Hairy Snowman
Footballguy
ESPN reporting he has been released.
Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
that's laughable . . .a person has to have value in order for someone to want him . . .which team would give up a draft pick for him??Obviously, no one . . .ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
Its not that easy trading someone of that salary. Everyone knew they wouldn't be able to trade him but hoping someone would bit.ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
QUOTEOfficially out: Carr released by TexansBy JOHN MCCLAINCopyright 2007 Houston Chronicle After weeks of trying to get a draft choice for quarterback David Carr, the Texans have decided to release the five-year veteran, making him an unrestricted free agent who can sign with any team in the league.The Texans also are releasing running back Domanick Williams (formerly Davis), their former leading rusher who has been unable to play because of a knee injury.An announcement is expected later today.john.mcclain@chron.com
Shouldn’t they have gone about this another way?Like trade Carr before acquiring Schaub?Its not that easy trading someone of that salary. Everyone knew they wouldn't be able to trade him but hoping someone would bit.ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
then ATL would have asked for even more knowing they only had Sage on the rosterShouldn’t they have gone about this another way?Like trade Carr before acquiring Schaub?Its not that easy trading someone of that salary. Everyone knew they wouldn't be able to trade him but hoping someone would bit.ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
IMO that would be a great move for the Raiders. Then trade Randy to the Pack for something and then get some linemen with that something......Well, if Al doesn't pick up Carr now, Mass Raider will be getting his wish of Russell. Personally, I'd like to get Carr, draft Johnson and then have the most coveted rookie to be able to keep or trade...ala SD and Eli.
How about Green to Miami, Culpepper to Oakland...now Moss is happy and Miami has a solid QB....of course not too sure where Carr ends up.IMO that would be a great move for the Raiders. Then trade Randy to the Pack for something and then get some linemen with that something......Well, if Al doesn't pick up Carr now, Mass Raider will be getting his wish of Russell. Personally, I'd like to get Carr, draft Johnson and then have the most coveted rookie to be able to keep or trade...ala SD and Eli.
The QB always gets all the blame. How about that ####ty O linethat's laughable . . .a person has to have value in order for someone to want him . . .which team would give up a draft pick for him??Obviously, no one . . .ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
Is that the same one that fat ron dayne averaged 5.3 ypc behind? 5.8 ypc over the last 5 games where carr had 1 TD and 5 INT's. That ####ty o-line? Just asking.The QB always gets all the blame. How the that ####ty O linethat's laughable . . .a person has to have value in order for someone to want him . . .which team would give up a draft pick for him??Obviously, no one . . .ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
That's the one!Is that the same one that fat ron dayne averaged 5.3 ypc behind? 5.8 ypc over the last 5 games where carr had 1 TD and 5 INT's. That ####ty o-line? Just asking.The QB always gets all the blame. How the that ####ty O linethat's laughable . . .a person has to have value in order for someone to want him . . .which team would give up a draft pick for him??Obviously, no one . . .ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
Yeah I just read about that over at FO. They seem to think it would be a good move for Minnesota, although they're understandably less than impressed with the receivers he'd have to work with. Are the Vikings really planning on starting Williamson, Wade, and Vishancoe (sp)?Another good spot for him would be Minnesota..............
Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.
I think he goes to baltimore or Miami w/Dom.Yeah I just read about that over at FO. They seem to think it would be a good move for Minnesota, although they're understandably less than impressed with the receivers he'd have to work with. Are the Vikings really planning on starting Williamson, Wade, and Vishancoe (sp)?Another good spot for him would be Minnesota..............
So, 249 sacks in 5 years were all his fault?Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.
Thanks people said that LT had one of the worst lines too. Peyton too. but a good player changes those thoughts quickly.Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.
I follow them and the line is poor. They aren't to bad at run blocking, but the pass blocking need some work to say the least. It was unfortunate losing Spencer.Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.
The first year the line was bad for Carr.year 2&3 not so bad.year 4&5 carr was snake bit and turned into a pretty boy. (most of those sacks were his fault. Year 4 i think Banks came in and didn't get sacked very much.So, 249 sacks in 5 years were all his fault?Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.
I think he has to clear waivers but with his contract that should not be a problem!Carr is on the waiver wire now correct? Of is just available to first come first served?
Doesn't Manning and LT both have one of the best lines in the game? I do believe at the time both players were drafted the o-line had key additions. A good player is only as good as the players that surround him.Thanks people said that LT had one of the worst lines too. Peyton too. but a good player changes those thoughts quickly.Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.
nope both had rookie lineman their first year.Doesn't Manning and LT both have one of the best lines in the game? I do believe at the time both players were drafted the o-line had key additions. A good player is only as good as the players that surround him.Thanks people said that LT had one of the worst lines too. Peyton too. but a good player changes those thoughts quickly.Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.
Ya know...I use to blame it all on the O-line too (that O-line still sucks no matter what). But when you look at the QB friendly coaches he's had it appears more of the blame should go on Carr's shoulders.You figure he had Chris Palmer who was supposed to be Mike Martz before Mike Martz was Mike Martz. Then he had Kubiak who made Plummer a pro-bowler. So either those two guys aren't all their cracked up to be, or Carr just isn't that good.I think Houston is pretty much a cluster F%$& being ran by monkeys or something. First, they commit all that money to Carr last year and say he's their man. Then they pass on VY AND BUSH! Then they give a DE with degenerative foot problems #1 pick moolah. And now they cut their supposed QB of the "present and future". Top that off with giving up a higher #1, and two 2nd rounders for an unproven, unimpressive backup Qb in Schaub! Man that 50% completion percentage with that 50% TD/INT ratio is pri-ttee impressive.That's the one!Is that the same one that fat ron dayne averaged 5.3 ypc behind? 5.8 ypc over the last 5 games where carr had 1 TD and 5 INT's. That ####ty o-line? Just asking.The QB always gets all the blame. How the that ####ty O linethat's laughable . . .a person has to have value in order for someone to want him . . .which team would give up a draft pick for him??Obviously, no one . . .ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
I think so too. I'm just saying if the Raiders really were interested in trading for him, we'll now know as they have first shot at him. (Maybe they try to get him to restructure his contract ahead of time and pick him up for nothing, is what I'd like to see)I think he has to clear waivers but with his contract that should not be a problem!Carr is on the waiver wire now correct? Of is just available to first come first served?
