Teams most likely to draft RB's (1 Viewer)

[Go deep]

I just finished up my RB spread sheet where i track and average a bunch of stuff.

With many considering this a deep class, and it probably is just without much top end talent. either way though, it wont matter if these players dont get the opportunity to play. Which teams are most in need of RB's or most likely to give one of these RB's an opportunity to play.

Here is the order i have so far.

1. Dolphins

2. Patriots

3. Bengals

4. Colts

5. Bucs

6. Redskins

7. Falcons

8. Giants

9. Broncos

10. Rams

11. Lions

12. Steelers

13. Packers

14. Eagles

15. Saints

16. Bears

17. Chargers

18. Seahwaks

19. Chiefs

20. 49ers

What do you guys think?

 

[Eastwood]

I just finished up my RB spread sheet where i track and average a bunch of stuff. With many considering this a deep class, and it probably is just without much top end talent. either way though, it wont matter if these players dont get the opportunity to play. Which teams are most in need of RB's or most likely to give one of these RB's an opportunity to play.Here is the order i have so far.1. Dolphins 2. Patriots3. Bengals4. Colts5. Bucs6. Redskins7. Falcons8. Giants9. Broncos10. Rams11. Lions12. Steelers13. Packers14. Eagles15. Saints16. Bears17. Chargers18. Seahwaks19. Chiefs20. 49ersWhat do you guys think?

looks like a good list, but I'd say the Rams have a bigger need at RB than the Giants or Broncos. Nice job overall!

 

[Steel Dillo]

I don't see Pitt that high.

Only way I see them taking a back is if its to give Moore some competition for the 3rd down back role.

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

I just finished up my RB spread sheet where i track and average a bunch of stuff. With many considering this a deep class, and it probably is just without much top end talent. either way though, it wont matter if these players dont get the opportunity to play. Which teams are most in need of RB's or most likely to give one of these RB's an opportunity to play.Here is the order i have so far.1. Dolphins 2. Patriots3. Bengals4. Colts5. Bucs6. Redskins7. Falcons8. Giants9. Broncos10. Rams11. Lions12. Steelers13. Packers14. Eagles15. Saints16. Bears17. Chargers18. Seahwaks19. Chiefs20. 49ersWhat do you guys think?

Are you listing teams that will draft a RB, or the likelihood they will, or how soon they will pick one next week?Regardless, I would certainly move WASH up. Indy's a questionable one as they SHOULD, but if the league plays by the 2010 rules then Addai is an RFA and the need goes down (although they have to replace him very soon). Same kind of reasoning on the need for the NYG - if Bradshaw and Jacobs cannot leave, not as much need.This draft is going to be clouded by the lack of the CBA, as too many teams will be drafting looking at 2011 instead of the future like the good teams usually do. I expect another dominant performance by NE, PHI, PITT and GB.

 

[Fighting Noles]

I'm not sure team "need" is a real good method for predicting anyway though....How many here ever saw Stewart mocked to Carolina that year or Mendy to Pitt? Or CJ2K to Tenn. after they had taken Chris Henry & Lendale White back to back highly (as far as RB's go). Or all of Minnys' denials of interest with ADP after Chester Taylors' previous year (again ADP is a far superior RB to Taylor, but not many listed RB as a Minny "need" going into that draft). A lot of people knew Jerry Jones liked Felix from the Ark. connection, but MBIII had just finished a very good year & not very many people (scouts/mocks) thought Dallas needed a 1st RD RB.

I think with so many of the RB's bunched together this year (in terms of talent & possible draft Rds), we could see quite a few surprises come Draft day. Even with backups, I don't think many saw Minny using a 2nd on Gerhart last year.

It is fun to guess though Go Deep, so thanks for the list.

 

[Go deep]

I just finished up my RB spread sheet where i track and average a bunch of stuff.

With many considering this a deep class, and it probably is just without much top end talent. either way though, it wont matter if these players dont get the opportunity to play. Which teams are most in need of RB's or most likely to give one of these RB's an opportunity to play.

