Certain beliefs deserve derision.So this is where political discourse is at now, huh? Labeling the opposition with embarassing nicknames like "birthers" and "truthers" and "teabaggers" instead of engaging them in a real discussion. Good to see we're still a nation of 6 year olds.
Actually, the world isn't round. Bulges at the equator, flattens at the poles.When it's akin to saying you aren't sure if the world is round, yes, yes it does.Saying "I don't know" qualifies as a nutty statement now?How has this not gotten more play in the FFA? Or do we just all agree that Rick Perry is a nutjob?
I don't think he can possibly think it's any less worthy than me. If he did, "I don't know" is the last answer he should have used. Laughing in the guy's face would have been a better response than "I don't know"Maybe it was an issue he felt wasn't worth nearly as much attention as you seem to think it's worth....If that's his honest answer it's a glaring piece of evidence to the fact the guy is out of touch. That isn't bad? How's that saying go? It's better to keep your mouth shut and keep them guessing than to open it and remove all doubt" or something like that. That applies here.So you would prefer Perry lie?He was asked a question. He responded with honesty, "I don't know." How is that bad in any context?
Actually, the world isn't round. Bulges at the equator, flattens at the poles.When it's akin to saying you aren't sure if the world is round, yes, yes it does.Saying "I don't know" qualifies as a nutty statement now?How has this not gotten more play in the FFA? Or do we just all agree that Rick Perry is a nutjob?
 Touche
   ToucheWell then why did he bring it up in the Parade interview? Then, less than 24 hours later, he called it a big distraction?'Brock Middlebrook said:Maybe it was an issue he felt wasn't worth nearly as much attention as you seem to think it's worth....'The Commish said:If that's his honest answer it's a glaring piece of evidence to the fact the guy is out of touch. That isn't bad? How's that saying go? It's better to keep your mouth shut and keep them guessing than to open it and remove all doubt" or something like that. That applies here.'Joe T said:So you would prefer Perry lie?He was asked a question. He responded with honesty, "I don't know." How is that bad in any context?
It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
see, to put this whole birth certificate "issue" on the same level as WMDs is really just....wow....'17seconds said:How would you feel if Perry was asked if Iraq had WMDs in the early 90s and he said "I don't know"?'Brock Middlebrook said:Maybe it was an issue he felt wasn't worth nearly as much attention as you seem to think it's worth....'The Commish said:If that's his honest answer it's a glaring piece of evidence to the fact the guy is out of touch. That isn't bad? How's that saying go? It's better to keep your mouth shut and keep them guessing than to open it and remove all doubt" or something like that. That applies here.'Joe T said:So you would prefer Perry lie?He was asked a question. He responded with honesty, "I don't know." How is that bad in any context?
So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? How would you know? How would anyone know? It's logical to assume that someone could not have gotten this far without verification, but I'm not running around personally checking all the documents.Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
Oh come on!!So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? How would you know? How would anyone know? It's logical to assume that someone could not have gotten this far without verification, but I'm not running around personally checking all the documents.Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
I've been and will tell you if you can tell me if electrons really exist. I've never seen one to be able to verify.Do the people in France speak French? I don't know. I've never been there, so I can't verify that.
What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
Do you have to pay royalties to Christo on this silly cross-examination style parsing of words shtick? Come on, you're better than this.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
FWIW, I did not know that, and didn't even know that the Rangers were in the World Series. I would expect Rick Perry to know more about political stuff, however, than I know about baseball stuff. I'm not throwing my hat into the ring to become MLB Commissioner.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.
Just stop already.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
Edit: I really don't know what the media has done to actually verify any of this. This thing got so hyped everything I have seen is just people yammering at each other. It's certainly possible that a reliable source has actually verified it somehow.
Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.Come to think of it, there really isn't much evidence of most people's births. Not unless you were someone of importance anyway. You would have a birth certificate and maybe a hospital recording, but I've seen fake birth certificates (although I couldn't really say how good they were). I imagine a recording in a local paper would be the best evidence.Do you have to pay royalties to Christo on this silly cross-examination style parsing of words shtick? Come on, you're better than this.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
Did George Bush orchestrate the destruction of the world trade center?I assume you and Rick Perry would answer you don't know...Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.Come to think of it, there really isn't much evidence of most people's births. Not unless you were someone of importance anyway. You would have a birth certificate and maybe a hospital recording, but I've seen fake birth certificates (although I couldn't really say how good they were). I imagine a recording in a local paper would be the best evidence.Do you have to pay royalties to Christo on this silly cross-examination style parsing of words shtick? Come on, you're better than this.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
I assume Obama was born in the US, but I don't know for sure. That's the best answer I could give based on what I know. If that outrages you or makes me a "birther" then so be it.
