What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The 70's were the best decade of rock music. Challenge me on this (1 Viewer)

I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
Both of which are better than 99% of the drivel passed off as television entertainment today, Especially on the Big 3.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
I agree that there has been a ton of great music in the 00s and 10s, but the difference between the great newer music and, say, the 70s is that most of the best music back then was actually played on the radio and was known, while much of the great stuff nowadays is not very mainstream. To say the landscape has changed would be an understatement, so while you have to look harder now to find the great music, it's not like it's not out there.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
I agree. I loved classic rock junior high-college. I went though many different phases of it, but 80% of it now I just don't want to listen to anymore. That isn't even a vote for modern rock as much as it is a vote for listening to music that isn't rock.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
I listen to plenty of new music. Almost everything I listened to today is from this decade. But when comparing past decades, I'll take the '70s

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
I agree that there has been a ton of great music in the 00s and 10s, but the difference between the great newer music and, say, the 70s is that most of the best music back then was actually played on the radio and was known, while much of the great stuff nowadays is not very mainstream. To say the landscape has changed would be an understatement, so while you have to look harder now to find the great music, it's not like it's not out there.
Current technology makes it a lot easier to look for new (and old) music. I probably averaged an hour a week of digging through crates at record stores between my high school years and when my kids were born. Radio in the 70s was much better than the tightly formatted, commercial heavy dreck that's on the air now but even big cities only had at most a handful of good stations back then. There's a tendency to romanticize old radio but there was still some stuff that made me run across the room to change the station. Today you can listen to thousands of streaming stations from around the world and curated playlists of just about any kind of music.

 
Just to be clear, not all of us still into older stuff have exhausted the vaults of music we didn't hear the first time around. Like most people I could not afford to buy everything that came out back then so I listened to a sampling of each artist that rarely included what is now called "deep cuts". So it's not always "the same old things" but instead "new old things".

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
I agree that there has been a ton of great music in the 00s and 10s, but the difference between the great newer music and, say, the 70s is that most of the best music back then was actually played on the radio and was known, while much of the great stuff nowadays is not very mainstream. To say the landscape has changed would be an understatement, so while you have to look harder now to find the great music, it's not like it's not out there.
Current technology makes it a lot easier to look for new (and old) music. I probably averaged an hour a week of digging through crates at record stores between my high school years and when my kids were born. Radio in the 70s was much better than the tightly formatted, commercial heavy dreck that's on the air now but even big cities only had at most a handful of good stations back then. There's a tendency to romanticize old radio but there was still some stuff that made me run across the room to change the station. Today you can listen to thousands of streaming stations from around the world and curated playlists of just about any kind of music.
Even in the last few years, it has improved drastically. Spotify changed my life. I'll be reading about a new band or some random hard to find recoding of Wagner or something and instantly I have the whole thing on my phone, computer and in my car. It's nuts.
 
Just to be clear, not all of us still into older stuff have exhausted the vaults of music we didn't hear the first time around. Like most people I could not afford to buy everything that came out back then so I listened to a sampling of each artist that rarely included what is now called "deep cuts". So it's not always "the same old things" but instead "new old things".
Great point tying into the other conversation. I forget what it's like not to be able to listen to whatever you want whenever you want for little to no money.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
I agree that there has been a ton of great music in the 00s and 10s, but the difference between the great newer music and, say, the 70s is that most of the best music back then was actually played on the radio and was known, while much of the great stuff nowadays is not very mainstream. To say the landscape has changed would be an understatement, so while you have to look harder now to find the great music, it's not like it's not out there.
Current technology makes it a lot easier to look for new (and old) music. I probably averaged an hour a week of digging through crates at record stores between my high school years and when my kids were born. Radio in the 70s was much better than the tightly formatted, commercial heavy dreck that's on the air now but even big cities only had at most a handful of good stations back then. There's a tendency to romanticize old radio but there was still some stuff that made me run across the room to change the station. Today you can listen to thousands of streaming stations from around the world and curated playlists of just about any kind of music.
Even in the last few years, it has improved drastically. Spotify changed my life. I'll be reading about a new band or some random hard to find recoding of Wagner or something and instantly I have the whole thing on my phone, computer and in my car. It's nuts.
Yeah, I think I follow you on Spotify based on one of the playlists you posted in another thread. You have very eclectic tastes.