Here is the order i have so far.

1. Dolphins

2. Patriots

3. Bengals

4. Colts

5. Bucs

6. Redskins

7. Falcons

8. Giants

9. Broncos

10. Rams

11. Lions

12. Steelers

13. Packers

14. Eagles

15. Saints

16. Bears

17. Chargers

18. Seahwaks

19. Chiefs

20. 49ers

What do you guys think?

Are you listing teams that will draft a RB, or the likelihood they will, or how soon they will pick one next week?

Regardless, I would certainly move WASH up. Indy's a questionable one as they SHOULD, but if the league plays by the 2010 rules then Addai is an RFA and the need goes down (although they have to replace him very soon). Same kind of reasoning on the need for the NYG - if Bradshaw and Jacobs cannot leave, not as much need.

This draft is going to be clouded by the lack of the CBA, as too many teams will be drafting looking at 2011 instead of the future like the good teams usually do. I expect another dominant performance by NE, PHI, PITT and GB.

I guess its really a combination of everything. Need playing a big part, also which team could give a drafted RB the best opportunity to get immediate playing time. Your right about Indy, if i were just making a list of teams i thought would draft one, they would be further down the list.

The only reasons i dont have the Redskins higher is because Shanahan doesnt normally spend high picks on RB"s. With the depth at RB this year, i doubt that will change.

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

 

[Go deep]

I'm not sure team "need" is a real good method for predicting anyway though....How many here ever saw Stewart mocked to Carolina that year or Mendy to Pitt? Or CJ2K to Tenn. after they had taken Chris Henry & Lendale White back to back highly (as far as RB's go). Or all of Minnys' denials of interest with ADP after Chester Taylors' previous year (again ADP is a far superior RB to Taylor, but not many listed RB as a Minny "need" going into that draft). A lot of people knew Jerry Jones liked Felix from the Ark. connection, but MBIII had just finished a very good year & not very many people (scouts/mocks) thought Dallas needed a 1st RD RB.

I think with so many of the RB's bunched together this year (in terms of talent & possible draft Rds), we could see quite a few surprises come Draft day. Even with backups, I don't think many saw Minny using a 2nd on Gerhart last year.

It is fun to guess though Go Deep, so thanks for the list.

Im not really basing it on team need, although that factors into my list.

Your right about Minny and AD. But thats a pretty rare exception that a RB comes out that is so good almost any team can draft him and it would make sense.

I tried to put a list together of teams i thought would draft a RB wether it be for immediate help, strictly a backup, or a guy to pair with someone else in a RBBC, etc.

 

[Go deep]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

As opposed to other years drafts?

When all is said and done, i dont think things will end up too much different.

 

[Sinrman]

I can certainly see Detroit going for one in the 2nd or 3rd round or later. Jahvid Best has potential, but there's no way his small frame can take the every down pounding. They need a pounder.

 

[FUBAR]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

I wonder how much this will impact early trades. Instead of asking for a 2012 pick, will teams be more likely to seek a couple later picks in the package? I think so.

 

[Ghost of Bill Walsh]

The Dolphins are the team with the most need for a RB and the only team of those you listed that MIGHT take a RB in round 1. A lot of the teams listed will draft RB's but when and where depends on overall team needs. I do believe the 49ers will draft a RB mainly as depth for Gore and Dixon but that won't happen until at least the 3rd round and probably later than that. Lot of RB depth in this draft just not top-ended as has been said. A lot of them too that get drafted won't see playing time right away and will have to wait for the opportunity to get playing time.

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

I would love to see the Colts move up in the 2nd round and take LeShoure.

 

[Dr. Octopus]

I'd move Seattle quiteba bit up that list.

 

[hutchins929]

I can certainly see Detroit going for one in the 2nd or 3rd round or later. Jahvid Best has potential, but there's no way his small frame can take the every down pounding. They need a pounder.