I'm gonna assume this is shtick because I like you too much to think otherwise. Unless maybe you were stuck in a remote canyon 127 Hours-style or something when this happened? I'll assume it's one of the two.Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.
That's true. I actually don't know for sure. Based on the evidence I have seen I don't think he did, but I couldn't say with 100% certainty that he didn't.I would say there is a lot more evidence surrounding 911 than any particular indivudal birth record though.Did George Bush orchestrate the destruction of the world trade center?I assume you and Rick Perry would answer you don't know...Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.Come to think of it, there really isn't much evidence of most people's births. Not unless you were someone of importance anyway. You would have a birth certificate and maybe a hospital recording, but I've seen fake birth certificates (although I couldn't really say how good they were). I imagine a recording in a local paper would be the best evidence.Do you have to pay royalties to Christo on this silly cross-examination style parsing of words shtick? Come on, you're better than this.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
I assume Obama was born in the US, but I don't know for sure. That's the best answer I could give based on what I know. If that outrages you or makes me a "birther" then so be it.
obvious fakeI'm gonna assume this is shtick because I like you too much to think otherwise. Unless maybe you were stuck in a remote canyon 127 Hours-style or something when this happened? I'll assume it's one of the two.Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.
However, I'm pretty sure Perry was not stuck in a canyon or otherwise indisposed at that time, which means his comments are also either shtick or the statements of a moron or lunatic. No matter which, it's not very presidential. Although, sadly, those characteristics do seem to be increasingly frequent in the GOP presidential field, so I guess he kind of fits in there.
So you acknowledge that you don't know who caused 9/11 and you do not know that it was not all a grand plan by bush.That's true. I actually don't know for sure. Based on the evidence I have seen I don't think he did, but I couldn't say with 100% certainty that he didn't.I would say there is a lot more evidence surrounding 911 than any particular indivudal birth record though.Did George Bush orchestrate the destruction of the world trade center?I assume you and Rick Perry would answer you don't know...Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.Come to think of it, there really isn't much evidence of most people's births. Not unless you were someone of importance anyway. You would have a birth certificate and maybe a hospital recording, but I've seen fake birth certificates (although I couldn't really say how good they were). I imagine a recording in a local paper would be the best evidence.Do you have to pay royalties to Christo on this silly cross-examination style parsing of words shtick? Come on, you're better than this.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
I assume Obama was born in the US, but I don't know for sure. That's the best answer I could give based on what I know. If that outrages you or makes me a "birther" then so be it.
No, I didn't realize a complete birth certificate was ever released, but I stopped following the story long before it was. I have a tendency to gloss over things I have no interest in. I don't know the circumstances of the release, but if it was through the hospital and it was verified as original then that would be enough for me.I'm gonna assume this is shtick because I like you too much to think otherwise. Unless maybe you were stuck in a remote canyon 127 Hours-style or something when this happened? I'll assume it's one of the two.Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.
However, I'm pretty sure Perry was not stuck in a canyon or otherwise indisposed at that time, which means his comments are also either shtick or the statements of a moron or lunatic. No matter which, it's not very presidential. Although, sadly, those characteristics do seem to be increasingly frequent in the GOP presidential field, so I guess he kind of fits in there.
I've seen enough evidence to assume it wasn't Bush, but no, I can't say for 100% certainty that it wasn't a grand government conspiracy headed by Bush.So you acknowledge that you don't know who caused 9/11 and you do not know that it was not all a grand plan by bush.That's true. I actually don't know for sure. Based on the evidence I have seen I don't think he did, but I couldn't say with 100% certainty that he didn't.I would say there is a lot more evidence surrounding 911 than any particular indivudal birth record though.Did George Bush orchestrate the destruction of the world trade center?I assume you and Rick Perry would answer you don't know...Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.Come to think of it, there really isn't much evidence of most people's births. Not unless you were someone of importance anyway. You would have a birth certificate and maybe a hospital recording, but I've seen fake birth certificates (although I couldn't really say how good they were). I imagine a recording in a local paper would be the best evidence.Do you have to pay royalties to Christo on this silly cross-examination style parsing of words shtick? Come on, you're better than this.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.