It's an incredible tool for non-linear exploration.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
The late 70's was also a great time in music when a lot of fresh music was being produced: Punk, New Wave, Ska, Reggae, even disco produced a lot of new and different types of music to listen to on the radio. Of course, none of it is new now because it is not in the present, The present day always has the ability to have original music; that does not always mean it will be good music.

 
Can you guys recommend some King Crimson? I picked up a CD at the library and was underwhelmed.
Court of the Crimson King. If you don't like that one then you probably won't like the others.
Disagree. Their '70s stuff is much different. I like their first but its far from my favorite KC.
I am going with NC here - start with Court of the Crimson King. If you like 70s prog rock - its one of the founding fathers.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
I agree that there has been a ton of great music in the 00s and 10s, but the difference between the great newer music and, say, the 70s is that most of the best music back then was actually played on the radio and was known, while much of the great stuff nowadays is not very mainstream. To say the landscape has changed would be an understatement, so while you have to look harder now to find the great music, it's not like it's not out there.
Current technology makes it a lot easier to look for new (and old) music. I probably averaged an hour a week of digging through crates at record stores between my high school years and when my kids were born. Radio in the 70s was much better than the tightly formatted, commercial heavy dreck that's on the air now but even big cities only had at most a handful of good stations back then. There's a tendency to romanticize old radio but there was still some stuff that made me run across the room to change the station. Today you can listen to thousands of streaming stations from around the world and curated playlists of just about any kind of music.
Even in the last few years, it has improved drastically. Spotify changed my life. I'll be reading about a new band or some random hard to find recoding of Wagner or something and instantly I have the whole thing on my phone, computer and in my car. It's nuts.
Yeah, I think I follow you on Spotify based on one of the playlists you posted in another thread. You have very eclectic tastes.

It's an incredible tool for non-linear exploration.
Speaking of which, I need to update my 2014 list. I've been on a huge classical and jazz run.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
The late 70's was also a great time in music when a lot of fresh music was being produced: Punk, New Wave, Ska, Reggae, even disco produced a lot of new and different types of music to listen to on the radio. Of course, none of it is new now because it is not in the present, The present day always has the ability to have original music; that does not always mean it will be good music.
It wasn't all good music then either. You're comparing the 70s all-stars against the entire 2014 league including expansion teams.

 
Can you guys recommend some King Crimson? I picked up a CD at the library and was underwhelmed.
Court of the Crimson King. If you don't like that one then you probably won't like the others.
Disagree. Their '70s stuff is much different. I like their first but its far from my favorite KC.
I am going with NC here - start with Court of the Crimson King. If you like 70s prog rock - its one of the founding fathers.
Won't argue that. But I disagree if you don't like Court you probably won't like the others. They are different. I like the others and Court not so much.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
I agree that there has been a ton of great music in the 00s and 10s, but the difference between the great newer music and, say, the 70s is that most of the best music back then was actually played on the radio and was known, while much of the great stuff nowadays is not very mainstream. To say the landscape has changed would be an understatement, so while you have to look harder now to find the great music, it's not like it's not out there.
Current technology makes it a lot easier to look for new (and old) music. I probably averaged an hour a week of digging through crates at record stores between my high school years and when my kids were born. Radio in the 70s was much better than the tightly formatted, commercial heavy dreck that's on the air now but even big cities only had at most a handful of good stations back then. There's a tendency to romanticize old radio but there was still some stuff that made me run across the room to change the station. Today you can listen to thousands of streaming stations from around the world and curated playlists of just about any kind of music.
Even in the last few years, it has improved drastically. Spotify changed my life. I'll be reading about a new band or some random hard to find recoding of Wagner or something and instantly I have the whole thing on my phone, computer and in my car. It's nuts.
Yeah, I think I follow you on Spotify based on one of the playlists you posted in another thread. You have very eclectic tastes.