I still say they take a run at Mikel LeShoure. They would have to trade up to get him though IMO. I don't see him getting past NE in the second round. or maybe even GB at the end of the first round. So they would have to drop a few spots and pick up another second round pick. Then get themselves a quality OL, CB or LB. Then trade their two second round picks to someone in the late first round and take LeShoure. I know some people think that would be a stupid move but I think this LeShoure kid could be great combined with Best. Thunder and Lightning for sure. I'd be happy if the Lions got Pouncey and LeShoure.

 

[BigSteelThrill]

I don't see Pitt that high.

Only way I see them taking a back is if its to give Moore some competition for the 3rd down back role.

I dont see Pitt taking a RB in the first three rounds.But Moore is currently a free agent. And the Pitt-Post-Gazzette reported they are likely to try and replace Moore with one of their drafts picks.

 

[The Real Hipster Doofus]

I can certainly see Detroit going for one in the 2nd or 3rd round or later. Jahvid Best has potential, but there's no way his small frame can take the every down pounding. They need a pounder.

I still say they take a run at Mikel LeShoure. They would have to trade up to get him though IMO. I don't see him getting past NE in the second round. or maybe even GB at the end of the first round. So they would have to drop a few spots and pick up another second round pick. Then get themselves a quality OL, CB or LB. Then trade their two second round picks to someone in the late first round and take LeShoure. I know some people think that would be a stupid move but I think this LeShoure kid could be great combined with Best. Thunder and Lightning for sure. I'd be happy if the Lions got Pouncey and LeShoure.

I'd prefer a Delone Carter/Bilal Powell/etc. in the 4th round area. Would rather invest the earlier picks in more pressing areas.

 

[loose circuits]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

I wonder how much this will impact early trades. Instead of asking for a 2012 pick, will teams be more likely to seek a couple later picks in the package? I think so.

i don't think you can trade for future picks if there is no cba?

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

I wonder how much this will impact early trades. Instead of asking for a 2012 pick, will teams be more likely to seek a couple later picks in the package? I think so.

i don't think you can trade for future picks if there is no cba?

I thought that only pertained to players, not picks? If true, that really puts a damper on the Patriots who love to trade for picks.

 

[loose circuits]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

I wonder how much this will impact early trades. Instead of asking for a 2012 pick, will teams be more likely to seek a couple later picks in the package? I think so.

i don't think you can trade for future picks if there is no cba?

I thought that only pertained to players, not picks? If true, that really puts a damper on the Patriots who love to trade for picks.

no, it's future picks too: http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/03/20/don%E2%80%99t-expect-many-draft-day-trades-with-no-cba-in-place/

 

[zilladog]

The Dolphins are the team with the most need for a RB and the only team of those you listed that MIGHT take a RB in round 1. A lot of the teams listed will draft RB's but when and where depends on overall team needs. I do believe the 49ers will draft a RB mainly as depth for Gore and Dixon but that won't happen until at least the 3rd round and probably later than that. Lot of RB depth in this draft just not top-ended as has been said. A lot of them too that get drafted won't see playing time right away and will have to wait for the opportunity to get playing time.

The Pats will take the BPA, need or not. And many believe RB is an actual need for them. So it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they grabbed Ingram if he fell to them.

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

I wonder how much this will impact early trades. Instead of asking for a 2012 pick, will teams be more likely to seek a couple later picks in the package? I think so.

i don't think you can trade for future picks if there is no cba?

I thought that only pertained to players, not picks? If true, that really puts a damper on the Patriots who love to trade for picks.

no, it's future picks too: http://www.scoresreport.com/2011/03/20/don%E2%80%99t-expect-many-draft-day-trades-with-no-cba-in-place/

thanks for the link.

 

[FUBAR]

So many factors will play a part in this year's draft, it is just impossible to predict.

1. No free agency

2. No CBA, so no idea who's going to be gone as a FA either

3. Lots of RBs will be available to be drafted

But the biggest issue...

