Is a situation where you have two good players at the same position and can't find the right trade partner?

 
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It is ridiculous. DA is going to play all year (barring injury) and probably next year. Then there is a QB controversy in that DA will be going into the final year of his contract. One will be moved and the other will be the starter. And Quinn will be a better QB for holding the clipboard a couple of years
I understand what you're saying.I don't agree it is the right call for the Browns to make.
 
There's been speculation that the team locked up Anderson with the intent of trading him. Whether or not there's any truth to those rumors remains to be seen. Frankly, if Cleveland isn't excited about having him as their franchise QB then I don't know why any other team would be. Then again, one man's trash is another man's treasure.

Cleveland is a team that will be in the playoff hunt next year. If Anderson comes out and stinks up the joint for the first 6-8 games then the rumblings are going to get louder and louder. I'm in the camp that thinks Anderson isn't a franchise QB, so I expect him to be exposed as a fraud sooner or later. I do think he'll begin the year as the starter though. He's definitely earned a bit of a "suck" cushion.

 
MAC_32 said:
Pictus Cat said:
Does the hypothetical conversation go like this...

Coach, who is our best QB?

Anderson did very well last season, but

Quinn has more ability and needs time to develop it.

Coach, who should we start in 08?

Starting Quinn would allow him to get experience and develop his ability to give the team the best chance to go to the playoffs and deeper.

But coach, we might have to pay some incentives if he starts and we're the Clevelend Browns.

What do you want me to do? Start the capable back-up and not develop the future and best chance to win in the playoffs?

I'm glad we're on the same page coach.
:pics: My Gawd, I see we're going to be dealing with this for the next six months, I'm not tired of it yet so I'll keep saying it until you all get it. Listen to the soundbites from Romeo and Savage from the last 6 weeks, notably soon after the DA signing. He is the starting QB, there is no competition. You, and many others, obviously have not. The problem is you, and many others, are talking like they know; you don't. It's reminiscent of that commercial on ESPN last year of that guy talking out of his ###. Whether you believe DA is better than Quinn, Quinn is better than DA, they both suck, they're both Gods, Quinn is sleeping with Romeo's wife, DA is gay, your Brady Quinn posters on your wall told you 'I am starting,' or Bernie Kosar is in a never-ending alcoholic haze (sorry Bern, you sound drunk everytime I hear your voice) DA will still be the opening day starter. Now. Speculate all you want that DA will implode and Quinn will be starting by midseason, I disagree but you're entitled to your opinion.
I'm singling this post out, but it's not the only one here.Discussions are welcome, but this is heading in a bad direction.

Feel free to talk about the + and - of the CLE QB situation, but there's no need to go down the road of the items in bold.
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It's ok - just trying to keep the SP going in the right direction.
Apologies for any offense. None was intended.My point is if the Browns were shopping DA,

that should imply they would be ok with Quinn instead of DA.

If they beleive that, and I would think the coach would be the most likely to be on board with it,

why in the world would they start DA?

The hypothetical was to be clear that this was not a real conversation as far as I know.

We think Quinn is better and the future but we're starting DA (the guy we shopped because we thought we could do better without?)

What do they think they can get for DA that would make them a better team overall?

Seems like smoke and mirrors to me so they can keep his value up and still trade him.

Is a situation where you have two good players at the same position and can't find the right trade partner?
*sigh* Again, they were never shopping him, they were trying to sign him for the entire month of February. It took a last minute rumor of Dallas signing DA to an offer sheet and then turn around and deal him to BMore to move into the top 10 to spur late night negotiations to get him signed. Your entire case is irrelevant as the Browns were never shopping him, the media speculated but that was all, the level of media speculation has reached new levels this offseason so this shouldn't be of any surprise. Please prove me wrong that the Browns stated they were shopping him and I'll shut up, until you do I won't.
 
There's been speculation that the team locked up Anderson with the intent of trading him. Whether or not there's any truth to those rumors remains to be seen. Frankly, if Cleveland isn't excited about having him as their franchise QB then I don't know why any other team would be. Then again, one man's trash is another man's treasure. Cleveland is a team that will be in the playoff hunt next year. If Anderson comes out and stinks up the joint for the first 6-8 games then the rumblings are going to get louder and louder. I'm in the camp that thinks Anderson isn't a franchise QB, so I expect him to be exposed as a fraud sooner or later. I do think he'll begin the year as the starter though. He's definitely earned a bit of a "suck" cushion.
:pics: Couldn't say it any better myself.
 
MAC_32 said:
Pictus Cat said:
Does the hypothetical conversation go like this...