It's an incredible tool for non-linear exploration.
Speaking of which, I need to update my 2014 list. I've been on a huge classical and jazz run.
Spotify is great for classical. The ability to listen back-to-back to multiple different interpretations of the same piece of music has really increased my appreciation for the classics.

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Actually Tim Proto-Punk was the percursor to punk. The Who was a big part of the growth of proto-punk. So that's why I said they were a big part of the birth of punk.

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.
The early Who were a contradiction. They were mod, but you can't miss the punk roots. Ironic as punk and mod couldn't be more opposite in aesthetic.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
You mean like all the r&b and hiphop rap that floods the airwaves?
Yes, exactly what I meant. :rolleyes:

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.
The early Who were a contradiction. They were mod, but you can't miss the punk roots. Ironic as punk and mod couldn't be more opposite in aesthetic.
Mod was pretty much over by 1969. Aside from being one of the best live albums ever, Live at Leeds has a lot of punk qualities to it, except for all the guitar solos.

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.
Yeah, but you can say that about most 60s "garage" style rock: early Kinks even more so, "Wooly Bully", "Louie Louie", even the early Beatles' covers of Chuck Berry have a "punk" sense to them. But the Who changed rather quickly.

Bands like The Jam and some other New Wave bands of the early 80s owe an awful lot to the Who- (Joy Division is another example.) But punk, not so much IMO.

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.
Yeah, but you can say that about most 60s "garage" style rock: early Kinks even more so, "Wooly Bully", "Louie Louie", even the early Beatles' covers of Chuck Berry have a "punk" sense to them. But the Who changed rather quickly.Bands like The Jam and some other New Wave bands of the early 80s owe an awful lot to the Who- (Joy Division is another example.) But punk, not so much IMO.
The Kinks definitely had a significant influence on punk.

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.
The early Who were a contradiction. They were mod, but you can't miss the punk roots. Ironic as punk and mod couldn't be more opposite in aesthetic.
Mod was pretty much over by 1969. Aside from being one of the best live albums ever, Live at Leeds has a lot of punk qualities to it, except for all the guitar solos.
Yeah but My Generation was recorded in 65.

 
eoMMan said:
Ghost Rider said:
eoMMan said:
NYSNC

Nirvana

Pearl Jam

NKOTB

98 Degrees

La Bouche

Should I go on?
If you are trying to demonstrate how mediocre the 90s were as far as mainstream music goes, congratulations, you have succeeded admirably.
I was joking but seriously, the 90s were the best OVERALL decade for music. Many different types in that decade to suit different people. It was like just one genre took over.
OH wow

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.
This.

 
I think we're currently in the best decade for music, period. The 60's and 70's were great, but still controlled by the music industry. There's much more variety now then ever before.
Meh
I just dont see how people continue to listen to this same tired stuff over and over. :shrug:
The current decade is the only one that offers the possibility (however slim) of producing something fresh, different and amazing. I'm old but I haven't lost the feelings of anticipation and excitement over listening to new music. Old music is great but this thread is the musical equivalent of people exclusively watching reruns of Happy Days and The Rockford Files.
The late 70's was also a great time in music when a lot of fresh music was being produced: Punk, New Wave, Ska, Reggae, even disco produced a lot of new and different types of music to listen to on the radio. Of course, none of it is new now because it is not in the present, The present day always has the ability to have original music; that does not always mean it will be good music.
It wasn't all good music then either. You're comparing the 70s all-stars against the entire 2014 league including expansion teams.
No, I was just responding to his point that current music is better because it is new. New does not always mean better. 80's music was new in the 80's, that does not mean it was better the 70's music.

 
eoMMan said:
Ghost Rider said:
eoMMan said:
NYSNC

Nirvana

Pearl Jam

NKOTB

98 Degrees

La Bouche

Should I go on?
If you are trying to demonstrate how mediocre the 90s were as far as mainstream music goes, congratulations, you have succeeded admirably.
I was joking but seriously, the 90s were the best OVERALL decade for music. Many different types in that decade to suit different people. It was like just one genre took over.
OH wow
I think we should have some of what he's smoking.
 