I assume Obama was born in the US, but I don't know for sure. That's the best answer I could give based on what I know. If that outrages you or makes me a "birther" then so be it.
I'd love to see perry acknowledge that as well
We should set up a system of FBG credits for this.Do you have to pay royalties to Christo on this silly cross-examination style parsing of words shtick? Come on, you're better than this.What are you talking about? I can watch a recording of the World Series and it's documented in thousands of newspapers on the day it occurred. Your average Joe's birth doesn't garner that kind of recording or evidence.If anyone wants to send me a video recording of their birth and a snippet from the local newspaper I would scratch them off of my "I can't officially verify were you were born, but I will assume it's wherever you say" list.Oh, stop. This isn't a court of law. You can "know" things secondhand in the real world based on mountains of reports through the media. For example, I assume you would say you "know" that the Rangers won Game 5 of the World Series even though probably you weren't actually at the game. I assume you'd even say that if you didn't watch the game.So you're telling me everybody has personally verified all of this? Perry assumes Obama is a citizen, but he doesn't know for sure. It's the answer I would probably give for just about any President, or any person for that matter. It's the most accurate anwer anyone can give.It shouldn't outrage anyone, but it should be a little red flag indicating a problem with general knowledge and/or common sense.'jonessed said:He doesn't know, but isn't worried about it. Why would this outrage anyone? It's the most logical answer he can give.

They are both situations where the truth was sought out for some time and then very publicly revealed.Saying "I don't know" to anything like that is a very strange response.see, to put this whole birth certificate "issue" on the same level as WMDs is really just....wow....'17seconds said:How would you feel if Perry was asked if Iraq had WMDs in the early 90s and he said "I don't know"?'Brock Middlebrook said:Maybe it was an issue he felt wasn't worth nearly as much attention as you seem to think it's worth....'The Commish said:If that's his honest answer it's a glaring piece of evidence to the fact the guy is out of touch. That isn't bad? How's that saying go? It's better to keep your mouth shut and keep them guessing than to open it and remove all doubt" or something like that. That applies here.'Joe T said:So you would prefer Perry lie?He was asked a question. He responded with honesty, "I don't know." How is that bad in any context?
my understanding is that was abstract of the original long form.I'm gonna assume this is shtick because I like you too much to think otherwise. Unless maybe you were stuck in a remote canyon 127 Hours-style or something when this happened? I'll assume it's one of the two.Better than what? I rarely assume anything. I assume you are male and work in D.C and I would point to your years of posts here as evidence, but I don't know for sure. I don't have to personally verify someone's birth to assume it's accurate, but I'm certainly not going to use the media hype machine as evidence. Once an issue becomes politicized like this it's more akin to a political pissing match than a news story. I've haven't seen any evidence, but to be fair, I haven't looked very hard either.
However, I'm pretty sure Perry was not stuck in a canyon or otherwise indisposed at that time, which means his comments are also either shtick or the statements of a moron or lunatic. No matter which, it's not very presidential. Although, sadly, those characteristics do seem to be increasingly frequent in the GOP presidential field, so I guess he kind of fits in there.
Did Gorbechev bring down the berlin wall after a passionate night of lovemaking with the gipper?Did Ronald Reagan keep a harem of sex slaves in the White House dungeon? I don't know. I've never even seen the dungeon.
 
 Maybe they're all the same thing. Maybe they're not. We don't know.So far we have compared knowledge of Obama's birth certificate to the following:
Abraham Lincoln walking on the moon
French people speaking French
Bush blowing up the World Trade Center
Reagan having a dungeon of sex slaves
Yep, those are all the same thing. End of story. Please lock the thread up now, this mystery has been solved.
Maybe they're all the same thing. Maybe they're not. We don't know.So far we have compared knowledge of Obama's birth certificate to the following:
Abraham Lincoln walking on the moon
French people speaking French
Bush blowing up the World Trade Center
Reagan having a dungeon of sex slaves
Yep, those are all the same thing. End of story. Please lock the thread up now, this mystery has been solved.
 The fact that this thread exists amazes me.  But maybe it doesn't.
 The fact that this thread exists amazes me.  But maybe it doesn't.As always....thanks for your input Joe. You blogging this one up?So far we have compared knowledge of Obama's birth certificate to the following:Abraham Lincoln walking on the moonFrench people speaking FrenchBush blowing up the World Trade CenterReagan having a dungeon of sex slavesYep, those are all the same thing. End of story. Please lock the thread up now, this mystery has been solved.
