Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
Yes, I’m not that concerned about the rankings really anyway. It’s opinion and we like what we like.
I appreciate him creating the forum.
I appreciate him creating the forum.
You misunderstood me. I don’t dislike this movie. It’s a memorable visual spectacle. I appreciate its greatness, I just didn’t enjoy it so much.I guess, as usual I do not get the point of these lists. If these are your rankings why rank movies you don't like?
ETA: didn’t mean “do not get the point” like it sounded. I meant it more literally.
Now wait just one damn minute!I would rather watch The Wrath of Khan than 81/2 or The Bicycle Thieves. But I know the latter two are much better films. I take that into account.
No, they are not better. They are just artier.Now wait just one damn minute!I would rather watch The Wrath of Khan than 81/2 or The Bicycle Thieves. But I know the latter two are much better films. I take that into account.
#3 of John Cazale's entire filmography of five films listed so far, with the remaining two undoubtedly way way up there.34. The Conversation (1974)
Directed by: Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Gene Hackman, John Cazale, Cindy Williams
Synopsis: A surveillance expert hears about a planned murder by accident.
I’m not afraid of death but I am afraid of murder. -Gene Hackman as Harry Caul
A forgotten classic at this point, but one of Coppola’s absolute best films and arguably Gene Hackman’s greatest role. Just an excellent, extremely tense thriller.
You're a tough crowd.I cannot watch Peter Sellers. Every role looks like all the others. Just irritating.
I cannot watch Peter Sellers. Every role looks like all the others. Just irritating.
33. Being There (1979)
Directed by: Hal Ashby
Starring: Peter Sellers, Shirley MacLaine, Melvyn Douglas
Synopsis: A mentally challenged gardener is mistaken for a brilliant philosopher.
As long as the roots are severed, all is well in the garden.- Peter Sellers as Chance
A sharp and brilliant satire. Designed to lampoon those people who tend to prop up certain artists as “profound”. Peter Sellers in one of his greatest roles. (And last.)
Huh. Not what I've found. And certainly not with Being There.I cannot watch Peter Sellers. Every role looks like all the others. Just irritating.
George c Scott? Sterling Hayden? And many others... This is in my top 3 and I'm not in Dales generation.I cannot watch Peter Sellers. Every role looks like all the others. Just irritating.
I barely can, either, and I was wondering why. Is Dr. Strangelove really that good of a movie? wikkid would say yes and that you needed to be from that generation to get it. I personally found it slightly boring because of Sellers, and I wanted to like it. Terry Southern wrote it and back then I considered Terry Southern hot **** as a writer.
“Who do I have to **** to get off of this set?” - Blue Movie
All five of his films were nominated for the Best Picture Oscar.#3 of John Cazale's entire filmography of five films listed so far, with the remaining two undoubtedly way way up there.34. The Conversation (1974)
Directed by: Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Gene Hackman, John Cazale, Cindy Williams
Synopsis: A surveillance expert hears about a planned murder by accident.
I’m not afraid of death but I am afraid of murder. -Gene Hackman as Harry Caul
A forgotten classic at this point, but one of Coppola’s absolute best films and arguably Gene Hackman’s greatest role. Just an excellent, extremely tense thriller.
Oliver! beat The Lion in Winter. Forrest Gump beat Quiz Show and The Shawshank Remdemption. Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.All five of his films were nominated for the Best Picture Oscar.#3 of John Cazale's entire filmography of five films listed so far, with the remaining two undoubtedly way way up there.34. The Conversation (1974)
Directed by: Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Gene Hackman, John Cazale, Cindy Williams
Synopsis: A surveillance expert hears about a planned murder by accident.
I’m not afraid of death but I am afraid of murder. -Gene Hackman as Harry Caul
A forgotten classic at this point, but one of Coppola’s absolute best films and arguably Gene Hackman’s greatest role. Just an excellent, extremely tense thriller.
Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.
IMO The Graduate was a better film than either Oliver! or The Lion in Winter. But…I like Oliver!…I don’t find it crap.Oliver! beat The Lion in Winter. Forrest Gump beat Quiz Show and The Shawshank Remdemption. Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.All five of his films were nominated for the Best Picture Oscar.#3 of John Cazale's entire filmography of five films listed so far, with the remaining two undoubtedly way way up there.34. The Conversation (1974)
Directed by: Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Gene Hackman, John Cazale, Cindy Williams
Synopsis: A surveillance expert hears about a planned murder by accident.