Coach, who is our best QB?

Anderson did very well last season, but

Quinn has more ability and needs time to develop it.

Coach, who should we start in 08?

Starting Quinn would allow him to get experience and develop his ability to give the team the best chance to go to the playoffs and deeper.

But coach, we might have to pay some incentives if he starts and we're the Clevelend Browns.

What do you want me to do? Start the capable back-up and not develop the future and best chance to win in the playoffs?

I'm glad we're on the same page coach.
:thumbup: My Gawd, I see we're going to be dealing with this for the next six months, I'm not tired of it yet so I'll keep saying it until you all get it. Listen to the soundbites from Romeo and Savage from the last 6 weeks, notably soon after the DA signing. He is the starting QB, there is no competition. You, and many others, obviously have not. The problem is you, and many others, are talking like they know; you don't. It's reminiscent of that commercial on ESPN last year of that guy talking out of his ###. Whether you believe DA is better than Quinn, Quinn is better than DA, they both suck, they're both Gods, Quinn is sleeping with Romeo's wife, DA is gay, your Brady Quinn posters on your wall told you 'I am starting,' or Bernie Kosar is in a never-ending alcoholic haze (sorry Bern, you sound drunk everytime I hear your voice) DA will still be the opening day starter. Now. Speculate all you want that DA will implode and Quinn will be starting by midseason, I disagree but you're entitled to your opinion.
I'm singling this post out, but it's not the only one here.Discussions are welcome, but this is heading in a bad direction.

Feel free to talk about the + and - of the CLE QB situation, but there's no need to go down the road of the items in bold.
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It's ok - just trying to keep the SP going in the right direction.
Apologies for any offense. None was intended.My point is if the Browns were shopping DA,

that should imply they would be ok with Quinn instead of DA.

If they beleive that, and I would think the coach would be the most likely to be on board with it,

why in the world would they start DA?

The hypothetical was to be clear that this was not a real conversation as far as I know.

We think Quinn is better and the future but we're starting DA (the guy we shopped because we thought we could do better without?)

What do they think they can get for DA that would make them a better team overall?

Seems like smoke and mirrors to me so they can keep his value up and still trade him.

Is a situation where you have two good players at the same position and can't find the right trade partner?
*sigh* Again, they were never shopping him, they were trying to sign him for the entire month of February. It took a last minute rumor of Dallas signing DA to an offer sheet and then turn around and deal him to BMore to move into the top 10 to spur late night negotiations to get him signed. Your entire case is irrelevant as the Browns were never shopping him, the media speculated but that was all, the level of media speculation has reached new levels this offseason so this shouldn't be of any surprise. Please prove me wrong that the Browns stated they were shopping him and I'll shut up, until you do I won't.
Is DA the better QB?This has been fun.

 
Scott,What are your projections for him? I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your points, but I already have tempered expectations for the guy. I don't think too many people are going to have him ranked in the top 15 anyway. If he falls below QB20, I'll nab him but I wouldn't take him much higher than that. If you mean he's already tracking as a top 10 guy, then I agree with you.
Hey Ollie, I think many on this board have Anderson as a top 10, even top 7 or 8 for dynasty and redraft.
Yep, I hadn't taken a close look at his ADP from the WSLs before I made the above statement. I think he's going much too high and expect him to finish in the lower 50% of starting QBs not the top 25%.
 
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It is ridiculous. DA is going to play all year (barring injury) and probably next year. Then there is a QB controversy in that DA will be going into the final year of his contract. One will be moved and the other will be the starter. And Quinn will be a better QB for holding the clipboard a couple of years
I understand what you're saying.I don't agree it is the right call for the Browns to make.
Which is why you are on a FFB website and the guys that signed DA to the extension get paid by the NFL...
 
MAC_32 said:
Pictus Cat said:
Does the hypothetical conversation go like this...

Coach, who is our best QB?

Anderson did very well last season, but

Quinn has more ability and needs time to develop it.

Coach, who should we start in 08?

Starting Quinn would allow him to get experience and develop his ability to give the team the best chance to go to the playoffs and deeper.

But coach, we might have to pay some incentives if he starts and we're the Clevelend Browns.

What do you want me to do? Start the capable back-up and not develop the future and best chance to win in the playoffs?