McCown should have a cap freindly contract, I dont know this for sure, just speculating, and could draw some interest via a trade.IIRC, Martz loved Carr during the draft. I know Detroit has McCown and Orlovsky, but maybe they sign Carr as a flier?
"I think Carr's in a class by himself," St. Louis coach Mike Martz said.That's the only quote I can find from before the draft, but I think that at least convinces me I wasn't making it up.IIRC, Martz loved Carr during the draft. I know Detroit has McCown and Orlovsky, but maybe they sign Carr as a flier?
I don't see why Carr would do that.I think so too. I'm just saying if the Raiders really were interested in trading for him, we'll now know as they have first shot at him. (Maybe they try to get him to restructure his contract ahead of time and pick him up for nothing, is what I'd like to see)I think he has to clear waivers but with his contract that should not be a problem!Carr is on the waiver wire now correct? Of is just available to first come first served?
Ragone was trash almost got all our wrs killed. And believe me when I say that the 60% completion by Carr is highly overrated. He not a bad qb but he just plays very uninspiring football. And I think that line got tired of being blame for all the sacks (most of which was about 50/50) i honestly think they quit on him. There were plenty of times that I saw that line make a perfect pocket for him and he lokked at one guy and if he didn't have it would roll out and get sacked other than stepping up and taking a chance on a deep route.Hey Chase since your good with stats..... I bet if you check to see what team had the least amout of yards for pass interference calls I bet the texans are at the bottom because they never gave the wrs a chance to fight for deep balls.I'm not claiming this to be the be-all, end-all, but...David Carr completed 1242 of 2067 pass attempts (60%) for 13,374 yards (6.47 Y/A) while throwing 59 TD and 64 INT, for an average of 5.36 adjusted yards per pass.Sage Rosenfels (19%), Dave Ragone (18%) and Tony Banks (63%) completed 122 of 204 passes (59.8%) for 1,297 yards (6.36 Y/A) while throwing 9 TD and 6 INT for the Texans, an average of 5.48 adjusted yards per pass.We're dealing with a pretty small sample size, but it's not insignificant, either. And basically one part Rosenfels, one part Ragone and three parts Banks was just as good as David Carr.
I agree that the stumbling block was the contract. If he didn't agree to redo the contract, then any trade was dead in the water. He doesn't feel any loyalty to the Texan organization at this point. If you force them to cut you then he can negotiate with anyone he chooses.Its not that easy trading someone of that salary. Everyone knew they wouldn't be able to trade him but hoping someone would bit.ESPN reporting he has been released.Very nice move for Carr - Texans should have gotten SOMETHING............
I think that until he clears waivers, any team that picks him up has to honor his current contract. Meaning he will clear waivers. Then he is a free agent to negotiate with anyone.Carr is on the waiver wire now correct? Of is just available to first come first served?
I think you're in a class by yourself too, Chase, but that's not necessarily a good thing."I think Carr's in a class by himself," St. Louis coach Mike Martz said.That's the only quote I can find from before the draft, but I think that at least convinces me I wasn't making it up.IIRC, Martz loved Carr during the draft. I know Detroit has McCown and Orlovsky, but maybe they sign Carr as a flier?
i forgot about this, but was going to say DET anyways...harrington went right after carr, i think... that would be weird with harrington & carr busting if carr ended up succeeding with lions as reclamation project...what about CHI? CAR? JAX?IIRC, Martz loved Carr during the draft. I know Detroit has McCown and Orlovsky, but maybe they sign Carr as a flier?
I think CAR makes a lot of sense. He can back up Delhomme - who may be on shaky ground if he starts off poor. He can come in without worrying about being the saviour; instead he can just learn the system. And, it may be the quickest road to a starting position on a good team.i forgot about this, but was going to say DET anyways...harrington went right after carr, i think... that would be weird with harrington & carr busting if carr ended up succeeding with lions as reclamation project...what about CHI? CAR? JAX?IIRC, Martz loved Carr during the draft. I know Detroit has McCown and Orlovsky, but maybe they sign Carr as a flier?
Cleveland should make a run for Carr and get AP in the draft.i forgot about this, but was going to say DET anyways...harrington went right after carr, i think... that would be weird with harrington & carr busting if carr ended up succeeding with lions as reclamation project...what about CHI? CAR? JAX?IIRC, Martz loved Carr during the draft. I know Detroit has McCown and Orlovsky, but maybe they sign Carr as a flier?
Well, in 2005 they gave up 68 sacks, in 2006 it was 43 - T23rd. Not good, but again not horrible. If Spencer returns, they'll have 2 second year starters and solid depth for the first time in the franchise history. So yes, the line needs to improve, but on a team that is overall bad, it wasn't a true weak spot.So, 249 sacks in 5 years were all his fault?Only people that don't follow the team think their line is bad. Its not great, but its not bad.I hope Schaub learned some of Vicks moves....with that O-line he's gonna need it......maybe they can spend of few of their picks this year on a couple of O-lineman.