I’m not afraid of death but I am afraid of murder. -Gene Hackman as Harry Caul
A forgotten classic at this point, but one of Coppola’s absolute best films and arguably Gene Hackman’s greatest role. Just an excellent, extremely tense thriller.
I did and it was awful - the effect I mean: the movie was decently enjoyable. I'm very susceptible to the Uncanny Valley effect and this instance was even worse than Rogue One.32. Alien (1979)
Directed by: Ridley Scott
Starring: Sigourney Weaver, Tom Skerritt, John Hurt, Ian Holm, Veronica Cartwright, Harry Dean Stanton
Synopsis: An alien creature invades a spaceship from Earth and attempts to kill all aboard.
Micro changes in air density my ***- Sigourney Weaver as Ripley
I see that in another thread here, this movie was selected as the greatest horror film of all time. That’s not at all a bad choice, but I find myself disagreeing with it, since I have another film in this category ranked above it on this list, and I also think this movie’s first sequel is just a little better as well.
Nonetheless this a great great movie. One of the plot elements that makes it so great is that the alien is not the only villain- Ian Holm as the incredibly creepy Ash gives a superb performance. (Speaking of which did anyone see Alien Romulus and what they did with Holm, who died in 2020, via CGI? That freaked me out.) a truly scary and marvelous flick.
I had to look up what this is.Uncanny Valley effect
36. A Clockwork Orange (1971)
34. The Conversation (1974)
32. Alien (1979)
Amen, brochacho! This right here is the crime of the century in this thread, all the other missteps pale in comparison.you left smokey and bandit off this list so you are dead to me and you are forbidden from using the words east bound or down take that to the bank brochacho
This is easily top 10 for me. Easily. I watch this movie over and over and it doesn’t get old.32. Alien (1979)
Directed by: Ridley Scott
Starring: Sigourney Weaver, Tom Skerritt, John Hurt, Ian Holm, Veronica Cartwright, Harry Dean Stanton
Synopsis: An alien creature invades a spaceship from Earth and attempts to kill all aboard.
Micro changes in air density my ***- Sigourney Weaver as Ripley
I see that in another thread here, this movie was selected as the greatest horror film of all time. That’s not at all a bad choice, but I find myself disagreeing with it, since I have another film in this category ranked above it on this list, and I also think this movie’s first sequel is just a little better as well.
Nonetheless this a great great movie. One of the plot elements that makes it so great is that the alien is not the only villain- Ian Holm as the incredibly creepy Ash gives a superb performance. (Speaking of which did anyone see Alien Romulus and what they did with Holm, who died in 2020, via CGI? That freaked me out.) a truly scary and marvelous flick.
I went and checked his filmography. I don't like any of those movies. Not a ding on his acting skills.IMO The Graduate was a better film than either Oliver! or The Lion in Winter. But…I like Oliver!…I don’t find it crap.Oliver! beat The Lion in Winter. Forrest Gump beat Quiz Show and The Shawshank Remdemption. Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.All five of his films were nominated for the Best Picture Oscar.#3 of John Cazale's entire filmography of five films listed so far, with the remaining two undoubtedly way way up there.34. The Conversation (1974)
Directed by: Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Gene Hackman, John Cazale, Cindy Williams
Synopsis: A surveillance expert hears about a planned murder by accident.
I’m not afraid of death but I am afraid of murder. -Gene Hackman as Harry Caul
A forgotten classic at this point, but one of Coppola’s absolute best films and arguably Gene Hackman’s greatest role. Just an excellent, extremely tense thriller.
I’m also curious about you making this point here. Is there one or more of the Cazale films that you don’t find worthy? Which one?
I think that Shawshank should have won. Pulp Fiction was brilliant in some places and lousy in others.Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.
Forrest Gump is not crap. It’s a darn good movie. It didn’t blow my mind like Pulp Fiction, the film that should have won, did—but it was a good movie.
