What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Texas and California have more registered sex offenders (1 Viewer)

johnnycakes

Footballguy
Texas and California each have more registered sex offenders than all of New England plus New York state and New Jersey combined. Link.

 
What is the population breakdown of Cali/Tex vs NE+NY+NJ?
seriously, what the #### is this nonsense?

I bet California and Texas have more of just about everything than the rest of the country combined.
According to wikipedia, Texas and California have a shade under 65 million people combined.

When I added up New York, NJ, Mass, Conn., Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Maine, and Vermont, I got a shade over 43.1 million people combined.

 
I'm pretty sure that Governor Christie is not going to start an ad campaign, "Come to New Jersey, we have less registered sex offenders than California!"

I'm just saying.

 
Someone should put that station on some type of list where offenders are prevented from teaching kids math. Ministry of Pain's List or something.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At first I thought we'd have to look at each state's sex offender statutes and probably conclude that California and Texas have more broad registration laws.

But no, just simple math shows have stupid this statistic is.

 
At first I thought we'd have to look at each state's sex offender statutes and probably conclude that California and Texas have more broad registration laws.

But no, just simple math shows have stupid this statistic is.
Well, it gives us something to kick around on Friday. Plus, who doesn't like to crap on Texas?

 
At first I thought we'd have to look at each state's sex offender statutes and probably conclude that California and Texas have more broad registration laws.

But no, just simple math shows have stupid this statistic is.
Well, it gives us something to kick around on Friday. Plus, who doesn't like to crap on Texas?
Kick around the use of misleading statements?

 
At first I thought we'd have to look at each state's sex offender statutes and probably conclude that California and Texas have more broad registration laws.

But no, just simple math shows have stupid this statistic is.
Well, it gives us something to kick around on Friday. Plus, who doesn't like to crap on Texas?
Kick around the use of misleading statements?
What's misleading?

On a per capita basis,

CA = 0.2143%

TX = 0.3071%

NE+NY+NY = 0.0615%

That makes CA 3.484 times higher than NE+NY+NY and makes TX almost 5 times higher.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At first I thought we'd have to look at each state's sex offender statutes and probably conclude that California and Texas have more broad registration laws.

But no, just simple math shows have stupid this statistic is.
Well, it gives us something to kick around on Friday. Plus, who doesn't like to crap on Texas?
Kick around the use of misleading statements?
What's misleading?On a per capita basis,

CA = 0.2143%

TX = 0.3071%

NE+NY+NY = 0.0615%

That makes CA 3.484 times higher than NE+NY+NY and makes TX almost 5 times higher.
I read it as TX and CA combined. Whoops

 
I'm not going to bother with the links.

Is there a breakdown of how many offenders are repeat offenders? Like some sort of criminal : # of victims ratio?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top