4. There will not be UDFAs permitted with no CBA in place. For that alone, Day 3 will be Must See TV as I can see that there might be more trades for Rounds 6-7 picks than ever before. Teams will want to corral the players on Day 3 and not let the other leagues (Arena FL, AIFA, Arena-II, possibly CFL and of course the UFL) get their hands on them.

Another one:

5. Drafting a RB affords teams with two things in one fell swoop - rookies who are highly likely to contribute in Year 1 (one of the easiest positions for rookies to contribute), not only as a RB but also with the athleticism to contribute on special teams.

I wonder how much this will impact early trades. Instead of asking for a 2012 pick, will teams be more likely to seek a couple later picks in the package? I think so.

i don't think you can trade for future picks if there is no cba?

I thought that only pertained to players, not picks? If true, that really puts a damper on the Patriots who love to trade for picks.

no, it's future picks too: http://www.scoresrep...o-cba-in-place/

thanks, I did not realize that was the case. makes sense though. Seems to me then that the smart teams will move down whenever possible even at a lower price than in previous years.

 

[Go deep]

I don't see Pitt that high.

Only way I see them taking a back is if its to give Moore some competition for the 3rd down back role.

I dont see Pitt taking a RB in the first three rounds.But Moore is currently a free agent. And the Pitt-Post-Gazzette reported they are likely to try and replace Moore with one of their drafts picks.

While it wasnt very noticeable because the Steelers have a great defense and vertical passing game, the Steelers coud really use a big play back that can catch to complment Mendenhall.

I could see them going as high as the 2nd for a guy like Demarco Murray or Taiwan Jones.

Here are some other guys i can see the Steelers targeting:

3rd: Shane Vereen, Kendall Hunter

4th/5th: Derrick Locke, Dion Lewis, Roy Helu

6th/7th: Noel Devine, Mario Fanin, Brandon Saine

 

[loose circuits]

I don't see Pitt that high.

Only way I see them taking a back is if its to give Moore some competition for the 3rd down back role.

I dont see Pitt taking a RB in the first three rounds.But Moore is currently a free agent. And the Pitt-Post-Gazzette reported they are likely to try and replace Moore with one of their drafts picks.

While it wasnt very noricable because the Steelers have a great defense and vertical passing game, the Steelers coud really use a big play back that can catch to complment Mendenhall.

I could see them going as high as the 2nd for a guy like Demarco Murray or Taiwan Jones.

Here are some other guys i can see the Steelers targeting:

3rd: Shane Vereen, Kendall Hunter

that would basically mean they have no plans for Dwyer at all and he would be inactive all year again

 

[Go deep]

I would love to see the Colts move up in the 2nd round and take LeShoure.

I doubt the Colts trade up for someone who isnt very good in the passing game.

 

[Go deep]

I can certainly see Detroit going for one in the 2nd or 3rd round or later. Jahvid Best has potential, but there's no way his small frame can take the every down pounding. They need a pounder.

I agree Detroit needs a bigger back, but i think Best will end up playing a Mccoy, Rice or Charles role, so im no sure how high the Lions will go to get one considering the needs they have at other positions.

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

I would love to see the Colts move up in the 2nd round and take LeShoure.

I doubt the Colts trade up for someone who isnt very good in the passing game.

Strengths-Prototype Size for NFL running back. Flashes good hands as a receiver. Runs with good pad level. Gets to speed very quickly. Shows quick feet in the hole and can get to the edge quickly. Displays a very good burst to separate. Is compact and well built. Sets up blocks well and runs with good vision. Flashes good power and tackle breaking ability. Shows ability to be an outstanding pass blocker.

a different one ....

"Pass Catching

Illinois has lined him up as an outside receiver and he has shown reliable hands when asked to catch. He has shown a good job running routes from out of the backfield, in motion and even in the slot. Does not make the best cuts and will round off routes.