Shawshank might be the most overrated movie in historyI think that Shawshank should have won. Pulp Fiction was brilliant in some places and lousy in others.Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.
Forrest Gump is not crap. It’s a darn good movie. It didn’t blow my mind like Pulp Fiction, the film that should have won, did—but it was a good movie.
Fart jokes are too offensive these days, so I’d say no.31. Blazing Saddles (1974)
Directed by: Mel Brooks
Starring: Cleavon Little, Gene Wilder, Harvey Korman, Slim Pickens, Madeleine Kahn, Burton Gilliam, Alex Karras
Synopsis: The town of Rock Ridge is saved from destruction by a black sheriff.
Hey where the white women at? - Cleavon Little as Bart.
Still a classic, still one of the funniest films ever, still Mel Brooks’ finest effort. Could it be made today? Possibly not.
Your taste in movies is a little suspect.Shawshank might be the most overrated movie in historyI think that Shawshank should have won. Pulp Fiction was brilliant in some places and lousy in others.Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.
Forrest Gump is not crap. It’s a darn good movie. It didn’t blow my mind like Pulp Fiction, the film that should have won, did—but it was a good movie.
Don’t get me wrong it’s a good movie, but nowhere near deserving of the best of all time status it gets
Blueberry pancakes?I think that Shawshank should have won. Pulp Fiction was brilliant in some places and lousy in others.Crap gets nominated and wins all the time.
Forrest Gump is not crap. It’s a darn good movie. It didn’t blow my mind like Pulp Fiction, the film that should have won, did—but it was a good movie.
Uh-oh. This can't end well.the most annoying earwig song in cinematic history
Beats me.Earwig?
I'll take "things that Andy Dufresne wouldn't say" for $100, Alex.And anyway, **** Stephen King. The guys a lunatic and is no more the arbiter of what constitutes horror than anyone else.But there are supernatural elements in Halloween. When Michael sits up after getting stabbed in the eye and when Loomis looks over the balcony and sees nothing but an imprint, that's surreal and supernatural and that's what added to the suspense dramatically, imo.42. Halloween (1978)
Directed by: John Carpenter
Starring: Jamie Lee Curtis, Donald Pleasance
Synopsis: Crazed killer escapes from asylum and threatens baby-sitter.
I realized that what was living between that boy’s eyes was purely and simply…evil. - Donald Pleasance as Dr. Loomis
The original film in the franchise is less gory and far more suspenseful than its many sequels, IMO. There are also no supernatural elements which, in Stephen King’s definition (which has already created some controversy here) makes it not really a horror film at all but a suspense thriller ala Psycho. But most critics would rank both films as among the greatest horror films of all time.
Personally I enjoyed this film when it came out and was reasonably scared but it created a “slasher” genre which I really have not enjoyed over the years: this film’s endless sequels, the Friday the 13th movies, the Scream movies, etc. Each one with the same basic plot, a similar group of teenagers all of whom die but one, and bloody gory slashing and killing. I know these films must make a ton of money or Hollywood wouldn’t keep churning them out year after year, but I’ve never been a fan.
What about the score? Surely that at least rates a comment? It is groundbreaking and integral to the film as well imo.36. A Clockwork Orange (1971)
Directed by: Stanley Kubrick
Starring: Malcolm McDowell, Patrick Magee
Synopsis: In a future dystopian England, a sociopath rapist undergoes experimental “rehabilitation”.
I was cured, all right! - Malcolm McDowell as Alex
This is a visually stunning movie. I saw it at a midnight showing during my college years. It is highly regarded as one of the greatest films of the 20th century, and most of the critics lists of 70s films have this movie at the very top.
I couldn’t do that. For me, as I wrote, it is visually stunning, but that’s about it. The excessive violence (particularly in the first third of the film) and subsequent storyline lacks real drama for two reasons- first off, just as in the novel (which I tried to read and failed) the language barrier is too great- whatever this slang is supposed to be I can’t figure out what they’re saying and I don’t want to spend my time deciphering it.