I'm glad we're on the same page coach.
:no: My Gawd, I see we're going to be dealing with this for the next six months, I'm not tired of it yet so I'll keep saying it until you all get it. Listen to the soundbites from Romeo and Savage from the last 6 weeks, notably soon after the DA signing. He is the starting QB, there is no competition. You, and many others, obviously have not. The problem is you, and many others, are talking like they know; you don't. It's reminiscent of that commercial on ESPN last year of that guy talking out of his ###. Whether you believe DA is better than Quinn, Quinn is better than DA, they both suck, they're both Gods, Quinn is sleeping with Romeo's wife, DA is gay, your Brady Quinn posters on your wall told you 'I am starting,' or Bernie Kosar is in a never-ending alcoholic haze (sorry Bern, you sound drunk everytime I hear your voice) DA will still be the opening day starter. Now. Speculate all you want that DA will implode and Quinn will be starting by midseason, I disagree but you're entitled to your opinion.
I'm singling this post out, but it's not the only one here.Discussions are welcome, but this is heading in a bad direction.

Feel free to talk about the + and - of the CLE QB situation, but there's no need to go down the road of the items in bold.
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It's ok - just trying to keep the SP going in the right direction.
Apologies for any offense. None was intended.My point is if the Browns were shopping DA,

that should imply they would be ok with Quinn instead of DA.

If they beleive that, and I would think the coach would be the most likely to be on board with it,

why in the world would they start DA?

The hypothetical was to be clear that this was not a real conversation as far as I know.

We think Quinn is better and the future but we're starting DA (the guy we shopped because we thought we could do better without?)

What do they think they can get for DA that would make them a better team overall?

Seems like smoke and mirrors to me so they can keep his value up and still trade him.

Is a situation where you have two good players at the same position and can't find the right trade partner?
*sigh* Again, they were never shopping him, they were trying to sign him for the entire month of February. It took a last minute rumor of Dallas signing DA to an offer sheet and then turn around and deal him to BMore to move into the top 10 to spur late night negotiations to get him signed. Your entire case is irrelevant as the Browns were never shopping him, the media speculated but that was all, the level of media speculation has reached new levels this offseason so this shouldn't be of any surprise. Please prove me wrong that the Browns stated they were shopping him and I'll shut up, until you do I won't.
Yes, and I can't stand it. I have stopped watching ESPN completely and have cancelled NFLN. Sports reporting has become pathetic, they are trying to make news when there isn't any. I guess you could say Professional Sports has gone Hollywood. I am afraid that it won't be long before I stop watching the games too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It is ridiculous. DA is going to play all year (barring injury) and probably next year. Then there is a QB controversy in that DA will be going into the final year of his contract. One will be moved and the other will be the starter. And Quinn will be a better QB for holding the clipboard a couple of years
I understand what you're saying.I don't agree it is the right call for the Browns to make.
Which is why you are on a FFB website and the guys that signed DA to the extension get paid by the NFL...
:shrug: You and me both, brother.How long does a Quinn need to hold a clipboard before he needs to take the reigns to learn more? (currently 1 year and counting...)How much better is DA going to be?How much better do these NFL paid people think Quinn is going to be?If you're looking at the playoffs, who do you want starting against the best NFL teams in the league, and how prepared do you want your QB to be?Will every practice reveal who is better and what would you expect a coach to do about it?To the topic,Boom or bust, DA should do well in this offense, locking up both Quinn and DA in a draft at QB 12ish and Quinn late would be worth the gamble to me. DA as your QB1 and missing Quinn would be a mistake IMHO.
 
Poor attempt at comic relief evidently. Apologies. Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It is ridiculous. DA is going to play all year (barring injury) and probably next year. Then there is a QB controversy in that DA will be going into the final year of his contract. One will be moved and the other will be the starter. And Quinn will be a better QB for holding the clipboard a couple of years
I understand what you're saying.I don't agree it is the right call for the Browns to make.
Which is why you are on a FFB website and the guys that signed DA to the extension get paid by the NFL...
:shrug: You and me both, brother.How long does a Quinn need to hold a clipboard before he needs to take the reigns to learn more? (currently 1 year and counting...)

How much better is DA going to be?

How much better do these NFL paid people think Quinn is going to be?

If you're looking at the playoffs, who do you want starting against the best NFL teams in the league,

and how prepared do you want your QB to be?

Will every practice reveal who is better and what would you expect a coach to do about it?