We have noticed him catching with his body too often. Due to his size and running type, many find him to be a surprisingly good pass catcher out of the backfield.

Pass Blocking

The technique to be a great blocker is lacking, but he does show a ton of effort in blocking. Leshoure has the body type to be a good blitz protector once he learns the right technique."

another one.....

Positives: Great size, very strong build... Plays faster on tape than timed speed... Does a great job holding the football close to his body... Very quick feet, reaches his top speed almost immediately which makes him a big play threat... Gets his first 15-20 yards in a hurry, tough to contain... Runs through tackles, does a great job getting through trash and running between the tackles... Keeps his legs moving at all times, very hard to slow down... Runs with low pad level, delivers hits rather than absorb them... Great vision, waits for his blockers... Soft hands, is growing to be a capable receiver out of the backfield... Put up big numbers against tough Big 10 defenses, had only one game this year with less than 75 rushing yards... Illinois has put some good running backs into the NFL recently (Pierre Thomas, Rashard Mendenhall)... One of the few backs in this class that has the potential to be a true workhorse... Only had one season as a starter so he will come to the NFL without much tread on his tires... A complete running back, isn't flashy, but is the type of player who can carry the ball a ton, and contribute on passing downs... Ended the year on a strong note, ran for 917 yards and 11 touchdowns in his final four games in 2010.

There's more but that would be overkill.

 

[Go deep]

I would love to see the Colts move up in the 2nd round and take LeShoure.

I doubt the Colts trade up for someone who isnt very good in the passing game.

Strengths-Prototype Size for NFL running back. Flashes good hands as a receiver. Runs with good pad level. Gets to speed very quickly. Shows quick feet in the hole and can get to the edge quickly. Displays a very good burst to separate. Is compact and well built. Sets up blocks well and runs with good vision. Flashes good power and tackle breaking ability. Shows ability to be an outstanding pass blocker.

a different one ....

"Pass Catching

Illinois has lined him up as an outside receiver and he has shown reliable hands when asked to catch. He has shown a good job running routes from out of the backfield, in motion and even in the slot. Does not make the best cuts and will round off routes.

We have noticed him catching with his body too often. Due to his size and running type, many find him to be a surprisingly good pass catcher out of the backfield.

Pass Blocking

The technique to be a great blocker is lacking, but he does show a ton of effort in blocking. Leshoure has the body type to be a good blitz protector once he learns the right technique."

another one.....

Positives: Great size, very strong build... Plays faster on tape than timed speed... Does a great job holding the football close to his body... Very quick feet, reaches his top speed almost immediately which makes him a big play threat... Gets his first 15-20 yards in a hurry, tough to contain... Runs through tackles, does a great job getting through trash and running between the tackles... Keeps his legs moving at all times, very hard to slow down... Runs with low pad level, delivers hits rather than absorb them... Great vision, waits for his blockers... Soft hands, is growing to be a capable receiver out of the backfield... Put up big numbers against tough Big 10 defenses, had only one game this year with less than 75 rushing yards... Illinois has put some good running backs into the NFL recently (Pierre Thomas, Rashard Mendenhall)... One of the few backs in this class that has the potential to be a true workhorse... Only had one season as a starter so he will come to the NFL without much tread on his tires... A complete running back, isn't flashy, but is the type of player who can carry the ball a ton, and contribute on passing downs... Ended the year on a strong note, ran for 917 yards and 11 touchdowns in his final four games in 2010.

There's more but that would be overkill.

i didnt say he wasnt OK in the passing game, just that he wasnt going to be very good at it. I have to assume after Donald Brown, they wont want a guy who may or may not be a good pass blocker, especially at the price of a 2nd round pick.

Either way though, thats only a small part of the reason i dont see the Colts taking Leshoure in the 2nd. Even though Addai nor Brown are great RB's, i dont think the RB's have been the biggest problem with their run game over the last several years.