The second reason is- Kubrick always leaves me cold. I have tried to watch and enjoy almost all of his films and with very few exceptions (Spartacus, the first 20 minutes of Full Metal Jacket) I just find his movies uninteresting, lacking the character development and drama I need to love a film. I don’t even have Barry Lyndon (1975) on this list because it’s so incredibly dull to me.
This film does belong on this list, and pretty high, because, once again, it’s so visually stunning, groundbreaking really, and there’s something incredibly charismatic about Malcolm McDowell’s performance. But 36 is as high as I could go.
earwormBeats me.Earwig?
I watched this last week. I was all excited as I liked it 20 years ago. But frankly the movie stinks. The comedy has not stood the test of time. It's fairly depressing too The TV show was much better and lighter hearted. I think if people sat down and watched this, 1) they'd be lucky to last 30 mins and 2) it would not crack their top 200 of the 1970s. And agree Tim ... the song has awful words. It's a nice instrumental, but the words will make one actually want to go through with it. How this ranks above Patton is crazy especially as another war movie. Acting, story, and directing all 10x better in Patton.30. M*A*S*H* (1970)
Directed by: Robert Altman
Starring: Elliot Gould, Donald Sutherland, Sally Kellerman
Synopsis: Adventures of a mobile hospital unit during the Korean War
This isn’t a hospital, it’s an insane asylum!- Sally Kellerman as “Hotlips”
I had to lower this movie in the rankings by a point or two for introducing us to the most annoying earwig song in cinematic history, “Suicide Is Painless” complete with lyrics that were thankfully removed from the TV show.
But beyond that horror, this film is practically the definition of “black comedy”, and I think makes the point about the madness of war much better than Catch-22 ever did.
I'll take "things that Andy Dufresne wouldn't say" for $100, Alex.And anyway, **** Stephen King. The guys a lunatic and is no more the arbiter of what constitutes horror than anyone else.But there are supernatural elements in Halloween. When Michael sits up after getting stabbed in the eye and when Loomis looks over the balcony and sees nothing but an imprint, that's surreal and supernatural and that's what added to the suspense dramatically, imo.42. Halloween (1978)
Directed by: John Carpenter
Starring: Jamie Lee Curtis, Donald Pleasance
Synopsis: Crazed killer escapes from asylum and threatens baby-sitter.
I realized that what was living between that boy’s eyes was purely and simply…evil. - Donald Pleasance as Dr. Loomis
The original film in the franchise is less gory and far more suspenseful than its many sequels, IMO. There are also no supernatural elements which, in Stephen King’s definition (which has already created some controversy here) makes it not really a horror film at all but a suspense thriller ala Psycho. But most critics would rank both films as among the greatest horror films of all time.
Personally I enjoyed this film when it came out and was reasonably scared but it created a “slasher” genre which I really have not enjoyed over the years: this film’s endless sequels, the Friday the 13th movies, the Scream movies, etc. Each one with the same basic plot, a similar group of teenagers all of whom die but one, and bloody gory slashing and killing. I know these films must make a ton of money or Hollywood wouldn’t keep churning them out year after year, but I’ve never been a fan.
Right with you. How that movie came out of the book is a mystery. The book is so much better.I watched this last week. I was all excited as I liked it 20 years ago. But frankly the movie stinks. The comedy has not stood the test of time. It's fairly depressing too The TV show was much better and lighter hearted. I think if people sat down and watched this, 1) they'd be lucky to last 30 mins and 2) it would not crack their top 200 of the 1970s. And agree Tim ... the song has awful words. It's a nice instrumental, but the words will make one actually want to go through with it. How this ranks above Patton is crazy especially as another war movie. Acting, story, and directing all 10x better in Patton.30. M*A*S*H* (1970)
Directed by: Robert Altman
Starring: Elliot Gould, Donald Sutherland, Sally Kellerman
Synopsis: Adventures of a mobile hospital unit during the Korean War
This isn’t a hospital, it’s an insane asylum!- Sally Kellerman as “Hotlips”
I had to lower this movie in the rankings by a point or two for introducing us to the most annoying earwig song in cinematic history, “Suicide Is Painless” complete with lyrics that were thankfully removed from the TV show.
But beyond that horror, this film is practically the definition of “black comedy”, and I think makes the point about the madness of war much better than Catch-22 ever did.