To the topic,

Boom or bust, DA should do well in this offense, locking up both Quinn and DA in a draft at QB 12ish and Quinn late would be worth the gamble to me. DA as your QB1 and missing Quinn would be a mistake IMHO.
As to the last questions, here is some of what I wrote in this topic where it was debated quite heavily, http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...4438&st=100
3) "We've gone as far as we can with Anderson" argument, and its corrolary, the "Quinn has more upside" argument. History does not bear this out at all. Question: if I could give you Jim Harbaugh's career in place of Brady Quinn, would you take it? In other words, over/under, is Quinn going to be better than Harbaugh? Harbaugh was an above average, non-first overall, first round drafted quarterback. Half of the first rounders (excluding the #1 overalls) drafted between 1970-2001 never threw for 15,000 yards in their careers. As for the upside, we don't know what Quinn is capable of, but the opinions seem to be he has a different skill set, more accurate, heady, less arm. If that is true, then Anderson has the greater upside. The sometimes dumb gunslinger QB's who throw for a high TD rate early in their career, accompanied by an above average INT rate, and an average comp %, have a higher upside than those that complete a decent amount, throw for an average to low TD rate, and avoid interceptions. Comp % is the one area where new QB's improve the most--not all do, but its where the biggest jumps occur.

4) "The DA we saw over the last 4 weeks is the true DA" argument. Focusing, and placing greater weight, on the recent is a normal and understandable human response. I think all games are evidence of the true DA, not just cherry picked selections. But, is it true that young QB's who regress or decline in the second of half of a debut season are worse going forward than those that appear to be getting better? I can't find strong evidence of that. In fact, most of the recent young breakouts actually did regress in the second half of their first season starting. Anderson is not even the biggest regresser, though he did have the most td passes in the first 8, so he had more room to do so. Eli (14td,5int first 8, 9/12 last 8), Bulger (13 ints last 8) and Aaron Brooks (16 ints last 8!) all had much worse second halves compared to the first halves. Brady, McNair, Roethlisberger, Brees, and Griese were also playing worse and the league was catching up to them. Romo was too, though by my method, he was actually about equal. Others who stayed the same from first 8 to last 8 were Brunell, McNabb, Vick and Rivers. The only improvers were Culpepper, Pennington, and Palmer. I don't have game by game data earlier than 1995, but I can say that, while a quarterback at 27 years old is typically better than he was at 24 years old, it is not a smooth process, where every 4-6 games is better than the previous. Guys like Favre (24 interceptions) and Brees regressed in year two, after solid first seasons starting.
Now, to the fantasy question of value, I think his value is probably in about the QB7-QB10 range this year, taking into account both upside and downside. I just don't see what QB's people think are both less risky and/or have more upside when they say they would consider him at QB20.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe my take on DA is different, or maybe my thinking is very different.

Most people see DA as a boom or bust candidate, which means that they can see him performing in the 3-6 area, but wouldn't be shocked at all to see him in the 18-20 area. For these folks, a finish in the 11-15 area doesn't make sense (barring injuries). For those who lean towards "boom", ranking him in the 5-7 area makes sense. For those that think "bust", the 15-17 area makes sense.

Sometimes we overanalyze the "ADP", particularly with the "boom or bust" candidates like this. The truth is that he is NOT going to go 8-10 in most drafts...he'll go a little sooner in most, much later in some.

Most of us recognize the "boom or bust" candidacy here...so it makes NO SENSE at all to make fun of those with a strong opposite opinion. The OP's opinion is that he's a bust, and I respect that.

Where I am different then most here is that I actually think that he really will be a borderline QB1, and perform to the QB10-13 area while in Cleveland. In most other cities, I think he would drop to the mid or low teens. He's a starter, but no stud (just IMHO)

 
It is impossible for Derek Anderson to be a fantasy bust because no quality team should invest their entire QB position in the guy. A strong backup should be selected by the team picking him. OR Derek is the backup to compliment your starting QB. Just the fact that Brady Quinn may take the job at any time should be enough to knock him WAY down the fantasy draft boards.
:goodposting:
 
hope some of you heeded the warning!
:hifive: Good call, but you weren't the only one. I grabbed Quinn in SSL IV to back up Romo, he'll be starting by Romo's BYE.Funny to see the adamant stand some posters took:

Just trying to emphasize how ridiculous it is that anyone thinks Quinn has any shot at the starting job.
It is ridiculous. DA is going to play all year (barring injury) and probably next year. Then there is a QB controversy in that DA will be going into the final year of his contract.
Also funny how things change:
If the Browns go into the bye 0-4 then either a switch will be made before MNF against the Giants or during (if things continue to go poorly), if they win either of the next two games it would be at least week 7, if they win both it's going to be a while, if at all.
-- This isn't meant to call out any particular poster either... every single person here has been wrong about a player or situation before. Kudos to Team Legacy for making the right call. Maybe we shouldn't jump on people so much for thinking against the norm.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top