 

[Go deep]

What i am really trying to find here is which teams are the most likely to give a RB an opportunity for fantasy success. Last year the Vikings drafting Gerhart all but ruined any fantasy value he might have had. The Texans taking Tate did wonders for his fantasy value(even if things didnt work out that way)

Look at it like this, assume you already did a rookie draft, and drafted your favorite RB(outside of the top 3, Ingram, Leshoure, Williams) give an order of teams you would most like to see draft your player.

Dolphins - Glaring need at RB, pretty good offense that loves to run.

Patriots - Great team, high scoring offense. Pass first, but plenty to go around, look no firther than the numbers of BJGE last season. Any decent rookie could easily take the starteing job.

Bengals - Might have to wait a season, but could take over the starting role this year in what should be at least a decent offense that likes to run.

Colts - Dont run very often and even when they do they are not good at it. But they do have a pretty big need at RB, and have one of the best offenses in the league.

Redskins - Shanahan does work wonders for RB's, and they do have a pretty big need for one.

Bucs - Blount is OK between the 20's(as long as he doesnt need to catch) at the very least a RB could come in here and get a decent share of the pie. Best case scenario a rookie could show what a real RB could do in that offense.

Falcons - Turner isnt going anywhere this season, but a rookie wpouldnt have to wait long to start for a team that should be good for a while.

Giants - If Bradshaw leaves, the Giants would move up to the top 3. Even if Bradshaw stays, a good rookie could get a fair share of touches and maybe end up as the bell cow if Bradshaw continues to get hurt.

Rams - Jackson doesnt have much tread left on those tires, but he is still one of the best on the league. A young Rb might have to wait a year or two, but he could end up in a great situation in St Louis a year from now.

Broncos - Fox likes to run, and Moreno hasnt held up well. He is still young though, and they used an high pick on him, so as long as he is healthy, he is likely to see the bigger chunk of pie for the forseeable future.

Steelers - Mendenhall has been good, but he is very one dimensional. A big play back could put up some big numbers in that offense, even with limited touches.(i think if they get the right back, Mendenhall could be the COP)

Lions - It would likely take an injury to Best for a RB to have any real value in Detroit, but you never know.

Packers - With Grant andstarks, its unlikely the Packers pend an early pick, but starks is still unproven and Grant doesnt have much time left, so a young Rb could be huge here in a tear or two.

Eagles - There is a spot for a big back to take some carries in Philly, but as long as Mccoy is healthy, you likely have to hope for a goalline vulture.

Saints - Great offense that has alot of average RB's there already. Its possible someone can come in and beat them all out for #1 RB spot.

49ers - Gore doesnt have alot left, and dixon isnt a reason to not look for a future #1. The 49ers have alot of other needs, so i dont see them drafting Gore successor this year, although i can see them spending a late pick on a COP back.

Seahawks - I dont see them drafting a starter type with already having Lynch and Forsett. Of course that could change if someone falls into their lap, but other than the top 3 guys, i dont know if anything is a big improvement on Lynch.

Chargers - Will likely draft a COP to replace Sproles, but Mathews is going to be given every opportunity to be the man there.

Chiefs - Run enough to support 2 RB's, plus any RB they bring in could end up getting goalline duty. No chance at ever winnig the starting job behind one of the best RB's in the league who is still only 23.

Jets - A great run blocking Oline with only Shonn Greene ahead of him? Im just not sure the Jets will draft a RB if they decide to bring LT back.

 

[Hoss_Cartwright]

First you said...

Either way though, thats only a small part of the reason i dont see the Colts taking Leshoure in the 2nd. Even though Addai nor Brown are great RB's, i dont think the RB's have been the biggest problem with their run game over the last several years.

Then you said...

Colts - Dont run very often and even when they do they are not good at it. But they do have a pretty big need at RB, and have one of the best offenses in the league.

Which is true?

 

[Go deep]

First you said...

Either way though, thats only a small part of the reason i dont see the Colts taking Leshoure in the 2nd. Even though Addai nor Brown are great RB's, i dont think the RB's have been the biggest problem with their run game over the last several years.