Can you guys recommend some King Crimson? I picked up a CD at the library and was underwhelmed.
Was that after the milkman came and left the glass jar at your door?
Driving gives me the most opportunities to listen to music. CD's are the easiest. I'm sure I could do some app through my bluetooth, but I still haven't figure out how to do itunes on my phone. :bag:

Listen, my Accord has Pandora and I feel like Dr. Emmett Brown.

 
The Who are Punk? Huh?
Yes they are widely considered to have been part of the birth of punk.
Yeah not really. I've read a few books about punk rock[s major influences: Jerry Lee Lewis and rockabilly, The Velvet Underground, Lou Reed, David Bowie, MC5, Iggy Pop, the New York Dolls, Brian Eno, etc.- the Who wasn't really mentioned.
Put down the books and listen to "My Generation" really loud.
The early Who were a contradiction. They were mod, but you can't miss the punk roots. Ironic as punk and mod couldn't be more opposite in aesthetic.
Mod was pretty much over by 1969.
:shrug:

Tell that to The Jam

 
Let's not forget Rolling Stone's artist of the decade for the 1970's.........Neil Young

Johnny Rotten states that his 1973 Hammersmith shows were the precursor to punk.

Known as "The Godfather of Grunge", idolized by Pearl Jam, RHCP, etc.

Closed out the seventies with side one of "Rust Never Sleeps"

Opened the eighties with side two of "Rust Never Sleeps"

Sued by his own record company in the eighties for making Neil Young music that didn't sound like Neil Young music.

Number one album and song in 1972, followed by three albums tearing all of that down.

Part of CSNY, the largest arena tour to date, left them as "Dead weight to me"

etc.

 
Let's not forget Rolling Stone's artist of the decade for the 1970's.........Neil Young

Johnny Rotten states that his 1973 Hammersmith shows were the precursor to punk.

Known as "The Godfather of Grunge", idolized by Pearl Jam, RHCP, etc.

Closed out the seventies with side one of "Rust Never Sleeps"

Opened the eighties with side two of "Rust Never Sleeps"

Sued by his own record company in the eighties for making Neil Young music that didn't sound like Neil Young music.

Number one album and song in 1972, followed by three albums tearing all of that down.

Part of CSNY, the largest arena tour to date, left them as "Dead weight to me"

etc.
But his best ever album, Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere, is from 1969, isn't it?
 
Can you guys recommend some King Crimson? I picked up a CD at the library and was underwhelmed.
Court of the Crimson King. If you don't like that one then you probably won't like the others.
Disagree. Their '70s stuff is much different. I like their first but its far from my favorite KC.
I am going with NC here - start with Court of the Crimson King. If you like 70s prog rock - its one of the founding fathers.
Won't argue that. But I disagree if you don't like Court you probably won't like the others. They are different. I like the others and Court not so much.
agreed

 
Let's not forget Rolling Stone's artist of the decade for the 1970's.........Neil Young
Just shows ya how clueless Rolling Stone is. I mean, Neil Young has some good stuff, but is he better than Floyd or Zeppelin? No freaking way.
I think that they were judging by the output, and the outstanding variety and quality of that output:

1970 - After The Goldrush

1971 - De Ja Vu

1972 - Harvest

1972 - Journey Through The Past

1973 - Time Fades Away

1974 - On The Beach

1975 - Tonight's The Night

1975 - Zuma

1976 - Long May You Run

1977 - Stars n' Bars

1977 - Decade

1978 - Comes A Time

1979 - Rust Never Sleeps

 
I don't think any of thesehave been mentioned...

Bob Seger and the Silver Bullet Band

England Dan and John Ford Coley

Firefall

Orleans

10cc

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top