He didn't bring it up. Here is a link to the original interview that may help you: Link to Parade Magazine inteview.Perhaps you should ask Perry why he's bringing it back up? The talking heads last night were suggesting that it's a ploy by Perry to drum up/energize support from the ~ 25% of the Republican base who still believe Obama isn't a citizen.I'm not sure why this is news or why timschochet bumped this thread with his usual non-thought provoking copy and paste style.
Perry basically said, I don't know but it's a non-issue. How is that news?
As usual, its an easy way to get around talking about real issues like jobs or the economy to drag up 2 year old news stories that no one on earth gives a #### about.
No, that is where Frank Sinatra banged NancyDid Ronald Reagan keep a harem of sex slaves in the White House dungeon? I don't know. I've never even seen the dungeon.
Are you saying the sex dungeon was lincoln's?I asked perry, he said he did not know.So far we have compared knowledge of Obama's birth certificate to the following:Abraham Lincoln walking on the moonFrench people speaking FrenchBush blowing up the World Trade CenterReagan having a dungeon of sex slavesYep, those are all the same thing. End of story. Please lock the thread up now, this mystery has been solved.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbizzLzcpnMDid Ronald Reagan keep a harem of sex slaves in the White House dungeon? I don't know. I've never even seen the dungeon.
wellyou weren't thereHe didn't bring it up. Here is a link to the original interview that may help you: Link to Parade Magazine inteview.Perhaps you should ask Perry why he's bringing it back up? The talking heads last night were suggesting that it's a ploy by Perry to drum up/energize support from the ~ 25% of the Republican base who still believe Obama isn't a citizen.I'm not sure why this is news or why timschochet bumped this thread with his usual non-thought provoking copy and paste style.
Perry basically said, I don't know but it's a non-issue. How is that news?
As usual, its an easy way to get around talking about real issues like jobs or the economy to drag up 2 year old news stories that no one on earth gives a #### about.
HTH
Are you saying that Frank Sinatra was a diddler?No, that is where Frank Sinatra banged NancyDid Ronald Reagan keep a harem of sex slaves in the White House dungeon? I don't know. I've never even seen the dungeon.
25 or 6 to 4.'Brock Middlebrook said:Does anybody really know what time it is?
Was that Question 67 or 68?25 or 6 to 4.'Brock Middlebrook said:Does anybody really know what time it is?
I believe the term is 'shtupped'No, that is where Frank Sinatra banged NancyDid Ronald Reagan keep a harem of sex slaves in the White House dungeon? I don't know. I've never even seen the dungeon.
This:He didn't bring it up. Here is a link to the original interview that may help you: Link to Parade Magazine inteview.HTHPerhaps you should ask Perry why he's bringing it back up? The talking heads last night were suggesting that it's a ploy by Perry to drum up/energize support from the ~ 25% of the Republican base who still believe Obama isn't a citizen.I'm not sure why this is news or why timschochet bumped this thread with his usual non-thought provoking copy and paste style.
Perry basically said, I don't know but it's a non-issue. How is that news?
As usual, its an easy way to get around talking about real issues like jobs or the economy to drag up 2 year old news stories that no one on earth gives a #### about.
is bringing it back up.But you’ve seen his.
I don’t know. Have I?
You don’t believe what’s been released?
I don’t know. I had dinner with Donald Trump the other night.
At the time (mid-70s), SSNs were applied for at about the age a person started working, not at birth. SSN applications were processed by local offices based on the zip code that the envelope came from, not the residency of the person applying. So if a person from Kansas mailed in the application from California, he'd get a "California" SSN, not a KS one. So Obama's application must have been sent in an envelope with a CT return address, when he was about 16 years old. At the time, his father was living in CT.There is some documentation that Obama worked at a Baskin-Robins in Hawaii a few years before that, and should have applied for an SSN then, but since he was 13 at the time, he was most likely paid "under the table" since he was not old enough to legally be employed.Not to get off topic here. I haven't read any of this thread nor do I intend to, but a quick question. I really haven't kept up with all this this but I'm curious about the fact that some say his SS# is from CT while he is from HI. Has this been debunked? If not how is that explaiined? This may have already been answered but like I said, I'm not going back throgh 75 pages to find out. I'm just don't care that much.