Then you said...

Colts - Dont run very often and even when they do they are not good at it. But they do have a pretty big need at RB, and have one of the best offenses in the league.

Which is true?

Both, you dont see how the RB's can be bad but not the worse thing about the run game?

 

[Fighting Noles]

I think your summary of the Lions & Steelers above should be reversed Go Deep & then I'd be in pretty much agreement with it (although I don't think Gore is pretty much done as you sort of put it).....

 

[Go deep]

I think your summary of the Lions & Steelers above should be reversed Go Deep & then I'd be in pretty much agreement with it (although I don't think Gore is pretty much done as you sort of put it).....

I think Mendenhall is more likely to lose carries to a more talented back than Best, assuming both stay healthy, which of course Mendenhal is more likely to do. When i say Mendenhall could end up the COP, i mean he would play the Jerome Bettis role to Willie Parker from a few years back.I think Gore has a good season or two left, but the end is not far away.

 

[BigSteelThrill]

Mendenhall could end up the COP, i mean he would play the Jerome Bettis role

Let em assure you, physicality is not the strong suit to Rashard. He should never be confused with a Bettis skill set.While he may on occasion shows glimpses of it, its not his natural style or mindset in any way.He is best suited to play in a spread-shotgun offense. Which Pittsburgh does a lot.

 

[Go deep]

Mendenhall could end up the COP, i mean he would play the Jerome Bettis role

Let em assure you, physicality is not the strong suit to Rashard. He should never be confused with a Bettis skill set.While he may on occasion shows glimpses of it, its not his natural style or mindset in any way.He is best suited to play in a spread-shotgun offense. Which Pittsburgh does a lot.

Im not suggesting Mendenhall is a Bettis clone or anything, just that he isnt much of a threat to take it to the house from anywhere on the field, and he isnt very good in the passing game...Things he has on common with Bettis. I also know he thinks thats not his natural style, but he doesnt play like it. I dont watch the Steelers as much as you, but i have seen enough of him bracing for impact the second he gets his hands on the ball. Him ending up as a COP back is the extreme, but i can see him losing significant touches to a guy like Taiwan Jones or Kendall Hunter. I would think Steelers fans would be hoping for something like that. I know when i watch the Steelers i think as good as that offense is, how much better they could be with a more dynamic back to go along with Mendenall.

 

[hutchins929]

I think your summary of the Lions & Steelers above should be reversed Go Deep & then I'd be in pretty much agreement with it (although I don't think Gore is pretty much done as you sort of put it).....

I agree

 

[Fighting Noles]

I think your summary of the Lions & Steelers above should be reversed Go Deep & then I'd be in pretty much agreement with it (although I don't think Gore is pretty much done as you sort of put it).....

I think Mendenhall is more likely to lose carries to a more talented back than Best, assuming both stay healthy, which of course Mendenhal is more likely to do. When i say Mendenhall could end up the COP, i mean he would play the Jerome Bettis role to Willie Parker from a few years back.I think Gore has a good season or two left, but the end is not far away.

Thoughts now Go Deep.....

 

[Burning Sensation]

I think your summary of the Lions & Steelers above should be reversed Go Deep & then I'd be in pretty much agreement with it (although I don't think Gore is pretty much done as you sort of put it).....

I think Mendenhall is more likely to lose carries to a more talented back than Best, assuming both stay healthy, which of course Mendenhal is more likely to do. When i say Mendenhall could end up the COP, i mean he would play the Jerome Bettis role to Willie Parker from a few years back.I think Gore has a good season or two left, but the end is not far away.

Thoughts now Go Deep.....

Go deep thinks that certainly doesnt help Best, but it was inevitable the Lions were going to take a back at some point. Obviously Best will lose carries to Leshoure, but he is still the #1 in Detroit. As will Mendenhall be, but a guy like Dion Lewis or Taiwan Jones will get steal plenty of touches.